Welcome Challenge Inspire Support Inspire - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

welcome
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Welcome Challenge Inspire Support Inspire - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Welcome Challenge Inspire Support Inspire Challenge Empower 2011-12 Budget Hearing Budget Hearing Agenda School Finance / Budgeting Overview Impact of the States 2011-13 Biennial Budget Overview of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Challenge Inspire Support

Welcome

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2011-12 Budget Hearing

Inspire Challenge Empower

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Budget Hearing Agenda

 School Finance / Budgeting Overview

 Impact of the State’s 2011-13 Biennial Budget

 Overview of 2011-12 Preliminary Budget  What will this mean for the school district tax

payers?

 Questions regarding preliminary budget and

tax levy?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

2011-13 State Budget Summary and K-12 Education Impact

 Reduced general aid to schools by $749.4 million

  • ver the biennium

 Reduced revenue limit per pupil by 5.5% in

2011-12 ($-588.11 for MCPASD)

 Required public sector employees to contribute

50% of total payments to Wisconsin Retirement System

 Reduced or eliminated a number of categorical

aid appropriations

 Significantly changed public sector collective

bargaining

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Revenue Limit Explanation

The revenue limit:

 is the maximum amount that a school district

may raise through general state aid and the property tax levy The revenue limit is determined using:

 district’s prior year revenue limit base  student enrollment averaged over a period of

three school years

 a per-student adjustment set by the Legislature  there are several exceptions to the revenue limit

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2011-12 Preliminary Budget Revenue Limit Overview

Student Enrollment (Membership):

 2011-12 Preliminary Budget based on a K-12

enrollment increase of 100 and enrollment generated from the new 4K program

 Unofficial enrollment numbers (as of September

12th) reflect a 50 student increase in K-12 resident enrollment (membership) from 2010-11 and a 4K resident enrollment of 294 Per Student Adjustment:

 Decrease of $588.11 per student for 2011-12

(5.5% decrease)

 2010-11 increase was $200 per student (1.9%

increase)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

K-12 Student Enrollment

(District Residents - does not include open enrollment students)

5200 5300 5400 5500 5600 5700 5800 5900 6000 6100 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Projected (for budget development purposes) Unofficial Count (as of Sept 12, 2011) - includes 21st Century eSchool Does not include 4K enrollment

slide-8
SLIDE 8

K-12 Student Enrollment

(District Residents - does not include open enrollment students)

5600 5650 5700 5750 5800 5850 5900 5950 6000 6050 6100 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Projected (for budget development purposes) Unofficial Count (as of Sept 12, 2011) - includes 21st Century eSchool Does not include 4K enrollment

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2011-12 Preliminary Budget Revenue Limit Overview

Student Enrollment (Membership):

 2011-12 Preliminary Budget based on a K-12

enrollment increase of 100 and enrollment generated from the new 4K program

 Unofficial enrollment numbers (as of September

12th) reflect a 50 student increase in K-12 resident enrollment (membership) from 2010-11 and a 4K resident enrollment of 294 Per Student Adjustment:

 Decrease of $588.11 per student for 2011-12

(5.5% decrease)

 2010-11 increase was $200 per student (1.9%

increase)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Revenue Limit History

3.82% $2,319,504 1.91% $200.00 2010-11 3.06% $1,810,781 1.95% $200.00 2009-10

  • 2.85%2
  • $1,789,3342
  • 5.50%
  • $588.11

2011-12 4.57% $2,582,533 2.76% $274.68 2008-09 3.85% $2,096,127 2.73% $264.12 2007-08 4.20% $2,193,590 2.74% $256.93 2006-07 5.30% $2,630,740 2.73% $248.48 2005-06 % Change Revenue Limit $ Change % Change1 Per Member Adjustment Year

1 Change from prior year revenue limit base per member 2 Estimated

slide-11
SLIDE 11

What is State “Equalization” Aid? Equalization aid is education revenue that comes directly from the state to support the operations

  • f public school districts.

The State Aid system’s design and intent:

 to “level the playing field” or equalize the

amount of school property taxes paid by residents throughout Wisconsin

 more property wealth = less state aid  less property wealth = more state aid

State Equalization Aid Explanation

slide-12
SLIDE 12

How is the amount of aid for each district determined? By using the “equalization aid formula.” How much equalization aid does our district receive? Our district’s high property value per student means a lower state share of funding (MCPASD’s share of state equalization aid per student is less than one-half of the state average).

