WELCOME US 380 Collin County Feasibility Study DALLAS DISTRICT - - PDF document
10/4/2018 US 380 FEASIBILITY STUDY CSJs: 0135-11-022, 0135-02-059, 0135-03-048, 0135-04- 032, 0135-05-026 Collin County October 4, 9, and 11 US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11 WELCOME US 380 Collin County Feasibility
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
CSJs: 0135-11-022, 0135-02-059, 0135-03-048, 0135-04- 032, 0135-05-026
October 4, 9, and 11 US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
2
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
3
STEP 1: Need for the study is identified and study begins STEP 2: TxDOT develops and evaluates many potential alignment options based on engineering factors and known environmental constraints STEP 3: TxDOT presents to the public the project need, 3 possible roadway options, and 5 draft freeway alignment options to the public in Spring 2018 STEP 4: More than 4,000 people and key stakeholders provide input STEP 5: TxDOT analyzed input and continued evaluation tasks STEP 6: TxDOT refined alignment options STEP 7: TxDOT is presented revised alignment options today for your input
STEP 1: Need for the study is identified and study began June 2017 STEP 2: TxDOT developed and evaluated many potential alignment options based on engineering factors and known environmental constraints STEP 3: TxDOT presented the project need, modes of transportation considered, three roadway scenarios, and five draft freeway alignment options in April and May of 2018 STEP 4: TxDOT received and began analyzing more than 4,000 surveys and comments STEP 5: TxDOT refined alignment options STEP 6 TxDOT presents revised alignment options in October 2018
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
4
STEP 1: Need for the study is identified and study begins STEP 2: TxDOT develops and evaluates many potential alignment options based on engineering factors and known environmental constraints STEP 3: TxDOT presents to the public the project need, 3 possible roadway options, and 5 draft freeway alignment options to the public in Spring 2018 STEP 4: More than 4,000 people and key stakeholders provide input STEP 5: TxDOT analyzed input and continued evaluation tasks STEP 6: TxDOT refined alignment options STEP 7: TxDOT is presented revised alignment options today for your input
BIKE/PEDESTRIAN
TRANSIT
ROADWAY
freeway alignments.
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
5
NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
6
Input highlights
from all
RED DOTS INDICATE THE LOCATION OF RESIDENCES AND BUSINESSES IN COLIN COUNTY WHERE INPUT WAS RECEIVED DURING THE COMMENT PERIOD
concerns about existing US 380 including:
and high rates of speed)
impacts on congestion
NOT TO SCALE
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
7
Input highlights
from all over the county 2,300 from mckinney US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
8
Input highlights
from all over the county 2,300 from mckinney
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
9
Input highlights
from all over the county 2,300 from mckinney
combined into green alignment
blue, and yellow alignments to the red alignment
average now between 330 and 350 feet wide SPRING 2018 FALL 2018
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
10
Input highlights
from all over the county 2,300 from mckinney
alignments into green alignment
businesses
developments
needed from Prosper and Frisco
transmission lines
improvements currently under construction
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
11
Input highlights
from all over the county 2,300 from mckinney
Evaluation Category No Build Green Alignment Number of Residential Property Impacts Number of Residential Displacements Number of Business Impacts 10 Number of Business Induced Displacements 1 Number of Business Direct Displacements Number of Business Displacements 1 Future Development Impacts (acres) 12 Environmental, Watershed, and Park Land Impacts (acres) 5 Cost - includes construction, ROW, utility relocation $298M Evaluation Category No Build Green Alignment Enhances Regional Mobility
Satisfies Travel Demand
Enhances Safety
Supports Future Regional Economic Growth
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
12
Input highlights
from all over the county 2,300 from mckinney
Green alignment:
neighborhoods
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
13
Input highlights
from all over the county 2,300 from mckinney
Red Alignment – Coit Road to Ridge Road:
proximity to neighborhoods and to avoid impacting existing soil conservation lake. This alignment is now red alignment –
alignment in this area
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
14
Input highlights
from all over the county 2,300 from mckinney
Red Alignment –Ridge Road to FM 1827
and Bloomdale Farms and north of Heatherwood
Courthouse due to impact on neighborhoods, businesses, floodplains, major water utilities, and public infrastructure.
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
15
Input highlights
from all over the county 2,300 from mckinney
Evaluation Category No Build Green Alignment Red Alignment Option A Red Alignment Option B Number of Residential Property Impacts
18 43 41
Number of Residential Displacements
21 18 16
Number of Business Impacts
77 18 5
Number of Business Induced Displacements
11 1
Number of Business Direct Displacements
167 15 2
Number of Business Displacements
178 16 2
Future Development Impacts (acres)
33 156 214
Environmental, Watershed, and Park Land Impacts (acres)
94 224 219
Cost - includes construction, ROW, utility relocation
$916M $748M $645M
Evaluation Category No Build Green Alignment Red Alignment Option A Red Alignment Option B Enhances Regional Mobility 0
Satisfies Travel Demand 0
Enhances Safety
Supports Future Regional Economic Growth
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
16
Input highlights
from all over the county 2,300 from mckinney
Option A
City of McKinney
Option B
McKinney park
MCKINNEY Airport Rd.
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
17
Input highlights
from all over the county 2,300 from mckinney
Evaluation Category No Build Green Alignment Option A Green Alignment Option B Number of Residential Property Impacts
14 4
Number of Current Residential Displacements
6 2
Number of Business Impacts
10 11
Number of Business Induced Displacements Number of Business Direct Displacements
1 1
Number of Business Displacements
1 1
Future Development Impacts (acres)
19 6
Environmental, Watershed, and Park Land Impacts (acres)
198 69
Cost - includes construction, ROW, utility relocation
$433M $266M
Evaluation Category No Build Green Alignment Option A Green Alignment Option B Enhances Regional Mobility
Satisfies Travel Demand
Enhances Safety
Supports Future Regional Economic Growth
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
18
Input highlights
from all over the county 2,300 from mckinney
combined into green alignment and right-of-way width reduced
to impacts to planned Water Recovery facility and because its location did not work well with the Spur 399 extension traffic movements
and right-of-way width reduced
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
19
Input highlights
from all over the county 2,300 from mckinney
Evaluation Category No Build Green Alignment Red Alignment Number of Residential Property Impacts
15 11
Number of Residential Displacements
15 11
Number of Business Impacts
17 1
Number of Business Induced Displacements
3 1
Number of Business Direct Displacements
87 18
Number of Business Displacements
90 19
Future Development Impacts (acres)
42 105
Environmental, Watershed, and Park Land Impacts (acres)
24 35
Cost - includes construction, ROW, utility relocation
$416M $342M
Evaluation Category No Build Green Alignment Red Alignment Enhances Regional Mobility
Satisfies Travel Demand
Enhances Safety
Supports Future Regional Economic Growth
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
20
Input highlights
from all over the county 2,300 from mckinney
combined into green alignment and refined to minimize impacts to businesses, homes, the planned Collin College development, and potentially historic churches
to USACE property impacts and a planned cemetery
and revised to minimize impacts to homes, businesses, and the South lake.
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
21
Input highlights
from all over the county 2,300 from mckinney
Evaluation Category No Build Green Alignment Red Alignment Number of Residential Property Impacts 7 10 Number of Residential Displacements 45 4 Number of Business Impacts 5 4 Number of Business Induced Displacements 1 Number of Business Direct Displacements 34 2 Number of Business Displacements 35 2 Future Development Impacts (acres) 4 Environmental, Watershed, and Park Land Impacts (acres) 25 34 Cost - includes construction, ROW, utility relocation $399M $406M Evaluation Category No Build Green Alignment Red Alignment Enhances Regional Mobility
Satisfies Travel Demand
Enhances Safety
Supports Future Regional Economic Growth
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
22
Input highlights
from all over the county 2,300 from mckinney
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
23
5 alignment
2 to 3 alignment options 1 recommended alignment option
Initial Data Gathering
One–on-one meetings with partners Technical work session
Stakeholder input and Public Involvement J U N E 2 0 1 7 – M A R C H 2 0 1 8 A P R I L – M A Y 2 0 1 8
Public meeting and comment period Elected leader
council presentations Stakeholder work groups
Process data/input S U M M E R 2 0 1 8 Stakeholder input and public involvement
Public meeting and comment period Key stakeholder and elected leader
S P R I N G 2 0 1 9 Project implementation plan, stakeholder input and public involvement F A L L 2 0 1 8
Input analyzed TxDOT selects alignments for the study team to refi fine further Evaluation of alignments Recommend long and short term improve vements as well as regional action items Public meeting and comment period Alignment trends WE ARE HERE
Process data/input
Input analyzed TxDOT selects alignment for the study team to refi fine further
W I N T E R 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
24
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
25
TxDOT Project Manager Stephen.Endres@txdot.gov (214) 320-4469
Study Team Project Manager TKimmey@burnsmcd.com (972) 455-3112
TxDOT Public Information Officer Michelle.Raglon@txdot.gov (214) 320-4480
US 380 Feasibility Study Update October 4, 9, and 11
26