1
welcome welcome
Pn Pn. . Parimala Parimala and En and En Masseri Masseri
SIRIM SIRIM Auditor Auditor
:: 8 :: 8 – – 9 Jan 2009 :: 9 Jan 2009 ::
welcome welcome Pn Pn. . Parimala Parimala and En and En - - PDF document
welcome welcome Pn Pn. . Parimala Parimala and En and En Masseri Masseri SIRIM SIRIM Auditor Auditor :: 8 :: 8 9 Jan 2009 :: 9 Jan 2009 :: Presentation Highlights Presentation Highlights Introduction Introduction I I d
:: 8 :: 8 – – 9 Jan 2009 :: 9 Jan 2009 ::
www.utm.my www.utm.my
UTM UTM Vision Vision T b ld T b ld l t f d i d t h l i l ll th h ti it l t f d i d t h l i l ll th h ti it UTM UTM Mission Mission To lead in the development of creative human resource and technology in line with the To lead in the development of creative human resource and technology in line with the aspirations of the Nation. aspirations of the Nation. To be a world To be a world – class centre of academic and technological excellence through creativity class centre of academic and technological excellence through creativity
DEKAN
TIMBALAN DEKAN (Penyelidikan & Pengajian Siswazah) TIMBALAN DEKAN (Akademik) Ketua Jabatan Struktur & Bahan Ketua Jabatan Kejuruteraan Alam Sekitar Ketua Jabatan Geoteknik & Pengangkutan Ketua Jabatan Program Luar Ketua Jabatan Hidraul & Hidrologi Ketua Jabatan Ijazah Lanjutan Penolong Pendaftar (PSM) Timbalan Pendaftar (Akademik) Pengurus Teknologi Maklumat
Construction Technology Management Centre IT Unit of Civil Engineering
Coastal and Offshore Engineering Institute Forensic Engineering Centre Surveying Unit Engineering
Civil Engineering Testing Unit Steel Technology Centre Institute Institute of Environmental & Water Resource Management (IPASA)
3000 3500
Undergraduate student enrolment by year
1989/1990 842 1990/1991 829 1991/1992 771 1992/1993 632 1993/1994 731
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Numbers Y
1994/1995 821 1995/1996 1017 1996/1997 1431 1997/1998 1881 1998/1999 2722 1999/2000 2874 2000/2001 2670 2001/2002 2550 2002/2003 2297 2003/2004 1965 2004/2005 1612 2005/2006 1578 2006/2007 1482 2007/2008 1400
Year
2007/2008 1400 2008/2009 1393
Category Number (Current) 1 Academic 147
Appointment Number (Current) 1 Professors 16 2 Associate 45
2 Administration 41 3 Technical 46 Technical 20%
2 Professors 45 3 Lecturers & Senior Lecturers 77 4 Tutors & PPAs 9
Professor 11% Tutor 6%
Academic 62% Administration 18%
Associate Professor 31% Lecturer 52%
Academic Qualification Number (Current)
Bachelor 6%
1 Doctorate 73 2 Masters 65 3 Bachelor 9 4 Professional Engineers (IR) 20
Masters 44% Doctorate 50%
52 48 31 7 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Number of Staff 10 0-9 10-19 20-29 >=30 Years of Service
Supporting Staff Current Figure Department Current Figure 1 Structures & Materials 13 1 Technical Assistant 1 2 Laboratory Technician 37 3 Administrative Staff 33 4 Others 14 2 Geotechnical & Transportation 11 3 Hydraulics & Hydrology 6 4 Environmental Engineering 6 5 IT, Surveying & Others 12
Taklimat ISO 9001:2009 13/4/09 8 & 9/1/09 JA N F EB M AC Perlantikan Juru Audit Dalam MSP 1/09 Sesi Berm ula Surat Makluman 1 Surat Makluman 2 Surveillance Au dit SIRIM ‘08 Surat Makluman 3 MSP 2/09 Audit SIRIM ‘09 Audit Dalam ‘09
Dalam OGOS SEPT OK T NOV DIS Bengkel Penambahbaikan 2009 Kursus Audit Dalam APR M EI J UN JU L Kursus In- House Dokumentasi Post-Mortem Surveillance Audit SIRIM ‘08 JK ISO 2/09 Kursus Lead Auditor JK ISO 1/09 JK ISO 3/09 JK ISO 4/09 Post-Mortem Audit SIRIM ‘09 2/1/09 Bengkel Pemurnian Dokumen 2008
Ms Evelynn velynn Recommendation for Upgrading to 2000 version Recommendation for Upgrading to 2000 version Recommendation for Upgrading to 2000 version Recommendation for Upgrading to 2000 version 2. 2. 30 30 -
31 December 2003 : Mr Mr K. Mani
Maaran, Ms , Ms Aini Aini Jamaliah Jamaliah & Ir. & Ir. Rosli Rosli Yaakob Yaakob 1 Minor NCR raised (Cl. 8.5) 1 Minor NCR raised (Cl. 8.5) (Determination of causes for nonconformities raised during (Determination of causes for nonconformities raised during IQA IQA not available) not available) 3.
