welcome welcome Pn Pn. . Parimala Parimala and En and En - - PDF document

welcome welcome
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

welcome welcome Pn Pn. . Parimala Parimala and En and En - - PDF document

welcome welcome Pn Pn. . Parimala Parimala and En and En Masseri Masseri SIRIM SIRIM Auditor Auditor :: 8 :: 8 9 Jan 2009 :: 9 Jan 2009 :: Presentation Highlights Presentation Highlights Introduction Introduction I I d


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

welcome welcome

Pn Pn. . Parimala Parimala and En and En Masseri Masseri

SIRIM SIRIM Auditor Auditor

:: 8 :: 8 – – 9 Jan 2009 :: 9 Jan 2009 ::

I d i I d i

Presentation Highlights Presentation Highlights

Changes Changes Audit History & Performance Audit History & Performance Management & CQI Management & CQI Introduction Introduction

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Introduction Introduction Introduction Introduction

Presentation Highlights Presentation Highlights

Changes Changes Audit History & Performance Audit History & Performance Management & CQI Management & CQI

www.utm.my www.utm.my

Our University Our University

UTM UTM Vision Vision T b ld T b ld l t f d i d t h l i l ll th h ti it l t f d i d t h l i l ll th h ti it UTM UTM Mission Mission To lead in the development of creative human resource and technology in line with the To lead in the development of creative human resource and technology in line with the aspirations of the Nation. aspirations of the Nation. To be a world To be a world – class centre of academic and technological excellence through creativity class centre of academic and technological excellence through creativity

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

DEKAN

JAWATANKUASA JAWATANKUASA PENTADBIRAN PENTADBIRAN FKA FKA

TIMBALAN DEKAN (Penyelidikan & Pengajian Siswazah) TIMBALAN DEKAN (Akademik) Ketua Jabatan Struktur & Bahan Ketua Jabatan Kejuruteraan Alam Sekitar Ketua Jabatan Geoteknik & Pengangkutan Ketua Jabatan Program Luar Ketua Jabatan Hidraul & Hidrologi Ketua Jabatan Ijazah Lanjutan Penolong Pendaftar (PSM) Timbalan Pendaftar (Akademik) Pengurus Teknologi Maklumat

Pengarah Pusat Kecemerlangan

Our Faculty Our Faculty

FKA Vision

To be a world class centre of education and research in Civil Engineering

FKA Mission

To spearhead excellence in academic and technology development through creativity

FKA Motto FKA Motto

Always Ahead Always Ahead

www.fka.utm.my

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Departments and Centre of Excellence Departments and Centre of Excellence

ITUCE CTMC

Construction Technology Management Centre IT Unit of Civil Engineering

Civil Engineering Faculty Civil Engineering Faculty

ITUCE FEC CTMC IKPLP Unit Ukur

JABATAN-JABATAN

Struktur & Bahan Geoteknik & Pengangkutan Kejuruteraan Alam Sekitar Hidraul & Hidrologi

Coastal and Offshore Engineering Institute Forensic Engineering Centre Surveying Unit Engineering

IPASA CETU STC

Civil Engineering Testing Unit Steel Technology Centre Institute Institute of Environmental & Water Resource Management (IPASA)

Our Services Our Services

1.

  • 1. Undergraduate

Undergraduate Programme Programme 2.

  • 2. Postgraduate

Postgraduate Programme Programme 3.

  • 3. Part

Part-

  • time Undergraduate and Postgraduate

time Undergraduate and Postgraduate programme programme 4.

  • 4. Research and Publication

Research and Publication 5.

  • 5. Commercialization

Commercialization 6.

  • 6. Consultancy

Consultancy 7.

  • 7. Professional and Community

Professional and Community

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Undergraduate Enrolment Undergraduate Enrolment

3000 3500

Undergraduate student enrolment by year

1989/1990 842 1990/1991 829 1991/1992 771 1992/1993 632 1993/1994 731

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Numbers Y

1994/1995 821 1995/1996 1017 1996/1997 1431 1997/1998 1881 1998/1999 2722 1999/2000 2874 2000/2001 2670 2001/2002 2550 2002/2003 2297 2003/2004 1965 2004/2005 1612 2005/2006 1578 2006/2007 1482 2007/2008 1400

Year

2007/2008 1400 2008/2009 1393

Human Resources Human Resources -

  • Overall

Overall

Category Number (Current) 1 Academic 147

Appointment Number (Current) 1 Professors 16 2 Associate 45

2 Administration 41 3 Technical 46 Technical 20%

2 Professors 45 3 Lecturers & Senior Lecturers 77 4 Tutors & PPAs 9

Professor 11% Tutor 6%

Academic 62% Administration 18%

Associate Professor 31% Lecturer 52%

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Human Resources Human Resources – – Competency of Academics Staff Competency of Academics Staff

Academic Qualification Number (Current)

Bachelor 6%

1 Doctorate 73 2 Masters 65 3 Bachelor 9 4 Professional Engineers (IR) 20

Masters 44% Doctorate 50%

Human Resources Human Resources – – Experiences of Academics Staff Experiences of Academics Staff Experience of Academic Staff

52 48 31 7 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Number of Staff 10 0-9 10-19 20-29 >=30 Years of Service

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Human Resources Human Resources – – Technical & Distribution Technical & Distribution

Supporting Staff Current Figure Department Current Figure 1 Structures & Materials 13 1 Technical Assistant 1 2 Laboratory Technician 37 3 Administrative Staff 33 4 Others 14 2 Geotechnical & Transportation 11 3 Hydraulics & Hydrology 6 4 Environmental Engineering 6 5 IT, Surveying & Others 12

Human Resources Human Resources – – Experiences of Support Staff Experiences of Support Staff

Supporting Staff Experience Supporting Staff Experience

5 8 14 11 10 13 17 5 10 15 20

Number

< 5 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 >=30

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

ISO Process Plan ISO Process Plan

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

ISO Work Schedule for the year 2009 ISO Work Schedule for the year 2009

JADUAL KERJA ISO 9001:2000 TAHUN 2009

Taklimat ISO 9001:2009 13/4/09 8 & 9/1/09 JA N F EB M AC Perlantikan Juru Audit Dalam MSP 1/09 Sesi Berm ula Surat Makluman 1 Surat Makluman 2 Surveillance Au dit SIRIM ‘08 Surat Makluman 3 MSP 2/09 Audit SIRIM ‘09 Audit Dalam ‘09

