Welcome South S h Seminole H Height hts Civic A Ci c - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

welcome
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Welcome South S h Seminole H Height hts Civic A Ci c - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Welcome South S h Seminole H Height hts Civic A Ci c Association, Inc. Inc. October 17, 2018 Tam ampa I a Int nterstat ate Study Sup upplement ntal E Environm nment ntal Impact Statement nt 1 St Stephen B Benso son Opening


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Welcome

Tam ampa I a Int nterstat ate Study Sup upplement ntal E Environm nment ntal Impact Statement nt

South S h Seminole H Height hts Ci Civic A c Association, Inc. Inc.

October 17, 2018

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Opening

St Stephen B Benso son

FDO FDOT Dis District ict Seven

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

In Inter erstate Modernization Tr Transit Bi Bike/P /Ped Facilities Complete Str treets ts Transportation In Innovation Freigh ght t Mobility

Active/ e/Ongo going g Studies es

Our s r sol

  • lution
  • ns a

are re more

  • re

th than an ju just in t inter erstates es. .

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

A New w Approa

  • ach

ch to

  • Transpor
  • rta

tati tion S Stu tudies es:

Ho How c can w n we w work together an and thin think d dif ifferently ab about transportation s

  • n solut

ution

  • ns?

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

A N New w Approa

  • ach
  • Tampa I

Interstate St Study S y SEIS (Westshore t to Downtown)

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

A N New w Approa

  • ach
  • Tampa I

Interstate St Study S y SEIS (Westshore t to Downtown)

  • I-275 North P

Projec ject D Develo lopment & Environment S Study

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

A N New w Approa

  • ach
  • Tampa I

Interstate St Study S y SEIS (Westshore t to Downtown)

  • I-275 North P

Projec ject D Develo lopment & Environment S Study

  • Regio

ional T Transit P Pla lan Vis isio ion P Pla lan & Catalyst P Proje jects

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Tampa I

Interstate St Study S y SEIS (Westshore t to Downtown)

  • I-275 North P

Projec ject D Develo lopment & Environment S Study

  • Regio

ional T Transit P Pla lan

  • Tampa St

Streetcar E Ext xtensi sion St Study (Alt lter ernatives es A & & B B)

A N New w Approa

  • ach

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Tampa I

Interstate St Study S y SEIS (Westshore t to Downtown)

  • I-275 North P

Projec ject Devel elopmen ent & & Environment S Study

  • Regio

ional T Transit P Pla lan

  • Tampa St

Streetcar E Ext xtensi sion St Study y (Alternatives A s A & B)

  • Heig

ights M Mobilit ility P Pla lan

A N New w Approa

  • ach

‘Florida Ave is a ma main s stree eet, It should be

  • ptimized for local t

transpor

  • rtation
  • n modes’.

‘There is too m

  • o much c

cut-thru Traffic. These cars should be on I-275 but its backed up daily!’ ‘Tr Traffic c calming, W Walk/bike s safe fety & & TR TRANSIT!’

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • Tampa I

Interstate St Study S y SEIS (Westshore t to Downtown)

  • I-275 North P

Projec ject D Develo lopment & Environment S Study

  • Regio

ional T Transit P Pla lan

  • Tampa St

Streetcar E Ext xtensi sion St Study (Alt lter ernatives es A & & B B)

  • Heig

ights M Mobilit ility P Pla lan

  • Mult

ltim imodal Center er S Studies ies

A N New w Approa

  • ach

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Tampa I

Interstate St Study S y SEIS (Westshore t to Downtown)

  • I-275 North P

Projec ject D Develo lopment & Environment S Study

  • Regio

ional T Transit P Pla lan

  • Tampa St

Streetcar E Ext xtensi sion St Study

  • Heig

ights M Mobilit ility P Pla lan

  • Univ

iver ersity Area M Mult ltim imodal F l Feasibil ilit ity S Study

  • BRT C

Corrido dor A Analysi ysis s – Florida A Ave ve & & Fow

  • wler Ave
  • Builds off Heights Study & University Study
  • Optimize service network to provide true BRT
  • Service plan & stations on surface streets
  • Covers Project Development & Engineering