22 – – 23 December 2004 : 23 December 2004 : Mr Mr K. Mani
Maaran No NCR recorded. Recommend to continue certification without change No NCR recorded. Recommend to continue certification without change 4. 4. 23 23 – – 24 Jan. 2006 : 24 Jan. 2006 : Pn Pn Fauziah Fauziah Sulaiman Sulaiman & & Mr Mr K. Mani
Maaran Recommend to continue certification with change in scope Recommend to continue certification with change in scope g p g p (Design & Development of Education (Design & Development of Education Programmes Programmes) )
i Clause 4 2 2
Quality Manual Process Mapping does not clearly demonstrated the input and output
Management Review Decision and action related to resource needs was not reported
Planning and Production Realization g Noted the planning for delivery (Rangka Perancangan Kuliah) was not demonstrated equally of the topics by different section. Sighted Knowledge Management for SAB 4412 – Civil Engineering Information Technology.
Makmal Pengajaran Pengajaran
Simenfero Bilik Bilik P G d G d
1. 1. Human Human Resources Resources
Deputy Dean (Academic) )
3 Head of Dept (Structures and Materials, E t l E t l P P t d t St d ) P t d t St d )
Bilik Post Post-
Graduate
TV Display
New FKA building . 3 Overall improvement on all documents . 3 Overall improvement on all documents
Manual Kualiti Kualiti (Improved) (Improved)
Pengajaran & & Pembelajaran Pembelajaran (Improved) (Improved)
Jadual Waktu Waktu (Improved) (Improved) K ik K ik P k t P k t St f St f Ak d ik Ak d ik External External Prg Prg, Postgraduate Study) , Postgraduate Study)
Assistant Registrar
Retirement: 3 Academics, 1 Support
Promoted: 4 Academics
New Appointment: 6 6 Academics, 5 Support Academics, 5 Support
Seconded : VC, Dep. VC(AI), Corporate Director, Internationalization Director, Director, Internationalization Director, Dean CTL, Dean of SPACE, Dean CTL, Dean of SPACE, Dep.Dean Dep.Dean BIP, BIP, Pengetua Pengetua Kampus Kampus Manager of Manager of
Kenaikan Pangkat Pangkat Staf Staf Akademik Akademik (Improved) (Improved)
Pendaftaran (Improved) (Improved)
Peperiksaan (Improved) (Improved)
Perolehan (Improved) (Improved) Pengetua Pengetua Kampus Kampus, Manager of , Manager of postgraduate taught course postgraduate taught course prog prog, Const. , Const. Focus Group, Head Marketing Unit, Head of Focus Group, Head Marketing Unit, Head of Executive Executive Programme Programme, Fellows , Fellows
Pelajar sedang membuat pendaftaran seksyen di Kaunter Pelajar beratur untuk Key-in data Borang pendaftaran pelajar Slip pendaftaran berlogo
Penyediaan Jadual Waktu Setelah mendapat maklumat Dari Ketua-ketuan Jabatan Contoh Jadual Waktu Yang di berikan kepada Pensyarah
Penyediaan Kertas Soalan Contoh Soalan Peperiksaan Pelajar menduduki peperiksaan Staf key-in data keputusan Peperiksaan Contoh Slip Keputusan Peperiksaan Penganugerahan
Info: www.bem.org.my
43
PROGRAMME OBJECTI VES EAC - BEM's LEARNI NG OUTCO MES as require d by MPTN SOFTSKI LL S as required by MoHE UTM GRADUATE ATTRI BUTE S ABET's REQUI REM ENT BODY OF KNOW LEDG E 2 BY ASCE PEO1 Graduates are able to apply their knowledge and skills in the planning, analysis, design and supervision of works related to the civil engineering discipline. i, ii, iii, iv,v LO1, LO4 CTPS CTPS a, c, d, h, g
2, 3, 4,5,6,7,8,9, 12, 13, 17, 18, 21, 23 PEO2 Graduates are technically competent in solving problems logically analytically and creatively based ii iii iv LO4, CTPS CTPS c f
