WEEK 2 FEBRUARY 4 & 6 MAKING AS MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

week 2
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

WEEK 2 FEBRUARY 4 & 6 MAKING AS MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CRITICAL MAKING [MCC-UE 1033] 1 WEEK 2 FEBRUARY 4 & 6 MAKING AS MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 2 Why I Am Not a Maker Debbie Chachra The Atlantic , January 23, 2015 3 OBJECTS OVER PEOPLE? the shift from the corporate


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MAKING AS MAINTENANCE & REPAIR

1

CRITICAL MAKING [MCC-UE 1033] FEBRUARY 4 & 6

WEEK 2

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Debbie Chachra The Atlantic, January 23, 2015

“Why I Am Not a Maker”

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

“the shift … from the corporate to the individual (supported, mind, by a different set of companies selling a different set of things) … mostly re-inscribes familiar values, in slightly different form: that artifacts are important, and people are not.” (Chachra)

OBJECTS OVER PEOPLE?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Baumol’s cost disease, from economics: “Suggests that it is somehow pathological that the time [cost] and energy taken by a string quartet to prepare for a performance … has not fallen in the same way as goods.”

OBJECTS OVER PEOPLE?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Chachra: The “maker” designation is “mistaking what I do (teaching) for what I’m actually trying to help elicit (learning).”

OBJECTS OVER PEOPLE?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

SO ... WHY MAKING? CRITICAL

Can we repair making? … or practice a making that properly accounts for care and maintenance?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Andrew Russell & Lee Vinsel aeon, April 7, 2016

“Hail the maintainers”

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

… but what about happens after.

INNOVATION

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

“the central fact of our industrial civilisation is labour, and most of this work falls far outside the realm of innovation”

INNOVATION

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

What is the image of the user? “In some cases, the image of the ‘user’ could be an individual like you, sitting at your computer, but in other cases, end users are institutions – companies, governments, or universities that struggle to make technologies work in ways that their inventors and makers never envisioned.”

INNOVATION

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

“Innovation-speak worships at the altar of change, but it rarely asks who benefits, to what end? A focus on maintenance provides opportunities to ask questions about what we really want out of technologies. What do we really care about? What kind of society do we want to live in?”

INNOVATION

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Shannon Mattern Places journal, November 2018

“Maintenance and Care”

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

§ Rust: Urban repair § Dust: Spaces of labor and care § Cracks: Fixing Objects § Corruption: Cleaning Code and Data

FOUR SCALES

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

§ RUST: URBAN REPAIR

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

§ DUST: SPACES OF LABOR & CARE

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

REPRODUCTIVE LABOR

“things lying around the house” social reproduction

"Critics and activists have validated a greater range of (re)productive activities, to include all the mental, manual, and emotional work necessary to ‘maintain existing life and to reproduce the next generation’.” (Mattern)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

CARE

“How can we position ‘care’ as an integral value within the city’s architectures and infrastructures of criminal justice, designing systems and spaces for restoration rather than retribution?” (Mattern)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Ruth Schwartz Cowan: “household labor is increasingly ‘performed with tools that can be neither manufactured nor understood by the workers who use them’.” (Mattern)

§ CRACKS: FIXING OBJECTS

planned obsolescence

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Lisa Parks on Macha, Zambia: “In open-air shops … people gather around, watch, and chat. The shop is a space of public pedagogy … the repairman

  • pens gadgets, demonstrates technical skills, encourages
  • bservers to mend rather than discard.” (Mattern)

SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE

“the context for a temporary public”

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Ginger Nolan: “The ‘protean capabilities’ of the ‘Third-World bricoleur,’ Ginger Nolan argues, can be used to “enable and justify the perpetuation of economic instability.” (Mattern)

IDEALIZATION OF REPAIR

“romanticization of strategies of survival”

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

§ CORRUPTION: CLEANING CODE AND DATA

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE

Nathan Ensmenger: “from the early 1960s to the present, software maintenance costs have represented between 50 and 70 percent of all total expenditures on software development.” (Mattern) Fidler & Russell: “ARPANET lived beyond its original ‘demo’ function thanks to the maintenance work performed by ‘sponsors, liaisons and bureaucrats who labored to sustain and link … organizations and technologies’.” (Mattern)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE

software developers? yes, but … systems administrators content moderators

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

INNOVATIVE REPAIR?

Jes Ellacott: emphasizes “the innovative potential of repair — highlighting the fact that cutting-edge technologies can improve maintenance [and] could ‘change how we see, value, and reward’ our maintainers.” (Mattern)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

REPAIRED MAKING

the “maintenance of an entire ecology” (Mattern) Making of ecology? Making within an ecology

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

“There will be dust. There is always dust.” (Jay Owens) damage, corrosion, decay, mess materials and bodies

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

REPAIRING MAKING

“Three enduring truths: (1) Maintainers require care; (2) caregiving requires maintenance; and (3) the distinctions between these practices are shaped by race, gender, class, and other political, economic, and cultural forces.” “Who gets to organize the maintenance of infrastructure, and who then executes the work? “