A N New w Approa

  • ach
slide-13
SLIDE 13

FDOT I Invest sts i s in Transi sit i in 3 Ways: s:

  • 1. Fundin

ing f g for St Studie ies & & Res esea earch

Transit

Intermod

  • dal

Center S Studies

  • 2. F

Formula-base ased Gr Grant nts ( (Ong ngoing)

  • 3. Competi

titi tive G Grants ts (Pro roje ject-based) )

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Jef eff Novotn tny

FDO FDOT Dis District ict Seven

14

SEIS UPDATE

slide-15
SLIDE 15

SEIS B Began January 2017 Publi lic Worksho hop October 2017 Prepar arat ation

  • f

f Documents Ongoing Publi lic Worksho hop December 2018 SEIS P Publi lic Hear aring Summer 2019 We are h here *A Preferred Alternative will be recommended after the December 2018 Public Workshop.

AL ALL documents r remain ain in in DR DRAFT f form a m and open pen f for pub ublic c comment nt unti until a after th the Public He Hear arin ing in in 2019.

Wher ere A e Are e We I e In T The P e Process?

15

SE SEIS U S Update

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Other S Small G ll Group roup M Meetin ings gs t to date

West estsh shore P Palms s – May 3 3 North B th Bon A Air – Ju Jun 1 n 14 Tampa H Hei eights s – Ju Jun 2 n 28 Oakfor

  • rd Pa

d Park – Jul 9 l 9 East T Tamp mpa C Comm.

  • mm. P

Partnership – Jul 10 10 Encore! – Jul 17 17 SE SE Semin inole le H Heig ights – Jul 17 17 Ridgewood

  • od Pa

Park – Jul 24 24 Old ld Semin inole le H Heig ights – Au Aug 9 9 Cor Corpor

  • ration t

to

  • Develop
  • p Com
  • Comm. – Aug 17

17 Trio io a at Encore! ! – Aug 21 21 Colle llege H Hill ill Civ ivic ic Assoc. – Au Aug 2 23 V.M. Y Ybor Neighbor

  • rhood A
  • od Assoc. – 9/5

/5 Ybor bor Ch Chamber/His ist Ybor bor/East Y Ybor bor/Gary– 9/1 /11 Jackson

  • n H

Heights N Neighbor borhood A

  • od Assoc. – 9/

9/18 18 East st Tampa pa Com Community W Wor

  • rking G

Grou

  • up– 9/2

/25 Mc McFarlane P Par ark/Armory G Gar ardens – 9/26 26 South S Sem eminole H Hei eights C s Civi vic Asso

  • ssoc. – 10/

10/17

More S Sched eduled ed

Colle llege H Hill ill Civ ivic ic Assoc. N Neig

  • igh. – 10/

10/25 25 His istoric ic E East Ybor bor & Gary Nei eigh A Asso

  • ssoc. – 10/30

30 Tamp mpa H Heights

Draft M Map

Encore! SE SE Se Seminole He Heights Ridgewood

  • od Pa

Park West estsh shore P Palms North B th Bon A Air Oakfor

  • rd Pa

d Park Old ld Semin inole le H Heig ights East T Tamp mpa Comm. mm. Partner ersh ship Colle llege H Hill ill Civi vic A Asso ssoc. V.M. . Ybor bor

16

His ist Ybor bor/East Ybor bor/Gary Ja Jacks kson Heights ts So South Se Seminole He Heights

slide-17
SLIDE 17

SE SEIS U S Update

Ta Tampa Inter erstate e Stu tudy ( y (TIS) S) Su Supplem lemen ental Envir ironmenta tal l Imp mpact S Statement (SEI SEIS) S)

Pu Purpo pose & & Need: eed:

  • Improve regional connectivity
  • Provide multimodal corridor
  • Meet future travel demand
  • Relieve congestion
  • Improve safety
  • Improve accessibility

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Safety ty

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Wha What i is FDOT s still c conside deri ring fo for the D Downt ntown I n Intercha hang nge?