  • Lap. Audit

Dalam OGOS SEPT OK T NOV DIS Bengkel Penambahbaikan 2009 Kursus Audit Dalam APR M EI J UN JU L Kursus In- House Dokumentasi Post-Mortem Surveillance Audit SIRIM ‘08 JK ISO 2/09 Kursus Lead Auditor JK ISO 1/09 JK ISO 3/09 JK ISO 4/09 Post-Mortem Audit SIRIM ‘09 2/1/09 Bengkel Pemurnian Dokumen 2008

Introduction Introduction

Presentation Highlights Presentation Highlights

Changes Changes Audit History & Performance Audit History & Performance Audit History & Performance Audit History & Performance Management & CQI Management & CQI Introduction Introduction

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Audit History & Performance Audit History & Performance

  • 1. 26 December 2002 :
  • 1. 26 December 2002 : Ms

Ms Evelynn velynn Recommendation for Upgrading to 2000 version Recommendation for Upgrading to 2000 version Recommendation for Upgrading to 2000 version Recommendation for Upgrading to 2000 version 2. 2. 30 30 -

  • 31 December 2003 :

31 December 2003 : Mr Mr K. Mani

  • K. Mani Maaran

Maaran, Ms , Ms Aini Aini Jamaliah Jamaliah & Ir. & Ir. Rosli Rosli Yaakob Yaakob 1 Minor NCR raised (Cl. 8.5) 1 Minor NCR raised (Cl. 8.5) (Determination of causes for nonconformities raised during (Determination of causes for nonconformities raised during IQA IQA not available) not available) 3.

  • 3. 22

22 – – 23 December 2004 : 23 December 2004 : Mr Mr K. Mani

  • K. Mani Maaran

Maaran No NCR recorded. Recommend to continue certification without change No NCR recorded. Recommend to continue certification without change 4. 4. 23 23 – – 24 Jan. 2006 : 24 Jan. 2006 : Pn Pn Fauziah Fauziah Sulaiman Sulaiman & & Mr Mr K. Mani

  • K. Mani Maaran

Maaran Recommend to continue certification with change in scope Recommend to continue certification with change in scope g p g p (Design & Development of Education (Design & Development of Education Programmes Programmes) )

Audit History & Performance Audit History & Performance 5.

  • 5. 6

6 – – 7 Dis. 2006 : 7 Dis. 2006 : Pn Pn Fauziah Fauziah Sulaiman Sulaiman, Tuan , Tuan Hj

  • Hj. Ali

. Ali Borhan Borhan & & Pn Pn. . Siti Siti Rahmah Rahmah Ahmad Ahmad No NCR recorded. 5 No NCR recorded. 5 OFIs OFIs

  • Cl

Cl 4.2.2 4.2.2- Quality Manual : Noted Process Mapping ( Quality Manual : Noted Process Mapping (Pelan Pelan proses proses, , Jadual Jadual 1) does not specify 1) does not specify Cl Cl 4.2.2 4.2.2 Quality Manual : Noted Process Mapping ( Quality Manual : Noted Process Mapping (Pelan Pelan proses proses, , Jadual Jadual 1) does not specify 1) does not specify the design & Development of curriculum. the design & Development of curriculum.

  • Cl

Cl 5.4.1 5.4.1-

  • Quality Objectives : Quality objectives requires for review for more measurable at

Quality Objectives : Quality objectives requires for review for more measurable at relevant function and level. relevant function and level.

  • Cl

Cl 6.3 6.3-

  • Infrastructure

Infrastructure

  • Cl

Cl 7.3 7.3-

  • Design & Development: Procedure ‘

Design & Development: Procedure ‘Rekabentuk Rekabentuk & Pembangunan & Pembangunan Kurikulum Kurikulum’ need to ’ need to be reviewed be reviewed i.e i.e 7.3.5 & 7.3.6. 7.3.5 & 7.3.6.

  • Cl

Cl 8.2.2 8.2.2-

  • Internal Audit : Non Conformance were recorded in the Non

Internal Audit : Non Conformance were recorded in the Non-

  • Compliance Note

Compliance Note however the followings were noted: however the followings were noted:

  • Auditors did not sign the Non Conformance statement to validate findings.

Auditors did not sign the Non Conformance statement to validate findings.

  • No remarks were made on the ‘Verification to Corrective Action Taken’ by the follow

No remarks were made on the ‘Verification to Corrective Action Taken’ by the follow-

  • up auditors.

up auditors.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Audit History & Performance Audit History & Performance

6.

  • 6. 12-13 Feb. 2008 :
  • Feb. 2008 : Pn

Pn Fauziah Fauziah Sulaiman Sulaiman 2 Minor NCR raised (Cl. 8.5.2 b, c, d & e and Cl. 7.5.1) and 3 OFIs 2 Minor NCR raised (Cl. 8.5.2 b, c, d & e and Cl. 7.5.1) and 3 OFIs

i Clause 4 2 2

  • i. Clause 4.2.2

Quality Manual Process Mapping does not clearly demonstrated the input and output

  • ii. Clause 5.6

Management Review Decision and action related to resource needs was not reported

  • iii. Clause 7.1

Planning and Production Realization g Noted the planning for delivery (Rangka Perancangan Kuliah) was not demonstrated equally of the topics by different section. Sighted Knowledge Management for SAB 4412 – Civil Engineering Information Technology.