10 11 15 PEO2 problems logically, analytically and creatively based
ii, iii, iv LO7 CTPS CTPS c, f 10,11, 15, 17 PEO3 Graduates possess leadership, ethical and professional qualities contributing towards the development of the Nation and Worldwide vi, vii,, viii LO2 LS, EP LS, ET b, e, h
14, 22, 28 PEO4 Graduates are able to work collectively in societies of diverse backgrounds to achieve common goals vii, viii LO3, LO6, LO8 TS TW e, b
25, 26 PEO5 Graduates are able to communicate effectively across a range of contexts and audiences vii, viii LO6 CS CS b
19, 26 d bl l
45
PEO6 Graduates are able to manage civil engineering issues for the development and betterment of the Nation and Mankind v,ix, x, vii LO1, LO3, LO5 LS, LL LS,LL k, j, h
16, 21, 23, 26, 27 PEO7 Graduates are willing to embark on business and not depend on establishment to provide job x LO8 LL LL j
24, 27 PROGRAMME OUTCOMES ( LOs) EAC-BEM's LEARNI NG OUTCOME S as required by MPTN SOFTSKI L LS as required by MoHE UTM GRADUATE ATTRI BUTES ABET's REQUI REM ENT BODY OF KNOW LEDGE 2 BY ASCE LO1 Ability to acquire knowledge of science and civil engineering principles. i, ii, iii, iv,v LO1, LO4 CTPS CTPS a, c,
2, 3, 4,5,6,7,8,9, 12, 13, 17, 18, 21, 23 LO2 Ability to use the techniques, skills and modern civil engineering tools. ii, iii, iv LO4 CTPS CTPS c, f, g
10,11, 15, 17 Ability to analyse, interpret, develop and conduct 13 LO3 Ability to analyse, interpret, develop and conduct experiments; and design components, systems, or processes. iv, ii,, iii LO1, LO4 CTPS CTPS b, e, h
12 LO4 Ability to think critically, identify, formulate and solve civil engineering related problems. iii, iv LO7, LO1 CTPS CTPS d, f
12,11 LO5 Ability to communicate effectively and with confidence. vii, viii LO6 CS CS b
25, 26 LO6 Ability to identify business opportunities and embark on entrepreneurship. xi LO8 ES ES k, j
17, 27 LO7 Ability to function effectively as an individual in a team iii LO3 LO6 TS CS TW CS E
46
LO7 Ability to function effectively as an individual in a team to achieve common goals viii LO3, LO6 TS, CS TW, CS E
26 LO8 Ability to perpetually seek and acquire contemporary knowledge. x LO5 LL LL J Outcomes 27, 14 LO9 Ability to lead, communicate and manage effectively with confidence viii LO6 LS, CS, TS LS, CS, TW b,e Outcomes 19, 26, 25 LO1 0 Ability to apply high ethical standards in professional practice and social interactions for sustainable development. vi, ix LO2 EP ET H Outcomes 16, 22, 28
47
a) Graduates are able to apply their knowledge and skills in the planning, analysis, design and supervision of works related to the civil engineering discipline. b) Graduates are technically competent in solving problems logically, analytically and creatively based on sound facts and ideas. c) Graduates possess leadership, ethical and professional qualities contributing towards the development of the Nation and Worldwide. d) Graduates are able to work collectively in societies of diverse backgrounds to achieve common goals. e) Graduates are able to communicate effectively across a range of contexts and audiences. f) Graduates are able to manage civil engineering issues for the development and betterment of the Nation and Mankind. g) Graduates are willing to embark on business and not depend on establishment to provide job.
