What is Inclusive growth? Tony Addison Miguel Nio Zaraza Nordic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

what is inclusive growth
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

What is Inclusive growth? Tony Addison Miguel Nio Zaraza Nordic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

What is Inclusive growth? Tony Addison Miguel Nio Zaraza Nordic Baltic MDB meeting Helsinki, Finland January 25, 2012 Why is economic growth important? Economic Growth to deliver sustained poverty reduction (e.g. Bangladesh,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

What is Inclusive growth?

Tony Addison Miguel Niño‐Zarazúa

Nordic‐Baltic MDB meeting Helsinki, Finland January 25, 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Why is economic growth important?

  • Economic Growth – to deliver sustained poverty reduction

(e.g. Bangladesh, Uganda – poverty down)

  • BUT: chronic poverty can remain resilient even when growth is

high (e.g. India) – discrimination by ethnicity, gender etc.

  • Growth can reduce the poverty of a healthy young man able to

work, but not a sick mother in subsistence farming

  • AND: growth’s environmental impact must be managed
  • AND: growth does not necessarily reduce conflict (Pakistan)
  • Foreign Aid has a robust impact on growth (but not at all times

& in all places)

  • Aid has helped Ethiopia, Ghana, Rwanda, Mozambique,

Uganda, Tanzania pull themselves out of crisis

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What do we mean by Inclusive growth?

  • Ambiguous concept in the Economics literature –it lacks

theoretical foundations and it is, to a large extent, country specific

  • It refers to the notion of achieving material progress through

economic growth while encompassing equity, equal opportunity to basic service provision; access the key markets (labour and credit), and social protection for the most vulnerable in society

  • It is often linked to the concepts of ‘pro‐poor growth’ and ‘growth

with equity ‘

– Are there differences between these concepts? – Is there anything new under the sun?

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Economic growth is in general ‘pro‐poor’

4

From Ravallion 2011

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Growth and poverty reduction

Change in poverty headcount and GDP growth (2000s)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Growth and inequality

Neutral effect of growth on inequality

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Growth and child malnutrition

Figure 2: Malnutrition and growth in cross-country evidence

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000

GNI per capita, PPP Under-5 malnutrition prevalence

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Growth and life expectancy

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Pro‐poor growth vs. Inclusive growth

  • Growth is ‘pro‐poor’; under two definitions:

1. If growth accompanies a reduction in the absolute aggregate headcount ratio of an agreed poverty threshold –for example the World Bank US $1.25 dollar a day poverty line 2. If growth accompanies a pro‐poor redistribution, i.e. if poverty falls by more than the overall population holding distribution

  • constant. In other words, if the incomes of the poor grow faster

than the overall population

  • The notion of inclusive growth may not necessary be

aligned with ‘pro‐poor’ growth…Why?

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

People living on less than $1.25 per day

10

China managed to lift 630 million people

  • ut of poverty in a matter of 25 years
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Inequality in China (1978‐2006)

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

What do we mean by Inclusive growth?

  • Inclusive growth deals with policies that allow people

from different groups –gender, ethnicity, religion‐, and across sectors – agriculture, manufacturing industry, services, to contribute to, and benefit from economic growth

– It links macroeconomic fundamentals with microeconomic determinants of growth

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Determinants of inclusive growth

13

Macro fundamentals Micro determinants Elements of Inclusive growth

Macroeconomic stability

  • Moderate fiscal and current

account deficits

  • Low debt to DGP ratio
  • Moderate inflation

Political stability –democratic institutions Progressive fiscal policies Social Protection for vulnerable groups Openness to trade Promotion of direct investment in key sectors (agriculture key for LIC) Vertical and horizontal industrial policies Low population growth rate Investment in human capital

  • Health
  • Education
  • Water and Sanitation

Investment in physical infrastructure Tackling horizontal inequalities in basic service provision

  • Discrimination by gender,

ethnicity, religion, etc. Facilitate access to finance

  • Microfinance
  • SMEs finance
  • Capital markets

Support broad‐based skill development and employment High growth rates for several years

  • Particularly relevant for LIC

Sustained growth patterns

  • Avoiding collapses/crisis/environmental

degradation Structural transformation –finding country’s

  • wn competitive advantage
  • Production specialisation
  • Export diversification
  • Good business environment
  • Broad‐based productive (and decent)

employment opportunities

  • Equal opportunities for all, in terms of

education and health

  • Significant reduction of absolute poverty
  • Reduction in vertical and horizontal

inequalities

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Clues for inclusive growth

There is no rule of thumb for general inclusive growth policy, as it is a country‐ specific question, BUT there are some important empirical clues

  • Structural transformation is key –finding country’s own competitive advantage
  • Growth determinants are dependent on initial conditions of growth, such as

levels of income, capital endowments and labour

  • LIC require much higher AND steady growth rates than MIC to reduce poverty –

the poorer the country, the more relevant GDP growth is for poverty reduction

  • The rate of growth matters , BUT especially a sustained and steady longer‐term

pattern of growth

– high growth rates for many years (how long?) – Sustained growth accelerators (investment) – Policies that provide stability and avoid collapses

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Divergence, Big Time in current levels of output, mapped into history

$0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 1700 2000 GDP PPP per Capita UK USA

India, $2990

1851

China, $5332

1898

Ethiopia, $688 ~ Year 1250

1929

Mexico, $8165

Economic Trajectory

  • f Leading Country

Current Cross Section

Source: Pritchett (2009)

China is in the 19th century, India pre‐USA Civil War, and Ethiopia far before pre‐Columbus era

China’s achieved in 30 years what the leading economy achieved in more than 600 years in terms of economic progress

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Standard Deviation of GDP per capita growth (1980‐2010)

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

High or steady growth?

