Update on CMCS Medicaid Pharmacy Program John M. Coster, Ph.D., - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

update on cmcs medicaid pharmacy program
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Update on CMCS Medicaid Pharmacy Program John M. Coster, Ph.D., - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Update on CMCS Medicaid Pharmacy Program John M. Coster, Ph.D., R.Ph. Director, Division of Pharmacy Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services EMPAA November 2015 1 Medicaid is a Major and Growing Part of Medicaid is a Major and Growing


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Update on CMCS Medicaid Pharmacy Program

John M. Coster, Ph.D., R.Ph. Director, Division of Pharmacy Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services EMPAA November 2015

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Medicaid is a Major and Growing Part of Health Coverage and Spending Medicaid is a Major and Growing Part of Health Coverage and Spending

2

Health Coverage, CY 2015 Health Expenditures, CY 2015

Other Private (including Marketplaces), 24 million

Employer Sponsored Insurance, 172.4 million Medicare, 54.3 million

Medicaid 70.1 million

CHIP, 6.2 million Uninsured, 27.3 million Other Public, $398 billion Employer Sponsored Insurance, $1,009 billion Medicare, $669 billion

Medicaid, $531 billion

CHIP, $15 billion

Other Private (including Marketplaces) $91 billion

Total = $2.7 trillion

Source: CMS, Office of the Actuary, http://cms.hhs.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and- Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/Downloads/Proj2012.pdf

slide-3
SLIDE 3

CMCS Division of Pharmacy

Policy

  • COD Regulation
  • Reimbursement

– NADAC, FULs

  • SPAs
  • Specialty Drugs
  • Quality/DUR
  • MCOs
  • 340B
  • PADs
  • ABPs/Expansion

Operations

  • Rebate Program

– Utilization Data – AMP, BP Calculations

  • BPD
  • DRP

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Medicaid Pharmacy Regulation Issues

  • Official Publication Date
  • Medicaid Proposed Pharmacy Regulation

– Manufacturer Issues

  • AMP Definition, 5i drugs, pediatric drugs, LE drugs

– Pharmacy Issues

  • AAC, FULs, professional dispensing fee

– Subregulatory guidance to states on reimbursement changes; new manufacturer rebate agreement, release of new FULs

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

National Average Drug Acquisition Cost (NADAC) Approach

  • 1. Survey pharmacies
  • 2. Collect acquisition costs
  • 3. Acquisition cost database
  • 4. Scrub, review and analyze data
  • 5. Compute national average drug acquisition

costs

  • 6. Publish reference file
  • 7. Statistical reliability
  • 8. Confidentiality

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

NADAC: Survey Pharmacies

  • Random nationwide sample
  • 2,000 – 2,500 pharmacies monthly
  • Voluntary
  • Independent and Chain pharmacies in all states

(excludes closed door pharmacies)

  • Invoice purchase records from most recent 30

day period

  • Discounts, Rebates, Chargeback's, Free Goods

– Typically not included on invoice – Typically not correlated to individual drug products or invoices

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

NADAC: Collect Acquisition Costs

  • Electronic or hard copy records acceptable
  • Copies, not originals
  • No special formatting needed
  • Purchase records may come directly from

wholesalers

  • Mail, fax or email
  • Typically takes less than 30 minutes of non-

pharmacist time to complete/prepare

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

NADAC: Publish Reference File

  • NADAC rates published on a weekly and monthly

schedule:

– Weekly updates occur for brand products to reflect changes in published pricing and updates for brand and generic products due to help desk calls – Monthly updates occur to reflect the results of the

  • ngoing monthly acquisition cost survey for brand and

generic products

  • Posted in excel file on CMS web site

– NADAC rates posted on NDC level – NADAC rates calculated at drug group level

  • average for brand
  • average for generics

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

States Reimbursing at Average Acquisition Cost (AAC)

State Ingredient Cost Dispensing Fee

Delaware NADAC $10.00 Alaska NADAC Tiered based on in state location (range: $13.36 - $21.28) Nevada NADAC $10.17 Alabama AAC $10.64 Idaho AAC Tiered based on total dispensing volume (range: $11.51 - $15.11) Iowa AAC $10.12 Louisiana AAC $10.51 Oregon AAC Tiered based on total dispensing volume (range: $9.68 - $14.01) Colorado AAC Tiered based on total dispensing volume (range: $9.31 - $13.40)

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

MCOs and Medicaid Pharmacy

  • MCOs may adopt approaches to prescription drug coverage that are

different from the states FFS drug coverage such as different prior authorization, PDLs, other limitations etc.

  • MCOs may reimburse pharmacies differently from Medicaid FFS
  • States must ensure the access standards at 438.206 are met for its

contracts with MCOs (no specific access standards like TriCARE)

  • ACA added the requirement for states to collect rebates on MCO

drug claims

– Challenges that states are facing collecting utilization data from MCOs

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Medicaid Expansion & Alternative Benefit Coverage

  • Medicaid expansion population may receive prescription drug

benefits via Medicaid MCOs; follows rules of the exchanges

  • Floor of prescription drug coverage for traditional Medicaid is

different from floor for Medicaid expansion group

  • Alternative Benefit prescription drug coverage is at least the

greater of: 1 drug per USP category/class or the same # drugs per USP category/class as state’s benchmark plan and have a process in place that will permit the beneficiary access to clinically appropriate drugs (1/1/17: P+T Committee)

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Medicaid Expansion and Alternative Benefit Coverage

  • CHANGE: Publish up to date list of all covered drugs

including tiers structure in a manner that is accessible to plan and prospective enrollees

