Washington Township 2018-2019 Budget Proposal March 21, 2018 Board - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Washington Township 2018-2019 Budget Proposal March 21, 2018 Board - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Washington Township 2018-2019 Budget Proposal March 21, 2018 Board of Trustees Our Principles 1. Preserve the rural character of our community 2. Operate in an equitable manner 3. Manage in a fiscally responsible manner 4. Provide friendly,
Our Principles
- 1. Preserve the rural character of our community
- 2. Operate in an equitable manner
- 3. Manage in a fiscally responsible manner
- 4. Provide friendly, respectful service
- 5. Promote a favorable business environment
- 6. Demonstrate the highest ethical standards
Agenda
- Year In Review
– Financial Goals – Emergency Services Goals – Infrastructure Goals – Customer Service / Other Goals
- Major Influencing Factors
- Goals for the Coming Year
- Budget Overview
Goals Pursued - Financial
Goal Outcome Collective bargaining with 4 UAW unions Commenced and continuing including IAFF one year early Sell non-strategic land after rezoning by the PC Offering pending on 43 acres and 5 acres; Rezoned Jewell to R1B 60 units Re-evaluate W/S rates after getting County/GLWA increases Done – 0% for water and 4.9% sewer due to sinkhole costs Evaluate the impact of the SINKHOLE Done – incorporated in rates Community Center Feasibility Teams formed; architect deployed Solid audit results Another solid year and clean opinion
Goal Pursued – Financial Results
- 2016/2017financials received a clean opinion from Plante Moran:
– Continued focus on infrastructure and service over bureaucracy – Increased net position since 2009 despite taxable value remaining below 2009 levels – AA BOND RATING! – Washington compares favorably to neighbors in net position as a percent of expenses for governmental activities. – Continued aggressive cost management
- Staffing levels responsive to economics
- Reasonable cost structure per employee
- 2017/2018 Not yet complete but proceeding as anticipated
Surplus Fund Balance Governmental Funds $ 239,174 $22,138,820 Enterprise Funds $1,855,052 $58,901,716 Total $2,094,226 $81,040,536
Township Taxable Value vs Net Position
20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 1,000 1,050 1,100 1,150 1,200 1,250 1,300 1,350 1,400 1,450 1,500
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Taxable Value 1,315 1,260 1,155 1,122 1,088 1,113 1,146 1,200 1,241 1,374 Net Position 25.523 26.202 29.634 30.827 31.438 32.087 32.624 34.062 34.968 35.000
Taxable value has rebounded from the real estate crash with the help of new construction. Despite the 10 year drought, our net position (health) has improved steadily.
Net Position as a % of Most Recent Year Costs For Governmental Funds
- 100%
- 50%
0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 300% 350% 400%
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Washington (3/31) 270% 305% 317% 324% 330% 336% 351% 360% Shelby (12/31) 202% 202% 195% 193% 191% 144% 146% Bruce (3/31) 155% 148% 106% 91% 80% 64% 59% 38% Romeo (6/30) 89% 79% 65% 39% 16%
- 41%
- 57%
- 50%
Operating with a Low Millage Rate
But Keeping Property Values High
- 50,000
100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000
Washington Township Macomb Township Shelby Township Bruce Township Ray Township Armada Township Richmond Township New Baltimore Chesterfield Township Sterling Heights Macomb County Average Harrison Township Clinton Township Richmond Utica Lenox Township Fraser St Clair Shores Memphis Warren
- Mt. Clemens
Centerline Roseville Eastpointe
Source: 2017 Equalization Report Excludes 40 homes in the Lake Township portion of Grosse Pointe Shores on the very south end of Macomb County at $618,375; note that villages are combined with townships in this presentation.
Washington’s approach to development and building a great lifestyle has helped us maintain the highest property values in the County.
