variational methods for effective dynamics
play

Variational methods for effective dynamics Robert L. Jerrard - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Variational methods for effective dynamics Robert L. Jerrard Department of Mathematics University of Toronto Minischool on Variational Problems in Physics October 2-3, 2014 Fields Institute Robert L. Jerrard (Toronto ) Variational methods for


  1. Variational methods for effective dynamics Robert L. Jerrard Department of Mathematics University of Toronto Minischool on Variational Problems in Physics October 2-3, 2014 Fields Institute Robert L. Jerrard (Toronto ) Variational methods for effective dynamics Variational Problems in Physics 1 / 15

  2. effective dynamics means: Given a nonlinear evolution equation with small or large parameter one seeks a simple description of (at least some) solutions, where simple may mean: in terms of lower-dimensional objects relevance of the calculus of variations Γ -convergence is very often a source of inspiration Γ -convergence (with related estimates) is often an ingredient in proofs including for example for wave and Schrödinger equations Γ -convergence (with upgrades) can sometimes be the basis for proofs especially for gradient flows, cf lectures of Ambrosio In general: effective dynamics is largely a question of stability and calculus of variations is very relevant to stability. Robert L. Jerrard (Toronto ) Variational methods for effective dynamics Variational Problems in Physics 2 / 15

  3. effective dynamics means: Given a nonlinear evolution equation with small or large parameter one seeks a simple description of (at least some) solutions, where simple may mean: in terms of lower-dimensional objects relevance of the calculus of variations Γ -convergence is very often a source of inspiration Γ -convergence (with related estimates) is often an ingredient in proofs including for example for wave and Schrödinger equations Γ -convergence (with upgrades) can sometimes be the basis for proofs especially for gradient flows, cf lectures of Ambrosio In general: effective dynamics is largely a question of stability and calculus of variations is very relevant to stability. Robert L. Jerrard (Toronto ) Variational methods for effective dynamics Variational Problems in Physics 2 / 15

  4. general open problems 1 . Abstract framework for Γ -convergence and Hamiltonian systems. For gradient flows, Sandier-Serfaty ’04, Serfaty ’11 2 . For Hamiltonian systems (especially), Can one ever establish global-in-time results ? In particular, given a periodic solution of a limiting Hamiltonian system, can one find “nearby" periodic solutions for the approximating functional? Robert L. Jerrard (Toronto ) Variational methods for effective dynamics Variational Problems in Physics 3 / 15

  5. First example Exercise Assume that F ε : R 2 ∼ = C → R and that F ε → F in some topology. For which topologies is it true that solutions of the ODEs ˙ x ε = −∇ F ε ( x ε ) , x ε ( 0 ) = x 0 (1) ¨ x ε ( 0 ) = x 0 , ˙ x ε = −∇ F ε ( x ε ) , x ε ( 0 ) = v 0 (2) i ˙ x ε = −∇ F ε ( x ε ) , x ε ( 0 ) = x 0 (3) converge, as ε → 0, to solutions of the ε = 0 systems? Note: for (1), “energy" decreases along trajectories: d dt F ε ( x ε ) = −| ˙ x ε | 2 x ε | 2 + F ε ( x ε )] = 0. for (2), “energy" is conserved: d dt [ 1 2 | ˙ for (3), (a different) “energy" is conserved: d dt F ε ( x ε ) = 0. Robert L. Jerrard (Toronto ) Variational methods for effective dynamics Variational Problems in Physics 4 / 15

  6. Another example The above exercise is misleading in that it (probably) doesn’t use gradient structure doesn’t distinguish between different dynamics more illustrative : Let g : R 2 → R be a fixed smooth function, and define F ε ( x , y ) := g ( x , y ) + ε − p ( y − ε q sin ( x ε )) 2 for certain p , q > 0. Exercise Show that � g ( x , 0 ) if y = 0 Γ F ε → F 0 ( x , y ) := + ∞ if not Exercise For which values of p , q do solutions of various ODEs for F ε converge to solutions for F 0 ? Robert L. Jerrard (Toronto ) Variational methods for effective dynamics Variational Problems in Physics 5 / 15

  7. Note : in general Γ -convergence is far too weak to allow any conclusions about dynamics. Exercise Assume that f : R n → R is continuous, φ : R n → R is measurable and Z n -periodic, with inf φ = 0. Then for any p > 0, F ε ( x ) := f ( x ) + ε − p φ ( x Γ ε ) − → f . Exercise Assume that f : R n → R is positive. Let { x i } be a countable dense subset of R n , and define � if x ∈ ∪ ∞ i = 1 B ( x i , 2 − i ε ) 0 F ε ( x ) := f ( x ) if not Then Γ F ε → F > 0 a.e. and in L 1 loc , but F ε ( x ) − → 0 . Robert L. Jerrard (Toronto ) Variational methods for effective dynamics Variational Problems in Physics 6 / 15

  8. For the duration of this lecture, we consider the Allen-Cahn energy � ε 2 |∇ u | 2 + 1 2 ε ( u 2 − 1 ) 2 dx u ∈ H 1 F ε ( u ) := loc (Ω) Ω and associated evolution problems (where typically Ω = R n .) Plan recall Γ -convergence (for inspiration) and state corresponding wave equation result discuss proof transform via change of variables into a stability question address this using variational arguments Robert L. Jerrard (Toronto ) Variational methods for effective dynamics Variational Problems in Physics 7 / 15

  9. Theorem (Modica-Mortola ’77, Modica ’87,Sternberg ’88) 1. (compactness) If ( u ε ) ε ∈ ( 0 , 1 ] is a sequence in H 1 (Ω) such that F ε ( u ε ) ≤ C then there is a subsequence that converges in L 1 as ε → 0 to a limit u ∈ BV (Ω; {± 1 } ) . L 1 2. (lower bound) If ( u ε ) ⊂ H 1 (Ω) and u ε → u, then � 4 3 | Du | (Ω) if u ∈ BV (Ω; {± 1 } ) lim inf ε → 0 F ε ( u ε ) ≥ F 0 ( u ) := + ∞ if not 3. (upper bound) For any u ∈ L 1 (Ω) there exists a sequence ( u ε ) ⊂ H 1 (Ω) such that L 1 u ε → u and lim sup F ε ( u ε ) ≤ F 0 ( u ) . ε → 0 Robert L. Jerrard (Toronto ) Variational methods for effective dynamics Variational Problems in Physics 8 / 15

  10. Informally, F ε ( · ) Γ → “ interfacial area functional ” As a corollary : if ( u ε ) is a sequence of minimizers of F ε (for suitable boundary data....) then u ε → u ∈ BV (Ω; {± 1 } ) after passing to a subsequence if necessary , and the set { x ∈ Ω : u ( x ) = 1 } has minimal perimeter in Ω . Robert L. Jerrard (Toronto ) Variational methods for effective dynamics Variational Problems in Physics 9 / 15

  11. further (PDE) results : ( many references omitted here.....) similar for nonminimizing solutions of − ε ∆ u ε + 1 ε ( u 2 ε − 1 ) u ε = 0 (assuming natural energy bounds.) solutions of − ε ∆ u ε + 1 ε ( u 2 ε − 1 ) u ε = ε κ are related in a similar way to surfaces of Constant Mean Curvature. in addition, u ε ( x ) ≈ q ( d ( x ) ) , where d ( · ) is signed distance from interface, ε |∇ d | 2 = 1 , so that d ( · ) satisfies d = 0 on Γ . Robert L. Jerrard (Toronto ) Variational methods for effective dynamics Variational Problems in Physics 10 / 15

  12. Theorem (J ’11, Galvão-Sousa and J., ’13) Assume that Γ is a smooth, compact, embedded, timelike hypersurface in ( T ∗ , T ∗ ) × R n , bounding a set O , and such that H mink (Γ) = κ ∈ R . Then there exists a sequence of solutions ( u ε ) of the wave equation ε ( ∂ tt u ε − ∆ u ε ) + 1 ε ( u 2 − 1 )( 2 u − εκ ) = 0 such that � 1 in O in L 2 loc (( T ∗ , T ∗ ) × R n ) u ε → u := in O c − 1 In fact we prove more, including energy concentration around Γ , estimates of rate of convergence etc. H mink = ( 1 − v 2 ) − 1 / 2 ( H euc − ( 1 − v 2 ) − 1 a ) , where v = velocity , a = acceleration . H mink = 0 ⇐ ⇒ critical point of Minkowskian area functional Robert L. Jerrard (Toronto ) Variational methods for effective dynamics Variational Problems in Physics 11 / 15

  13. Formal arguments and elliptic results suggest that u ≈ q ( d ε ) , where q is the optimal 1-d profile: − q ′′ + ( q 2 − 1 ) q = 0 , q ( 0 ) = 0 , q → ± 1 at ± ∞ d is the signed Minkowski distance function to Γ , i.e. − ( ∂ t d ) 2 + |∇ d | 2 = 1 , d = 0 on Γ , Note that q minimizes � 2 ( v ′ ) 2 + 1 1 2 ( 1 − v 2 ) 2 dr v �→ R among functions such that v ( r ) → ± 1 as r → ±∞ . Robert L. Jerrard (Toronto ) Variational methods for effective dynamics Variational Problems in Physics 12 / 15

  14. Plan: consider 1 d case (with κ � = 0) for simplicity Let r 0 = κ − 1 . Then Γ = { r 0 ( sinh θ, cosh θ ) : θ ∈ R } := { ( t , x ) : x 2 − t 2 = r 2 0 } change to Minkowskian polar coordinates ( r cosh θ, r sinh θ ) = ( x , t ) , r > 0 , θ ∈ R Then θ ≈ “ time ” and r − r 0 = d = Minkowski distance to Γ then hope to show that u ( x , t ) = v ( r , θ ) ≈ q ( d ε ) = q ( r − r 0 ) . ε in fact we will concoct a functional ζ such that η ( v ( · , θ )) small ⇒ v ≈ q ( r − r 0 ) , ε d θη ( v ( · , θ )) ≈ 0 if v ≈ q ( r − r 0 d ) . ε Robert L. Jerrard (Toronto ) Variational methods for effective dynamics Variational Problems in Physics 13 / 15

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend