WELCOME Northeast I-94 Land Use Plan Open House January 17, 2018 O - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

welcome
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

WELCOME Northeast I-94 Land Use Plan Open House January 17, 2018 O - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

WELCOME Northeast I-94 Land Use Plan Open House January 17, 2018 O UTLINE Introductions History Current Plan Options GATHER INPUT Next Steps P LANNING H ISTORY Pre - 1978 no density restrictions County (and by default


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Northeast I-94 Land Use Plan Open House January 17, 2018

WELCOME

slide-2
SLIDE 2

OUTLINE

  • Introductions
  • History
  • Current Plan
  • Options
  • GATHER INPUT
  • Next Steps
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Pre - 1978 no density restrictions 1978 - 1996 County (and by default Frankfort Township) adopts a 1 dwelling unit per 40 acre policy. 1 acre lot subdivisions allowed if contiguous to an existing subdivision. Most development northeast

  • f I-94 occurred in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s

1996 - present merger of City of St. Michael and Frankfort Township in 1996 – all development is required to be on City sewer and water

PLANNING HISTORY

slide-4
SLIDE 4

1 Acre Lot Subdivisions

1973 - Country View Acres

  • Zachman’s Hillside

1978 - Crow River Acres 1987 - Foster Lakeshore Acres 1988 - Fox Hollow 1989 - Crow River Highlands

  • Foster Hills
  • Schandosy Hills
  • Schandosy Hills East

1990 - Willow Bend 1993 - Bourgeois Hills

  • Fox Ridge
  • Zachman Hilltop Estates
slide-5
SLIDE 5

1997 Land Use Plan

slide-6
SLIDE 6

1997 Land Use Plan

slide-7
SLIDE 7

1999 Park, Trail and Open Space Plan

slide-8
SLIDE 8

1999 Park, Trail and Open Space Plan

  • 2 Future Parks
  • Trail System
  • Preserve wooded hill running southwest to northeast from I-94 past Foster Lake
slide-9
SLIDE 9

2004 Sanitary Sewer Plan – NE District

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Current Land Use Plan

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Why Consider Change?

  • Accommodate demand in City for larger lots – not everyone wants

to live on ¼ acre ‘city’ lots

  • Encourage a variety of housing styles and price ranges within the

community

  • Provide opportunities for more custom builders versus larger

subdivisions with increasingly larger builders

  • Secure expansive planned and desired open space and trail corridors
  • Approximately 50% of this area is already developed into 1+ acre

lots

  • Upgrades to sanitary trunk sewer would be needed to extend City

sewer to entire area; with existing capacity desired to be reserved for mostly commercial development near freeway

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • 1. Current Plan – “Suburban” Development
  • 2. “Rural” Development
  • Substantially similar to existing development in the area
  • Minimum lot size likely to be 1.5-2 acres versus 1 acre in
  • rder to accommodate primary and secondary septic sites
  • 3. “Open Space” Residential
  • Allows similar density as large lot development but clusters

the lots to preserve open space

  • Often lots are on shared community septic systems,
  • r backup options are available in the open space area
  • Can minimize length of roads and reduce runoff
  • More likely to preserve existing natural features, views,
  • r desired park areas

Options

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Example 1 – Rural Development

Size: approx. 237 acres Lots: 164 lots Minimum Lot Size: 1.0 acre Density: Approximately 28 lots per 40 acres

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Example 2 – Rural Development

Size: approx. 192 acres Lots: 89 lots Minimum Lot Size: 1.0 acre Density:

  • Approx. 18.5 lots per 40 acres

Open Space/Park: none

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Example – Open Space Development

Size: 230 acres Lots: 72 Minimum Lot Size: 1 acre Density: Approximately 12.5 lots per 40 acres 52% open space

Location: Otsego – Mississippi Pines

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • St. Michael Example – “Open Space”

Size: 80 acres Lots: 24 Open Space: approx. 46% or 37 acres

Location: St. Michael - Zachman’s Hilltop

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Sewer/Water Costs – if utilities are brought further into the area, the City typically only brings them into a neighborhood if there is a petition Traffic I-94 – 3rd lane from Hwy. 241 to Albertville is designed; if funded construction would be as early as 2019; this includes reconstruction/expansion of the 241 Interchange CSAH 36 (I-94 to TH101) - part of Wright County Transportation Plan - likely 5-10 year time period Schools – City coordinates and shares information with both SMTA and ER School Districts

Additional Information

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Planning Commission & Council will:

  • Review feedback
  • Evaluate and select a preferred option
  • Develop specific goals, policies and ordinances for

implementation

  • Hold Public Hearing to consider preferred plan and

receive additional input

Next Steps

slide-19
SLIDE 19

There are 4 stations with the following 2 sheets: Preference for future growth – 3 scenarios

Feedback

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Weigh in on various goals or topics – use stickers

Feedback

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Input on the maps on the tables:

Feedback

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Be respectful of other opinions Please fill out the sign-in sheet at your table Comment Cards – grab one on the way out the door!

Feedback

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Additional questions or comments? Please contact: Marc Weigle 763-416-7932 mweigle@ci.st-michael.mn.us

Thanks for your input!