Webinar series: Confidentiality and Restrictive Covenants Around - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

webinar series confidentiality and restrictive covenants
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Webinar series: Confidentiality and Restrictive Covenants Around - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Webinar series: Confidentiality and Restrictive Covenants Around the Globe UK 24 January 2013 Paul Oxnard Morna Mackenzie 37 Offices in 18 Countries Today s presenters Jane Bullen Partner and todays Moderator UK


slide-1
SLIDE 1

37 Offices in 18 Countries

Webinar series: Confidentiality and Restrictive Covenants Around the Globe UK

24 January 2013 Paul Oxnard Morna Mackenzie

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Today’s presenters

Morna Mackenzie

Associate UK

morna.mackenzie@squiresanders.com

Jane Bullen

Partner and today’s Moderator UK

jane.bullen@squiresanders.com

Paul Oxnard

Partner UK

paul.oxnard@squiresanders.com

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Overview

  • What are the risks when an employee leaves?
  • What are “restrictive covenants”?
  • What are the established categories of covenant in the UK?
  • Why does your business need them?
  • What practical steps should you take when you discover

potential unfair competition?

  • How do you go about taking Court action?
  • What steps should you be taking now to protect your business?
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Importance and scope

What restrictions are there on an employee's ability to compete? During employment

  • Implied contractual terms

– Duty of fidelity

  • Express contractual terms

– Restrictions on competitive activity during employment. – Confidential Information / IP – Garden Leave

  • Fiduciary duties

After employment Post-termination restrictions (“restrictive covenants”)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Importance and scope

  • The established position in the UK is that post-termination

restrictions are only enforceable to the extent that they protect a legitimate business interest of the employer and go no further than is reasonably necessary to protect that interest.

  • Established categories of legitimate business interests:
  • Trade connections (with customers or suppliers), and more

generally, goodwill.

  • Trade secrets and other confidential information.
  • Maintaining the stability of the workforce.
  • The legitimacy of the business interest is judged at the time

the covenant is entered into.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Restrictive covenants

Types of covenant

  • Non-compete
  • Non-solicit
  • Non-deal
  • Non-poach
  • Confidentiality
slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Confidentiality

Duties

  • During employment – express / implied / fiduciary
  • After employment ends – much more limited

Three types of confidential information 1 – Trivial or public information which cannot be protected – anything widely known / available to the public or custom and practice in the trade. 2 – Information which an employee must treat as confidential - this will include the employee’s ordinary skills and experience 3 - Trade secrets – for example chemical formulae / recipes

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Importance and scope

Why are post-termination restrictive covenants important?

  • Protecting against unfair competition
  • Implied restrictions are of a limited nature and do not generally

extend to periods after termination

  • Harder to control individuals once they are no longer an

employee

  • Deterrent effect - put off potential employers
  • Basis for a negotiation with employee
slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Specific points to consider

  • Duration
  • Effective date
  • Geographical scope
  • Prohibited activity
  • Competitive activity
  • Business interests
  • Definition of customer
  • Definition of employees/key personnel
  • PILON clause
  • Limiting the scope of restrictions as far as possible will maximise

chances of enforceability

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Case Study

  • You are the HR Director of ABC.
  • The Ex-Sales Director (Mr Smith), (who left ABC last month) has gone to

work for a major competitor, XYZ.

  • Mr Smith has apparently approached one of ABC’s major customers and

told them that his new employer, XYZ, would be able to offer more competitive rates than ABC. The MD suspects that he may have contacted other customers.

  • The MD has also discovered that 2 of the most senior members of the

sales force have handed in their notice and plan to go and work for XYZ

  • too. He suspects they have been approached by Mr Smith and is

concerned that other employees may have been approached.

  • Mr Smith’s Service Agreement contains a 12-month non-solicitation of

customers clause, a 12-month non-poaching clause and an express confidentiality clause. He spent the last 4 months of his notice period on garden leave.

  • ABC sells its products to customers all over Europe and in the US. XYZ

does not operate in the UK. It only competes with ABC in the US and German markets.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Practical points

Practical points where competitive activity is suspected / discovered

  • Act swiftly and take steps to find out what has happened
  • Check any relevant employment contract(s), employee

handbooks and/or company policies

  • Gather information and evidence promptly, including details of:
  • What has occurred?
  • What is the employee doing?
  • Who else is involved?
  • Are other employees involved or likely to be?
  • Are customers involved or will they be?
  • Where is or will the employee be operating from?
  • Are the employer’s customers/suppliers being targeted or

are they likely to be?

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Practical points

  • Consider whether any obligations have been breached
  • Have any competitive activities been carried out during

company time?

  • Has any confidential information been misused and/or

removed?

