vigilnet an integrated sensor
play

VigilNet: An Integrated Sensor 70 Mica2 motes along 280 foot long - PDF document

Prototype System VigilNet: An Integrated Sensor 70 Mica2 motes along 280 foot long perimeter Network System for Energy- Equipped with 433 Mhz. Chipcon short range Efficient Surveillance (<1000 ft) radio, sensor board with magnetic


  1. Prototype System VigilNet: An Integrated Sensor � 70 Mica2 motes along 280 foot long perimeter Network System for Energy- � Equipped with 433 Mhz. Chipcon short range Efficient Surveillance (<1000 ft) radio, sensor board with magnetic sensor � Laptop base station for visualization Eric Nicks � TinyOS running on each mote � Entire system consists of 40,000 lines of NesC and Java code allegedly downloadable from Sourceforge Requirements Architecture � Longevity � Confidential nature � Inaccessibility � Adjustable sensitivity � Environmental, security, criticality � Stealthiness � Size, radio frequency detection � Effectiveness � Location, latency Execution Cycle Phase II: Time Sync � GPS obvious solution, but is large and expensive � Reference broadcast scheme –Phase and frequency difference between clocks shared between motes by message sharing � Not selected due to overhead and energy use � Flooding time synchronization protocol selected � modified to run during phase II only 1

  2. Phase III: Localization Phase IV: Asymmetric Detection � Walking GPS � Asymmetric links – Different reception rates along different directions between same pair of motes � Installer wears GPS device � Link Symmetry Detection � Motes infer position based on beacons sent out by � Designed to reduce irregularity for upper network layers wearable GPS device � Local Beaconing � VigilNet created prototype system Each node has an ID � � Accurate up to 0.8 +/- 0.5 meters, studied to be Beaconing node adds all discovered neighbors to beacon � sufficient for routing, sensing, and tracking When node receives beacon, it adds the node to its list � Checks to see whether its own ID is on the list, if so this is a � symmetric link, otherwise asymmetric Phase V: Backbone Creation Phase VI: Sentry Selection � Sentry mote performs reconnaissance duty � Diffusion Tree � 2 conditions for sentry selection � Time synchronization messages used to distribute information needed to create routes back to � Internal node of diffusion tree basestation � No neighboring sentries � Creates network from base station to leaf motes � Contention: Sentry declaration message with � Updates to the tree allow for mote failure delay on each mote detection � Energy balancing: Delay based on energy � New routes updated during each execution � Sensing coverage: Declaration message range smaller than magnetic sensor range Phase VIII: Phase VIII: Event Tracking and Power Reporting Management � Problem: Many motes are going to track the vehicle as it passes through the mote path, creating increased traffic and energy � Proactive consumption � Periodic sleep commands sent by sentry to each neighboring mote with timer associated with data � Solution: Report Aggregation � Non-sentry motes receive the sleep commands, � Groups of motes formed dynamically in response and sleep the length of the timer to an event, and migrate when an event moves � Reactive � A group leader reports to the base station. � Transition between sleep and wakeup controlled by timer. Chosen for VigilNet 2

  3. Evaluation of In-Network Aggregation Critique � Still in a semi-controlled environment � Moisture and temp � Base Station not accounted for in experiment � Animal reclamation � Need to develop protective housing � Gateway to long distance command and control not implemented � No dynamic human configuration performed � Magnetometer sensor unable to sense human presence, recommend additional RF, sound, or visualization (activated based on other sensors) system as a backup � Has to be a better more dynamic solution to localization than walking GPS. Improper results could be found if the sensor is moved by wind, water, animal, etc. � No real study for effects to performance when multiple sensors “die” Comparison � Still a study, not a real world application like Great Duck Island � Energy savings in Great Duck Island could have been quite significant with the reactive power scheme of this experiment � 34 day median life for burrow motes in Great Duck Island will not work for military � External tools mentioned as need in Great Duck Island paper to allow non-experts to install the motes. Same things will be needed for these motes if 18 year old soldiers will be installing these surveillance networks in field 3

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend