Update on morphology WP activities M. Huertas-Company (GAL-SWG - - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

update on morphology wp activities
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Update on morphology WP activities M. Huertas-Company (GAL-SWG - - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Update on morphology WP activities M. Huertas-Company (GAL-SWG - morphology) EUCLID France - 7 Janvier 2016 Morphology WP in a nutshell Legacy Galaxies WP Provide? Request? shape / morphology measurements for EUCLID galaxies France


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Update on morphology WP activities

  • M. Huertas-Company

(GAL-SWG - morphology)

EUCLID France - 7 Janvier 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Morphology WP in a nutshell

  • Legacy Galaxies WP
  • Provide? Request? shape / morphology

measurements for EUCLID galaxies

  • France leadership - DUC (SWG) - DOLE (OU-

MER?)

  • Close relation with OU-MER (cataloguing), OU-SHE

(shape), OU-VIS (background), OU-SIR (size estimate required), OU-PHZ

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Morphology?

  • Star/galaxy separation - ALL OUs
  • Ellipticity, size, Sersic index, C, A, S, G - ALL OUs
  • B/T - Legacy: SWGs + OU-PHZ?
  • internal structure, clumps, spiral arms, merger

signatures, lenses? - Legacy: SWGs + OU-PHZ? +OU-SHE? Fundamental legacy value of EUCLID

slide-4
SLIDE 4

MORPH
 WP

OU-MER OU-SIM OU-VIS

Codes “Realistic” imaging

Which morphologies? Precision? Which codes? Test and provide algorithms

background “Euclidization” + Cataloguing

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Concentration (EUCLIDized CANDELS DC1 - OU-MER)

Unresolved/faint — very high concentration ETGs LTGs Irr CAS codes provided to OU- MER (MHC, Conselice) - test in progress

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Galaxy sizes: galfit

Unresolved objects Objects at z>1, faint/unresolved in EUCLID images…

MAIN ISSUE: EXECUTION TIME ~ 1 obj/sec Alternative algorithms: SExtractor model fitting ~20 obj/sec (singe Sersic) 40 times slower than detection mode Problem with neighbors — requires calibration OTHER POSSIBILITIES: ML, DL

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Big-data opportunities: DEEP LEARNING FOR EUCLID

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Deep convolutional neural networks

  • Hubel & Wiesel 1962 + LeCun 1998
  • Mimic the human brain
  • Learn non-linear features (from pixels!) using

hidden layers

  • Very expensive in computing time
  • GPUs…
  • Very popular, used by *all* the technology

giants (Google, Microsoft)

slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Learning algorithm (Neural Network, SVM…)

DATA

Dimension reduction PCA or manual (colors, C, A, n …) morphs. photoz’s ….

N parameters

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Learning algorithm (Neural Network, SVM…)

DATA

Dimension reduction PCA or manual (colors, C, A, n …) morphs. photoz’s ….

N parameters

FEATURE LEARNING LAYERS

OPTIMAL FEATURES

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Gini-M20 plane (EUCLID emulated images)

Very noise/resolution dependent… ETGs LTGs Irr

slide-13
SLIDE 13

CONVNET for CANDELS Feature learning Neural Network INPUT: RGB JPEG GDS snapshots OUTPUT: 10 probs. 10

  • TRAIN: ~50.000 redundant galaxies

in GDS (~10 days)

  • CLASSIFY: GDN, COSMOS, UDS,

GDS (~8h/field)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

99.8 96.3 88.5 97.1 93.7 11.5 3.0 5.6 2.9 0.2 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2

SPHEROID DISK IRR PS Unc VISUAL DOMINANT CLASS SPHEROID DISK IRR PS Unc AUTO DOMINANT CLASS

DOMINANT CLASS

slide-15
SLIDE 15

SPHEROIDS DISKS IRR PS UNC

slide-16
SLIDE 16

SPHEROIDS DISKS B+D D+I I/MERGER

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Classical ML + CAS

MHC+14a

20-30% contamination in a sample of ETGs at z>1 EUCLID

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Action items for 2016

  • First set of OU-SIM simulations should become available

(analytic profiles)

  • Enough for pursuing ellipticity, size etc algorithm testing
  • Pursue on deep-learning testing (simulations from HST +

numerical)

  • Detailed morphology classification
  • B/D, sizes etc ?
  • Good news: manpower available (Student+postdoc)