Who We Are Community Benefits Partnership Report to the Health - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Who We Are Community Benefits Partnership

Report to the Health Commission

December 6, 2011 Abbie Yant, Saint Francis Memorial Hospital Jim Soos, San Francisco Department of Public Health

Community Benefit Partnership Steering Committee

Abbie Yant, SFMH (Co-Chair) Jim Soos, SFDPH (Co-Chair) Michael Huff, AAHDP Lara Sallee, Kaiser Permanente Ron Smith, Hospital Council Stuart Fong, CHASF Wylie Liu, UCSF Dick Hodgson, SFCCC Barry Lawlor, SMMC Cecilia Thomas, CPMC Gloria Thornton, Anthem BC Administrative Support: Meghan Daniels, Circlepoint Dana Gregg, Circlepoint

State Law Produces Partnership

• SB 697 (1994) results in Building a Healthier SF
• 6 BHSF needs assessments since 1996
• 2007 – Health Matters in SF
• Community Benefits Partnership in 2007
• 2010 needs assessment – Community Vital

Signs

Organizational Structure

San Francisco Community Benefit Partnership

Building a Healthier San Francisco Needs Assessment Charity Care Project Charity Care Report

Context for Planning

Mandate or Requirement Partner Impacted SB 697 (1994) Non-Profit Hospitals New IRS Rules under federal ACA Non-Profit Hospitals Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB) DPH Health Care Services Master Plan All Community Transformation Grant All

Community Vital Signs Community Health Goals

• Increase Access to Quality Medical Care
• Increase Physical Activity and Healthy Eating to Reduce Chronic

Disease

• Stop the Spread of Infectious Diseases
• Improve Behavioral Health
• Prevent and Detect Cancer
• Raise Healthy Kids
• Have a Safe and Healthy Place to Live
• Improve Health and Health Care Access for Persons with Disabilities
• Promote Healthy Aging
• Eliminate Health Disparities

Challenge: How to “Move the Needle” on Each Indicator?

Following September 2010 Launch of CVS:

• Identify the work being done across SF on

each indicator

• Five stakeholder meetings between 2/11

and 6/11 addressing each goal & indicator

• “Champion” identified for each indicator:

– Assess current state of activity – Outline plan/ideas to “move the needle”

• September 9, 2011 Champions meeting to

share findings & ideas to improve health

• More than 100 project ideas shared

Moving Forward: Criteria to Evaluate

• Indicator represents a health disparity
• Achievability given the scope of the problem
• Sufficient data on the current status of the problem
• Modest capacity to affect change
• Problem is demonstrated – “Target Not Met”
• Gap in resources or services
• No existing network with capacity
• Champion identified an actionable project
• Intervention is reasonably doable
• Priority to projects that affect multiple indicators
• BHSF can make a concrete contribution

Moving Forward: Next Steps

• Using the 11 criteria to determine which

projects to support & how to support them

• Working with DPH and others to ensure that

assessment and planning are coordinated

• Looking toward 2013 assessment to

demonstrate progress in ten goals

Stakeholder Updates

• Jacque McCright, SFDPH STD Prevention and

Control, “Chlamydia Incidence Rate”

• David Pating, M.D., Kaiser Permanente SF,

“Age-Adjusted Death Rate Due to Suicide”

• Ria Mercado, DAAS, “Hospitalization Rate Due

to Hip Fracture in Women/Men Age 65+”

Questions/Comments