Code I ntended Learning Outcom es Teaching and Learning Methods Assessm ent ( a) Technical Know ledge and Com petencies LO1 Ability to acquire knowledge of science and civil engineering principles. Lectures, tutorials, seminars, laboratory works, directed reading, independent study, active learning. Examinations, laboratory reports, presentations, assignments, problem- based exercises, project reports. LO2 Ability to use the techniques, skills and modern civil engineering tools. Lectures, tutorials, computer hands-on sessions, laboratory works, industrial training, surveying camps. Examinations, laboratory reports, presentations, assignments, problem- based exercises, project reports, design tasks, sim ulation exercises, industrial training reports. LO3 Ability to analyse, interpret, develop and conduct experiments; and design components, systems, or processes. Project supervision, lectures, tutorials, laboratory works, directed reading, simulation exercises, computer-based exercises, independent study, problem-based learning. Final Year Project reports, project reports, design tasks, examinations, laboratory reports, presentations, assignments.
Code I ntended Learning Outcom es Teaching and Learning Methods Assessm ent
( b) Generic Skills LO4 Ability to think critically, identify, formulate and solve civil engineering related problems. Project supervision, lectures, tutorials, laboratory works, group projects, independent study. Final Year Project reports, project reports, design tasks, examinations, laboratory reports, presentations, assignments. LO5 Ability to communicate effectively and with confidence. Projects, independent study, tutorials, surveying camps. Oral presentations, written reports. LO6 Ability to identify business
entrepreneurship. Independent study, group project, industrial visit, Seminar (SEMKA), dialogue with invited speaker. Seminar report, written business proposal. LO7 Ability to function effectively as an individual in a team to achieve common goals. Independent projects, group projects, industrial training, final year project, surveying camps. Industrial training report and logbook, project report, final year project report and logbook. LO8 Ability to perpetually seek and acquire contemporary knowledge. Independent study, final year projects. Final year project reports, assignm ents. contemporary knowledge. LO9 Ability to lead and manage effectively with confidence. Lectures, laboratory works, group assignments, Industrial training, final year project. Industrial training reports and logbooks, final year project reports and logbooks. LO1 0 Ability to apply high ethical standards in professional practice and social interactions for sustainable development. Final year projects, Laboratory works, Industrial training, surveying camps. Written assignments, laboratory reports, essays, final year project reports, I ndustrial training report.
