Wheatley and National Rankings
May 2013
1
Wheatley and National Rankings May 2013 1 Recent National - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Wheatley and National Rankings May 2013 1 Recent National Rankings Several national High School Rankings have been published within the past several weeks Wheatley Ranking National NYS LI US News & World Report #108 #19 #3
May 2013
1
Several national High School Rankings have been
published within the past several weeks
Wheatley Ranking National NYS LI US News & World Report #108 #19 #3 Challenge Index (Jay Matthews) #146 #7 #5 Newsweek #92 #25 #4
2
Rankings based on a three-step methodology:
1)
Comparison of school’s performance on state mathematics and English against the statistically expected performance
2)
Comparison of the performance of least-advantaged students (black, Hispanic, low-income) with state- wide results for these same groups.
3)
Schools that made it through these first two steps were then judged nationally on college-readiness. This metric took into account AP/IB participation and passing rates using a formula that combined the number of 12th Grade students that took and passed at least one AP/IB exam during high school with a simple AP/IB participation rate.
3
student performance on state and national exams
schools
main designations: Gold, Silver and Bronze
4
Wheatley’s Historical USN&WR Ranking
Year National Rank NYS Rank LI Rank Index Status 2009 88 19 4 63.6 Gold 2012* 246 / 146 40 / 27 13 / 8 56.7 / 66 Gold 2013 108 19 3 74.3 Gold
5 Notes:
erroneous data to arrive at the index values. The aforementioned table includes the data as reported by US News as well as the correct data.
The original high school ranking list, developed by Jay
Matthews (of the Washington Post).
Previously reported as the Newsweek list, before
Newsweek was sold and decided to develop its own ranking system.
Very simply methodology that relies on a ratio of two
data points:
1)
Total number of AP/IB exams given
2)
Size of graduating class Challenge Index =
/
6
AP/IB exams given each year
into the index
given makes it easy to manipulate
7
Wheatley’s Historical Ranking
Year Rank Index 1998 1 2.862 2000 12 2.696 2003 30 3.146 2005 85 2.887 2006 178 2.591 2007 115 3.227 2008 67 4.025 2009 119 3.594 2010 154 3.518 2011 95 4.478 2012 117 4.600 2013 146 4.561
8 27% increase in Index value
A relatively new ranking, using the following
methodology:
1)
4-year on-time graduation rate (25%)
2)
Percent of graduates accepted to college (25%)
3)
AP/IB tests per student (25%)
4)
Average SAT or ACT score (10%)
5)
Average AP/IB score (10%)
6)
% of students enrolled in at least one AP/IB courses (5%)
9
important factors
helps normalize schools by size
student performance on AP/IB exams
that are not directly taught by most schools
in Index values, making longitudinal comparisons challenging
10
Wheatley’s Historical Newsweek Ranking
Year National Rank NYS Rank LI Rank Index 2011 55 9 4 0.973 2012 62 9 4 1.150 2013 92 25 4 3.580
11 Notes:
selective or charter schools
among schools with Open admissions
12
An improved index value does not necessarily result in
an improved ranking
In the Newsweek ranking (from 2011 to 2012):
Wheatley, CSH, GNN, GNS, Manhassset, South Side
(RVC) and Syosset had improved index values even as their rankings decreased
Jericho saw a 25% improvement in its index value, yet
their rank “improved” only 4 places (to 41 from 45)
In the US News ranking (from 2009 to 2013), Wheatley,
CSH, GNS and Jericho each had improved Index values with a decrease in national ranking
13
Magnet schools, select schools and charter schools
dominate the top echelons of these rankings.
In Newsweek’s list, only three of top 50 schools are
Open enrollment
The average Special Education enrollment for the top 50
schools on the Challenge Index is 3.6%
The lists are stacked with schools having more
affluent populations
Schools with the greatest challenges can appear to be
the greatest failures
14
Each index is a statement of values, ranking schools
based on attempts to measure academic achievement
Art, music and theatre programs have little direct
impact on these rankings
Dual enrollment courses such as those we have through
SUPA, Adelphi, Stony Brook, St. John’s and Molloy have no impact on the rankings
Athletic opportunities and student clubs and activities
have no impact on the rankings
“Chasing the Rankings” can have unintended
consequences to a school’s culture
15