What is Inclusive growth?
Tony Addison Miguel Niño‐Zarazúa
Nordic‐Baltic MDB meeting Helsinki, Finland January 25, 2012
What is Inclusive growth? Tony Addison Miguel Nio Zaraza Nordic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
What is Inclusive growth? Tony Addison Miguel Nio Zaraza Nordic Baltic MDB meeting Helsinki, Finland January 25, 2012 Why is economic growth important? Economic Growth to deliver sustained poverty reduction (e.g. Bangladesh,
Nordic‐Baltic MDB meeting Helsinki, Finland January 25, 2012
2
– Are there differences between these concepts? – Is there anything new under the sun?
3
4
From Ravallion 2011
Change in poverty headcount and GDP growth (2000s)
Neutral effect of growth on inequality
7
Figure 2: Malnutrition and growth in cross-country evidence
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000
GNI per capita, PPP Under-5 malnutrition prevalence
9
10
China managed to lift 630 million people
11
12
13
Macro fundamentals Micro determinants Elements of Inclusive growth
Macroeconomic stability
account deficits
Political stability –democratic institutions Progressive fiscal policies Social Protection for vulnerable groups Openness to trade Promotion of direct investment in key sectors (agriculture key for LIC) Vertical and horizontal industrial policies Low population growth rate Investment in human capital
Investment in physical infrastructure Tackling horizontal inequalities in basic service provision
ethnicity, religion, etc. Facilitate access to finance
Support broad‐based skill development and employment High growth rates for several years
Sustained growth patterns
degradation Structural transformation –finding country’s
employment opportunities
education and health
inequalities
There is no rule of thumb for general inclusive growth policy, as it is a country‐ specific question, BUT there are some important empirical clues
levels of income, capital endowments and labour
the poorer the country, the more relevant GDP growth is for poverty reduction
pattern of growth
– high growth rates for many years (how long?) – Sustained growth accelerators (investment) – Policies that provide stability and avoid collapses
14
$0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 1700 2000 GDP PPP per Capita UK USA
India, $2990
1851
China, $5332
1898
Ethiopia, $688 ~ Year 1250
1929
Mexico, $8165
Economic Trajectory
Current Cross Section
Source: Pritchett (2009)
China is in the 19th century, India pre‐USA Civil War, and Ethiopia far before pre‐Columbus era
China’s achieved in 30 years what the leading economy achieved in more than 600 years in terms of economic progress
16
17
18
20 25 30 35 Export to GDP (% ) 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Year Exports of goods and services (% of GDP) Fitted values
1960-2009
Export Performance of SSA (Percentage of GDP)
20
Tax revenues as % of GDP have grown modestly among low income countries, to about 11% in the end of 2000s Constraints associated with:
the rural subsistence economy and the informal sector are difficult to tax
revenue authorities
21
22
Source: OECD
Is the US tax regime progressively distributive?
23
Source: Corak (2011), OECD, CEA estimates
Denmark Finland France Germany Japan New Zealand Norway Sweden United Kingdom United States
y = 2.2x - 0.27 R² = 0.76
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 Inequality (1985 Gini Coefficient) Intergenerational earnings elasticity
The Great Gatsby Curve
y = 2.2x - 0.27 R² = 0.76
The vertical axis shows how much a 1% rise in your parents’ income improves your expected income – the higher the number, the lower expected social mobility
United States (2010 Gini)
24
Inclusive growth is about policies that facilitate intergenerational social mobility
25
challenges:
– Small labour force participation – Not well integrated to the rest of the economy – Governance and transparency issues
– Rises in VAT earmarked for expenditures on the social sectors – Anti tax‐evasion policies
necessary to eliminate the normalised aggregate poverty gap?
– MTR: proportion of tax paid for each additional income unit earned at the highest income threshold
26
Source: Niño‐Zarazúa etal (2012)
27
28
29
30
31