Welcome INNO INNOVATION SERIES TION SERIES WEBIN WEBINAR AR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Welcome INNO INNOVATION SERIES TION SERIES WEBIN WEBINAR AR (All phone lines are muted for now)

Reminders • Today’s presentation is being recorded. • Slides and recording will be available at www.amwa.net/amwa-innovation- series. • We’ll take questions after both speakers have presented. • All lines are muted until discussion period.

How to Ask a Question Type and send your question.

Agenda • Diane VanDe Hei, CEO Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies • Scott Potter, Director, Nashville Metro Water Services and President, AMWA • Glen Gerads, Director of Water Treatment and Distribution Services, Minneapolis Water Works • Q&A Open Discussion •

Diane VanDe Hei CEO Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies

Poll Question #1

Scott Potter Director, Nashville Metro Water Services President, AMWA

“Triple Bottom Line” Impacts of Maintaining Our Community’s Infrastructure Economic, Social, & Environmental Impacts of Water Infrastructure in Nashville, TN May 2017

Triple Bottom Line Impacts riple Bottom Line Impacts

Water Infrastructur ater Infrastructure - Lakewood, TN e - Lakewood, TN Lakewood: founded 1959, merged with Nashville 2011 Credit: RCSprinter123

Water Infrastructur ater Infrastructure - Lakewood, TN e - Lakewood, TN Service to Service to Service to Service to Service Service Mains Mains Meters Meters Right-of-way Right-of-way Buildings Buildings Water ater ✔ ✔ ✔ Selected Sewer Sewer ✔ ✔ Selected Stormwater Stor mwater ✔ Metro Water Services invests $13.9M in infrastructure Credit: RCSprinter123

Economic Impact Analysis Economic Impact Analysis Benefits: • Jobs • Wages • Local Impact • Property Value • Employment Stability

The Infrastructure Investment The Infrastructur e Investment Investment Cost Estimates by Task Sector Estimated Cost Water & Sewer $8,710,988 Construction Street Construction $2,584,870 Design & $2,619,562 Management Total $13,915,420

Employment Inputs Employment Inputs Actual Employment by Industry Sector FTEs IMPLAN Jobs 38 45 Water & Sewer Construction Street Construction 10 12 MWS 4 Management Contract Design 2 Design & Contract 5 14 Management Support 1 Total 60 71

Business Business Business Consumer Business

Study Region Study Region Direct Davidson County Indirect & Induced Davidson County & 6 adjacent counties

Local Services, But Imported Goods Local Services, But Imported Goods Wholesale output excluded, local retail output included

Total Jobs & W otal Jobs & Wages Impact ages Impact

Employment Stability fr Employment Stability from Infrastructur om Infrastructure; e; Nashville Construction Jobs, 2014 Nashville Construction Jobs, 2014 Residential: 4,290 Residential: 4,290 Infrastructur Infrastructure: 6,587 e: 6,587

Improved Pr Impr oved Property V operty Value alue Pr Previous Main & Service evious Main & Service Lakewood Investment Lakewood Investment Old New Meter Main Main Old Private Restored New Public Service Private Service Service Affected Private Service Restored = $1.36M Value

Social Impact Analysis Social Impact Analysis Benefits: • Aesthetics • Water Pressure • Sewer Draining • Stormwater Collection • Fire Protection • Small Business

Aesthetic Impr Aesthetic Improvements ovements Before After (estimated) Credit: Clean Water Nashville Credit: Wilmot Inc. Added valley gutters, restoring sidewalks & pavement

Improved W Impr oved Water Pr ater Pressur essure e MWS Service Call History for "Low Water Pressure" 30 25 37138 excluding 20 Lakewood 15 Lakewood 10 5 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Tuberculated pipe replaced to meter and/or building

Improved Sewer Drainage Impr oved Sewer Drainage New pipe resists roots and replaces inferior materials Sources: Clark County ReclamaOon District, Michael Butkus, Jr., All Plumbing, Inc., J. ScoU Shipe

Impr Improved Stor oved Stormwater Collection mwater Collection 98% of heavy rainfall events (<10-year storm) captured Sources: Northeast Ohio RSD, thecuriousquilter.files.wordpress.com, BBC.co.uk

Impr Improved Fir oved Fire Pr e Protection otection Available hydrant fire flow (gpm) 2000 AVAILABLE FIRE FLOW (GALLONS PER MINUTE) 1500 1000 500 0 Before AXer Similar hydrant density; doubling of flow

Small & Disadvantaged Business Impact Small & Disadvantaged Business Impact Proportion of Small & Disadvantaged Businesses Total Bid $10,293,365 Small or Disadvantaged Bid $9,344,719 % Small or Disadvantaged 91% >90% Construction team = Small or Woman-owned

Envir Environmental Impact Analysis onmental Impact Analysis Benefits: • Reduced Water Leaks • Reduced Inflow & Infiltration • Reduced Cost Externalities

Inflow & Infiltration (I/I) Inflow & Infiltration (I/I)

Inflow & Infiltration Reduction Inflow & Infiltration Reduction Average of all July – September flows (mgd) Periods LW01 GC13 Average of 2011-2013 0.27 1.01 2015 0.17 0.69 Difference 2011-2013 to 2015 37% 32% Relative reduction in flow for 5% LW01 vs. GC13 5% = 5,500,000 I/I gallons avoided annually

Water Ener ater Energy Nexus gy Nexus

PolluOon Community risks LiOgaOon Ammonia releases PopulaOon declines Lost property value Methane emissions FataliOes Building degradaOon Stream polluOon Community illnesses Ecological impacts Stream destrucOon Community disabiliOes Abandoned Mine Lands Groundwater contaminaOon Mental health impacts Acid rain Mercury exposure Loss of views Loss of marine life Heavy metal release BlasOng damage Decreased ozone Carbon emissions Increased poverty EutrophicaOon Increased air parOculates Public health burden Harmful algal blooms TransportaOon emissions DeforestaOon EXTERNAL COSTS OF ENERGY Ash spills Decrease in jobs Lost carbon storage Slurry spills Wear on infrastructure Land disturbance Air polluOon Emissions High violent crime rates Soil loss Job risks Tourism loss Loss of biodiversity Mining injuries NaOonal security concerns Damage to farmland DisabiliOes Higher infant death Land required for waste disposal Chronic illness Mudslides Incomplete reclamaOon Mining deaths Flooding Climate damage from CO 2 & TransportaOon injuries Subsidies NO 2

Exter Externalities of Coal-fir nalities of Coal-fired Electricity ed Electricity Cause of Cost Externality Best EsOmate AcOvity From Coal-Fired Electricity (¢ per kWh) Land disturbance 0.01 Methane emissions 0.08 Mining Public health burden 4.36 Abandoned mine lands (AMLs) 0.44 Transport FataliOes ($ based on VSL) 0.09 Air pollutant emissions 9.31 Effects of mercury emissions 0.33 CombusOon Climate damage from CO 2 and N 2 0 3.06 EIA 2007 (subsidies) 0.16 Total 17.84 $0.18 external + $0.06 retail = $0.24/kWh Total Source: “Full cost accounOng for the life cycle of coal”, Epstein et al.

Infrastructur Infrastructure for a Sustainable Futur e for a Sustainable Future e Policies & funding needed to sustain infrastructure

Infrastructure for a Sustainable Futur Infrastructur e for a Sustainable Future e $14M = $14M = Questions? $27.1M Impact $27.1M Impact 159 area jobs 159 ar ea jobs Water Leaks ater Leaks Water Flow ater Flow I/I r I/I reduced educed Stor Stormwater mwater

Poll Question #2

Glen Gerads City of Minneapolis Director of Water Treatment

CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Beyond Guns, Gates, and Guards – A High Level Look at the J100 Assessment Glen M. Gerads Director – Water Treatment & DistribuOon Services City of Minneapolis – Public Works 5/15/17 39

Agenda • Introduce Minneapolis Water • Review the J100 Vulnerability Assessment methodology • Review the outcomes and lessons learned 40

Who is Minneapolis Water Works? 41

Minneapolis Water Treatment & DistribuKon Services • Established in 1867 • Provides drinking water and fire- fighOng capabiliOes • Sole water source is the Mississippi River o Withdraws 21 billion gallons of water per year o Two treatment campuses o Produces an average of 57 MGD • SoXens water prior to distribuOon • 8 wholesale customers • 1,000 miles of water mains • 238 employees 42

J100 Vulnerability Assessment Project Approach & Summary 43

What is the AWWA J100 Standard? Historical Context • Bioterrorism Act of 2002 • Vulnerability Assessments RAM-W • Emergency Response Plans • 2002: Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Established • 2003: Homeland Security PresidenOal DirecOve 7 (HSPD-7) • 17 (now 16) CriOcal Infrastructure Sectors established 44

What is the AWWA J100 Standard? Historical Context Guns Response All Guards Recovery Hazards Approach Gates Resilience 45

What is the AWWA J100 Standard? • AWWA J100 Standard (Risk and Resilience Management of Water and Wastewater Systems “J100”) • Methodology to quanOfy risk ($) • Down to the individual asset level • Analyzing mulOple threat types • A way to compare apples to oranges 46

What is the J100 Process? 47