Introduction Introduction

Presentation Highlights Presentation Highlights

Changes Changes Changes Changes Audit History & Performance Audit History & Performance Management & CQI Management & CQI

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

  • 2. Infrastructure & Facilities
  • 2. Infrastructure & Facilities
  • Makmal

Makmal Pengajaran Pengajaran

  • Simenfero

Simenfero Bilik Bilik P G d G d

Changes, at the glance

1. 1. Human Human Resources Resources

  • Deputy Dean (Academic

Deputy Dean (Academic) )

  • 3 Head of Dept (Structures and Materials,

3 Head of Dept (Structures and Materials, E t l E t l P P t d t St d ) P t d t St d )

  • Bilik

Bilik Post Post-

  • Graduate

Graduate

  • TV Display

TV Display

  • New FKA building

New FKA building . 3 Overall improvement on all documents . 3 Overall improvement on all documents

  • Manual

Manual Kualiti Kualiti (Improved) (Improved)

  • Pengajaran

Pengajaran & & Pembelajaran Pembelajaran (Improved) (Improved)

  • Jadual

Jadual Waktu Waktu (Improved) (Improved) K ik K ik P k t P k t St f St f Ak d ik Ak d ik External External Prg Prg, Postgraduate Study) , Postgraduate Study)

  • Assistant Registrar

Assistant Registrar

  • Retirement: 3 Academics, 1 Support

Retirement: 3 Academics, 1 Support

  • Promoted: 4 Academics

Promoted: 4 Academics

  • New Appointment:

New Appointment: 6 6 Academics, 5 Support Academics, 5 Support

  • Seconded : VC, Dep. VC(AI), Corporate

Seconded : VC, Dep. VC(AI), Corporate Director, Internationalization Director, Director, Internationalization Director, Dean CTL, Dean of SPACE, Dean CTL, Dean of SPACE, Dep.Dean Dep.Dean BIP, BIP, Pengetua Pengetua Kampus Kampus Manager of Manager of

  • Kenaikan

Kenaikan Pangkat Pangkat Staf Staf Akademik Akademik (Improved) (Improved)

  • Pendaftaran

Pendaftaran (Improved) (Improved)

  • Peperiksaan

Peperiksaan (Improved) (Improved)

  • Perolehan

Perolehan (Improved) (Improved) Pengetua Pengetua Kampus Kampus, Manager of , Manager of postgraduate taught course postgraduate taught course prog prog, Const. , Const. Focus Group, Head Marketing Unit, Head of Focus Group, Head Marketing Unit, Head of Executive Executive Programme Programme, Fellows , Fellows

TV Display

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Simenfero Post-Graduate Room

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Introduction Introduction

Presentation Highlights Presentation Highlights

Changes Changes Audit History & Performance Audit History & Performance Management & CQI Management & CQI Management & CQI Management & CQI Introduction Introduction

CQI : 5 Management Responsibility CQI : 5 Management Responsibility

  • Commitment
  • Responsibility
  • Customer requirement
  • Planning
slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Registration Registration

Pelajar sedang membuat pendaftaran seksyen di Kaunter Pelajar beratur untuk Key-in data Borang pendaftaran pelajar Slip pendaftaran berlogo

Time Time-

  • Tabling

Tabling

Penyediaan Jadual Waktu Setelah mendapat maklumat Dari Ketua-ketuan Jabatan Contoh Jadual Waktu Yang di berikan kepada Pensyarah

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Teaching and Assessment Teaching and Assessment Examination and Graduation Examination and Graduation

Penyediaan Kertas Soalan Contoh Soalan Peperiksaan Pelajar menduduki peperiksaan Staf key-in data keputusan Peperiksaan Contoh Slip Keputusan Peperiksaan Penganugerahan

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Training Training Purchasing and Facilities Purchasing and Facilities

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Programmes Accreditation Programmes Accreditation

Info: www.bem.org.my

CQI : 6 Resource Management CQI : 6 Resource Management

  • Provisions

Provisions

  • Human Resources

Human Resources

  • Infrastructure

Infrastructure

  • Environment

Environment

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Work Environment Work Environment Infrastructure : Recreation Infrastructure : Recreation

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Infrastructure : Recreation Infrastructure : Recreation CQI : 7 Product Realisation CQI : 7 Product Realisation

  • Planning

Planning

  • Customer

Customer-

  • related Processes

related Processes

  • Design & Development

Design & Development

  • Purchasing

Purchasing

  • Service Provision

Service Provision

  • Control of Monitoring Devices

Control of Monitoring Devices

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Curriculum Design & Development Curriculum Design & Development Curriculum Design & Development Curriculum Design & Development

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

43

Curriculum Design & Development Curriculum Design & Development

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

PROGRAMME OBJECTI VES EAC - BEM's LEARNI NG OUTCO MES as require d by MPTN SOFTSKI LL S as required by MoHE UTM GRADUATE ATTRI BUTE S ABET's REQUI REM ENT BODY OF KNOW LEDG E 2 BY ASCE PEO1 Graduates are able to apply their knowledge and skills in the planning, analysis, design and supervision of works related to the civil engineering discipline. i, ii, iii, iv,v LO1, LO4 CTPS CTPS a, c, d, h, g

  • utcomes 1,

2, 3, 4,5,6,7,8,9, 12, 13, 17, 18, 21, 23 PEO2 Graduates are technically competent in solving problems logically analytically and creatively based ii iii iv LO4, CTPS CTPS c f

  • utcomes

10 11 15 PEO2 problems logically, analytically and creatively based

  • n sound facts and ideas

ii, iii, iv LO7 CTPS CTPS c, f 10,11, 15, 17 PEO3 Graduates possess leadership, ethical and professional qualities contributing towards the development of the Nation and Worldwide vi, vii,, viii LO2 LS, EP LS, ET b, e, h

  • utcomes

14, 22, 28 PEO4 Graduates are able to work collectively in societies of diverse backgrounds to achieve common goals vii, viii LO3, LO6, LO8 TS TW e, b

  • utcomes

25, 26 PEO5 Graduates are able to communicate effectively across a range of contexts and audiences vii, viii LO6 CS CS b

  • utcomes

19, 26 d bl l

45

PEO6 Graduates are able to manage civil engineering issues for the development and betterment of the Nation and Mankind v,ix, x, vii LO1, LO3, LO5 LS, LL LS,LL k, j, h

  • utcomes

16, 21, 23, 26, 27 PEO7 Graduates are willing to embark on business and not depend on establishment to provide job x LO8 LL LL j

  • utcomes

24, 27 PROGRAMME OUTCOMES ( LOs) EAC-BEM's LEARNI NG OUTCOME S as required by MPTN SOFTSKI L LS as required by MoHE UTM GRADUATE ATTRI BUTES ABET's REQUI REM ENT BODY OF KNOW LEDGE 2 BY ASCE LO1 Ability to acquire knowledge of science and civil engineering principles. i, ii, iii, iv,v LO1, LO4 CTPS CTPS a, c,

