Update on NAAQS and Regulatory Issues
SC Manufacturer’s Alliance February 4-5, 2014
Robert J. Brown, Jr., Director
- Div. of Air Assessment and Regulation
BAQ, SCDHEC brownrj@dhec.sc.gov (803) 898-4105
Update on NAAQS and Regulatory Issues SC Manufacturers Alliance - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Update on NAAQS and Regulatory Issues SC Manufacturers Alliance February 4-5, 2014 Robert J. Brown, Jr., Director Div. of Air Assessment and Regulation BAQ, SCDHEC brownrj@dhec.sc.gov (803) 898-4105 Ozone NAAQS Primary/Secondary =
Robert J. Brown, Jr., Director
BAQ, SCDHEC brownrj@dhec.sc.gov (803) 898-4105
1 Ten at the Top 2 Catawba Regional Air Quality Coalition 3 Central Midlands Air Partnership 4 CSRA Air Quality Alliance 5 Waccamaw Air Quality Coalition 6 BCDCOG Clean Air and Climate Coalition 7 Florence and Darlington Counties???
Purpose:
and either existing or planned federal/state measures to address multipollutant air quality management can be modeled to demonstrate continued compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in a particular area of South Carolina.
quality management plan as envisioned in the 2004 National Academy of Science (NAS) report into South Carolina’s combined ozone/particulate matter Advance program.
COMPLIANCE WITH NAAQS
EPA’s and DHEC’s goals for this project are: (1) Identify local emission reduction measures for the Upstate that address multiple pollutants, that are harmonized with existing or planned federal/state/local measures,[1] that are quantifiable, and whose implementation by DHEC and/or Upstate is achievable; (2) Maintain compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS); (3) Demonstrate that the selected strategy(ies) can reduce population risk from exposure to ozone, PM2.5, and selected air toxics in the Upstate and can reduce exposure among populations at greatest level of baseline risk; (4) Transition to a multi-pollutant air quality management strategy; and (5) Foster a spirit of collaboration among EPA, the Upstate, and DHEC that highlights the importance of a coalition approach.
[1] See the 2004 National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report describing the elements of a multi- pollutant air quality management plan (AQMP).
CAIR/Next Transport Utility MACT 2014/5 Ozone 2012 2013
Final Proposal
2010 SO2 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Tailoring Rule GHG Existing NSPS Regional Haze 2010 NO2 2012 PM CAIR/Next Transport Utility MACT 2014/15 Ozone 2010 SO2 Tailoring Rule Regional Haze 2010 NO2 2012 PM
Final State Plan Proposal Final Final Compliance Proposal Designations Proposal for Data Rule Designations Near‐road monitors in SC? Final Rule Designations Step 3 5‐year study Rule based on study 5‐year review Next plan due/BART Modeling plan
GHG Existing NSPS
Designations 2016‐2019 Allocations
New Fossil Fuel Power Plants (79 FR 1430) – Comments are due March 10, 2014 (60 day comment period)
Fuel Power Plants – Proposal June 2014 – Final Rule June 2015 (EPA sets broad guidelines) – State Plan due June 2016
– Adopt federal regulations promulgated from Jan 2013-Dec 2013 – Adopt NO2 and SO2 into R.61-62.5, Std 2 – SSM SIP Call (if final)
– Remove HF from R.61-62.5, Std 2 and add to R. 61-62.5, Std 8 (Governor’s Task Force) – Repeal R.61-62.5, Std 5.1 (Governor’s Task Force) – R.61-62.1, R. 61-62.5, Stds 1, 5.2, 7, and 7.1, and R.61-62.70 to streamline and clean-up our air quality regulations; address outstanding issues to include addressing previous stakeholder comments; and make corrections for internal consistency, clarification, reference, punctuation, codification, formatting, and spelling to improve the overall text
– Notice of Drafting December 27, 2013 (comment ends Jan 27, 2014) – The Title V Operating Permit Program at 40 C.F.R. Section 70.9(b)(1), provides “…[t]he State program shall establish a fee schedule that results in the collection and retention of revenues sufficient to cover the permit program costs.”
CAA requires that state meet NAAQS Nonattainment Demonstrations (SIP) need to specify control measures (to include Transportation Conformity). The CAA requires interagency consultation between: EPA, US DOT (FHWA & FTA), SC DOT, DHEC, and MPOs. January 29, 2004, (69 CFR 4245) the EPA approved to SC Transportation Conformity SIP/MOA. On July 28, 2009 (74 FR 37168), EPA approved 2008 revision to MOA/SIP to adopt federal amendments in Transportation Conformity Regulations. 2010 Census led to formation of new MPO (LATS). Need to revise again to incorporate new MPO and improve process.
The CAA was last amended in 1990, and while it has accomplished a lot in reducing air pollution throughout the nation, many of the requirements are out of date and are long overdue for an overhaul.
measurable reductions in NOX and other pollutants
upgrades)
filters, aerodynamics)
(Biodiesel, CNG, LNG)
Program each Fall (subject to Federal Budget cuts)
diesel emissions reduction projects ($15,000 from FY12)
December 9, 2013
$691K for $3.4M in projects
must beneficial and cost effective