  • CHANGE: Must allow enrollees to access prescription

drug benefits at in network retail pharmacies unless drug is subjected to restricted distribution by FDA; cannot require mail order

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Proposed MCO Regulation

  • MCO (including PIHPs & PAHP) contractually

required to provide covered outpatient drugs:

– Scope of coverage equal to 1927 coverage – Report drug utilization for rebates – Establish procedures to exclude 340B claims data from utilization data – Operate a DUR consistent with 1927 and provide description of activities on an annual basis – When establishing own formulary conduct PA program that complies with 1927(d)(5)

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Quality: DUR Background

  • Section 1927(g) requires that States shall

provide for a drug use review program (pro DUR, retro DUR, educational interventions) to ensure that:

– Drugs are appropriate; – Medically necessary; – Not likely to result in adverse medical results; We appreciate that all states responded in time to

  • ur 2014 survey!

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Status of Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP)

54% 14% 72% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Query the state's PDMP database Require prescribers to access the PDMP patient history Barriers that hinder the agency from fully accessing the PDMP % of 50 States Completing Survey

Source: State Comparison/Summary Report FFY 2013

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

POS Edits Limiting Quantity of Opioid

84% 82% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Short-acting opioids Long-acting opioids % of 50 States Completing Survey

Source: State Comparison/Summary Report FFY 2013

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Psychotropic Drugs/Stimulants

82% 74% 82% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Manage/monitor appropriate use of psychotropic drugs in children Monitor all children, not just those children in foster care Restrictions/special program to monitor/manage or control the use

  • f stimulants

% of 50 States Completing Survey

Source: State Comparison/Summary Report FFY 2013

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Child and Adult Voluntary Core Set: In Different Stages of Maturity

  • Child Core Set: CMS has spent the past five years (2010-2014)

working with states to understand the 24 Child Core Set measures and to refine the reporting guidance – Immunizations, HPV vaccine, ADHD medication follow up, MTM for asthmatics

  • Adult Core Set: New program. 2013 was first year of reporting. As

with any new reporting program, the early years focused on working with states to understand the Core Set measures, refine the reporting guidance, and improving data quality.

– Vaccinations, smoking cessation, antidepressant MTM, antipsychotic medication adherence, annual monitoring for patients on persistence medications, hemoglobin A1c control, diabetes control, HIV viral load suppression

  • Increased Use of Pharmacy MTM and Quality Measures

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Other Key Program Issues

  • MCO Rebates and Supplemental Rebates

– Number of States Collecting Supplemental Rebates on MCO drugs

  • Physician Administered Drugs

– Continue to get questions from states/MCO drugs – In 2011, the OIG conducted a study on the status of the states’ compliance regarding collection of manufacturer rebates for physician-administered drugs. – In 2014, the OIG’s Division of Audit began performing audits and issuing penalties regarding the non-compliance

  • f rebate collection for physician-administration drugs.
  • ABP Drug Coverage

– New standards for ABP drug coverage under expansion

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Other Key Program Issues

  • 340B

– Program Issues/Duplicate Discounts – Orphan Drug Issues – New Guidance

  • High Cost Drugs/Generic Drug Prices

– HCV drug access issues

  • Specialty Drugs/Biosimilars

– Guidance to state and manufacturers – biosimilars considered single source under the rebate program

  • BPD/DRP

– Avoiding disputes at the front end; resolving them at back end; same manufacturers appear to have issues

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

HHS Pharmaceutical Forum

  • HHS Pharmaceutical Forum: Innovation, Access,

Affordability and Better Health

  • Opportunity to dialogue with government, states,

manufacturers and payers on the importance of ensuring access to drugs

  • Investigate potential value based purchasing

arrangements that can be utilized by payers to reduce costs of drug treatments

  • Nov 20th, Washington DC: purchasing strategies, VBP,

consumer access to medications

slide-22
SLIDE 22

State Release on HCV Drugs

  • Recognizes challenges states have with covering new, high

cost drugs, balanced with patients need to have access

  • Provides guidance to states regarding Medicaid Coverage

related to HCV Treatments, specifically Direct Acting Antiviral (DAA) drugs.

  • Describes practices that concern CMS with respect to

restricting access.

  • Describes coverage policies with respect to FFS and

Medicaid MCOs.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Manufacturer Letter on HCV Drugs

  • Recognizes that manufacturer have key role in

making drugs affordable

– Sent to four manufacturers of HCV drugs

  • Stresses the importance of access to DAA drugs,

especially to the Medicaid program and patients

  • Requests manufacturers of these drugs to share their

ideas about how to make DAA drugs more affordable to payers, including Medicaid, through value-based purchasing type arrangements

slide-24
SLIDE 24

HHS Opiate Reduction Priorities

  • Improve opioid prescribing practices to reduce
  • verdoses and reduce opioid use disorders
  • Expand distribution and use of naloxone (to

reverse overdose deaths)

  • Expand Medication-assisted Treatment (MAT) so

as to decrease opioid use disorders and

  • verdoses
  • Congress looking at Methadone use in state PDLs

– Held webinar with states in early September to urge PDL review

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Recommendations/Action Plan

  • PDMPs (Prescription Drug Monitoring

Programs)

  • Guidelines (CDC is developing opioid prescribing

guidelines)

  • Naloxone – NIDA (NIH) supporting research trials
  • n efficacy of prescribing take home naloxone for

high risks individuals

  • MAT – use of buprenorphine, methadone, ER

naltrexone - in combo with counseling and behavioral therapy

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Questions/Discussion

John.Coster@cms.hhs.gov 410-786-1121

26