We lc o me to Swa mpe ria Swa mpe ria A c a se study o n future - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

We lc o me to Swa mpe ria

Swa mpe ria

A c a se study o n future te c hno lo g y in the fig ht a g a inst ma la ria

10 Minute s Re a ding T ime

Gro up Disc ussio n

Wha t issue s do e s the sc ie nc e a dviso r ne e d to c o nside r in pre pa ring a re spo nse ?

15 minute s

Communic a tion of c omple x sc ie nc e

• Wha t a udie nc e s to c o nside r?
• Ho w to c o mmunic a te a b o ut va c c ine s a nd

va c c ina tio n sc he dule s?

• Ho w to c o mmunic a te a b o ut g e ne -e diting ,

inhe rita nc e , risk o f ho rizo nta l tra nsfe r

Co nside ra tio ns

10 minute s ple na ry

Co nside ra tio ns

How se c ure is the e vide nc e ?

• Wha t e le me nts sho uld fo rm pa rt o f a re vie w?

Who sho uld unde rta ke it? Wha t pro c e ss sho uld b e a pplie d?

• Sho uld the sc ie nc e a dviso r me e t with the

mo sq uito study pro po ne nts? Wha t a re the ke y c o nside ra tio ns in suc h a s disc ussio n?

Co nside ra tio ns

How se c ure is the e vide nc e ?

Wha t a re the e le me nts o f kno wle dg e b ro ke ra g e tha t c o me into pla y?

• Wha t we kno w
• Wha t we do no t kno w
• Risks o f a c tio n o r ina c tio n
• Alte rna te a ppro a c he s
• T

ra de -o ffs

Co nside ra tio ns

Sc ie nc e a dvic e vs. a dvoc a c y

• T

wo ve ry diffe re nt pub lic he a lth inte rve ntio ns a re a rising (g e ne -e diting , with full de plo yme nt still a wa y o ff in the future a nd pursuing the la te st va c c ine ite ra tio n). Wha t is the ro le o f the sc ie nc e a dviso r in c o mpa ring the

• ptio ns?
• On wha t b a sis sho uld the y b e c o mpa re d?

Issue of e thic s a nd soc ia l lic e nse

• I

s the sc ie nc e stro ng e r o r mo re unc e rta in fo r

• ne pub lic he a lth inte rve ntio n o ptio n o r a ny
• the r (inc luding lo w te c h o ptio ns o f b e d ne t

use a nd dra ining sta nding wa te r)?

• Wha t ro le mig ht the so c ia l sc ie nc e s pla y in

a ddre ssing Swa mpe ria ’ s dile mma ?

Co nside ra tio ns

Issue of e thic s a nd soc ia l lic e nse

• Po te ntia l so c ie ta l e thic a l issue s c o uld b e

q uite diffe re nt fo r the o ptio ns o utline d (e .g . c o mpa ring va c c ine inte rve ntio ns to g e no mic inte rve ntio ns within a n e c o syste m)? Sho uld this b e a c o nside ra tio n fo r the sc ie nc e a dviso r? I f so , wha t a re the e thic a l drive rs a nd ho w sho uld the se b e a na lyse d a nd c o mmunic a te d?

Co nside ra tio ns

Be fo re the Me e ting

Divide yo urse lve s into the fo llo wing g ro ups (c o lo ur indic a to r a t the b a c k o f yo ur ta g ): T he Sc ie nc e Adviso r ha s invite d a ll

• f yo u to a me e ting to pro vide yo ur

pe rspe c tive s. Be fo re the me e ting :

• Spe nd so me time o n yo ur o wn

(individua l) de ve lo ping yo ur a rg ume nts/ sug g e stio ns

• Sha re yo ur pe rspe c tive s

a mo ng st yo ur g ro up.

• L

ist do wn a ll the yo ur g ro up’ s tho ug hts/ sug g e stio ns o n the flip- c ha rt.

• Sc ie nc e Adviso r
• Me dia
• GAMF
• Swa mpe ria Unive rsity Re se a rc he rs
• Anti GE

Advo c a c y Gro up

• Pub lic He a lth Offic ia ls
• Po litic ia ns

15 minute s

• F
• rm ne w g ro ups b a se d o n the numb e r a t the b a c k o f

yo ur na me ta g . T his g ro up will b e ma de o f up o f a ll sta ke ho lde rs.

• T

he Sc ie nc e Adviso r ha s invite d a ll o f yo u to a me e ting to pro vide yo ur pe rspe c tive s within yo ur ne w g ro ups.

• Co nve ne the me e ting a nd sha re a ll yo ur pe rspe c tive s.
• T

he sc ie nc e a dviso r will re po rt b a c k to the wo rksho p g ro up a nd ma ke a re c o mme nda tio n.

T he Me e ting

30 minute s g ro up 10 minute s ple na ry

• Wha t is the ro le o f the sc ie nc e a dviso r in this

situa tio n?

• Wha t pe rspe c tive s a nd c o nside ra tio ns

sho uld b e re fle c te d in a ny a dvic e g ive n?

Po st Me e ting Re fle c tio ns