Water tershed ed p plan anning from a g from a water ut er - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

water tershed ed p plan anning from a g from a water ut
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Water tershed ed p plan anning from a g from a water ut er - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Water tershed ed p plan anning from a g from a water ut er utili ility ty per perspecti ective Jo John hn Kounts Water Program Director Washington Public Utility Districts Association Wh Why ut utili iliti ties need eed water


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Water tershed ed p plan anning from a g from a water ut er utili ility ty per perspecti ective

Jo John hn Kounts Water Program Director Washington Public Utility Districts Association

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Wh Why ut utili iliti ties need eed water tershed ed plan planning

  • Legal obligation to serve

customers

  • Need predictable, adequate

water supply

  • Need long-term planning in

sync with growth management

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Ut Utili ilities ties’ h his istor

  • ry wit

with water ershed pl plannin ing

  • At the table from the beginning…

examples:

  • Chelan Agreement (1990)
  • Watershed Planning Act in

RCW 90.82 (1997-98)

  • Mixed record of wins and losses
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Hard Hard l lesson

  • ns l

learn arned ed

  • Patience and persistence

required

  • Planning table must be inclusive
  • Planning product must pass

muster in court (e.g. Foster, Swinomish, Hirst rulings)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

ES ESSB 609 SB 6091: T Today’s ’s water tershed ed plan planning

  • Mainly about mitigating permit-

exempt wells – response to Hirst ruling

  • Not aimed at utilities’ water

needs

  • Exception: Secs. 301-303

response to Foster ruling

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Foster T er Task Force in rce in ESS ESSB 609 6091

  • Foster ruling: strict “water for

water, in-time and in-place” mitigation requirement

  • Legislative task force and five

pilot projects to explore broader, “sequenced” mitigation

  • ptions
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Foster T er Task Force in rce in ESS ESSB 609 6091

  • Under review: in-kind and
  • ut-of-kind mitigation for net

environmental benefit

  • Still a work in progress but

utilities hopeful