Staffing Comparison
2008 Current Proposal General 20 FT 1 PT 16 FT 1 PT 16 FT 1 PT Fire/Ambulance 27 FT 15 POC 27 FT 9 POC 27 FT 13 POC Public Works 13 FT 1 PT 12 FT 1 PT 15 FT 1 PT Building Inspection 6 FT 2 POC 6 FT 7 POC/PT 6 FT 7 PT/POC Total 66 FT 19 PT/POC 61 FT 18 PT/POC 64 FT 22 PT/POC We continue at lower staffing vs 2008 despite the economic recovery and despite having 1/3 MORE residents to serve. The 2nd year of this budget will add 3 FT firemen for new station
Today assumes open accounting position (General) and engineer/inspector (PW) filled Engineer and Insp in PW as home in proposal column as well as 2 new utility (camera/meters); Today is just Engineer/Insp Floaters shown in their home dept. Elected shown in General
Staffing Cost Structure
2008 Now Union CBA’s 7 6 Legacy $7mm unfunded; $1mm/yr after Permanently eliminated Retirement Out of market Reduced by 7%-46% Salary Some positions out of market Cut up to $10k – tier 2 Medical No responsibility; high cost Shared / mitigated cost Time Off Out of market Reduced (tier 2) COLA Auto Cola – no incentives Some incentivized Clerical Probation 3 months 2 years Flexibility to shift Limited Broad Other New hires get same benefits Tiered
We reduced the cost per employee, not just the number of employees. This budget assumes the same contracts plus COLA.
Goals Pursued – Emergency Services
Goals Outcome COMTEC Conversion Done – EMD recently in; reasonable priority guidance; reporting issues Fire station land and initial design Acquired 2 parcels; not yet designed Install 3-5 “dry hydrants” Still working through challenges; 1 new project going in with hydrant Re-deploy fire resources Done CAD Units in trucks Maps, building footprints, hydrants in Hose purchases This traunch is done Ambulance remount Done
Goals Pursued - Infrastructure
Goals Outcome Garland parking lot (finalize) Lot complete; ticket station outstanding 3 Miles of limestone Done – Schoennher 26 to 29 Mile Township lot (punch list) Done Sewer plant construction Underway – complete in < 12 months Acquire a backhoe Postponed Election equipment Done Pursue strategies to generate economic activity in Van Dyke corridor (sewer) 2 SADs circulating (TWP may do one)
Goals Pursued – Infrastructure, continued
Goals Outcome GIS – incorporate storm sewer Postponed (potentially indefinitely) Continue sewer integrity efforts Asset mgt strategy devised - $1mm each year (Hayes Rd $1.8mm plus grouting and pipe repair) and new camera truck Pursue replacement of older water meters Replaced 315 meters this year Next phase of sidewalks Proposal before board for West; Octagon repair pending; meeting Breckinridge North side windows, vestibule improvements, board table, LED sign, sound system, and chairs Postponed Potentially internal road and water lines for community center Postponed – CC teams now meeting
Goals Pursued – Customer Service
Goals Outcome Issue Master Plan Hearings held, neighboring communities and agencies solicited, awaiting PC Invasive Species Efforts Grant assistance received and spent for Macomb Trail (4X), Campground Y, Meijer, Twp properties; AF Jonna; Willow Ridge and Trailside (they paid for cut) Conclude on monthly vs quarterly water bills Postponed Improved communications bi-annually with the public Issued 4 communications to date Planning and Zoning software Proposal before the board tonight Manage development Another challenging year – see list
Development Issues Impacting Planning, Public Works and Building
Commercial/Industrial
Total Soccer Proline Asphalt Radio tower Go Ape/Baypoint/Boat launch TBD Industrial Bldg Romeo High Washington Landing PUD Vanessa Center Mods Gemelli Concrete Capital Pointe Office Trailside Ice cream Van Dyke Retail Newberry Commercial Mines (brownfield, etc) Orchard Ridge Church Cavataio Center Michaelangelo (Dinoto)
Development Issues Impacting Planning, Public Works & Building
New Residential
Newbury On the Green 7 Lakes Expansion (3) Kirkway Expansion Washington Creek PUD Wood Duck Court Washington Landing PUD (residential) Township Acreage (43 acres) Powell Ridge Forest Brook White Oaks Meadowland Veridian
Ongoing Residential
Park Avenue Bradbury Glacier Club Greystone Estates Orchard Brook Orchards Hillcrest Franklin Park (including drainage issues) Stonecrest Accessory Structure Amendment CCN and Hidden Pond drainage issues
Goals Pursued - Talent
Goals Outcome Continue to recruit POC/PT Ongoing battle Hire engineer/inspector Postponed to this next budget WS Field Hires Done
Other Accomplishments
Authorized new pumper GLWA amendment Drone DPW/Fire trailers Policy to finance utility expansions Comment policy Stretchers Water asset mgt plan authorized Managed dewatering issues and added 26 customers at Powell AT&T settlement Managed sinkhole comms and legal decisions Upgraded fire code Fire Chief contract WBRW anniversary and continued improvement Held emergency drill Waste events Fire grants (Gloves/Foam) Metropark relationship Parking lot light repair and sealcoating PC, ZBA, Library/BOR appts Updated Engineering Ordinance
Other Accomplishments, continued
Began sign ordinance review Commenced Community Center teams Partnered with Octagon on silo drill Federal Investigation
Federal Investigation
- The Federal investigation was
known to limited persons in Washington Township offices who had initiated some of the probe.
- It has been a substantial drain
- n intellectual capital and
- perations for years.
- The ongoing Federal
Investigation has so far netted 19 persons.
- It is far from over as is the
backlash against those who helped.
- Clinton Trustee Dean Reynolds
- Chesterfield Supervisor Mike Lovelock
- Macomb Trustee Clifford Freitas
- Macomb Trustee Dino Bucci
- New Haven Trustee Chris Craigmiles
- New Haven Trustee Brett Harris
- Detroit Deputy Poice Chief Ceila Washington
- GWE Engineer Paul Modi
- GWE Engineer Jim Pistilli
- Washington PWD Steve Hohensee
- Shelby Engineer Fazal Khan
- Motor City Rep Robert Maechtle
- Chuck Rizzo (trash)
- Charles Rizzo (trash)
- Chris Sorrentino (Macomb contractor)
- Angelo Selva (attorney)
- Quinton Ramanauskas (Rizzo)
- Derrick Hicks (trash)
- Gasper Fiore (towing)
Background Factors Impacting 2018/2019
- Property Values
- Federal initiatives on tax reform
and infrastructure
- State budget impact on revenue
sharing (assumed 2% increase) or cost pushdowns
- CBA impacts (none assumed
- ther than inflation)
- Sewer system expansion
- Fire expansion
- Commercial market uncertainty
- Priority balancing given financial
and intellectual resource limitations
- Significant infrastructure spend
- Interest rate changes
- Continued population migration
- The Federal investigation
General Fund Profit (Excluding Transfers)
(200,000)
- 200,000
400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018P 2019B 2020B
03/2017 is the last “actual” year available. 03/2018 is conservatively
- projected. It is lower than
budget due to the lack of a land sale but that is offset by less sidewalk and other capital spending than anticipated. 03/2019B assumes the 43 and 5 acre land sales. Without the land sales, the 03/2019 would be $102k loss due to significant capital investments (West Road sidewalk alone is $200k). 03/2020 is positive but bears a $300k investment in sidewalk near Hevel.
General Fund Revenue Trends
We’re Finally Recovering BUT with MORE People to Serve
791 817 783 708 697 675 690 714 763 773 800 845 858 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018P 2019B 2020B
Property Tax Revenues Due to State law, the dramatic decline in property values is not reversed by subsequent dramatic increases for existing, unsold
- properties. Taxable value increases
are capped at inflation plus additions. We are finally drifting back to 2009 tax revenue levels due to market recovery PLUS significant development. During the downfall, we avoided tax increases through cost controls despite inflationary cost increases and additional clients to serve.
General Fund Revenues Other Trends
200 400 600 800
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018P 2019B 2020B
Interest Revenues
200 400 600 800 1000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018B 2019B 2020B
Other Revenues
500 1000 1500 2000 2500
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018B 2019B 2020B
Revenue Sharing Lower interest absorbed thru cost control measures. Interest rates, improved savings, and change in approach is improving interest.
The census will help SRS which helped mitigate some revenue losses since ‘08. However, we have more people to
- serve. Estimates are
conservative. Other revenues exclude the land sale and cable fees. They are lower due to lack of Romeo/Bruce fees, lower SADs, and grants.