Fou

  • ur De

Design O Option

  • ns

No F

  • Further Acti

ction

A B C D

Tolled E Express ss Lanes s

  • r
  • r Non
  • n-Tolled E

Express ss Lanes Ori Origi gina nal TIS TIS Pref refer erred ed Alternat ative

SE SEIS U S Update

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

How will we ultimately make a decision?

Pu Publi lic Comme mment Engineering and T Traffic Environment nt

Constr tructa tability ty

Balanc ance t the I Issue ues

Foll

  • llow t

the he P Proc

  • cess

Bala lance t the he Is Issues

*No s

  • single

le f factor

  • r
  • utweighs all ot

l others

20

SE SEIS U S Update

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Soci ciocu cultura ral Effe fects

SCE Tech Memo (includes Environmental Justice and Economic Considerations) Cultural Resources Assessment Survey/Section 106 Case Study Conceptual Relocation Plan

Nat atural al an and Physic ical E l Effects

Air Quality Tech Memo Natural Resources Evaluation Noise Tech Memo Contamination Screening

Engin ineering g Consid ideratio ions

Preliminary Engineering Traffic Tech Memo Pond Siting

Pu Publ blic Outreach

Public and Agency Coordination Plan Comments and Coordination Tech Memo Small Group Meeting Public Workshop/ Hearing

Tam ampa Inter erstate S e Stu tudy SEI y SEIS

A project’s environmental impacts, engineering considerations, and public comments aid in the decision-making process. This graphic lists the various documents that FDOT will prepare as a part of this process. Draft documents will be available at the December 10 & 13, 2018 Public Workshop.

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Socio iocult ltural l Effects ( (SCE)

Soc

  • cial

al Economic ic La Land U Use se Mobi bili lity Aesth theti tics Relocation

  • n
  • Demographics
  • Community

Cohesion

  • Safety
  • Community

Goals/Quality

  • f Life
  • Special

Community Designations

  • Business &

Employment

  • Tax Base
  • Traffic Patterns
  • Business Access
  • Special Needs

Patrons

  • Land Use- Urban

Form

  • Plan

Consistency

  • Growth Trends

& Issues

  • Focal Points
  • Mobility Choices
  • Accessibility
  • Connectivity
  • Traffic

Circulation

  • Public Parking
  • Noise/Vibration
  • Viewshed
  • Compatibility
  • Residential
  • Non-Residential
  • Public Facilities

22

SE SEIS U S Update

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Dr Draft Ma Map Dr Draft Ma Map

Are rea of Influence

23

½ mile ile a area o

  • f in

influ luence

South S Semin inole le Heights Civic ic Associa iatio ion

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Demographic Information from GIS Tool Percent Minority Population

Dr Draft Ma Map

24

Dr Draft Ma Map

South S Semin inole H

  • le Heigh

ghts Civic ic A Associa iation ion

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Demographic Information from GIS Tool Population Below Poverty

Dr Draft Ma Map

25

Dr Draft Ma Map

South S Semin inole H

  • le Heigh

ghts Civic ic A Associa iation ion

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Dra raft Ma Map

South S h Seminole

  • le H

Height hts Civic ic A Associat iatio ion

Commun unit ity F y Feature ures

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Downtown Tampa Interchange SEIS Alternatives

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

No Furthe ther A Acti tion

Where no additi tional constr tructi ction was previousl sly y approved

  • No
  • impacts t

cts to the p physi ysica cal environment

  • Does

s not require property ty acquisi siti tion

  • Does

s not relieve congesti stion

  • Potenti

tial decr crease se in air q quality ty

  • Potential increas

ase in traf affic noi

  • ise, or
  • r no
  • remedy for
  • r noi
  • ise
  • Does n

not

  • t provide multimod

modal al c corridor

  • r
  • Does

s not improve r regional connecti ctivity ty

  • Doe

Does not me meet f future travel deman and

  • Doe

Does not provide safe fety ty improvements ts

  • Doe

Does not imp mprove accessi ssibility ty

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

1996 Long Term Preferred as updated

29

Var ariou

  • us p

por

  • rtions have al

alread ady b been ap approved an and c con

  • nstructed
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Build Alternatives

  • Tolled or Non-tolled Express Lanes

– 4 Design Options

*Boulevard and Beltway are being investigated as a part of the Hillsborough County MPO’s Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) process.