  • utcomes 1,

2, 3, 4,5,6,7,8,9, 12, 13, 17, 18, 21, 23 LO2 Ability to use the techniques, skills and modern civil engineering tools. ii, iii, iv LO4 CTPS CTPS c, f, g

  • utcomes

10,11, 15, 17 Ability to analyse, interpret, develop and conduct 13 LO3 Ability to analyse, interpret, develop and conduct experiments; and design components, systems, or processes. iv, ii,, iii LO1, LO4 CTPS CTPS b, e, h

  • utcomes 13,

12 LO4 Ability to think critically, identify, formulate and solve civil engineering related problems. iii, iv LO7, LO1 CTPS CTPS d, f

  • utcomes

12,11 LO5 Ability to communicate effectively and with confidence. vii, viii LO6 CS CS b

  • utcomes 19,

25, 26 LO6 Ability to identify business opportunities and embark on entrepreneurship. xi LO8 ES ES k, j

  • utcomes 24,

17, 27 LO7 Ability to function effectively as an individual in a team iii LO3 LO6 TS CS TW CS E

  • utcomes 25,

46

LO7 Ability to function effectively as an individual in a team to achieve common goals viii LO3, LO6 TS, CS TW, CS E

  • utcomes 25,

26 LO8 Ability to perpetually seek and acquire contemporary knowledge. x LO5 LL LL J Outcomes 27, 14 LO9 Ability to lead, communicate and manage effectively with confidence viii LO6 LS, CS, TS LS, CS, TW b,e Outcomes 19, 26, 25 LO1 0 Ability to apply high ethical standards in professional practice and social interactions for sustainable development. vi, ix LO2 EP ET H Outcomes 16, 22, 28

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

47

Curriculum Design & Development Curriculum Design & Development

:: Programme Specification ::

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Curriculum Design & Development Curriculum Design & Development 1 2 Program m e Objectives 1 2 . Program m e Objectives

a) Graduates are able to apply their knowledge and skills in the planning, analysis, design and supervision of works related to the civil engineering discipline. b) Graduates are technically competent in solving problems logically, analytically and creatively based on sound facts and ideas. c) Graduates possess leadership, ethical and professional qualities contributing towards the development of the Nation and Worldwide. d) Graduates are able to work collectively in societies of diverse backgrounds to achieve common goals. e) Graduates are able to communicate effectively across a range of contexts and audiences. f) Graduates are able to manage civil engineering issues for the development and betterment of the Nation and Mankind. g) Graduates are willing to embark on business and not depend on establishment to provide job.

Curriculum Design & Development Curriculum Design & Development

1 3 . Program m e Learning Outcom es

Code I ntended Learning Outcom es Teaching and Learning Methods Assessm ent ( a) Technical Know ledge and Com petencies LO1 Ability to acquire knowledge of science and civil engineering principles. Lectures, tutorials, seminars, laboratory works, directed reading, independent study, active learning. Examinations, laboratory reports, presentations, assignments, problem- based exercises, project reports. LO2 Ability to use the techniques, skills and modern civil engineering tools. Lectures, tutorials, computer hands-on sessions, laboratory works, industrial training, surveying camps. Examinations, laboratory reports, presentations, assignments, problem- based exercises, project reports, design tasks, sim ulation exercises, industrial training reports. LO3 Ability to analyse, interpret, develop and conduct experiments; and design components, systems, or processes. Project supervision, lectures, tutorials, laboratory works, directed reading, simulation exercises, computer-based exercises, independent study, problem-based learning. Final Year Project reports, project reports, design tasks, examinations, laboratory reports, presentations, assignments.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Curriculum Design & Development Curriculum Design & Development

1 3 . Program m e Learning Outcom es

Code I ntended Learning Outcom es Teaching and Learning Methods Assessm ent

( b) Generic Skills LO4 Ability to think critically, identify, formulate and solve civil engineering related problems. Project supervision, lectures, tutorials, laboratory works, group projects, independent study. Final Year Project reports, project reports, design tasks, examinations, laboratory reports, presentations, assignments. LO5 Ability to communicate effectively and with confidence. Projects, independent study, tutorials, surveying camps. Oral presentations, written reports. LO6 Ability to identify business

  • pportunities and em bark on

entrepreneurship. Independent study, group project, industrial visit, Seminar (SEMKA), dialogue with invited speaker. Seminar report, written business proposal. LO7 Ability to function effectively as an individual in a team to achieve common goals. Independent projects, group projects, industrial training, final year project, surveying camps. Industrial training report and logbook, project report, final year project report and logbook. LO8 Ability to perpetually seek and acquire contemporary knowledge. Independent study, final year projects. Final year project reports, assignm ents. contemporary knowledge. LO9 Ability to lead and manage effectively with confidence. Lectures, laboratory works, group assignments, Industrial training, final year project. Industrial training reports and logbooks, final year project reports and logbooks. LO1 0 Ability to apply high ethical standards in professional practice and social interactions for sustainable development. Final year projects, Laboratory works, Industrial training, surveying camps. Written assignments, laboratory reports, essays, final year project reports, I ndustrial training report.

Mapping of Program m e Learning Outcom es to Courses

CORE COURSES OFFERED PROGRAMME LEARNI NG OUTCOMES ( LOs)

ire Know ledge Technique yse & lopm ent lem Solving m unication epreneurship m W ork Long Learning ership al Acqu Use T Analy Deve Probl Com m Entre Team Life L Leade Ethica

LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9 LO1 0 CORE COURSES SAB 1011 Engineering Survey – Fieldwork b a a 2 1

  • 2
  • 2

2 SAB 1023 Engineering Survey a a b 2 2

  • 2

SAB 1031 Survey Camp b a a 2 2

  • 1

2 1 2 SAB 1042 Civil Engineering Laboratory I a a a 2 1

  • 1

2 2 2 SAB 1213 Applied Mechanics a b b 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 SAB 1423 Civil Engineering Drawing a a b

  • 2
  • 2

2 2 1 SAB 1513 Fluid Mechanics a a a 1 2

  • 2

2 2 2 SAB 1713 S il M h i b b 2 1 1 2 2 2

52

SAB 1713 Soil Mechanics a b b 2 1

  • 1

2 2 2 SAB 2012 Civil Engineering Laboratory II a a a 2 1

  • 1

2 2 2 SAB 2032 Mechanical & Electrical Systems a b b 2 2 2

  • 2

2 1 SAB 3233 Structural Steel & Timber Design a a a 2 2

  • 1

2 2 2

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

53

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Registration Registration

Pelajar sedang membuat pendaftaran seksyen di Kaunter Pelajar beratur untuk Key-in data Borang pendaftaran pelajar Slip pendaftaran berlogo

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Time Time-

  • Tabling

Tabling

Penyediaan Jadual Waktu Setelah mendapat maklumat Dari Ketua-ketuan Jabatan Contoh Jadual Waktu Yang di berikan kepada Pensyarah

Teaching and Assessment Teaching and Assessment

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Effective Classroom Strategies

■ Democratic instructional approaches are superior

to indoctrinational approaches for imparting to indoctrinational approaches for imparting generic skills to students

61

Penerapan Penerapan kemahiran kemahiran generik generik dikalangan dikalangan pelajar pelajar melalui melalui pengajaran pengajaran dan dan pembelajaran pembelajaran

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Effective Classroom Strategies

■ A key feature of classes that

successfully teach generic skills is that instructors hold and communicate high expectations for the learning and behaviour of their students-whether or not the overall culture of the school holds high expectations for them

63

Problem Based Learning - PBL

■ Instructors assume the role of

facilitators and coaches rather than lecturers and order givers, than lecturers and order givers, requiring students to take much

  • f the responsibility for their own

learning

64

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

E-

  • Learning

Learning UTM UTM ( (http://elearning.utm.my http://elearning.utm.my) ) E-

  • Learning UTM

Learning UTM – –Daftar Masuk Daftar Masuk Pelajar sudah daftar masuk

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

MAKLUMAT UMUM (Contoh : Matapelajaran SAM 5413)

  • Pelajar Boleh mendapatkan maklumat pensyarah-pensyarah yang mengajar

matapelajaran berkenaan

67

OTHER APROACHES

■ Projects on Professional Practices ■ Seminars ■ Engineering ethics ■ Laboratory works

68

y

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Examination and Graduation Examination and Graduation

Penyediaan Kertas Soalan Contoh Soalan Peperiksaan Pelajar menduduki peperiksaan Staf key-in data keputusan Peperiksaan Contoh Slip Keputusan Peperiksaan Penganugerahan

CQI : 8. Measurement Analysis & Improvement CQI : 8. Measurement Analysis & Improvement

  • Monitoring & measurement
  • Internal Audit
  • Control of NC Process
  • Data Analysis
  • Improvement
  • Improvement
slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

71

FKA CQI Model Fram ew ork 1

72

FKA CQI Model Fram ew ork 2

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

73 74

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Program Objective Assessment tools or methods used When will the data collection/analysis carried

  • ut and presented

What will be the the indicator that the outcome is achieved *** What are the outcomes of the analysis? Who is responsible? (collection and analysis) Feedback/comments for continuous improvement Alumni Survey (Online and

  • ff line facility)

Every three years starting 2008 > 80% indicating a satisfactory feedback 93.1% indicate competency in applying knowledge and skills in planning, analysis, design and supervision TP(A) Phone Interview Every three years starting 2008 > 50% has work as a consultant/design

  • ffice/academic staff

in progress Panels of Academic Staff ‐ Employers perception survey Every year starting 2007 > 80% giving a positive feedback by the employer 83% and 98% giving positive feedback in 2007 and 2008 respectively TD(A) PEO1 Graduates are able to apply their knowledge and skills in the planning, analysis, design and supervision of works related to the civil engineering discipline. Alumni Survey (Online and

  • ff line facility)

Every three years starting 2008 > 80% indicating a satisfactory feedback 93.0% indicate competency in solving problems logically, analytically and creatively TP(A) Three PhD research work to enhance student ability to apply fundamental knowledge and skills through learning strategies are carried out i.e > 70% involvement in in problem solving situation in progress

  • 1. An Innovative Design Course for Undergraduate

Civil Enginering : Enhancing Students’ Learning in Engineering Design > 50% of the solutions are based on facts either carried

  • ut analytically or creatively

in progress

  • 2. Fostering Problem Solving abilities through

Problem Based Learning Techniques Employers perception survey Every year starting 2007 > 80% giving a positive feedback by the employer 82% and 96% giving positive feedback in 2007 and 2008 respectively TD(A)

  • 3. A Contextual Case‐Based Teaching Strategies For

the Empowerment of Critical And Creative Thinking to Civil Engineering Undergraduates Alumni Survey (Online and

  • ff line facility)

Every three years starting 2008 > 80% indicating a satisfactory feedback 94.7% indicate that they possessed leadership skills and are ethical and professional towards development of the nation TP(A) The Faculty is currently reviewing the SAB Programme. Emphasise is on the content, deliver methods/approaches and also assessment strategies. Graduates possess leadership, ethical and professional Survey committee PEO2 Graduates are technically competent in solving problems logically, analytically and creatively based on sound facts and ideas Every three years starting 2008 Phone Interview

75

Phone Interview Every three years starting 2008 > 60% has become a project leader in progress Survey committee Employers perception survey Every year starting 2007 > 80% giving a positive feedback by the employer 81% and 96% giving positive feedback in 2007 and 2008 respectively TD(A) PEO3 qualities contributing towards the development of the Nation and Worldwide

PEO-PDCA cycle to improve the Effectiveness of the Programme

Program Outcome Assessment tools or methods used When will the data collection/analysis carried out and presented What will be the the indicator that the

  • utcome is achieved ***

Assessment Plan for the Attainment of LOs

Student examination performance in science and engineering courses Every year starting 2006 70% getting B and above in each courses Student examination performance in mathematics courses Every year starting 2006 70% getting B and above in each courses Employers perception survey Once in two years > 80% giving a positive feedback by the employer LO1 Ability to acquire knowledge of science and civil engineering principles.

76

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Program Outcom e W hat w ill be the the indicator that the outcom e is achieved * * * W hat are the outcom es

  • f the analysis?

