We lc o me to Swa mpe ria
Swa mpe ria A c a se study o n future te c hno lo g y in the fig ht a g a inst ma la ria 10 Minute s Re a ding T ime
Gro up Disc ussio n Wha t issue s do e s the sc ie nc e a dviso r ne e d to c o nside r in pre pa ring a re spo nse ? 15 minute s
Co nside ra tio ns Communic a tion of c omple x sc ie nc e • Wha t a udie nc e s to c o nside r? • Ho w to c o mmunic a te a b o ut va c c ine s a nd va c c ina tio n sc he dule s? • Ho w to c o mmunic a te a b o ut g e ne -e diting , inhe rita nc e , risk o f ho rizo nta l tra nsfe r 10 minute s ple na ry
Co nside ra tio ns How se c ure is the e vide nc e ? Wha t e le me nts sho uld fo rm pa rt o f a re vie w? • Who sho uld unde rta ke it? Wha t pro c e ss sho uld b e a pplie d? Sho uld the sc ie nc e a dviso r me e t with the • mo sq uito study pro po ne nts? Wha t a re the ke y c o nside ra tio ns in suc h a s disc ussio n?
Co nside ra tio ns How se c ure is the e vide nc e ? Wha t a re the e le me nts o f kno wle dg e b ro ke ra g e tha t c o me into pla y? Wha t we kno w • Wha t we do no t kno w • Risks o f a c tio n o r ina c tio n • Alte rna te a ppro a c he s • T ra de -o ffs •
Co nside ra tio ns Sc ie nc e a dvic e vs. a dvoc a c y T wo ve ry diffe re nt pub lic he a lth inte rve ntio ns • a re a rising (g e ne -e diting , with full de plo yme nt still a wa y o ff in the future a nd pursuing the la te st va c c ine ite ra tio n). Wha t is the ro le o f the sc ie nc e a dviso r in c o mpa ring the o ptio ns? On wha t b a sis sho uld the y b e c o mpa re d? •
Co nside ra tio ns Issue of e thic s a nd soc ia l lic e nse • I s the sc ie nc e stro ng e r o r mo re unc e rta in fo r o ne pub lic he a lth inte rve ntio n o ptio n o r a ny o the r (inc luding lo w te c h o ptio ns o f b e d ne t use a nd dra ining sta nding wa te r)? • Wha t ro le mig ht the so c ia l sc ie nc e s pla y in a ddre ssing Swa mpe ria ’ s dile mma ?
Co nside ra tio ns Issue of e thic s a nd soc ia l lic e nse • Po te ntia l so c ie ta l e thic a l issue s c o uld b e q uite diffe re nt fo r the o ptio ns o utline d (e .g . c o mpa ring va c c ine inte rve ntio ns to g e no mic inte rve ntio ns within a n e c o syste m)? Sho uld this b e a c o nside ra tio n fo r the sc ie nc e a dviso r? I f so , wha t a re the e thic a l drive rs a nd ho w sho uld the se b e a na lyse d a nd c o mmunic a te d?
Be fo re the Me e ting T he Sc ie nc e Adviso r ha s invite d a ll Divide yo urse lve s into the fo llo wing g ro ups o f yo u to a me e ting to pro vide yo ur (c o lo ur indic a to r a t the b a c k o f yo ur ta g ): pe rspe c tive s. Be fo re the me e ting : Sc ie nc e Adviso r • Me dia Spe nd so me time o n yo ur o wn • • (individua l) de ve lo ping yo ur GAMF • a rg ume nts/ sug g e stio ns Swa mpe ria Unive rsity Re se a rc he rs • Anti GE Advo c a c y Gro up • Sha re yo ur pe rspe c tive s • Pub lic He a lth Offic ia ls • a mo ng st yo ur g ro up. Po litic ia ns • L ist do wn a ll the yo ur g ro up’ s • tho ug hts/ sug g e stio ns o n the flip- c ha rt. 15 minute s
T he Me e ting F o rm ne w g ro ups b a se d o n the numb e r a t the b a c k o f • yo ur na me ta g . T his g ro up will b e ma de o f up o f a ll sta ke ho lde rs. T he Sc ie nc e Adviso r ha s invite d a ll o f yo u to a me e ting • to pro vide yo ur pe rspe c tive s within yo ur ne w g ro ups. Co nve ne the me e ting a nd sha re a ll yo ur pe rspe c tive s. • T he sc ie nc e a dviso r will re po rt b a c k to the wo rksho p • g ro up a nd ma ke a re c o mme nda tio n. 30 minute s g ro up 10 minute s ple na ry
Po st Me e ting Re fle c tio ns • Wha t is the ro le o f the sc ie nc e a dviso r in this situa tio n? • Wha t pe rspe c tive s a nd c o nside ra tio ns sho uld b e re fle c te d in a ny a dvic e g ive n?
Recommend
More recommend
