Validation of Programme of Validation of Programme of g Activities - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
validation of programme of validation of programme of g
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Validation of Programme of Validation of Programme of g Activities - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nov 24, 2022 310 likes •452 views

Institute for Global Environmental Strategies Towards sustainable development - policy oriented, practical and strategic research on global environmental issues Validation of Programme of Validation of Programme of g Activities ( Activities

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Institute for Global Environmental Strategies

Towards sustainable development - policy oriented, practical and strategic research on global environmental issues

Validation of Programme of Validation of Programme of g Activities ( Activities (PoAs PoAs): ): f C C f C C Analysis of CARs and CLs Analysis of CARs and CLs

Preparation Meeting for Capacity Building of Potential Thai DOEs 7 July 2010 7 July 2010

Nozomi OKUBO Institute for Global Environmental Strategies g Market Mechanism Group

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Status of Status of PoA PoA Development Development

#

40

N l (1)

45 Asia 40

Nepal (1)

  • S. Korea (1)

Thailand (1) Singapore (1)

30 30 Asia (30)

Biomass (2) Methane Avoidance (3) Other renewables (3)

Philippines (2)

Bangladesh (3)

20

Vietnam(4)

Indonesia (3)

Bi (7) Hydro (4)

Avoidance (3)

Bangladesh (3)

  • L. America

(7) China (6)

Vietnam(4) Mexco (1) Brazil (1) Biogas(7)

Africa (7)

Middle East (1)

India (8) ( )

Brazil (1) India (1)

Energy Efficiency (11)

2

East (1)

Countries in Asia Projects in Asia PoAs Registered

Data: IGES PoA Database (June, 2010)

PoAs in total

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Similar Project Cycle Applied to Similar Project Cycle Applied to PoA PoA

Normal CDM PoA

Project Design Document (PDD) PoA-DD, Typical CPA-DD, Specific CPA-DD Validation Validation of PoA-DD/CPA-DD DNA A l DNA A l Registration Registration of PoA-DD/CPA-DD DNA Approval DNA Approval Monitoring Monitoring

Inclusion of N CPA

Verification Verification

New CPA- DD(s)

V lid ti f CPA

3 CER Issuance CER Issuance

Validation of CPA

slide-4
SLIDE 4

PoA PoA Validation Needs Extra Reference Validation Needs Extra Reference

  • Article 12 KP

CDM-(SSC)-PDD

  • CDM M&Ps
  • SSC-CDM M&Ps

( )

  • SSC-CDM M&Ps
  • EB Decisions

A d CDM-(SSC)- P A DD

  • Approved

Methodologies PoA-DD CDM-CPA-DD (General) CDM-CPA-DD PoA Guidance and Procedures

4

(Specific) and Procedures

slide-5
SLIDE 5

3 3 PoAs PoAs registered so far registered so far g

CFLs distribtuion in Mexico

  • Registered in July 31 2009
  • Registered in July 31, 2009
  • ERs: 520,365 t-CO2/y (POA)

24 283 t CO /y (CPA) 24,283 t-CO2/y (CPA) Biogas utilization in Brazil

  • Registered in October 29, 2009
  • ERs: 591,418 t-CO2/y (POA)

139 t-CO2/y (CPA) CFLs distribution in India CFLs distribution in India

  • Registered in April 29, 2010
  • ERs: 34 892 t-CO2/y (POA)

5

  • ERs: 34,892 t-CO2/y (POA)

34,892 t-CO2/y (CPA)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Overview of PoA-CFLs-Mexico

PoA Title CUIDEMOS Mexico (Campana De Uso Intelegente De Energia Mexico) – Smart Use of Energy Programme Design To replace incandescent light bulbs (ILBs) with CFLs in households by providing CFLs free of charge. Baseline AMS II C (ver09) “Demand side energy efficiency Baseline AMS-II.C (ver09) Demand-side energy efficiency activities for specific technologies” Continued use of ILBs. Sampling procedure will be li d t d t i ti h f CFL applied to determine operating hours of CFLs. Additionality

  • f PoA

The replacement is not required by any law. PoA will face financial barrier.

  • f PoA

PoA will face financial barrier. Additionality

  • f Typical

CPA Simple cost analysis with/without CER revenue. Barrier analysis based on independent study. CPA Monitoring No sampling for monitoring; direct verification by

  • DOEs. Scrapping of incandescent light bulbs will

6

  • DOEs. Scrapping of incandescent light bulbs will

also be monitored.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Summary of PoA-CFLs-India

PoA Title CFL lighting scheme – “Bachat Lamp Yojana” P T l i d t li ht b lb (ILB) ith CFL Programme Design To replace incandescent light bulbs (ILB) with CFLs in households by providing CFLs Baseline AMS-II.J (ver03) “Demand-side activities for efficient Baseline AMS II.J (ver03) Demand side activities for efficient lighting technologies” Continued use of ILBs Additionality f P A There are no mandatory legal requirements. A t l t f b i

  • f PoA

Autonomous replacement faces barriers. Additionality

  • f Typical

Investment Barrier (Net Present Value with/without CER revenue)

  • f Typical

CPA CER revenue) Monitoring Director monitoring of CFLs distribution and d t ti f ILB destruction of ILBs. Sampling method adopted to determine some parameters related to CFLs. 7 Simple random sampling approach applied.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Summary of PoA-Biogas-Brazil

PoA Title Methane capture and combustion from Animal Waste Management System (AWMS) of the 3S Program farms of the Instituto Sadia de Sustentabilidade farms of the Instituto Sadia de Sustentabilidade Programme Design To install biogas digesters to treat the manure under controlled conditions and recover/burn the methane. g Baseline AMS-III.D (ver13) “Methane recovery in agricultural and agro industrial activities” Continuation of the current situation Continuation of the current situation. Additionality

  • f PoA

There are no mandatory rules to collect and burn the methane in swine manure. High investment cost g discourage the utilization of methane. Additionality

  • f Typical

Investment Barrier (Simple cost analysis) Technological Barrier (no special expertise)

  • f Typical

CPA Technological Barrier (no special expertise) Monitoring Sampling method to be used by DOEs for verification 8 g g y

  • f ERs. Sample size of 25% of all CPAs.
slide-9
SLIDE 9

5 Important Points in 5 Important Points in PoA PoA Validation Validation p

  • 1. Operation and management of PoA
  • Most of the PoAs received CAR/CL for the

documentation of the PoA:

  • Number of CPAs expected should be defined.
  • PP/CME in PoA should be clearly mentioned

PP/CME in PoA should be clearly mentioned.

  • Starting date of CPA should be confirmed not to

be before the start of validation of the PoA be before the start of validation of the PoA.

  • For more details: Para 4 (Preparation of a CDM
  • For more details: Para 4 (Preparation of a CDM-

PoA-DD) (a) to (n) and Para 5 (Preparation of a CDM-CPA-DD) (a) to (h) of PoA Procedures CDM-CPA-DD) (a) to (h) of PoA Procedures (EB47, Annex 29)

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

5 Important Points in 5 Important Points in PoA PoA Validation Validation

  • 2. Additionality of PoA
  • Additionality argument of PoA and CPA
  • Additionality argument of PoA and CPA
  • PoA: clarifications on national/sectoral policy,

d t ti f th f t th t l di t d demonstration of the fact that only coordinated voluntary action overcome the issue. CPA li ti f d th d l

  • CPA: application of approved methodology.

Simple cost calculation is applied in most cases.

  • Eligibility criteria for the additionality of CPA should

be defined in PoA.

  • Draft guidelines for the demonstration of

additionality for CDM PoAs (EB51 Annotations annnex 11) has been under consideration

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

5 Important Points in 5 Important Points in PoA PoA Validation Validation

  • 3. Ensuring no double counting/de-bundling
  • Submission of evidence (e g spread sheet for
  • Submission of evidence (e.g. spread sheet for

identification of each CPA) is often requested.

  • This will include the checking system by CMEs
  • For more details: Guideline for Determining the

Occurrence of De-bundling under a PoA (EB47 Annex 32)

  • 4. Public Consultation at PoA/CPA level
  • PP to choose at which level consultation will be held
  • PP to choose at which level consultation will be held.
  • In some cases, change was made during CARs/CL

f P A t CPA l l from PoA to CPA level.

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

5 Important Points in 5 Important Points in PoA PoA Validation Validation

  • 5. Sampling methodology/approach
  • All 3 PoAs employ sampling approach for ex-
  • All 3 PoAs employ sampling approach for ex-

ante/ex-post determination of parameters.

  • CARs/CL made for clarification on the formulas and
  • CARs/CL made for clarification on the formulas and

sampling size.

  • In most cases they use below by following the
  • In most cases, they use below by following the

indicative guidance in “General Guidelines for Sampling and Survey for SSC CDM Project Sampling and Survey for SSC CDM Project Activities (EB50 Annex 30)

 Simple Random Sampling  Simple Random Sampling  90% Confidence level  10% Error margin

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Summary Summary

  • Experiences of validating PoAs are yet to be

accumulated

  • CARs and CL have been requested regarding

such points as: such points as:

  • Concrete information of CPAs

Proof of no double counting

  • Proof of no double-counting
  • Sampling approach
  • DOEs should focus on those points for efficient

validation

  • Current “Procedures for PoA” as well as

“Guidelines for PoA” should serve as a reference for clarification

13