Washington County Community Participation Transition Planning - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

washington county community participation transition
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Washington County Community Participation Transition Planning - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Washington County Community Participation Transition Planning Final Report to the Board of County Commissioners January 12, 2016 Consulting Team Joe Hertzberg Holly Van Houten JUNE 23, 2015 www.solidgroundconsulting.com Transition Planning


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Washington County Community Participation Transition Planning

Final Report to the Board of County Commissioners January 12, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Consulting Team

Joe Hertzberg Holly Van Houten

www.solidgroundconsulting.com JUNE 23, 2015

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Transition Planning Team

www.solidgroundconsulting.com JUNE 23, 2015

CCI Nominees Bruce Bartlett CPO 1 Jim Long CPO 4M Kathy Stallkamp CPO 4K At‐Large: Under‐ Represented Eduardo Corona Pablo Nieves‐Valenzuela Practitioner Sheri Wantland Clean Water Services City/Special District Liz Newton City of Tigard Corinne Weiss City of Hillsboro Bob Wayt Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District County Staff Victoria Saager Washington County, Land Use & Transportation Bill Steele Washington County, Sheriffʹs Office At‐Large: General Mary Manseau Luis Nava

slide-4
SLIDE 4

TYPES OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION

slide-5
SLIDE 5

BOARD DIRECTION TO TEAM Scope Purpose Content Constituencies

slide-6
SLIDE 6

ASPIRATIONAL VISION AND UNDERLYING PHILOSOPY

“active engagement is the engine of democracy” “participation strengthens the sense of community” “opportunities for all“ “people from all walks of life” “meaningfully engage“ “real two‐way dialogue” “help shape decisions that affect their lives” “broad participation of diverse community members“ “open and responsive government” “government is transparent, cares, listens, and responds” “public officials appreciate community participation” “opportunities for civic education and leadership training“ “the County partners with other jurisdictions“

slide-7
SLIDE 7

MAJOR TRANSITION TEAM SUGGESTIONS

  • A. Retain basic elements of current system
  • B. Create new Community Participation Advisory

Commission and population-specific subcommittees

  • C. Acknowledge organizations representing communities
  • f interest and identity
  • D. Work with others to create an integrated system
  • E. Create a kit of digital tools available to all elements of

the program

  • F. Determine the best staffing model
  • G. Consider alternatives for Information, Referral, and

Troubleshooting

slide-8
SLIDE 8

MAJOR TRANSITION TEAM SUGGESTIONS

  • A. Retain basic elements of current system

– Discontinue use of the word “citizen” – Retain CPO system, with CCI as a “roll-up” structure – Acknowledgement for organizations representing smaller areas

slide-9
SLIDE 9

MAJOR TRANSITION TEAM SUGGESTIONS

  • B. Create new Community Participation Advisory

Commission (CPAC) with subcommittees for diversity, youth, and business

slide-10
SLIDE 10

MAJOR TRANSITION TEAM SUGGESTIONS

  • C. Acknowledge organizations representing

communities of interest and identity

– Establish standards and practices – Existing and newly formed organizations – Specify rights and responsibilities – Ensure that the system is integrated, rather than two parallel systems

slide-11
SLIDE 11

MAJOR TRANSITION TEAM SUGGESTIONS

  • D. Work with other jurisdictions and CPOs to

create an integrated system

– Make CPO boundaries more meaningful – Negotiate with each city – Negotiate with each special service district – Strengthen partnerships to build a more integrated, seamless system – Collaborate to create education and training opportunities

slide-12
SLIDE 12

MAJOR TRANSITION TEAM SUGGESTIONS

  • E. Create a kit of digital tools available to all

elements of the program

slide-13
SLIDE 13

MAJOR TRANSITION TEAM SUGGESTIONS

  • F. Determine the best staffing model

– Identify tasks that are better implemented by County staff

  • r contractors

– Conduct a cost-benefit analysis – Consider issuing an RFQ to identify potential contractors

slide-14
SLIDE 14

MAJOR TRANSITION TEAM SUGGESTIONS

  • G. Consider alternatives for Information, Referral,

and Troubleshooting

– Single point of contact – “No wrong door” – Ombudsperson

slide-15
SLIDE 15

PROPOSED “ARCHITECTURE”

slide-16
SLIDE 16

DEFINING SUCCESS: OUTCOMES

  • Anyone can easily become aware of issues of interest.
  • Anyone can easily obtain information and become

involved.

  • Public officials welcome public input and use it to craft

better decisions.

  • Individuals and groups can proactively raise their own

issues of concern.

  • Strong sense of two-way connection between the

people and their government.

  • People have a strong sense of community.
  • The community is stronger and more resilient.
slide-17
SLIDE 17

NEXT STEPS

  • Provide Board direction
  • Implementation

– Potential 2016 Action:

  • Determine staffing and budget for transition of CPO Program

(must be done by July

  • Bring in communities of identity and interest
  • Create digital toolkit
  • Initiate negotiations with cities and special districts
  • Strengthen geographic system

– Staff takes lead, advised by CPAC or Transition Team

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Washington County Community Participation Transition Planning

Final Report to the Board of County Commissioners January 12, 2016