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

General Purpose Lanes – New Construction Express Lanes Collector / Distributor Lanes Non-Interstate Roadwork ROW Footprint (170-190 new parcels)

Reconstructed Interchange with Express Lane Ramps to the North

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

General Purpose Lanes – New Construction Express Lanes Collector / Distributor Lanes Non-Interstate Roadwork ROW Footprint (130-150 new parcels)

Reconstructed Interchange without Express Lane Ramps to the North

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

General Purpose Lanes – New Construction Express Lanes Collector / Distributor Lanes Non-Interstate Roadwork ROW Footprint (30-50 new parcels)

Existing Interchange with Elevated Express Lanes South Option

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

General Purpose Lanes – New Construction Express Lanes Collector / Distributor Lanes Non-Interstate Roadwork ROW Footprint (60-80 new parcels)

Existing Interchange with Elevated Express Lanes North Option

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Evaluating the Impacts

Each alternative & design option has differences, trade-offs

No F

  • Further

Acti ction Fou

  • ur De

Design O Option

  • ns

Tolled E Express ss Lanes s

  • r
  • r Non
  • n-Tolled E

Express ss Lanes

A B C D

Ori Origi gina nal TIS TIS Pref refer erred ed Alternat ative

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

I-275 NORTH PD&E STUDY UPDATE

St Steve G Gordillo

FDOT Dis District ict S Seven

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

What Problems Are We Trying To Solve?

Safety Traffic Operations Congestion Choice

North Corridor

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Tampa Bay Next Interstate Modernization Projects

(Hillsborough & Pinellas Counties)

North Corridor

slide-39
SLIDE 39

I-275 North Corridor – Under PD&E Study

Nor

  • rth Cor

Corrido dor

39

 Project limits are from north of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard (SR 574) Osborne Avenue to north of Bearss Avenue (SR 678/CR 582)  Distance of approximately 7.64 miles

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Project Purpose and Need

The purpose of the project is to provide one additional general purpose lane in each direction along I-275 from north of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard (SR 574) to north

  • f Bearss Avenue (SR 678/CR 582) to:

 Enhance Corridor Capacity  Enhance Overall Safety  Enhance the Corridor Operating Conditions  Support Future Transit  Accommodate Future Growth Statewide and regional transportation plans and studies identify the need for interstate improvements.

Nor

  • rth Cor

Corrido dor

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Tampa Bay Talked. We Listened.

What t t the c comm mmunity w ty wants ts: Wha hat w we’ e’re d doing a about i it:

Hub System for Transit

Multimodal Options

Technology Solutions

Neighborhood Preservation

Prioritize Safety

Education/Explain Transportation

More Online & Recorded Meetings

Intermodal Center Studies

Funding Next Phase of Project Development for RTFP

Formed Tech Team; Working with City and County to Maximize Existing Pavement

Advanced the Heights Study; Created New Downtown Interchange Concepts

Developed Citizens Transportation Academy

Complete Streets; Working on Improved Road Geometry; Tech Solutions to Enhance Safety

Utilizing Webinars and Posting Recordings Online

Nor

  • rth Cor

Corrido dor

slide-42
SLIDE 42

NO EXPRESS LANES

FDO DOT is n is no l longer conside iderin ing t the addi addition o

  • f expr

xpress la lanes on

  • n the

he s section of

  • f

I-275 n nort

  • rth of
  • f the

he I I-4 4 intercha hange!

Trench with One Express Lane in Each Direction One Express Lane in Each Direction with Pylon Option One Elevated Express Lane in Each Direction Reversible Express Lane One Express Lane in Each Direction with Bus on Shoulder

Nor

  • rth Cor

Corrido dor

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Recommended Proposed Typical Section Nor

  • rth Cor

Corrido dor

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Section 106 – National Historic Preservation Act

Section 1 106 re requires F Federal a agencies t to

  • take i

into a account t the he e effects of

  • f the

heir u undertakings on

  • n hi

historic p prop

  • perties.

