White Paper: General Overview White Paper: General Overview - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

White Paper: General Overview White Paper: General Overview

Joseph Beaman, Joseph Beaman, Office of Science and Technology Office of Science and Technology

Purpose of the White Paper Purpose of the White Paper

• The information contained in this document will serve as the

The information contained in this document will serve as the foundation for decision foundation for decision-

• making for the subsequent

making for the subsequent development of AWQC for CECs when the need arises. development of AWQC for CECs when the need arises.

• This white paper and the recommendations it contains does

This white paper and the recommendations it contains does not supersede the not supersede the Guidelines Guidelines for Deriving Numerical for Deriving Numerical National Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic National Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms and Their Uses or Organisms and Their Uses or “ “Guidelines Guidelines” ” (Stephan, C.E., (Stephan, C.E., D.I. Mount, D.J. Hansen, J.H. Gentile, G.A. Chapman and D.I. Mount, D.J. Hansen, J.H. Gentile, G.A. Chapman and W.A. Brungs, W.A. Brungs,

• Document intended to serve as supplemental information to

Document intended to serve as supplemental information to guide the problem formulation and effects characterization guide the problem formulation and effects characterization

• f the ecological risk assessment paradigm as applied to
• f the ecological risk assessment paradigm as applied to

ambient water quality criteria development for aquatic life. ambient water quality criteria development for aquatic life.

Focus of the White Paper Focus of the White Paper

• This white paper discusses some of the major technical

This white paper discusses some of the major technical issues that challenge development of AWQC for issues that challenge development of AWQC for contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) specific to the contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) specific to the use of the current use of the current Guidelines Guidelines

• The paper also presents specific technical recommendations

The paper also presents specific technical recommendations reflecting best available science that address those issues reflecting best available science that address those issues and may allow progress with respect to derivation of AWQC and may allow progress with respect to derivation of AWQC for CECs with same technical rigor currently achieved using for CECs with same technical rigor currently achieved using the the Guidelines. Guidelines.

Additional Considerations Additional Considerations

• The workgroup realizes that there are other concerns

The workgroup realizes that there are other concerns inherent to the criteria derivation process that have been inherent to the criteria derivation process that have been identified, but these concerns are not specific to CECs, nor identified, but these concerns are not specific to CECs, nor do the recommendations presented here preclude other do the recommendations presented here preclude other efforts to address these issues. efforts to address these issues.

• Some of these issues are currently being addressed under

Some of these issues are currently being addressed under separate criteria derivation or guidelines revisions efforts; separate criteria derivation or guidelines revisions efforts;

• Other issues may require additional information so that

Other issues may require additional information so that scientifically defensible methods can be developed to scientifically defensible methods can be developed to address them. address them.

Acknowledgements Acknowledgements

• Office of Research and Development

Office of Research and Development – – NHEERL (Mid Continent Ecology Division) NHEERL (Mid Continent Ecology Division) – – Duluth, Minnesota Duluth, Minnesota

• Dale J. Hoff, Workgroup Co

Dale J. Hoff, Workgroup Co-

• chair*

chair*

• Gerald T. Ankley*

Gerald T. Ankley*

• Russell J. Erickson*

Russell J. Erickson*

• David R. Mount*

David R. Mount*

• Richard Bennett

Richard Bennett

• Joseph Tietge

Joseph Tietge – – NHEERL (Gulf Ecology Division) NHEERL (Gulf Ecology Division) – – Gulf Breeze, Florida Gulf Breeze, Florida

• Geraldine Cripe

Geraldine Cripe – – NERL (Ecological Exposure Research Division) NERL (Ecological Exposure Research Division) – – Cincinnati Ohio Cincinnati Ohio

• James Lazorchak*

James Lazorchak*

• Mitchell Kostich

Mitchell Kostich

• David Lattier

David Lattier

Acknowledgements Acknowledgements

• Office of Water; Office of Science and Technology (HQ)

Office of Water; Office of Science and Technology (HQ) – – Immediate Office Immediate Office

• Ephraim King, Director, Office of Science and Technology

Ephraim King, Director, Office of Science and Technology

• Suzanne Rudzinski, Deputy Director, Office of Science and

Suzanne Rudzinski, Deputy Director, Office of Science and Technology Technology – – Health and Ecological Criteria Division Health and Ecological Criteria Division

• Joseph Beaman, Workgroup Co

Joseph Beaman, Workgroup Co-

• chair*

chair*

• Diana Eignor

Diana Eignor

• Lisa Huff

Lisa Huff – – Standards and Health Protection Division Standards and Health Protection Division

• Janita Aguirre

Janita Aguirre

• Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (HQ)

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (HQ)

• Les Touart

Les Touart

• Office of Pesticide Programs (HQ)

Office of Pesticide Programs (HQ)

• Jean Holmes

Jean Holmes

Acknowledgements Acknowledgements

• Technical Support (Great Lakes Environmental Center)

Technical Support (Great Lakes Environmental Center)

• Tyler K. Linton*

Tyler K. Linton*

• Gregory J. Smith

Gregory J. Smith