Welcome Back Operational Effectiveness Keith Mullett, President - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Welcome Back

Operational Effectiveness

Keith Mullett, President and General Manager, International Oil and Gas at PHI International

Operational Effectiveness Goals

• Agreed priorities from Lisbon (2015) – FCOM, HTAWS, Operations / Training Standards

3

Operational Effectiveness

Pat Attaway, Tim Rolfe, and Alan Walling

Operational Effectiveness Workstreams Vision

6 Safety Information Programme (HSIP) Evidence- based Training (EBT) Flight Crew Operating Manuals (FCOM) Eye- tracking Research

Flight Path Management (FPM)

Terrain Awareness Warning System (HTAWS)

Individual workstreams informing each other through the provision and use of data via HSIP Addressing priority risks:

• System Failures
• Loss of Control
• Controlled Flight into Terrain /

Water

Flight Crew Operating Manuals (FCOM)

FCOM Expectations

• Why FCOM?
• HeliOffshore FCOM

Briefing Sheet

8

“…lack of understanding / awareness of the state of automated systems..”

Play FCOM video here

9

FCOM Steering Committee

Alan Walling

10

Background

Each OEM developing FCOMs for their models High-level guidelines only specified what each section of the FCOM should be, not format of content FCOM meeting in Oct 2018 resulted in OEM concern that the content structure may not be consistent OEMs agreed to meet to develop content structure (standardisation)

11

FCOM Meeting 2 – 4th April 2019

Hosted by Leonardo at the Leonardo Training Facility in Sesto Calende

Attendees: Leonardo, Airbus, Bell, Sikorsky, Bristow, Babcock, HeliOffshore We are all HeliOffshore!

Created FCOM Steering Committee responsible for:

• Determining content structure (i.e. common callouts, table construct, etc.)
• Reviewing and approving feedback for incorporation
• Developing and maintaining FCOM roadmap

12

Purpose and Mission Statements

Purpose Statement: The Flight Crew Operating Manual is the recommended practices that provide the flight crew guidance to operate the aircraft safely and efficiently based on manufacturer’s design philosophy and operational intent. Mission Statement: Encourage commonality for the development and implementation of the Flight Crew Operating Manual.

13

Steering Committee Actions

14

Action Estimated Complete Date Status Establish Steering Committee 2nd April 2019 Complete Adopt FCOM Guidelines 4th April 2019 Complete Coordinate with EASA workgroup June 2019 Preliminary info supplied to EASA Common Phraseology On-going Telecon in next 6 weeks Feedback review Every 6 months Based on user feedback Committee meetings Quarterly Telecons and in-person (yearly)

FCOM Steering Committee

15

Members: David Denman – Bristow (Chairman) Simon Fielding – Babcock François Lassale – HeliOffshore Christophe Pozzo-di-Borgo – Airbus Serge Tyran - Airbus Mike Gralish – Bell Neil Barton – Bell David Bohn – Bell Dario De Liguoro – Leonardo Matthew Boffin – Leonardo Carmine La Rocca – Leonardo Alessandro Dina – Leonardo Rod Duplin – Sikorsky Simon Gharibian – Sikorsky Alan Walling – Sikorsky

Delivering on FCOM Development & Implementation

Pat Attaway

16

FCOM Implementation Roadmap

17

Initial FCOM development Pre-release Revision OEM and Operator SME Input Initial Release Operator Implement Partial / Full Post-release Feedback HO supported Survey Iterative Revision OEM and Operator SME Input Iterative Release Operator Implement Partial / Full

Post- release Feedback HO supported Survey

Final Release Standalone FCOM adoption

HeliOffshore Targeted Survey

Which elements adopted / not adopted

Feedback Database Focused Revision

Elements to be prioritised for development?

HeliOffshore FCOM Status Table

What is status of latest version of FCOM for each fleet?

Operator Gap Analysis

18

FCOM Status Table

OEM Helicopter Type Stage Gate Status Revision # OEM POC Airbus

H225 G9 FR

• Rev. 2, 15-18
• C. POZZO DI BORGO

H175 G9 FR Rev.3, 18-39

• C. POZZO DI BORGO

H160 G6 ID

• C. POZZO DI BORGO

Bell

B525 G6 ID

• Mike Gralish

Leonardo

A139 G9 FR issue A 6/3/2017 D.de LIGUORO A 189 G9 FR issue 1 5/10/2018 D.de LIGUORO

Sikorsky

76 G6 FR Rev 1.0 Mike Petras 92 G6 FR Rev 1.0 Rod Duplin Revision # ID = In development PR = Pre-release FR = Post-release feedback required “n.n” [date] = Regular Published Revision

Recommended Practices for FCOM Implementation

Where an FCOM is published by an OEM for a given helicopter type,

• perators should review the FCOM in line with requirements of the

HeliOffshore FCOM briefing sheet and:

• identify and incorporate relevant sections into their operating

procedures (Normal and Emergency)

• identify sections not to be incorporated into their operating

procedures, and document the reasons for not doing so

19

Discussion and Poll EV Question

20

What is the main action you and your

• rganisation need to take to ensure full

implementation of the proposed FCOM Recommended Practice?