General Fund Expenses
2018B had a number of budget items that increased costs. We postponed the costs for another year, driving up 2019B costs. Key items included in 2019:
- Board room
- Vestibule
- Paint
- Sign
- Windows
- Planning software
- Legal for CBAs, etc.
- Sidewalks (see left)
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018P 2019B 2020B
Red line is 2008 inflation adjusted by 1.5% per year. All other than ‘09 expense would be >$300k more if OPEB not cut
West Road sidewalk ($200k) in 2019 and Hevel ($300k) in 2020 vs generic $100k (not spent ) in 2018.
Improvement Revolving
2019 2020 Powell area road 2,750,000 1,650,000 3 miles of limestone 30,000 30,000 Planner & Architect 100,000 TIP or microsurfacing 50,000 200,000 Watershed Training 600 600 Engineer 5,000 5,000 NPDES permit 500 500 PEP assistance CRWC 1,800 1,800 Workshop 500 500 Mac Orch Trail 5,000 5,000 Dry Hydrants 28,000 28,000 Siren Main 4,500 4,500 Total Estimate 2,975,900 1,925,900
Figures assume no SAD for the road project and also do not consider our share of a sewer line SAD.
Police Trends Revenue and Expense In Sync
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Rev Exp
Rev 1237 1259 1176 1177 1111 1081 1081 1133 2341 2084 2189 2183 2226 Exp 834 863 868 869 851 981 1005 1200 2017 2052 2094 2129 2213 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018B 2019B 2020B
New Deputy added Nov 2011 Doubled to 14 Jan 2015 following millage increase
Fire and Ambulance Income / Loss History
(2,000,000) (1,500,000) (1,000,000) (500,000)
- 500,000
1,000,000 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018B 2019B 2020B
Income
Income history is driven by major capital expenditures
- Fire station (3/11)
- Tanker (3/17)
- Dispatch/CAD (3/18)
- New Station land (3/18)
- Ambulance remount and
hose (3/18)
- Engine (3/19)
- Tanker (3/20)
- New Station (3/19 and
3/20)
- 3 New FT – (3/20)
Fire / Ambulance Revenues
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 B 2019 B 2020 B Tax 4244 4297 4060 3650 3590 3490 3575 3696 3913 4273 4422 4888 4986 Amb Fee 315 388 452 498 445 529 589 521 538 538 520 500 500 Grants 13 44 1436 180 34 43 16 148 2 Int/Other 324 442 54 67 43 58 101 4 58 104 49 94 94
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Taxes hurt by the market decline finally rebounding due to new
- construction. But now we serve
more people.
- Amb. fees are uncertain. Interest
also is insignificant. Both were estimated conservatively. To maximize value to customers, we rebalance emergency millages each year based on where the capital spend needs are without increasing taxes.
Fire and Ambulance Expenditures
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018B 2019B 2020B Exp 3574 4430 4273 6726 4443 3613 4009 4230 4159 4816 5162 7113 6579
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
- Fire station (3/11)
- Ambulance
10/12/14/15/16/17/18/19
- Tanks (Grant) bought in 2015.
- 3 new paramedics in 2016
- Tanker (3/17)
- Dispatch/CAD (3/18)
- New Station land (3/18)
- Ambulance remount and hose
(3/18)
- Engine (3/19)
- Tanker (3/20)
- New Station (3/19 and 3/20)
- Additional staffing in 3/20
OPEB was only in 2009; would be > $350k/yr if not cut)
Why Invest in Personnel and Stations
- Run Count is up 29% since 2009.
- Influx of development and senior
living creates a need.
- We were DOWN staff prior to last
hires since ‘08.
- Counting brass, we have 1 FF per
thousand residents. Bruce/Romeo were at 1.8 per 1,000.
- Every 3 hirings raise costs $200-
400k over time.
1000 2000 3000
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Runs
Runs Manpower Factors: Only 28% hydranted
Metropark (2mm visitors/yr) We transport 36 square miles M53 split Home compostion –petrochem Age and existence of assisted living
Fire Department Cost Mitigation Efforts
- Split various Coordinator
positions between shifts
- Created a shifted part-time role
with cooperation from unions.
- Expanded mutual aid to
automatic mutual aid for fires to increase resources.
- Improved tech for report
processing to reduce man hours.
- Eliminated Clerical Position
- CBA Concessions:
– OPEB eliminated – Some COLA shifted to bonus – Reduced retirement – Increased staff medical cost – Restructured new hire pay
- Shifted to ambulance remounting
- Merged Fire Marshall and
Assistant Fire Chief (till 2019)
- Now using COMTEC to free staff
Health Governmental Fund Balances
500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 2008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Police
1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 2008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
General and Other
1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Fire/Amb
Health is strong. Aggressive spend (for parking lots, roads, tanker, ambulances, station, etc) will reduce fund balances somewhat. We still have > 1 year in reserve for General 1.5 for Fire/Amb and 2 for Police. Note that you need 70% of budget to cover timing.
Enterprise Funds
Enterprise funds are government run businesses: – deliver services not done best by private enterprise – no taxing authority or use of taxes – generate revenues from fees for the services – recover their cost of capital expenditures over time – Cannot be supported by tax $.
Building Fund Fees
- Charges fees for reviewing
building plans and inspecting construction.
- Revenues from:
– Plan review fees – Bldg. inspection fees – Electric inspection fees – Plumbing inspection fees – Mechanical inspection fees
- Expenditures are primarily for
personnel
- We turned this fund around by:
– Use of paid on call – Pay freezes – Staff reductions at key times – Elimination of Opeb ($1mm liability and $114k per year) – Absorbing other activities – Significant CBA concessions.
Building Fund Major Assumptions of Budget
- 175 Residential new home permits
- $70k of Commercial permits
- 425 Misc Building permits
- Building Official has help of Facility Mgr and OE officer and
Engineer
- Continued POC model for Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical
- 3 Clerical plus a part timer
- Many cost risks are revenue dependent
- Capital for field PCs
Building Fund Revenue/Expense Trend
- 75
- 249-295
- 75
72 187 160 237 293 425 385 270 254 247
- 500
500 1000 1500
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018P 2019B 2020B
Revenue Expense Net Income
Had OPEB not been cut out, profits would be reduced by $100k/yr or more. Note that, due to market uncertainty, we typical budget this fund
- conservatively. Revenues for the current year are projected to be
almost $200k higher than plan as is net income. The next two years are planned based on 175 housing units.
Building Fund Permit Trend
100 200 300 400 500
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018P 2019B 2020B
Com Res
Peak residential building was 422 in
- 2000. Low since was
YE 3/31/2010. 2018P was budgeted at 175 homes and we have 167 with 2 weeks left. 2019B and 2020B assumes 175 residential each. Profitability is largely maintained by cost flexibiilty down to 100 residential permits.
Building Fund Fund Balance
- 1000
1000 2000 3000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018P 2019B 2020B
Fund Balance
Fund Balance was $1mm worse than shown here prior to eliminating unfunded OPEB. Note that in addition to having negative equity AND a $1mm unfunded liability, this fund owed several hundred thousand to the General
- Fund. It now has no
legacy, debt or negative equity – a > $3mm swing!
Low point was $100k negative equity plus $1mm OPEB liability plus several hundred thousand of debt to the General Fund in 2010
Water and Sewer Fund
- Delivers water and transports
sewerage for 6,045 “accounts” or approximately 20,000 “People” by DEQ standards.
- Revenues from:
– per unit charges – fixed meter charges – contributed pipe – tap and capacity fees – interest – Permits/Inspection fees – Grants
- Expenditures for:
– Pass-through cost of GLWA for water (fixed and variable) – Pass-through cost of GLWA, Macomb County, and Macomb Township for downstream sewer transport – Infrastructure, mostly within the township (lines, pump stations, meters, trucks, remote readers, etc.) – Field personnel – Administration
Water and Sewer Key Infrastructure Sewer System
- 390,842 feet of sanitary sewer
main (74 Miles)
- 5 pump stations
- One meter pit
- Sewer plant (pending)
- 3% “ownership” of 11 member
district assets
Water System
- 515,338 feet of water main
(97.6 Miles)
- Water storage facility (1.5mm g)
- 2 booster stations
- 2 GLWA meter pits
- 7 pressure reducing valves (PRVs)
- Meters / remote reading devices
Water and Sewer Active Accounts Trend
2000 4000 6000 8000 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Accounts
Customers
Water Only 588 Water & Sewer 5,237 Sewer Only 220 Total Accounts 6,045
R N
*excludes
96% 4%
Residential Non Residential
Accounts
DPW Specific Key Drivers
- Economic development of north end through sewer project
- New rates from GLWA/County for water and sewer (estimated to be 3.1%
and 7.5%).
- Development projects underway and in infancy
- System maintenance / System Integrity
- Aging meters
- Lead and copper rules
PW Budget Assumptions Water
Water Purchases
– Assumes we buy 73,800 MCF based on GLWA projections for Yr 1. The 5 year average is 72,200. – The purchase commodity and fixed rates for Yr 1 are based
- n the weighted average
published rates for the year from GLWA – The purchase commodity and fixed expense for Yr 2 are inflated at 3%
Water Sales
– Assumes we sell 73,800 MCF based on GLWA projections for Yr 1. The 5 year average is 72,200. – The sales rate assumes no change in volumetric rate for either year. – We assume a 3% growth on fixed charges due to new customers each year.
PW Budget Assumptions Sewer
Sewer Purchases
- Based on 5 year average of our
flows vs total, we pay 2.807% of the County costs
- We use their projection of a 7.5%
increase for the last 9 months of Yr 1 over current charges.
- Year 2 includes a 5% expense
increase. Sewer Sales
- Both fixed and variable revenues
are assumed to be increased in Yr 1 by 8% over the projected year end 3/31/18.
- This % is due to growth
assumption of 3% and rate increase of 5%.
- Year 2 we increased both fixed
and variable by 5% (higher than water because we assume water RATE increases are frozen and they only experience growth).
Other Key Assumptions
- Staff - 1 PW Director, 8.5 Field, 4 clerical, and ½ Engineer ¾ inspector
- Maintain focus on significant maintenance and capital
- Plant - built by year end. Operator hired in August. Hauling starts Jan
2019 through end of year 2.
Why Are Water Rates Higher Here? GLWA sets rates based on 3 factors –
- distance from plant (we are far)
- Elevation (we are high)
- usage during peak times (we are a
bedroom community). Washington prefers lower density development so has a higher infrastructure cost PER CUSTOMER because a mile of water main in another community might be borne by many more homes than it is in our
- town. That is a cost we bear for our
lifestyle choice. 2 4 6 8 10
5 Year Average Increase Pre- Storage 2016 2017
% Increases Passed to Customers Before Vs After Building a Water Storage Facility
Zero
The Water Storage Facility Is Benefiting Customers
Investments Paying Off for Residents
Water and Sewer Income
Overall income of $3mm for YE 2019 and $2.3mm for 2020. The net income includes contributed pipe (not cash) which, for each of the two years, is less than the total
- income. We need to cover
bond principal of $811k per year over 20 years. Note that Opeb would have hurt by $200k per year if not cut.
- 1000
- 500
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018B 2019B
Income Pipe TRUE
Major Capital Initiatives
2019 2020 Waste Water Treatment Plant 11,163,565 Water Main Extension on West Side 1,000,000 1,000,000 Hayes Road Pump Station Rehab (1976) 900,000 900,000 Sewer Line to 31 Mile 875,100 30.5 Booster Station Rehab (1995) 300,000 Transit Truck for Sewer Televising 250,000 Contracted Sewer and Manhole Replacement 100,000 Meter Change Out Program 86,000 90,000 Worksite Pro 45 Incompact Track Loader (Skid Stee 79,000 Scada System Upgrade (60/40 W/S) 50,000 Upgrade to Mega Net Collection System (MTU Towe 49,850 F150 4x4 with Plow/wo Plow 34,252 22,000 Temporary Pressure Monitoring Stations 12,240 Rain Guage 10,000 Tapping Machine 8,500 Backhoe and Dump Truck 235,000 PRV Pits/Booster Station VD/26 and Jewell/27 100,000 Vactor Truck Replacement (1994) 300,000 29 / VD Booster / Meter Pit (another water access point) 400,000 14,918,507 3,047,000 Funded from Bond 7,525,722
- New Cash Outlay
7,392,785 3,047,000
Sewer plant
Cash Needs
2019 2020 Net Income 2,979,000 2,347,000 Subtract Contributed Capital (2,162,000) (2,084,000) Add Back Depreciation 1,680,000 1,976,000 Net Available for Capital and Debt 2,497,000 2,239,000 Capital Not From Bond (7,393,000) (3,047,000) Principal on Bond (811,000) (811,000) Cash from Reserves (5,707,000) (1,619,000)
The capital investment program results in a decrease in cash in the short term in return for future cash flows going forward. These cash needs are funded from earmarked cash of $10mm of our $20mm of working capital that was set aside for exactly these purposes years ago.
Risks and Opportunities
Risks
- Revenue Sharing
- Ambulance fees
- Property Tax Values – long term
- Infrastructure deterioration
- Facility needs
- Push down from State/County
- Service level requirements
- Building trends
- New regulations for Flint driving
costs for local governments
- CBA negotiations
- Land price risk
Opportunities
- Attrition causing more 2nd tier
- Markets – interest
- Building trends
- Grants
- Revenue Sharing
- Ambulance fees
Resident Benefits Over Bureaucracy
2008
YE 2019 Full time staff
66 FT
64 FT at a lower cost per person Unfunded Legacy $7mm Eliminated Police 6 14 ISO ratings 5 and 9/10 3 and 4/10 Infrastructure dilapidated Lined and repaired sewers Added water main Built a water storage facility Built a new fire HQ New sewer plant 5 miles paved road 24 miles limestone New water tanker New ambulance fleet Public parking 180 acres added land Fund bal. (net of $7mm legacy) Governmental (5 legacy) Enterprise (2 legacy) $14.4mm $46.9mm $18.6mm $64.5mm
Operating with a Low Millage Rate
But Keeping Property Values High
- 50,000
100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000
Washington Township Macomb Township Shelby Township Bruce Township Ray Township Armada Township Richmond Township New Baltimore Chesterfield Township Sterling Heights Macomb County Average Harrison Township Clinton Township Richmond Utica Lenox Township Fraser St Clair Shores Memphis Warren
- Mt. Clemens
Centerline Roseville Eastpointe
Source: 2017 Equalization Report Excludes 40 homes in the Lake Township portion of Grosse Pointe Shores on the very south end of Macomb County at $618,375; note that villages are combined with townships in this presentation.
Washington’s approach to development and building a great lifestyle has helped us maintain the highest property values in the County.
Health Governmental Fund Balances
500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 2008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Police
1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 2008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
General and Other
1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Fire/Amb
Health is strong. Aggressive spend (for parking lots, roads, tanker, ambulances, station, etc) will reduce fund balances somewhat. We still have > 1 year in reserve for General 1.5 for Fire/Amb and 2 for Police. Note that you need 70% of budget to cover timing.
Sampling of Businesses Choosing Washington - 2009 to Present
Jake O’Malley’s Brown Iron Brewery Art and Jakes Pizza Nostalgia Bangkok Cuisine Sapori’s Taco Bell Pamela’s Catering Jimmy Johns Michigan Planners Angelica’s Place Pure Sleep Powerhouse Gym Salon V Total Health Systems Miracle Ear AAA Anytime Fitness Sylvan Learning Movement Project Yoga Salvation Army Advanced Auto Rite Aid Brush Salon Momentum Church All State Crittendon Medical Katy’s Corner Autozone Serra Kia ReCycle Fitness Verizon Total Soccer Sally’s Beauty Orielly’s Auto Parts Basement Salon Diversified Financial Escape Room Randazzo Call Center United Framing Gemelli Concrete
A Great Place to Live…
3 local orchards 20 dine-in 12 fast-food restaurants Several golf courses Sports facilities Amazing emergency services Clean water and waste services Park’s and Recreation activities AA bond rating Washington Historical Society Museum Octagon House Art Guild Macomb Orchard Trail. Washington Lions Sportsman’s Club, Boys and Girls Club Library and Schools WBRW TV 16 religious congregations. Stony Creek Metropark
- swim,
- fish,
- bike,
- nature center,
- disc golf,
- boat,
- sled,
- cross country ski,
- music in the park,
- camp,
- zip-line aerial course.
More to come…
What is Next?
- Must adopt budgets by 3/31.