Mapping of Program m e Learning Outcom es to Courses
CORE COURSES OFFERED PROGRAMME LEARNI NG OUTCOMES ( LOs)
ire Know ledge Technique yse & lopm ent lem Solving m unication epreneurship m W ork Long Learning ership al Acqu Use T Analy Deve Probl Com m Entre Team Life L Leade Ethica
LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9 LO1 0 CORE COURSES SAB 1011 Engineering Survey – Fieldwork b a a 2 1
2 SAB 1023 Engineering Survey a a b 2 2
SAB 1031 Survey Camp b a a 2 2
2 1 2 SAB 1042 Civil Engineering Laboratory I a a a 2 1
2 2 2 SAB 1213 Applied Mechanics a b b 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 SAB 1423 Civil Engineering Drawing a a b
2 2 1 SAB 1513 Fluid Mechanics a a a 1 2
2 2 2 SAB 1713 S il M h i b b 2 1 1 2 2 2
52
SAB 1713 Soil Mechanics a b b 2 1
2 2 2 SAB 2012 Civil Engineering Laboratory II a a a 2 1
2 2 2 SAB 2032 Mechanical & Electrical Systems a b b 2 2 2
2 1 SAB 3233 Structural Steel & Timber Design a a a 2 2
2 2 2
53
Pelajar sedang membuat pendaftaran seksyen di Kaunter Pelajar beratur untuk Key-in data Borang pendaftaran pelajar Slip pendaftaran berlogo
Penyediaan Jadual Waktu Setelah mendapat maklumat Dari Ketua-ketuan Jabatan Contoh Jadual Waktu Yang di berikan kepada Pensyarah
61
63
64
67
68
Penyediaan Kertas Soalan Contoh Soalan Peperiksaan Pelajar menduduki peperiksaan Staf key-in data keputusan Peperiksaan Contoh Slip Keputusan Peperiksaan Penganugerahan
71
72
73 74
Program Objective Assessment tools or methods used When will the data collection/analysis carried
What will be the the indicator that the outcome is achieved *** What are the outcomes of the analysis? Who is responsible? (collection and analysis) Feedback/comments for continuous improvement Alumni Survey (Online and
Every three years starting 2008 > 80% indicating a satisfactory feedback 93.1% indicate competency in applying knowledge and skills in planning, analysis, design and supervision TP(A) Phone Interview Every three years starting 2008 > 50% has work as a consultant/design
in progress Panels of Academic Staff ‐ Employers perception survey Every year starting 2007 > 80% giving a positive feedback by the employer 83% and 98% giving positive feedback in 2007 and 2008 respectively TD(A) PEO1 Graduates are able to apply their knowledge and skills in the planning, analysis, design and supervision of works related to the civil engineering discipline. Alumni Survey (Online and
Every three years starting 2008 > 80% indicating a satisfactory feedback 93.0% indicate competency in solving problems logically, analytically and creatively TP(A) Three PhD research work to enhance student ability to apply fundamental knowledge and skills through learning strategies are carried out i.e > 70% involvement in in problem solving situation in progress
Civil Enginering : Enhancing Students’ Learning in Engineering Design > 50% of the solutions are based on facts either carried
in progress
Problem Based Learning Techniques Employers perception survey Every year starting 2007 > 80% giving a positive feedback by the employer 82% and 96% giving positive feedback in 2007 and 2008 respectively TD(A)
the Empowerment of Critical And Creative Thinking to Civil Engineering Undergraduates Alumni Survey (Online and
Every three years starting 2008 > 80% indicating a satisfactory feedback 94.7% indicate that they possessed leadership skills and are ethical and professional towards development of the nation TP(A) The Faculty is currently reviewing the SAB Programme. Emphasise is on the content, deliver methods/approaches and also assessment strategies. Graduates possess leadership, ethical and professional Survey committee PEO2 Graduates are technically competent in solving problems logically, analytically and creatively based on sound facts and ideas Every three years starting 2008 Phone Interview
75
Phone Interview Every three years starting 2008 > 60% has become a project leader in progress Survey committee Employers perception survey Every year starting 2007 > 80% giving a positive feedback by the employer 81% and 96% giving positive feedback in 2007 and 2008 respectively TD(A) PEO3 qualities contributing towards the development of the Nation and Worldwide
Program Outcome Assessment tools or methods used When will the data collection/analysis carried out and presented What will be the the indicator that the
Student examination performance in science and engineering courses Every year starting 2006 70% getting B and above in each courses Student examination performance in mathematics courses Every year starting 2006 70% getting B and above in each courses Employers perception survey Once in two years > 80% giving a positive feedback by the employer LO1 Ability to acquire knowledge of science and civil engineering principles.