Continuous Quality I m provem ent I nitiatives W ho is responsible? ( collection and analysis) 70% getting B and above in each courses from the 24 samples taken over 3 years, all courses achieved the target ie more than 70%

  • f the student achieving B

in all the courses being Introduced system where examination questions must address the appropriate level of Bloom’s taxonomy and properly address the Course Learning Outcome TD(A) LO1 Ability to acquire knowledge of science and civil engineering principles. in all the courses being sampled Course Learning Outcome (CO) and subsequently addressing the LOs 70% getting B and above in each courses 78% of the samples (14 samples) involving all the maths courses offered do not meet the target To integrate engineering problems into the maths

  • courses. More discussion

between FKA ans maths staff. PhD Research to address this issue TD(A) > 80% giving a positive feedback by the employer 97% giving positive feedback The Faculty is currently reviewing the SAB

  • Programme. Emphasise is

TP(A) > 80% indicating a

77

g p

  • n the content, deliver

methods/ approaches or assessment strategies g satisfactory feedback by graduating student (exit survey) > 80% were able to attain the LO1 for the last 5 semester TP(A)

PO-PDCA cycle to improve the Effectiveness of the Programme

8.4 Assessment Tools and Data Analysis 8.4 Assessment Tools and Data Analysis

1. 1.Students Performance Students Performance

  • Students’ Examination results

Students’ Examination results

  • LI Employer on students

LI Employer on students p y p y

  • Employer Survey on graduates

Employer Survey on graduates

  • Graduate Mobility (

Graduate Mobility (UTM UTM) )

  • Customer Satisfaction (

Customer Satisfaction (UTM UTM) )

  • Industry Advisory Panels

Industry Advisory Panels

  • External Examiner

External Examiner 2. 2.Teaching and Learning Process Teaching and Learning Process

  • Lecturer Performance (

Lecturer Performance (OMR OMR, e , e‐ppp ppp) )

  • Registration and Time tabling

Registration and Time tabling

  • Examination

Examination

  • Customer Feedbacks (process)

Customer Feedbacks (process)

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

8.4 Assessment Tools and Data Analysis 8.4 Assessment Tools and Data Analysis

1. 1.Management Management

  • Staff survey on management team

Staff survey on management team

  • staff survey on management office

staff survey on management office 2. 2.Facilities Facilities

  • External Examiner

External Examiner

  • Graduate Traceability Study

Graduate Traceability Study

Alumni perception on the attainment level of PEOs ( 5 years after graduation)

Attainment of PEOs based on graduates survey carried out in 2008 indicating more than 80% achievement level

93.1% 93.0% 94.7% 98.8% 95.1% 93.4% 6.9% 7.0% 5.3% 1.2% 4.9% 6.6% 12.3% 86 0% 88.0% 90.0% 92.0% 94.0% 96.0% 98.0% 100.0% 102.0% not competent competent

80

87.7% 80.0% 82.0% 84.0% 86.0% A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 ITEM

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

Attainm ent of PEOs based on em ployers perception carried out in 2 0 0 7 and 2 0 0 8 indicating m ore than 8 0 % achievem ent level 81

Data Analysis Data Analysis – – Lecturer Performance (OMR) Lecturer Performance (OMR)

Penilaian Pengajaran FKA 2003 - 2007

4.5 4.55 4.1 4.15 4.2 4.25 4.3 4.35 4.4 4.45 304-01 304-02 405-01 405-02 506-01 506-02 607-01 Mata Min FKA Min UTM 2003 2003 2004 2004 2005 2005 2006 Sesi/Semester

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

OMR ratings for the Faculty ( FKA) com pared to other faculties for Sem ester I ( 0 7 / 0 8 )

83

Data Analysis Data Analysis – – Students’ Examination Results Students’ Examination Results

Pencapaian Semua Program (2003/04 - 2005/06)

3.30 2.70 2.80 2.90 3.00 3.10 3.20 CPA 2.60

0304-01 0304-02 0405-01 0405-02 0506-01 0506-02 0607-01 0607-02 0708-01

Sesi/Semester

slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

Data Analysis Data Analysis – – Students’ Examination Results Students’ Examination Results

P encapaian P elajar (% C PA > 3.0)

20 0 40.0 60.0 80.0 P eratus

P encapaian P elajar (Min C PA)

2 95 3.00 3.05 3.10 3.15 S es i 0.0 20.0 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/0601 2005/0602 2006/0701 2006/0702 2007/0801 S esi/S emester 2.90 2.95 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/0601 2005/0602 2006/0701 S esi/S emester

P encapaian P elajar (% K B C lean)

80.0 85.0 90.0 95.0 P eratus Kelas Graduan Bilangan % Graduate on Time 73.3%

Results 2006/07 Results 2006/07-

  • 02

02

75.0 2 2 / 3 2 3 / 4 2 4 / 5 2 5 / 6 1 2 5 / 6 2 2 6 / 7 1 S esi/S emester 1 53 18.2 2 Tinggi 154 53 2 Rendah 84 28.8 3 Registration Graduation GoT KONVO KE 35 - 2004/ 2005-02 Matrik SAW SAP SAS Jum S1 2 T 2 R S3 Jum 63.88 AA0 0 459 55 43 557 48 183 125 356 BA0 1 5 5 1 1 2 CA0 2 1 1 Jum lah 464 55 43 562 48 184 127 359 Registration Graduation GoT Matrik SAW SAP SAS Jumlah S1 2 T 2 R S3 Jum

Student Graduate on Time

KONVO KE 37 - 2005/ 206-02 Matrik SAW SAP SAS Jumlah S1 2 T 2 R S3 Jum 54.43 AA01 470 70 63 603 50 146 124 2 322 BA02 99 99 2 39 26 67 CA03 66 66 4 21 4 29 Jumlah 635 70 63 768 56 206 154 2 418 Registration Graduation GoT KONVO KE 39 - 2006/ 2007-02 Matrik SAW SAP SAS Jumlah S1 2 T 2 R S3 Jum 82.46 AA02 202 202 46 69 31 146 BA03 123 123 2 54 28 84 CA04 5 29 4 38 Jumlah 325 325 53 152 63 268 Registration Graduation GoT KONVO KE 40 - 2007/ 2008-02 Matrik SAW SAP SAS Jumlah S1 2 T 2 R S3 Jum 88.92 AA04 225 23 15 263 22 162 42 226 BA05 98 98 24 65 6 95 Jumlah 323 23 15 361 46 227 48 321

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

CPA Session/ sem ester 2004/ 05 2005/ 06 01 2005/ 06 02 2006/ 07 01 2006/ 07 02 2007/ 08 01 2007/ 08 02 CPA > 3.0 48.0 34.7 50.7 57.1 67.6 68.7 77.6 KB Clean 88.4 91.9 93.2 93.4 99.5 92.2 93.4

Percentage of KB clean

Session Sem 1 st Class ( CPA 3 .6 7 - 4 .0 0 ) 2 nd Class Upper ( CPA 3 .- 3 .6 6 ) 2 nd Class Low er ( CPA 2 .3 0 - 2 .9 9 ) 3 rd Class ( CPA 2 .0 0 - 2 .2 9 ) Total CPA> 3 .0 0 No % No % No % No % No No % 2002/ 03 2 34 8.8 166 43.1 157 40.8 28 7.3 385 200 51.9 2003/ 04 1 0.0 0.0 187 85.8 31 14.2 218 0.0 2 1 0.5 16 8.6 142 75.9 28 15.0 187 17 9.1

Graduation Statistics For FKA Students

87

2004/ 05 1 0.0 4 5.1 58 73.4 17 21.5 79 4 5.1 2 48 9.4 218 42.8 220 43.2 23 4.5 509 266 52.3 2005/ 06 1 1 0.7 26 19.3 96 71.1 12 8.9 135 27 20.0 2 64 13.7 227 48.6 168 36.0 8 1.7 467 291 62.3 2006/ 07 1 0.0 18 16.8 82 76.6 7 6.5 107 18 16.8 2 55 18.4 157 52.5 87 29.1 0.0 299 212 70.9 2007/ 08 1 1 1.6 16 25.0 46 71.9 1 1.6 64 17 26.6 2 52 15.8 227 69.0 50 15.2 0.0 329 279 84.8

Data Analysis Data Analysis – – Customer Feedback (LI 2006/2007 ) Customer Feedback (LI 2006/2007 )

BIL ITEM Kelemahan Kekuatan Catatan 1. Tahap pengetahuan terhadap kerja 17.7 % 82.3 % Lebih 80 % pelajar memiliki tahap pengetahuan kerja yang baik. 2 K b l h t k i k k j 6 4 % 93 6 % Kebolehpercayaan pelajar menyiap kerja amat tinggi dikalangan 2. Kebolehpercayaan untuk menyiapkan kerja 6.4 % 93.6 % p y p j y p j gg g syarikat. 3. Masa yang diambil untuk mendapatkan kemahiran 12.8 % 87.2 % Tempoh waktu LI mencukupi bagi pelajar untuk memperolehi kemahiran. 4. Keperluan penyeliaan 18.6 % 81.4 % Wbmpun keperluan kepada penyeliaan kerja dari penyelia syarikat agak tinggi. 5. Mutu kerja 10.2 % 89.8 % Kebanyakan pelajar dapat menghasilkan kerja yang bermutu, hampir 90 %. 6. Kebolehan berkomunikasi 13.7 % 86.3 % Lebih 85 % pelajar memiliki kebolehan berkomunikasi dengan baik. 7. Inisiatif dan motivasi 12.8 % 87.2 % Pelajar juga memiliki daya inisiatif dan motivasi yang tinggi melebihi 85 %. % 8. Sikap terhadap kerja 5.8 % 94.2 % Sikap pelajar terhadap kerja amat tinggi pada kacamata penyelia syarikat. 9. Disiplin 6.7 % 93.3 % Pelajar juga memiliki disiplin diri yang tinggi semasa menjalani LI.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

Data Analysis Data Analysis – – Customer Feedback (LI Customer Feedback (LI 2006/2007

2006/2007)

) Cont..

Cont..

6.4% 12 8% 10 2% 13 7% 12 8% 5.8% 6.7% 100.0% Penilaian Syarikat Terhadap Pelajar FKA Menjalani LI Sesi 2006/2007

82.3%

17.7%

93.6%

6.4%

87.2%

12.8%

81.4%

18.6%

89.8%

10.2%

86.3%

13.7%

87.2%

12.8%

94.2% 93.3%

6.7% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% Peratus Kelemahan Kekuatan 0.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Item

Data Analysis Data Analysis – – Customer Feedback (Process) Customer Feedback (Process)

Perkhidmatan 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Pendaftaran 35 16 18 7 8 Peperiksaan 2 1 4 1 Jadual waktu 3 Lain-lain 8 3 JUMLAH 48 20 22 7 9

Aduan Pelanggan

10 20 30 40

Bilangan Aduan

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Pendaftaran Peperiksaan Jadual w aktu Lain-lain

Perkhidmatan B

2007

slide-46
SLIDE 46

46

Data Analysis Data Analysis – – Customer Satisfaction (UTM) Customer Satisfaction (UTM)

Generic Skills Generic Skills Teaching Teaching Student Feedback Effectiveness Effectiveness Infrastructure & Infrastructure & Facilities Facilities Curriculum Curriculum

Data Analysis Data Analysis – – Willing to Employ Graduates Willing to Employ Graduates

Manufacturing 1% Others 2% Consulting Firm 24%

Employer Perception

No Answ er 3% Definitely Yes 42% Probably Yes 53% Probably No 1% Definitely No 1% Construction 50% Services (Utilities) 1% Services (Engineering) 14% Property/Treal Estates 6% Services (Public and others) 2%

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47

No. Criteria Very Satisfied Dissatisfied Neither Satisfied Nor Di ti fi d Satisfied Very Satisfied 1 , 2 & 3 4 & 5

Percentage showing how satisfied the organization with FKA graduates currently employed within the organization

No. Criteria Dissatisfied 1 , 2 & 3 4 & 5 1 2 3 4 5 a. Overall preparation 0.0% 0.0% 7.5% 77.4% 15.1% 7 .5 % 9 2 .5 % b. Job-related knowledge 0.0% 0.6% 9.4% 76.7% 13.2% 1 0 .1 % 8 9 .9 % c. Job-related skills 0.0% 1.9% 10.1% 71.7% 16.4% 1 1 .9 % 8 8 .1 % d. General professional