There are eight total historic resources either National Register–Listed (L), or considered National Register–Eligible (E), within the project’s Area of Potential Effects, based on the historic resources survey.  Seminole Heights Historic District (L)  Captain William Parker Jackson House (L)  T&GC Railroad/CSX Railroad (E)  Sulphur Springs Park Resource Group (E)  Harding’s Court (E)  Seminole Heights Elementary School (E)  City Fire Dept. Engine Company No. 7 (E)  Seminole Heights Baptist Church (E)

Seminole Heights Historic District Sulphur Springs Park Resource Group Harding’s Court T&GC Railroad/CSX Railroad Seminole Heights Elementar Seminole Heights Baptist Church

  • Capt. Wm. Parker Jackson House

City Fire Dept. Engine Co. No. 7

Ther ere a are e no anticipa pated ef effects t to a any l listed or el eligible e historic r res esources within t the e pr pro

North Corridor

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Sound Walls*

  • Aesthetic Treatment
  • Early construction to mitigate

traffic and construction noise, where possible

  • Future coordination with affected

property owners and local government to take place during the next project phase

* Noise Analysis Report To Be Completed

Nor

  • rth Cor

Corrido dor

45

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Pedestrian Friendly Underpass Improvements

Rendering of Future Condition 6-Lane Rendering of Future Condition 4-Lane

Yellow text indicates underpass is within a historic district.

  • Widen Sidewalks
  • Enhance Lighting
  • Paint Bridge Sub-Structure
  • Cut-back Walls for Improved

Bike/Pedestrian Experience

  • Include Public Art (in cooperation

with the City of Tampa)

  • Identify Landscape Opportunities

Listed i imp mprovements are e yet et t to be e finalized f for ea each ch und underpass. All i imp mprovements will no not b be e incl ncluded a at ev ever ery und underpass.

Nor

  • rth Cor

Corrido dor

46

Hillsborough Avenue Yukon Street Osborne Avenue Hanna Avenue Sligh Avenue Busch Boulevard Linebaugh Avenue Bougainvillea Avenue Broad Street Waters Avenue Bird Street

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Landscape Opportunities

 FDOT Right of Way along Sound Walls  Adjacent to Underpasses

Red Maple

Crepe Myrtle

Magnolia Live Oak

North Corridor

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Summary

Pr Project will l NOT:

 Acquire Additional Right of Way from North of

  • Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard (SR

574) to North of Bearss Avenue*  Acquire Right of Way in the Seminole Heights Historic District

*Minor right of way acquisition may be required at the Bearss

Avenue interchange for pond siting.

Pr Project wil ill: l:

 Enhance Connectivity Under the Interstate  Accommodate Potential Transit Opportunities  Identify Landscape Opportunities  Include Noise Barrier Walls where Feasible

North Corridor

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Ques Questi tions?

49

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Thank y you! Ho How can w can we best st reach y you

  • u?

Our site also contains NEPA overview videos and customer perspectives; Socio-cultural Effects, and more. Please also visit Tampa paInterstateStudy dy.c .com

50

slide-51
SLIDE 51

How do you access I-275 & I-4?

60

slide-52
SLIDE 52

How do you access I-275 & I-4?

What’s changing with build options

Also adding downtown access to express lanes

61

Re Removed o

  • r moved
slide-53
SLIDE 53
  • Tampa I

Interstate St Study S y SEIS (Westshore t to Downtown)

  • I-275 North P

Projec ject D Develo lopment & Environment S Study

  • Regio

ional T Transit P Pla lan

  • Tampa St

Streetcar E Ext xtensi sion St Study

  • Heig

ights M Mobilit ility P Pla lan

  • Univ

iver ersity Area M Mult ltim imodal F l Feasibil ilit ity S Study

  • BRT C

Corrido dor A Analysi ysis s – Florida A Ave ve & & Fow

  • wler Av

Ave

A N New w Approa

  • ach