76
Program Outcom e W hat w ill be the the indicator that the outcom e is achieved * * * W hat are the outcom es
Continuous Quality I m provem ent I nitiatives W ho is responsible? ( collection and analysis) 70% getting B and above in each courses from the 24 samples taken over 3 years, all courses achieved the target ie more than 70%
in all the courses being Introduced system where examination questions must address the appropriate level of Bloom’s taxonomy and properly address the Course Learning Outcome TD(A) LO1 Ability to acquire knowledge of science and civil engineering principles. in all the courses being sampled Course Learning Outcome (CO) and subsequently addressing the LOs 70% getting B and above in each courses 78% of the samples (14 samples) involving all the maths courses offered do not meet the target To integrate engineering problems into the maths
between FKA ans maths staff. PhD Research to address this issue TD(A) > 80% giving a positive feedback by the employer 97% giving positive feedback The Faculty is currently reviewing the SAB
TP(A) > 80% indicating a
77
g p
methods/ approaches or assessment strategies g satisfactory feedback by graduating student (exit survey) > 80% were able to attain the LO1 for the last 5 semester TP(A)
Alumni perception on the attainment level of PEOs ( 5 years after graduation)
93.1% 93.0% 94.7% 98.8% 95.1% 93.4% 6.9% 7.0% 5.3% 1.2% 4.9% 6.6% 12.3% 86 0% 88.0% 90.0% 92.0% 94.0% 96.0% 98.0% 100.0% 102.0% not competent competent
80
87.7% 80.0% 82.0% 84.0% 86.0% A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 ITEM
Attainm ent of PEOs based on em ployers perception carried out in 2 0 0 7 and 2 0 0 8 indicating m ore than 8 0 % achievem ent level 81
Penilaian Pengajaran FKA 2003 - 2007
4.5 4.55 4.1 4.15 4.2 4.25 4.3 4.35 4.4 4.45 304-01 304-02 405-01 405-02 506-01 506-02 607-01 Mata Min FKA Min UTM 2003 2003 2004 2004 2005 2005 2006 Sesi/Semester
OMR ratings for the Faculty ( FKA) com pared to other faculties for Sem ester I ( 0 7 / 0 8 )
83
Pencapaian Semua Program (2003/04 - 2005/06)
3.30 2.70 2.80 2.90 3.00 3.10 3.20 CPA 2.60
0304-01 0304-02 0405-01 0405-02 0506-01 0506-02 0607-01 0607-02 0708-01
Sesi/Semester
P encapaian P elajar (% C PA > 3.0)
20 0 40.0 60.0 80.0 P eratus
P encapaian P elajar (Min C PA)
2 95 3.00 3.05 3.10 3.15 S es i 0.0 20.0 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/0601 2005/0602 2006/0701 2006/0702 2007/0801 S esi/S emester 2.90 2.95 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/0601 2005/0602 2006/0701 S esi/S emester
P encapaian P elajar (% K B C lean)
80.0 85.0 90.0 95.0 P eratus Kelas Graduan Bilangan % Graduate on Time 73.3%
Results 2006/07 Results 2006/07-
02
75.0 2 2 / 3 2 3 / 4 2 4 / 5 2 5 / 6 1 2 5 / 6 2 2 6 / 7 1 S esi/S emester 1 53 18.2 2 Tinggi 154 53 2 Rendah 84 28.8 3 Registration Graduation GoT KONVO KE 35 - 2004/ 2005-02 Matrik SAW SAP SAS Jum S1 2 T 2 R S3 Jum 63.88 AA0 0 459 55 43 557 48 183 125 356 BA0 1 5 5 1 1 2 CA0 2 1 1 Jum lah 464 55 43 562 48 184 127 359 Registration Graduation GoT Matrik SAW SAP SAS Jumlah S1 2 T 2 R S3 Jum
KONVO KE 37 - 2005/ 206-02 Matrik SAW SAP SAS Jumlah S1 2 T 2 R S3 Jum 54.43 AA01 470 70 63 603 50 146 124 2 322 BA02 99 99 2 39 26 67 CA03 66 66 4 21 4 29 Jumlah 635 70 63 768 56 206 154 2 418 Registration Graduation GoT KONVO KE 39 - 2006/ 2007-02 Matrik SAW SAP SAS Jumlah S1 2 T 2 R S3 Jum 82.46 AA02 202 202 46 69 31 146 BA03 123 123 2 54 28 84 CA04 5 29 4 38 Jumlah 325 325 53 152 63 268 Registration Graduation GoT KONVO KE 40 - 2007/ 2008-02 Matrik SAW SAP SAS Jumlah S1 2 T 2 R S3 Jum 88.92 AA04 225 23 15 263 22 162 42 226 BA05 98 98 24 65 6 95 Jumlah 323 23 15 361 46 227 48 321
CPA Session/ sem ester 2004/ 05 2005/ 06 01 2005/ 06 02 2006/ 07 01 2006/ 07 02 2007/ 08 01 2007/ 08 02 CPA > 3.0 48.0 34.7 50.7 57.1 67.6 68.7 77.6 KB Clean 88.4 91.9 93.2 93.4 99.5 92.2 93.4
Session Sem 1 st Class ( CPA 3 .6 7 - 4 .0 0 ) 2 nd Class Upper ( CPA 3 .- 3 .6 6 ) 2 nd Class Low er ( CPA 2 .3 0 - 2 .9 9 ) 3 rd Class ( CPA 2 .0 0 - 2 .2 9 ) Total CPA> 3 .0 0 No % No % No % No % No No % 2002/ 03 2 34 8.8 166 43.1 157 40.8 28 7.3 385 200 51.9 2003/ 04 1 0.0 0.0 187 85.8 31 14.2 218 0.0 2 1 0.5 16 8.6 142 75.9 28 15.0 187 17 9.1
87
2004/ 05 1 0.0 4 5.1 58 73.4 17 21.5 79 4 5.1 2 48 9.4 218 42.8 220 43.2 23 4.5 509 266 52.3 2005/ 06 1 1 0.7 26 19.3 96 71.1 12 8.9 135 27 20.0 2 64 13.7 227 48.6 168 36.0 8 1.7 467 291 62.3 2006/ 07 1 0.0 18 16.8 82 76.6 7 6.5 107 18 16.8 2 55 18.4 157 52.5 87 29.1 0.0 299 212 70.9 2007/ 08 1 1 1.6 16 25.0 46 71.9 1 1.6 64 17 26.6 2 52 15.8 227 69.0 50 15.2 0.0 329 279 84.8
BIL ITEM Kelemahan Kekuatan Catatan 1. Tahap pengetahuan terhadap kerja 17.7 % 82.3 % Lebih 80 % pelajar memiliki tahap pengetahuan kerja yang baik. 2 K b l h t k i k k j 6 4 % 93 6 % Kebolehpercayaan pelajar menyiap kerja amat tinggi dikalangan 2. Kebolehpercayaan untuk menyiapkan kerja 6.4 % 93.6 % p y p j y p j gg g syarikat. 3. Masa yang diambil untuk mendapatkan kemahiran 12.8 % 87.2 % Tempoh waktu LI mencukupi bagi pelajar untuk memperolehi kemahiran. 4. Keperluan penyeliaan 18.6 % 81.4 % Wbmpun keperluan kepada penyeliaan kerja dari penyelia syarikat agak tinggi. 5. Mutu kerja 10.2 % 89.8 % Kebanyakan pelajar dapat menghasilkan kerja yang bermutu, hampir 90 %. 6. Kebolehan berkomunikasi 13.7 % 86.3 % Lebih 85 % pelajar memiliki kebolehan berkomunikasi dengan baik. 7. Inisiatif dan motivasi 12.8 % 87.2 % Pelajar juga memiliki daya inisiatif dan motivasi yang tinggi melebihi 85 %. % 8. Sikap terhadap kerja 5.8 % 94.2 % Sikap pelajar terhadap kerja amat tinggi pada kacamata penyelia syarikat. 9. Disiplin 6.7 % 93.3 % Pelajar juga memiliki disiplin diri yang tinggi semasa menjalani LI.
Cont..
