VigilNet: An Integrated Sensor 70 Mica2 motes along 280 foot long - - PDF document

vigilnet an integrated sensor
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

VigilNet: An Integrated Sensor 70 Mica2 motes along 280 foot long - - PDF document

Prototype System VigilNet: An Integrated Sensor 70 Mica2 motes along 280 foot long perimeter Network System for Energy- Equipped with 433 Mhz. Chipcon short range Efficient Surveillance (<1000 ft) radio, sensor board with magnetic


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

VigilNet: An Integrated Sensor Network System for Energy- Efficient Surveillance

Eric Nicks

Prototype System

70 Mica2 motes along

280 foot long perimeter

Equipped with 433 Mhz. Chipcon short range

(<1000 ft) radio, sensor board with magnetic sensor

Laptop base station for visualization TinyOS running on each mote Entire system consists of 40,000 lines of

NesC and Java code allegedly downloadable from Sourceforge

Requirements

Longevity

Confidential nature Inaccessibility

Adjustable sensitivity

Environmental, security, criticality

Stealthiness

Size, radio frequency detection

Effectiveness

Location, latency

Architecture Execution Cycle Phase II: Time Sync

GPS obvious solution, but is large and

expensive

Reference broadcast scheme –Phase and

frequency difference between clocks shared between motes by message sharing

Not selected due to overhead and energy use

Flooding time synchronization protocol

selected

modified to run during phase II only

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2 Phase III: Localization

Walking GPS

Installer wears GPS device Motes infer position based on beacons sent out by

wearable GPS device

VigilNet created prototype system Accurate up to 0.8 +/- 0.5 meters, studied to be

sufficient for routing, sensing, and tracking

Phase IV: Asymmetric Detection

Asymmetric links – Different reception rates along

different directions between same pair of motes

Link Symmetry Detection

Designed to reduce irregularity for upper network layers Local Beaconing

  • Each node has an ID
  • Beaconing node adds all discovered neighbors to beacon
  • When node receives beacon, it adds the node to its list
  • Checks to see whether its own ID is on the list, if so this is a

symmetric link, otherwise asymmetric

Phase V: Backbone Creation

Diffusion Tree

Time synchronization messages used to distribute

information needed to create routes back to basestation

Creates network from base station to leaf motes Updates to the tree allow for mote failure

detection

New routes updated during each execution

Phase VI: Sentry Selection

Sentry mote performs reconnaissance duty 2 conditions for sentry selection

Internal node of diffusion tree No neighboring sentries

Contention: Sentry declaration message with

delay on each mote

Energy balancing: Delay based on energy Sensing coverage: Declaration message

range smaller than magnetic sensor range

Phase VIII: Power Management

Proactive

Periodic sleep commands sent by sentry to each

neighboring mote with timer associated with data

Non-sentry motes receive the sleep commands,

and sleep the length of the timer

Reactive

Transition between sleep and wakeup controlled

by timer. Chosen for VigilNet

Phase VIII: Event Tracking and Reporting

Problem: Many motes are going to track the

vehicle as it passes through the mote path, creating increased traffic and energy consumption

Solution: Report Aggregation

Groups of motes formed dynamically in response

to an event, and migrate when an event moves

A group leader reports to the base station.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Evaluation of In-Network Aggregation

Critique

Still in a semi-controlled environment

Moisture and temp Base Station not accounted for in experiment Animal reclamation Need to develop protective housing

Gateway to long distance command and control not implemented No dynamic human configuration performed Magnetometer sensor unable to sense human presence,

recommend additional RF, sound, or visualization (activated based on other sensors) system as a backup

Has to be a better more dynamic solution to localization than

walking GPS. Improper results could be found if the sensor is moved by wind, water, animal, etc.

No real study for effects to performance when multiple sensors

“die”

Comparison

Still a study, not a real world application like Great

Duck Island

Energy savings in Great Duck Island could have

been quite significant with the reactive power scheme of this experiment

34 day median life for burrow motes in Great Duck

Island will not work for military

External tools mentioned as need in Great Duck

Island paper to allow non-experts to install the

  • motes. Same things will be needed for these motes

if 18 year old soldiers will be installing these surveillance networks in field