FCOM Next Steps

21

• OEM use of private FCOM Workspace
• Roll-out of Implementation Roadmap on HeliOffshore website, including:
• Status table
• Survey responses
• Targeted revision points for each FCOM
• Use of HSIP to monitor implementation and measure performance improvement

FCOM Next Steps

22

• Publish FCOM Status Table
• Survey operators on implementation
• Highlight priority revision points for each FCOM
• Collect and analyse HSIP data to monitor performance

improvement

Enhanced Helicopter Terrain Awareness Warning Systems (HTAWS)

HTAWS Progress

Phase 1 - enhanced envelope protection

• increasing warning times on existing Modes 1-6
• develop new Mode 7 (low speed / low power)

Phase 2 - enhanced HMI (increasing impact of warnings) Status update

• Enhancements to existing Modes 1-6 agreed (60% net safety benefit)
• Development of new Mode 7 not agreed
• EUROCAE WG established – April 2019 – to define HTAWS standards
• HMI report issued – published as CAP 1747

24

EGPWS -036 Deployment and Assumptions

• Mode 1 / 3 / 4 envelope modified per CAP1519 when TAWS Offshore Mode is selected
• No Primus Epic SW changes necessary to install -036 EGPWS
• Mode 7 disabled, waiting for refinements of CAP 1519
• OEI integration associated to updated TAWS TSO basis, currently under discussion
• Flight Test effort limited to check of envelope implementation
• Analysis effort to demonstrate low percentage of nuisance alerts

Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Design freeze Certification Flight test today

2019

Development EASA cert. SB issue Application to EASA TSO approval

(current TAWS TSO)

HTAWS Sikorsky S-92 Implementation

Project Summary Date: February 2019

Next Steps and Schedule

Schedule of CAP 1519 (mode 1 to 6) implementation in AH avionics Mode 1 to 6: * this milestone could be anticipated by 1-2 quarter depending on the outcome of milestone 3

• The two first candidates proposed for this upgrade are the H175 and H160. H145, H135 will follow
• Mode 7: AH continues to work on this key topic for aviation safety by:
• Contributing to the Eurocae working group
• Invest in R&D to improve pilot workload and anticipation of risks; more

will be communicated in the upcoming months.

Milestones Gate Initial commitment Update 01/2019

1 Validation of the technical solution G5 February 2019 February 2019 2 Decision of development in next Helionix upgrade G5 Q4/2019 Q1/2019 3 Validation of the solution on the first Helionix candidate G7 Q4/2020 Q4/2020 4 Deployment on the first candidate for the HLX upgrade G9 Q2/2021 Q2/2021* 5 Deployment on the next candidate for the HLX upgrade G9 None Previous milestone + 3 to 6 months

Recommended Practice for HTAWS Implementation

Where a solution is available providing enhanced HTAWS envelopes for an existing helicopter type, operators should develop an installation plan outlining the timescale for fleetwide upgrade supported by a risk assessment

28

HTAWS Next Steps

29

• Honeywell ready to certify Mode 1-6 enhancements for EGPWS -036 release

(late 2019)

• Operators to plan Mode 1-6 upgrades following -036 release for AW139

(early 2020) and S92 (late 2020/early 2021)

• Mode 7 enhancements to be addressed post EUROCAE WG effort – software

upgrade plan unknown (3+ years?)

30

Discussion and Poll EV Question

31

What do you propose is required to maintain the desired momentum on HTAWS development and implementation?

Evidence-based Training (EBT)

Pat Attaway and Phil Cullen

Training Standards – the need

• Multiple Industry Standards
• Can be in conflict
• Create road-blocks to efficiency
• Industry need for optimised Training Standards
• Clear industry agreed path
• Efficient
• Auditable

33

Evidence-based Training

Phil Cullen

34

How Resilient is your Organisation

35

• Completely resilient
• Mostly resilient …I think
• Partly resilient…but I can’t tell you how much
• I have no idea

How do you know if you are resilient?

36

The EVIDENCE – ‘E’ BT

37

E ‘BT’ – Competency-based Training

38

Generation 2

39

Repetitive Predictable causal factors What we know

System Operational complexity Operational Environment

Generation 3

40

System Operational complexity Operational Environment

Repetitive Predictable causal factors What we know

Generation 4

41

Unique Unforeseen causal factors

The Unexpected

System Operational complexity Operational Environment

42

EBT Rule-making Task RMT.0599 update

43

• Phase 1 – define regulatory EBT pathway

(Completed Q4 2018)

• Phase 2 – publish Helicopter Data Report

(Target release Q3 2019)

• Phase 3 – develop Baseline training

programme (Target release Q3 2020)

EBT Familiarisation Workshop (December 2018)

44

• Funded by HeliOffshore
• Run by Greenstone Starling
• Hosted by FlightSafety International
• 2-day familiarisation expanding on

EBT concepts and exposing SMEs to RMT.0599 work

• 2 courses planned – 7/8 & 9/10 May

EBT Next Steps

45

• Enrol support for Phase 3 – building EBT Baseline Programme
• Deliver further EBT workshops
• Publish EBT Briefing Sheet
• Use HSIP to monitor performance and inform EBT Data Report(s)
• Operators to review use of IATA Competency framework

Operational Effectiveness Summary Tim Rolfe

46

Operational Effectiveness Summary

Recognise continued progress to date…… … maintain focus on delivering safety improvements to the front line …

47