6.4% 12 8% 10 2% 13 7% 12 8% 5.8% 6.7% 100.0% Penilaian Syarikat Terhadap Pelajar FKA Menjalani LI Sesi 2006/2007
82.3%
17.7%
93.6%
6.4%
87.2%
12.8%
81.4%
18.6%
89.8%
10.2%
86.3%
13.7%
87.2%
12.8%
94.2% 93.3%
6.7% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% Peratus Kelemahan Kekuatan 0.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Item
Perkhidmatan 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Pendaftaran 35 16 18 7 8 Peperiksaan 2 1 4 1 Jadual waktu 3 Lain-lain 8 3 JUMLAH 48 20 22 7 9
Aduan Pelanggan
10 20 30 40
Bilangan Aduan
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Pendaftaran Peperiksaan Jadual w aktu Lain-lain
Perkhidmatan B
2007
Manufacturing 1% Others 2% Consulting Firm 24%
Employer Perception
No Answ er 3% Definitely Yes 42% Probably Yes 53% Probably No 1% Definitely No 1% Construction 50% Services (Utilities) 1% Services (Engineering) 14% Property/Treal Estates 6% Services (Public and others) 2%
No. Criteria Very Satisfied Dissatisfied Neither Satisfied Nor Di ti fi d Satisfied Very Satisfied 1 , 2 & 3 4 & 5
No. Criteria Dissatisfied 1 , 2 & 3 4 & 5 1 2 3 4 5 a. Overall preparation 0.0% 0.0% 7.5% 77.4% 15.1% 7 .5 % 9 2 .5 % b. Job-related knowledge 0.0% 0.6% 9.4% 76.7% 13.2% 1 0 .1 % 8 9 .9 % c. Job-related skills 0.0% 1.9% 10.1% 71.7% 16.4% 1 1 .9 % 8 8 .1 % d. General professional
0.0% 3.8% 12.7% 65.8% 17.7% 1 6 .5 % 8 3 .5 %
93
skills
No Convocation FKA UTM 1 33 56.3 2 34 58.8 3 35 71.7 72.5
Graduate Employment
20 40 60 80 Employment FKA UTM
4 36 64.8 48.9 5 37 63.1 49.4
1 2 3 4 5 Convocation % E
No. I tem s Percentage of Agreem ent ( % ) 1. Employability Status 85.5
2. Perception towards UTM reputation 95.5 3. Suitability of curriculum content 92.7 4. English language competency 75.5 5. Perception towards lecturer-student interaction 90.0 6. Perception towards information and career
84.5
95 96
LO1 Aquire knowledge LO2 Use techniques, skills and tools. LO3 Analyse, conduct exp and design y p g LO4 Critical thinking and problem solving LO5 Communicate effectively LO6 Entrepreneurship LO7 Teamworking LO8 Lifelong learning LO9 Leadership LO10 Ethics
97
Attainm ent of LOs based on em ployers perception survey 2 0 0 8 indicating m ore than 8 0 % achievem ent level
Sesi/sem Bilangan Peratus 2001/02-01 41 4.24 2001/02-02 9 0.98
Pelajar KG
45
2002/03-01 7 0.57 2002/03-02 6 0.48 2003/04-01 9 0.62 2003/04-02 7 0.49 2004/05-01 3 0.17 2004/05-02 2 0.12 2005/06-01 3 0.19 2005/06-02 2 0.12 2006/07-01 6 0.40 2006/07 02 0 00
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 2 1 / 2
2 1 / 2
2 2 / 3
2 2 / 3
2 3 / 4
2 3 / 4
2 4 / 5
2 4 / 5
2 5 / 6
2 5 / 6
2 6 / 7
2 6 / 7
Sesi/Sem Pelajar Bilangan Peratus
2006/07-02 0.00 2007/08-01 0.00
Sesi/Sem
90-100 80-89 75-74 70-74 4.0 4.0 3.67 3.33 A+ 65-69 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 00-39 3.0 2.67 2.33 2.0 1.67 1.33 1.0 0.0 3.67 3.00 3.67 3.00 2.30 2.30 2.00