State Equalization Aid Explanation

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Property Value Per Student Dane County School Districts

(2009-10 Fiscal Year Data)

Source: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Data Warehouse $0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 Middleton-CP Madison Wisconsin Heights Cambridge Monona Grove Sun Prairie Dane County Avg Verona Area Stoughton Waunakee State Avg De Forest McFarland Mount Horeb Oregon Belleville Deerfield Marshall $612,725 $985,316 $582,588

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Equalization Aid Per Student Dane County School Districts

(2009-10 Fiscal Year Data)

Source: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Data Warehouse $0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000

Marshall Deerfield Belleville Oregon Mount Horeb McFarland State Avg De Forest Waunakee Stoughton Verona Area Dane County Avg Sun Prairie Monona Grove Cambridge Wisconsin Heights Madison Middleton- CP

$4,483 $4,864 $1,176

slide-15
SLIDE 15

State General Aid History 2006-07 through 2011-12

$43,000,000 $46,000,000 $49,000,000 $52,000,000 $55,000,000 $58,000,000 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 (Estimated) $6,000,000 $8,000,000 $10,000,000 $12,000,000 $14,000,000 $16,000,000 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 (Estimated)

State General Aid Property Tax Levy

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Property Taxes 71.4% State General Aid 9.9% Other Revenue Sources 5.8% Federal Aid 3.1% Other State Aid 5.3% Other Local (Non-Property Tax) Revenue 4.5%

2011-12 Revenue Budget

(not including interfund transfers)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

2011-12 Revenue Budget Highlights

 10% Estimated Reduction in State General

Aid ($0.9 million)

 State Categorical Aid Estimated Reductions

($95,000)

 Special Education  Transportation  Library (Common School Fund)

 Open Enrollment Tuition

slide-18
SLIDE 18

2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000 16,000,000 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09** 2009-10** 2010-11 2011-12 (Estimated)

26.5%* 21.6%* 19.7%* 16.3%* 13.3%* 12.3%*

* State General Aid as a percentage of General Fund revenues (adjusted in FY 2006-07 for revenue generated through sale of surplus property) ** Includes Federal Stabilization Fund Aid

State General Aid History 2006-07 through 2011-12

slide-19
SLIDE 19

2011-12 Revenue Budget Highlights

 10% Estimated Reduction in State General

Aid ($0.9 million)

 State Categorical Aid Estimated Reductions

($95,000)

 Special Education  Bilingual  Transportation  Library (Common School Fund)

 Open Enrollment Tuition

slide-20
SLIDE 20

2011-12: $1,565,000*

225 Students ($6,948)*

2010-11: $1,144,949

177 Students ($6,665)

2009-10: $651,331

104 Students ($6,498)

2008-09: $554,375

92 Students ($6,225)

2007-08: $521,655

94 Students ($6,007)

2006-07: $318,895

57 Students ($5,845)

*Estimated (includes 21st Century

eSchool but not the 4K program)

$0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,400,000 $1,600,000 $1,800,000 2006- 07 2007- 08 2008- 09 2009- 10 2010- 11 2011- 12*

Non-Resident Open Enrollment Tuition Revenue

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Salaries 52.8% Fringe Benefits 21.2% Debt Retirement 7.0% Purchased Services 9.9% Non-Capital Objects 4.5% Capital Objects 1.8% Other Objects 2.8%

*Does not include inter-fund transfers

2011-12 Expenditure Budget

(not including interfund transfers)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Teachers 64.9% Para Educators 12.5% Other Employees 8.0% Admin Support/ Clerical 5.7% Custodians/ Maintenance 6.0% Administrators 2.9%

2011-12 School Year Staffing

slide-23
SLIDE 23

2011-12 Staffing Changes

2010-11

  • Support Staff 260.93
  • Certified Staff 536.88

Total FTE’s: 797.81

2011-121

  • Support Staff 253.90
  • Certified Staff 532.45

Total FTE’s:

786.35

Change

  • 11.46

1As of Aug 22, 2011 (does not include 4K transportation).

NOTE: Positions expressed in full-time equivalent (FTE) units.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

 Increased employee contributions (50%) to the

Wisconsin Retirement System and health insurance premium costs (minimum of 12%)

 Operational savings derived from implementation

  • f new business (HR/financial) information system

 Special Education / Student Services staffing

reductions

2011-12 Budget Reductions

slide-25
SLIDE 25

 4-Year Old Kindergarten (4K) Program  Global Academy (Project Lead the Way

Engineering Level 1 and Biomedical Level 2)

 21st Century eSchool Expansion (also provides

  • n-line education opportunities for MHS students

 Expansion of World Languages (Mandarin is being

  • ffered at MHS)

 Instructional Technology  Expanded Student Assessment (MAP)  Positive Behavior Intervention System

2011-12 Program Enhancements

slide-26
SLIDE 26

2011-12 Preliminary Budget Tax Levy

FUND 2010-11 2011-12 Change General Fund $ 52,182,238 $51,292,799

  • 1.70%

Debt Service (Fund 38) 321,750 320,250

  • 0.47%

Debt Service (Fund 39) 4,227,3231 4,382,079 + 3.66% Capital Projects 800,000 825,000 + 3.13% Community Service 340,364 343,890 + 1.04% TOTAL: $57,871,675 $57,164,018

  • 1.22%

1 Debt Service (Fund 39) levy was reduced by $400,000. A transfer from

the General Fund replaced the levy reduction.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12*