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Steady growth, as relevant as a high GDP rate

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

20 25 30 35 Export to GDP (% ) 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Year Exports of goods and services (% of GDP) Fitted values

1960-2009

Export Performance of SSA (Percentage of GDP)

Trend in SSA Export Performance

slide-20
SLIDE 20

The role of redistribution

  • Evidence shows that sustained economic growth can only be

achieved when a broader‐based labour force is included in the growth process

– Getting the balance right between winners and losers is a key challenge

  • Growth with progressive distributional policies are more

inclusive and have greater poverty impacts than distribution‐ neutral policies

  • In LIC, asset equality has a greater effect on inclusive growth

than income redistribution alone

– Land distribution, a challenge in SSA, India

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

The role of redistribution

Tax revenues as % of GDP have grown modestly among low income countries, to about 11% in the end of 2000s Constraints associated with:

  • The structure of the economy –

the rural subsistence economy and the informal sector are difficult to tax

  • Administrative capacity of

revenue authorities

  • Political economy factors

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Gini coefficients before and after taxes and transfers (2010)

22

Source: OECD

Is the US tax regime progressively distributive?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Source: Corak (2011), OECD, CEA estimates

Denmark Finland France Germany Japan New Zealand Norway Sweden United Kingdom United States

y = 2.2x - 0.27 R² = 0.76

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 Inequality (1985 Gini Coefficient) Intergenerational earnings elasticity

The Great Gatsby Curve

y = 2.2x - 0.27 R² = 0.76

Higher income inequality associated with lower intergenerational mobility

The vertical axis shows how much a 1% rise in your parents’ income improves your expected income – the higher the number, the lower expected social mobility

United States (2010 Gini)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Higher income inequality associated with lower intergenerational mobility

Inclusive growth is about policies that facilitate intergenerational social mobility

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Sources for redistribution?

  • Revenues from Natural resources in low income but resource rich countries –

challenges:

– Small labour force participation – Not well integrated to the rest of the economy – Governance and transparency issues

  • Medium‐term fiscal policy objectives

– Rises in VAT earmarked for expenditures on the social sectors – Anti tax‐evasion policies

  • Room for redistribution? What marginal tax rate on the ‘rich’ would be

necessary to eliminate the normalised aggregate poverty gap?

– MTR: proportion of tax paid for each additional income unit earned at the highest income threshold

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

MTR needed to eliminate the poverty gap

Source: Niño‐Zarazúa etal (2012)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

What can donors do to support inclusive growth?

27

  • Help countries to tighten the link between the macro‐economic

framework & the longer‐term development strategy e.g. via National Plan (Botswana good example)

  • Need to think harder about structural transformations– growth but not

enough structural change (new industrial policy, or ‘learning to compete’)

  • Support reforms to improve business environment
  • Role for aid in encouraging more private capital flows (e.g. via reducing

macroeconomic risks)

  • Support technical cooperation to boost productivity in labour intensive

sectors e.g. agriculture

slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • Distorting impact of resource rents – much to worry about –
  • ften associated with institutional weakening (oil especially)

whereas aid tries to improve institutions

  • Strengthen technical assistance & policy dialogue to help

countries use growing resource revenues in transparent & effective way

– For example enhance policy toolkit for investing resource rents in social protection & high‐value infrastructure & link to industrial policy (‘learning to compete’)

  • Retain budget support to countries receiving larger resource

revenues when it provides entry‐point for dialogue on overall fiscal framework (taxing & spending)

28

What can donors do to support inclusive growth?

slide-29
SLIDE 29

What can donors do to support inclusive growth?

29

  • In principle, plenty of high return projects that could pay

back the funding – but be careful about excessive borrowing

  • High‐return public investments (e.g. health, education)

still on the shelf – investments often financed by high‐cost domestic borrowing rather than concessional aid

  • So what is optimal blend of grant aid, concessional

borrowing, commercial borrowing, FDI? Very country specific

slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • Fragile countries where risk is high & stubborn & macro‐

framework weakest. Will aid become concentrated on these? – Country Fragility

  • (ii) International Monetary System – weakness – countries

build large forex reserves to provide shock‐insurance – reason why central banks like to use aid to add to reserves – Global Fragility

  • Aid‐Growth impact can’t be maximized without action on:

(i) Conflict ‐ ‘peace‐building is good economics (ii)Reform of the international monetary system to raise stability & provide more global shock insurance (& movement on trade agreements)

30

What can donors do to support inclusive growth?

slide-31
SLIDE 31

More information?

  • We have provided a taste of our thinking
  • More at: www.wider.unu.edu
  • Do check out ReCom at:
  • www.wider.unu.edu/recom
  • Do sign up for our WIDER Angle newsletter

31