  • Have other employees been enticed to participate in the

competitive activities?

  • Have customers/suppliers been notified by the

employee or has the employee sought to interfere with dealings between them and the company?

  • Has there been a failure by the employee to disclose

information to the company? (particularly relevant to fiduciaries)

  • Consider what threat the activity poses to the business
  • Consolidate relationships with customers/employees to

minimise scope for damage

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Evidence gathering

  • Speak to employee’s colleagues, including secretary and personal

assistant

  • Check the computer system, including electronic diaries, emails,

internet usage – especially around notice period/termination as well as telephone call logs and photocopying records

  • Unusual requests for information/documentation e.g. client lists
  • Unusual or unexplained behaviour – working weekends, taking

home documents, forwarding documents to personal email accounts

  • Correspondence with clients and lavish entertainment of clients
  • Social networking sites – Facebook and Twitter
  • Preservation of hard drives / forensic imaging
slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Practical tips for evidence gathering

  • Sophisticated employees will seek to cover their tracks but it is

rare for an employee to leave no evidence - a thorough search will usually find something.

  • Be cautious of details of any investigations being fed back to

the employee.

  • Beware of overstepping the mark – Data Protection Act 1998,

Part 3 of the Employment Practices Data Protection Code, Human Rights Act 1998.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Starting proceedings

  • Strategy is key
  • Issuing a claim
  • Injunctive relief
  • Order for speedy trial
slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Remedies / settlement

  • What can be achieved?
  • Can the Company demonstrate it has suffered financial loss or
  • ther harm?
  • Compensation/contribution to costs
  • Return of salary ?
  • Undertakings (extended period)/sworn affidavit
  • Delivery up
  • Apology / public statement
slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Social Media

Why is social media important in the context of restrictive covenants?

  • 200 million+ registered LinkedIn users.
  • Social media sites are designed to enable the type of

activity which you are trying to restrict.

  • New sources of evidence – approach to evidence

gathering.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Social Media

Specific issues

  • Is information stored on a social media site “confidential”?
  • What happens to information/ property stored on social

media sites after employment ends?

  • Who owns LinkedIn contacts?
  • What constitutes “solicitation” when using social media?
slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Action Plan

  • 1. Consider the risks.
  • 2. Review contracts – do you have the protection you need?
  • 3. Review handbook – do your policies and procedures give

you the protection you need?

  • 4. Review your termination procedures.
  • 5. Put in place a Social Media policy.
  • 6. Diarise to check again (and again!)
slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Contact details

Morna Mackenzie

Associate Squire Sanders (UK) LLP

E: morna.mackenzie@squiresanders.com

Paul Oxnard

Partner Squire Sanders (UK) LLP

E: paul.oxnard@squiresanders.com

London office

7 Devonshire Square, London, EC2M 4YH

T: +44 (0)20 7655 1000 F: +44 (0)20 7655 1001

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Worldwide Locations

  • Cincinnati
  • Cleveland
  • Columbus
  • Houston
  • Los Angeles
  • Miami
  • New York
  • Northern Virginia
  • Palo Alto
  • Phoenix
  • San Francisco
  • Tampa
  • Washington DC
  • West Palm Beach
  • Bogotá+
  • Buenos Aires+
  • Caracas+
  • La Paz+
  • Lima+
  • Panamá+
  • Santiago+
  • Santo Domingo
  • Beirut+
  • Berlin
  • Birmingham
  • Bratislava
  • Brussels
  • Bucharest+
  • Budapest
  • Frankfurt
  • Kyiv
  • Leeds
  • London
  • Madrid
  • Manchester
  • Moscow
  • Paris
  • Prague
  • Riyadh+
  • Warsaw
  • Beijing
  • Hong Kong
  • Perth
  • Seoul
  • Shanghai
  • Singapore
  • Sydney
  • Tokyo

North America Latin America Europe & Middle East Asia Pacific

+ Independent Network Firm

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Disclaimer

  • The information contained in this presentation is for general

information purposes only and should not be construed as giving the ground for any action or omission in connection with the above material.

  • This presentation should not be construed as professional

advice on legal or any other matters.

  • The examples given in this presentation are described with a

level of detail that does not provide for their implementation without additional comprehensive review with due regard to specific relevant facts and circumstances.

  • The application of laws and statutes may vary depending on

particular circumstances.

  • Squire Sanders does not assume liability for any damage that

may be caused to anyone as a result of any action (or omission)

  • n the basis of the information contained herein.
slide-23
SLIDE 23

37 Offices in 18 Countries

Webinar series: Confidentiality and Restrictive Covenants Around the Globe UK

24 January 2013 Paul Oxnard Morna Mackenzie