TAX LEVY $47.92M $50.88M $54.42M $57.87M $57.16M EQUALIZED $5.262M $5.705M $5.563M $5.390M $5.336M VALUATION MILL (TAX) $9.11 $8.92 $9.78 $10.74 $10.71 RATE

* Estimated

% Change +10.03% +6.17% +6.95% +6.35% -1.22% % Change +8.52% +8.43% -2.49% -3.12% -1.00% % Change +1.45% -2.09% +9.64% +9.82% -0.28%

Tax Levy & Mill Rate History

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Property Tax Levy Per Student Dane County School Districts

(2009-10 Fiscal Year Data)

Source: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Data Warehouse

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000 $10,000 Middleton- CP Madison Cambridge Monona Grove Wisconsin Heights Verona Area Sun Prairie Dane County Avg McFarland Waunakee De Forest Oregon State Avg Stoughton Deerfield Mount Horeb Belleville Marshall

$9,395 $6,432 $5,288

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Property Tax (Mill) Rates Dane County School Districts

(2009-10 Fiscal Year Data)

Source: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Data Warehouse

$9,093

$7.00 $8.00 $9.00 $10.00 $11.00 $12.00 $13.00

Stoughton Belleville Mount Horeb State (K-12) Avg Marshall Middleton-CP De Forest Wisconsin Heights Madison Dane County Avg Waunakee Oregon McFarland Deerfield Sun Prairie Verona Area Monona Grove Cambridge

$9.18 $10.42 $9.78

slide-30
SLIDE 30

2011-12 Preliminary Tax Levy - Estimated Average Impact

Property Value1 2010-11 Tax2 2011-12 Tax2 Change2 $200,000 $ 2,148 $ 2,120 $ - 28 $300,000 $ 3,222 $ 3,181 $ - 41 $450,000 $ 4,833 $ 4,772 $ - 61

1 Assumes same assessment of 100% for both years (2010 and 2011) with a

1% decrease in equalized (full market) valuation in 2011.

2 Estimated school taxes. The 2011-12 estimated school taxes were calculated

using a projected school tax (mill) rate of $10.71 per $1,000 of equalized (full market) property value. Note: Specific impact of the school tax levy will vary in each of the District’s eight municipalities depending on each municipality’s percentage of overall property value and change in value from the prior year.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

 Managing health insurance costs  Energy conservation  Proactive risk management  Investing in cost-saving technology  Achieving the highest possible (Aaa) bond

rating from Moody’s

 Intergovernmental cooperation  Debt management  Implementing new programs/services to

generate revenue

Effective (Fiscal) Resource Management & Strategies

slide-32
SLIDE 32

 Addressing Instructional Needs

 Technology  Professional Development  Curriculum Adoption

 Addressing the achievement/opportunity gap

 Digital Divide

 Maintaining current class size

 Addressing the district’s facility needs

Budget Challenges

slide-33
SLIDE 33

 Changing student demographics & needs

 i.e. special education, at-risk, bilingual/ELL,

health/medical, homeless, socio-economic

 Effectively managing budget constraints -

coping with limited revenue growth and anticipated budget shortfalls into the near future

 Achieving an appropriate balance

 providing a quality education  increasing programmatic expectations  our taxpayers ability / willingness to pay

Budget Challenges

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Questions

Inspire Challenge Empower

slide-35
SLIDE 35

2011-12 Annual Meeting

Inspire Challenge Empower

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Agenda

 Call to Order and Introductions  Election of Chairperson  Reading of Minutes, 9/20/2010 Annual

Meeting

 Old Business  New Business - Resolutions  Other New Business  Adjournment

slide-37
SLIDE 37

 RESOLUTION A - Resolution to Levy a

Tax for Adding to Capital Fund BE IT RESOLVED: That there be levied for the 2011-12 fiscal year a tax in the amount of $825,000 upon all taxable property in the Middleton-Cross Plains Area School District to be deposited into the segregated capital fund created at the 1993 Annual Meeting.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

 RESOLUTION B - Adoption of Tax Levy

BE IT RESOLVED: That there be levied a tax in the amount of $57,164,018 upon all taxable property in the Middleton-Cross Plains Area School District with the purpose of paying employee salaries and meeting other necessary expenses to operate and maintain the district schools and to finance the debt service and capital outlay of the said district on the basis of the approved budget for the 2011-12 fiscal year.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

 RESOLUTION C - Adoption of School

Board Salaries for 2011-12 BE IT RESOLVED: That the salaries of the school board members for the 2011-12 school year be established as follows: President . . . . . . . $ 3,000 Other Members . . $ 2,400

NOTE: These salaries remain the same as approved at the 1998 Annual Meeting.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

 RESOLUTION D - Authorization for Sale

  • f Surplus Property (equipment/materials)

BE IT RESOLVED: That the Board of Education be authorized to sell used and/or surplus school equipment, furniture, or supplies no longer needed for school purposes.