virginia webb phd rd procurement review process
play

Virginia Webb, PhD, RD Procurement Review Process First review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Virginia Webb, PhD, RD Procurement Review Process First review cycle Review last school year 2017-18 SY review 2016-17 SY On-site vs Off-site reviews Consistency Summary of Findings (sof) Procurement Review Process


  1. Virginia Webb, PhD, RD

  2. Procurement Review Process   First review cycle  Review last school year  2017-18 SY review 2016-17 SY  On-site vs Off-site reviews  Consistency  Summary of Findings (sof)

  3. Procurement Review Process   For 2018-19 reviews  Request information earlier  Clarity  Training  Technical assistance  Corrections made for current year

  4. Procurement Tool   Developed by USDA  USDA approval needed for LDOE to use other  Excel  Not printer friendly  Errors—USDA notified—misspellings, etc.  Emailed with procurement announcement  Available on LDOE website  All questions included

  5. What is the SFA Procurement Table?   SFA records all procurements  Reflects prior school year  Used to select procurements for review

  6. How does the SFA Procurement Table get completed?  SFA completes it

  7. Procurement Authority   Name  Position/Title  Responsibilities  Contact Information

  8. Small Purchase Threshold   Same as Simplified Acquisition Threshold  Maximum value at which the SFA can use informal procurement procedures  Federal threshold is set at $150,000—and for Charters  State of Louisiana $30,000  LEAs (School District) may set a lower, more restrictive threshold

  9. Group Purchasing Services   For-profit or not-for-profit organizations  Buy in larger quantities on behalf of members  May not provide Free and Open Competition if other sources are not allowed to compete  Different from SFA-only cooperative

  10. Micro purchase Section - Tool   SFAs can aggregate (total) all purchases by vendor  SFAs must include:  Goods/Services Provided  Total Paid to Vendor  # of Purchases

  11. Small Purchase Section - Tool   SFAs can aggregate all procurements by vendor  SFAs must include:  Goods/Services Provided  Total Paid to Vendor  One Time/Multiple Purchase  More than One Response  GPO/GBO/3 rd Party

  12. Formal Contracts   Value of purchase is > $150,000 for Charter and > $30,000 for others in Louisiana  Types of Formal Procurements  Invitation for Bid – lowest responsive and responsible bidder  Request for Proposal – most advantageous with price and other factors considered (price primary)  Noncompetitive - an SFA solicits a proposal from only one source

  13. Types of Formal Contracts  1. Fixed Price (Fee) – means a price that is fixed at the inception of a contract and is guaranteed for a specific period of time. Includes milk with escalation/de- escalation clauses. 2. Cost Reimbursable – reimburses the vendor for costs incurred under the contract, with or without a fixed fee.

  14. Formal Section - Tool  SFAs need to include:  Goods/Services Provided  Contract Value (amount spend during year)  Solicitation Type (IFB or RFP)  Contract Type(Fixed Price or Cost Reimbursable)  Contract Duration  More than One Response  GPO/GBO/3 rd Party  If amendments were made

  15. Food Service Management Company Contracts   Any organization, commercial or nonprofit, that contracts with a SFA to manage any aspect of the school nutrition program  Contracts limited to 1 year with up to 4 annual renewals

  16. FSMC Section - Tool  SFAs must include:  Goods/Services Provided  Contract Value  Solicitation Type (IFB or RFP)  Contract Type(Fixed Price or Cost Reimbursable)  Contract Year  More than One Response  GPO/GBO/3 rd Party  If amendments were made

  17. Processing Contracts for USDA Foods   Allows SFAs to contract with commercial food processors to convert raw and/or bulk USDA Foods into a variety of convenient, ready-to-use end products.  Louisiana Department of Agriculture does not solicit for individual SFAs

  18. Processing Contracts  4 Main Value Pass-Through Methods 1. Rebate System 2. Fee for Service 3. Direct Discount 4. Hybrid/Net Off Invoice

  19. Processing Section - Tool  SFAs must include:  Goods Provided  Contract Value  Procurement Type (IFB or RFP)  Contract Duration  More than One Response  GPO/GBO/3 rd Party  If amendments were made

  20. Vendor Paid List   Summary of expenses by vendor  Ledger  Dates, invoice numbers, $ amounts  Includes all purchases paid from nonprofit food service account for prior SY  Used to validate data provided in SFA Procurement Table

  21. Procurement Selection Chart Tab   Selection criteria varies by procurement type.  Each section contains instructions by procurement type.  The chart prescribes the minimum review requirement.

  22. Micro Purchase: Required Documentation  The SA will request:  Receipts  Invoices

  23. Small Purchase: Documentation   Solicitation Documents  Bid Quotes/Responses  Evaluation of Responses  Contracts  Purchase Orders  Receipts/Invoices

  24. Formal Procurement: Documentation   Solicitation Documents  Bidder Response  Evaluation  Executed Contract  Contract Renewal/Amendment  Cost/Price Analysis  Non-competitive Proposal Authorization  Invoices

  25. FSMC Contracts: Selection   SAs will simply review every FSMC contract listed on the procurement chart.  FSMC contracts are either in their base year or operating in a renewal year.

  26. FSMC: Base Year Documentation   Solicitation Documents  Bidder Response  Evaluation Documents/Scoring Sheets  Notification of Rejected Bids  Invoices  USDA Foods Credits  Reconciliation of discounts, rebates, credits, as applicable

  27. FSMC: Renewal Year Documentation   Solicitation Documents  Bidder Response  Evaluation Documents/Scoring Sheets  FSMC Invoices  Reconciliation for USDA Foods  Reconciliation of discounts, rebates, credits, as applicable * FSMC Renewal Section of Checklist

  28. Processing Contracts: Documentation   SDA template agreement/contract for processors  SDA list of approved foods for processing  SFA Planned assistance level (from prior school year)  SFA Solicitation documents, vendor bids/responses, evaluation for contract award and executed contracts for selected vendors  Contract Renewals/addenda/amendments, if applicable  Reconciliation of USDA Foods received, if applicable *Processing Section of Checklist

  29. General Procurement Tab 

  30. General Procurement Procedures  Written Code of Conduct  Does the SFA have a written Code of Conduct?  If yes, does the code of conduct prohibit conflicts of interest?

  31. Written Code of Conduct Continued   Does the code of conduct: a) Prohibit the acceptance of gratuities or favors from contractors? b) Provide for disciplinary actions for violations?

  32. Procurement Plan   Does the SFA have a Procurement plan as stated in 2 CFR 200.318 (a)?  Other things to consider in your procurement plan: a) Required Federal, State and local laws and regulations b) Assurance that unnecessary/ duplicative items are prohibited c) No features are included that unduly restrict competition

  33. Specifications   Food  Supplies  Equipment  Services

  34. Cost/Price Analysis   SFA must perform a cost or price analysis for all procurements that exceed the applicable small purchase threshold.  Make independent estimates of costs/prices before receiving bids or proposals, using market reports, etc.  SFA must maintain documentation

  35. Targeting Small Businesses   Does the SFA/LEA take steps to assure that small, minority and women's businesses enterprises and labor surplus firms are used when possible?

  36. Are there any questions???

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend