water depth and water quality in lake apopka
play

Water depth and water quality in Lake Apopka KARL HAVENS DIRECTOR, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Water depth and water quality in Lake Apopka KARL HAVENS DIRECTOR, FLORIDA SEA GRANT PROFESSOR, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA / IFAS HARRIS CHAIN OF LAKES RESTORATION COUNCIL, SEPT 2018 1999-2016 SJRWMD data from Harris Chain Intent: determine


  1. Water depth and water quality in Lake Apopka KARL HAVENS DIRECTOR, FLORIDA SEA GRANT PROFESSOR, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA / IFAS HARRIS CHAIN OF LAKES RESTORATION COUNCIL, SEPT 2018

  2. • 1999-2016 SJRWMD data from Harris Chain • Intent: determine if variation in depth can affect limnology of shallow FL lakes • Dataset originally used to examine zooplankton and phytoplankton • First, all Harris Chain lakes, then focus on Apopka • Study was not a test of efficacy of restoration program; it was a case study of climate variability effects

  3. Havens, Ji, Beaver, Fulton et al. (2017) Hydrobiologia

  4. Based on 1999-2016 data from the SJRWMD

  5. Havens and Ji (2018) Inland Waters

  6. Havens and Ji (2018) Inland Waters

  7. Conclusions 1: Droughts and extreme low water resulted in markedly reduced water quality in Lake Apopka during 1999-2016, as well as in the other Harris Chain of Lakes. Similar results have been obtained in other shallow lakes world-wide

  8. Drought Depth and Volume Decline Fish, nutrients and algae are concentrated / fish effects are magnified Blooms more severe

  9. Wet Years Depth and Volume Increase Fish, nutrients and algae are diluted / fish effects are weakened Blooms less severe

  10. A Longer Historical Context With additional data provided by the SJRWMD from the onset of routine water quality monitoring in 1985

  11. Mann-Kendall non-parametric trend tests Start: 230 End: 113 Change: 51% down Significant: yes, <0.001 Start: 5.6 End: 4.2 Change: 26% down Significant? Yes, <0.001

  12. Start: 101 End: 56 Change: 44% down Significant: yes, <0.001 Start: 0.22 End: 0.33 Change: 54% up Significant: yes, <0.001

  13. Last three values significantly lower, and by 40%

  14. Last three values significantly lower, and by 58%

  15. Last three values significantly lower, and by 32%

  16. Last three values significantly higher, and by 73%

  17. Conclusions 2: Statistically-significant long-term declines in TP, TN and Chl-a in the 1985-2018 dataset, and increased Secchi depth Comparing high water periods only, improved water quality during last three high water periods compared to earlier high water period. Reiterating – severe lows are a problem. Why are they happening?

  18. Thank you

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend