valuation et qualit des formations: regards croiss des institutions - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Lille, 20 mai 2011 1

Table ronde

Évaluation et qualité des formations: regards croisés des institutions et des agences

Conférence Européenne des Experts de Bologne

Les partenariats internationaux de formation : enjeux et pratiques dans l’espace européen de l’enseignement supérieur et de la recherche

Lille, 20 mai 2011 2

Problématique

Le développement de formations transnationales est l’une des manifestations les plus symboliques de la dynamique du Processus de

• Bologne. Plus largement, les établissements d’enseignement supérieur

conçoivent des formations conjointes pour les besoins de leurs stratégies propres non seulement dans l’Espace européen de l’enseignement supérieur mais aussi dans le cadre de coopérations qu’ils développent dans toutes les régions du monde.

• Comment la qualité de ces formations est-elle garantie ?
• Quelles sont les spécificités de leur évaluation ?
• Comment les agences d’évaluation ou d’accréditation envisagent-elles

cette partie de leur activité ?

• Les

diplômes conjoints invitent-ils à concevoir des évaluations conjointes ou bien à organiser la reconnaissance mutuelle des résultats d’évaluation ?

• Quels enseignements peut-on tirer des expériences de deux agences

et d’un établissement ?

Lille, 20 mai 2011 3

Participants

• Hilde Elin Haaland-Kramer, Université de Bergen, Norvège
• Laureano Lopez Vega, ANECA, Espagne
• Jean-Marc Geib, AERES, France

Animation

• Bruno Curvale, CIEP, France

Lille, 20 mai 2011 4

• !"#$%&$$'( )#'(

''%&*)#())

• +%+,
• $(-&.(#/ &'( %#

!( 0(('1) &!((

• (. 23(!#*
• !((
• 4.

Les 47 pays qui participent au Processus de Bologne et forment l’Espace Européen de l’Enseignement supérieur

Lille, 20 mai 2011 5

• !"##$$

$%&'"#()*((+,&

• .+,&!++)*/-.,-!

)

• 0)+,
• $(-&.(#/ &'( %#

!( 0(('1) &!((

• (. 23(!#*
• !((
• 4.

Les 47 pays qui participent au Processus de Bologne et forment l’Espace Européen de l’Enseignement supérieur

Lille, 20 mai 2011 6

• $
• %
• $%

%5

• 5%
• '

6' +56

• E4 Group

1'798-561-CE 2'72006-143-CE

Source : Colin Tück, E4, B. Curvale

• #

#&& "#

#5 6' %

• La dimension européenne de la garantie de la

qualité

• &

1

Lille, 20 mai 2011 7

“Promotion of European co-operation in quality assurance with a view to developing comparable criteria and methodologies.”

Bologna Declaration 1999

Lille, 20 mai 2011 8

“Promotion of the European dimensions in higher education In

• rder to further strengthen the important European dimensions of

higher education and graduate employability Ministers called upon the higher education sector to increase the development of modules, courses and curricula at all levels with "European" content, orientation or organisation. This concerns particularly modules, courses and degree curricula offered in partnership by institutions from different countries and leading to a recognized joint degree.”

Prague Communiqué 2001

Lille, 20 mai 2011 9

“Ministers recognized the vital role that quality assurance systems play in ensuring high quality standards and in facilitating the comparability of qualifications throughout Europe. They also encouraged closer cooperation between recognition and quality assurance networks. They emphasized the necessity of close European cooperation and mutual trust in and acceptance of national quality assurance systems. Further they encouraged universities and other higher education institutions to disseminate examples of best practice and to design scenarios for mutual acceptance

• f

evaluation and accreditation/certification mechanisms. Ministers called upon the universities and other higher educations institutions, national agencies and the European Network of Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA), in cooperation with corresponding bodies from countries which are not members of ENQA, to collaborate in establishing a common framework of reference and to disseminate best practice.”

Prague Communiqué 2001

Lille, 20 mai 2011 10

• “Ministers commit themselves to supporting further development
• f quality assurance at institutional, national and European level.

They stress the need to develop mutually shared criteria and methodologies on quality assurance. (…)

• At the European level, Ministers call upon ENQA through its

members, in co-operation with the EUA, EURASHE and ESIB, to develop an agreed set of standards, procedures and guidelines on quality assurance, to explore ways of ensuring an adequate peer review system for quality assurance and/or accreditation agencies or bodies (…)”

Berlin Communiqué 2003

Lille, 20 mai 2011 11

“We adopt the standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European Higher Education Area as proposed by ENQA. We commit ourselves to introducing the proposed model for peer review of quality assurance agencies on a national basis, while respecting the commonly accepted guidelines and criteria. We welcome the principle of a European register of quality assurance agencies based on national review. (…) We underline the importance of cooperation between nationally recognised agencies with a view to enhancing the mutual recognition of accreditation or quality assurance decisions.”

Bergen Communiqué 2005

Lille, 20 mai 2011 12

“We acknowledge the progress made with regard to mutual recognition of accreditation and quality assurance decisions, and encourage continued international cooperation amongst quality assurance agencies. 2.13 The first European Quality Assurance Forum, jointly organised by EUA, ENQA, EURASHE and ESIB (the E4 Group) in 2006 provided an opportunity to discuss European developments in quality assurance. We encourage the four organisations to continue to organise European Quality Assurance Fora

• n an annual basis, to facilitate the sharing of good practice and ensure that

quality in the EHEA continues to improve. 2.14 (…)The purpose of the register is to allow all stakeholders and the general public open access to objective information about trustworthy quality assurance agencies that are working in line with the ESG. It will therefore enhance confidence in higher education in the EHEA and beyond, and facilitate the mutual recognition of quality assurance and accreditation decisions.”

London Communiqué 2007

Lille, 20 mai 2011 13

• Focus on co-operation of agencies, on shared criteria and

methodologies and on mutual recognition of quality assurance decisions in order to foster mutual recognition of degrees;

• Concept of European Quality Assurance Dimension.

“19. Within each of the three cycles, opportunities for mobility shall be created in the structure of degree programmes. Joint degrees and programmes as well as mobility windows shall become more common practice.”

Leuven/Louvain-La Neuve Communiqué 2009

Lille, 20 mai 2011 14

Bologna Seminar The European Dimension of Quality Assurance

jointly organized by the German Rectors’ Conference – Project nexus – and the German Accreditation Council, on 14 March 2011 in Berlin.

Proposal for the Bucharest meeting …Taking the discussions and the outcome of this Bologna Seminar into account, the ministers are called upon to:

simplify recognition of degrees and modules by :

• 1. supporting information initiatives in their countries to provide

information on the Lisbon Recognition Convention in HEI;

• 2. encourage and support NARICs to promote the Lisbon

Recognition convention more actively and to provide a “White List” containing reliable information on HEIs and programmes;

Lille, 20 mai 2011 15

• pen up their national quality assurance systems to agencies

from other countries that are registered in the EQAR ;

to consider reviewing the ESG, based on the outcome of the

mapESG project ;

Bologna Seminar The European Dimension of Quality Assurance

jointly organized by the German Rectors’ Conference – Project nexus – and the German Accreditation Council, on 14 March 2011 in Berlin.

Lille, 20 mai 2011 16

foster the development of Joint Programmes by:

• 1. accepting core standards for the design of Joint Programmes;
• 2. accepting deviations from national standards in Joint Programmes;
• 3. accepting the ESG and the QF-EHEA as reliable overarching

principles for the design and quality assurance of Joint Programmes;

• 4. accepting that joint programmes accredited by a quality assurance

agency registered on the EQAR will not require additional national accreditations or quality assurance procedures.

Bologna Seminar The European Dimension of Quality Assurance

jointly organized by the German Rectors’ Conference – Project nexus – and the German Accreditation Council, on 14 March 2011 in Berlin.

Lille, 20 mai 2011 17

invite and support HEIs and scientific communities to develop

discipline-specific frameworks that underpin the connection between learning outcomes and quality assurance.

Bologna Seminar The European Dimension of Quality Assurance

jointly organized by the German Rectors’ Conference – Project nexus – and the German Accreditation Council, on 14 March 2011 in Berlin.

Lille, 20 mai 2011 18

Merci de votre attention curvale@ciep.fr