What are the right abstractions for capturing programming and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

what are the right abstractions
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

What are the right abstractions for capturing programming and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

What are the right abstractions for capturing programming and intent Discussion section Thursday Feb 12, 11:25-12:15 Capturing Intent Aaron Gember: Infer intent. Can you simply look at configurations or dataplane to extract intent. What


slide-1
SLIDE 1

What are the right abstractions for capturing programming and intent

Discussion section Thursday Feb 12, 11:25-12:15

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Capturing Intent

  • Aaron Gember: Infer intent. Can you simply look at configurations or

dataplane to extract intent. What intents do you need to support in a language.

  • Karthick:
  • undocumented legacy – reverse engineer intent.

Nontechnical challenge: cost of changing intent. To handle security has to cover both what has to be allowed and has to be

  • denied. Can be hard/infeasible to enumerate. Two initial buckets: known to

be allowed, known to be denied, third bucket underspecified. Resolve by talking to operators.

  • Architected systems – intent is accessible
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Performance Intent

  • Jennifer, Ratul:
  • For resource management and ACLs, configure and optimize network for objectives
  • See network as one big switch
  • Brighten:
  • Wide area network utility being developed
  • Canini:
  • Are there service level objectives for capturing performance intent.
  • [Ratul] availability SLA but not much systematic
  • Ratul:
  • Hardest part of reasoning about availability is reasoning on time windows
  • For resource allocation: have temporal resource buckets, need to think about what

network will look like tomorrow while making decisions today.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Performance Intent

  • Aaron:
  • Intrigued by dynamo. If we have may to capture intent there, then can we

capture them.

  • Brighten:
  • Intent discussion is ambitious, infeasible to fully handle. Merlin was a really

good approach to scope intent capturing in a feasible way. Would it be feasible to capture relatively complete intents for network fabrics (or some

  • ther domain).
  • Canini
  • How can we reason about forwarding over time is a challenge not handled

with current techniques. NetQKat an approach for reasoning about quantitative properties of network.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Performance Intent

  • Canini:
  • Much work relies on policies. Typical policy: there is a minimal bandwidth that

each participants gets, for additional b/w required there is a policy to distribute resources across the network.

  • Ratul:
  • Missing link: marrying applications intent with network operators intent.
  • Arjun:
  • One can choose different VMs with varying performance.
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Performance Intent

  • Karthick:
  • Security space: old paper lists 11 goals for security design (separation of duty,

least privilege, …) Most languages try to facilitate these notions in the notions they provide.

  • Is there a similar catalogue of intent for SDNs?
  • Canini:
  • Resource allocation, security, reliability: Are there different abstractions and

programming language features to apply?

  • Panda:
  • Panogotios:
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Languages

  • Canini:
  • P4 - Low level language
  • View of programmability of SDN, and Click where you have potentially arbitrary
  • software. Not sure if there is a way to unify this. Vision: as programmer of

application/distributed system I want to write one piece of software that encodes all the operations that application layer information needs to be looked at and

  • processed. Want it decomposed and tiered. Where the partition is a function of the

environment as opposed to development time.

  • Arjun:
  • DSL for discussing network, such as NetKAT
  • Then there is FlowLog for programming both data and control plane.
  • Then there is general computation on packets and do it well.
  • Dataplane verification becomes harder problem of general purpose program

verification.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Languages

  • Tim:
  • Don’t need Turing complete languages in general. In FlowLog created abstraction of

adequate but verifiable power.

  • Andrey:
  • SDN languages are there to create programs.
  • How many programs are there?
  • [Canini] why would you want to program a network?
  • [Jennifer] examples in my talk are real, e.g., wide area network control management

is used by both Google and Microsoft. Open networking foundation for creating an anchor stack, beginning of a path towards adoption.

  • [Ratul] are these systems implemented in SDN languages or just implemented?
  • [Nate] It is early days.