  • r generics

0.0% 3.8% 12.7% 65.8% 17.7% 1 6 .5 % 8 3 .5 %

93

skills

Data Analysis Data Analysis – –Graduates Employability Graduates Employability

No Convocation FKA UTM 1 33 56.3 2 34 58.8 3 35 71.7 72.5

Graduate Employment

20 40 60 80 Employment FKA UTM

4 36 64.8 48.9 5 37 63.1 49.4

1 2 3 4 5 Convocation % E

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

No. I tem s Percentage of Agreem ent ( % ) 1. Employability Status 85.5

Online Graduate Survey During 40th UTM Convocation

2. Perception towards UTM reputation 95.5 3. Suitability of curriculum content 92.7 4. English language competency 75.5 5. Perception towards lecturer-student interaction 90.0 6. Perception towards information and career

  • pportunity

84.5

95 96

Average Point Student achievement of Programme Outcome based on exit survey carried out every semester

slide-49
SLIDE 49

49

LO1 Aquire knowledge LO2 Use techniques, skills and tools. LO3 Analyse, conduct exp and design y p g LO4 Critical thinking and problem solving LO5 Communicate effectively LO6 Entrepreneurship LO7 Teamworking LO8 Lifelong learning LO9 Leadership LO10 Ethics

97

Attainm ent of LOs based on em ployers perception survey 2 0 0 8 indicating m ore than 8 0 % achievem ent level

Overall CQI Overall CQI

1.

  • 1. To improve or device

To improve or device tools tools to measure to measure effectiveness effectiveness of ALL existing

  • f ALL existing

activities/processes related to the main procedures of activities/processes related to the main procedures of Pendaftaran Pendaftaran, , Jadual Jadual Waktu Waktu Peperiksaan Peperiksaan Pengajaran Pengajaran & Pembelajaran Pembelajaran Latihan Latihan Pengambilan Pengambilan Waktu Waktu, , Peperiksaan Peperiksaan, , Pengajaran Pengajaran & & Pembelajaran Pembelajaran, , Latihan Latihan, , Pengambilan Pengambilan Staf Staf & & Kenaikan Kenaikan Pangkat Pangkat, , Perolehan Perolehan, , and and Rekabentuk Rekabentuk, , Semakan Semakan dan dan Pembangunan Pembangunan Kurikulum Kurikulum through customer and stakeholder feedbacks through customer and stakeholder feedbacks 2.

  • 2. To improve

To improve assessment methods assessment methods for Teaching & Learning processes and for Teaching & Learning processes and activities in activities in Prosedur Prosedur Pengajaran Pengajaran, within the set University regulations, in , within the set University regulations, in view of view of Outcome Outcome-

  • Based Education,

Based Education, OBE OBE 3 To improve or enhance the documentations of all activities processes and To improve or enhance the documentations of all activities processes and 3.

  • 3. To improve or enhance the documentations of all activities, processes and

To improve or enhance the documentations of all activities, processes and procedures, such that they shall be procedures, such that they shall be linked, and linked, and fulfill the requirements of fulfill the requirements of the the EAC EAC, , to facilitate accreditation to facilitate accreditation

slide-50
SLIDE 50

50

More CQI More CQI

1.

  • 1. To convert all

To convert all ISO9001:2000 ISO9001:2000 documentations into documentations into e-

  • documents

documents, in view , in view f

  • f a better and paperless management in
  • f a better and paperless management in FKA

FKA 2.

  • 2. Student e

Student e-

  • Portfolio

Portfolio 3.

  • 3. Review on

Review on Programme Programme Specification Specification (to consider (to consider OBE OBE & new Los, in & new Los, in addition to addition to UTM UTM Graduate attributes) Graduate attributes) 4.

  • 4. Quality objectives

Quality objectives to fulfill to fulfill OBE OBE needs needs

8.5.2 Corrective Actions 8.5.2 Corrective Actions

  • To facilitate accreditation, items for inspection are to be submitted

To facilitate accreditation, items for inspection are to be submitted at the end of the semester at the end of the semester

  • Weekness

Weekness in in LO5 LO5 Communication through CAT, English Communication through CAT, English helplines helplines (Univ Univ ‐ MyLine MyLine) )

  • Career Development Centre CDC (Degree++Courses) (

Career Development Centre CDC (Degree++Courses) (Univ Univ) )

  • KB (GPA<3.0)

KB (GPA<3.0)

  • FYE

FYE Program Program

  • PPC

PPC Student Enhancement Program Student Enhancement Program

  • PPB Student Development Program

PPB Student Development Program p g p g

slide-51
SLIDE 51

51

8.5.2 Corrective Actions 8.5.2 Corrective Actions – – PPB Development PPB Development

Sesi/sem Bilangan Peratus 2001/02-01 41 4.24 2001/02-02 9 0.98

Pelajar KG

45

2002/03-01 7 0.57 2002/03-02 6 0.48 2003/04-01 9 0.62 2003/04-02 7 0.49 2004/05-01 3 0.17 2004/05-02 2 0.12 2005/06-01 3 0.19 2005/06-02 2 0.12 2006/07-01 6 0.40 2006/07 02 0 00

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 2 1 / 2

  • 1

2 1 / 2

  • 2

2 2 / 3

  • 1

2 2 / 3

  • 2

2 3 / 4

  • 1

2 3 / 4

  • 2

2 4 / 5

  • 1

2 4 / 5

  • 2

2 5 / 6

  • 1

2 5 / 6

  • 2

2 6 / 7

  • 1

2 6 / 7

  • 2

Sesi/Sem Pelajar Bilangan Peratus

2006/07-02 0.00 2007/08-01 0.00

Sesi/Sem

8.5.2 Preventive Actions 8.5.2 Preventive Actions

1. 1. ISO documentation is linked to accreditation requirements ISO documentation is linked to accreditation requirements 2. 2. Maintenance of storage area Maintenance of storage area 3. 3. Backup of results (Hardcopy) Backup of results (Hardcopy) 4. 4. Change of Status (Univ.) Change of Status (Univ.)

slide-52
SLIDE 52

52

NEW GRADING SYSTEM NEW GRADING SYSTEM

90-100 80-89 75-74 70-74 4.0 4.0 3.67 3.33 A+ 65-69 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 00-39 3.0 2.67 2.33 2.0 1.67 1.33 1.0 0.0 3.67 3.00 3.67 3.00 2.30 2.30 2.00

Thank You Thank You