University of Alaska: Economic Impacts & Public Perceptions - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

university of alaska economic impacts amp public
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

University of Alaska: Economic Impacts & Public Perceptions - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

University of Alaska: Economic Impacts & Public Perceptions Prepared for: June 3, 2016 McDowell Group Multidisciplinary research and consulting since 1972 17 professional staff; offices in Juneau & Anchorage Complete 100+


slide-1
SLIDE 1

University of Alaska: Economic Impacts & Public Perceptions

Prepared for:

June 3, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

McDowell Group

 Multidisciplinary research and consulting since 1972  17 professional staff; offices in Juneau & Anchorage  Complete 100+ projects every year for a variety of public and private sector clients

 Program evaluations, survey research, economic impact studies, financial feasibility analysis, and other projects

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Presentation Outline

 Economic Impacts

 Methodology  Results

 Public Perceptions

 Methodology  Results

 Executive Interviews

 Methodology  Recommendations

 Questions

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Economic Impact Methodology

 Updates previous studies in 1998, 2004, 2007, and 2012  Considers 4 avenues of economic impact

 UA employee salaries and benefits  Non-personnel operational and capital expenditures  Student spending  Visitor spending

 Analyzes

 Direct impacts for FY2015  Indirect and induced impacts

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Total Economic Impact of UA System

$390 million $740 million

Indirect Spending Direct Spending

 UA is an economic engine for Alaska  Generated $1.1 billion in FY15

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Employment and Payroll

 One of the largest employers in Alaska

 7,548 direct jobs  15,740 total jobs  $630 million in annual wages

 State-wide employer: Ketchikan to Kotzebue  Peak employment during winter

Impact Direct Indirect & Induced Total Employment Impact 8,340 7,400 15,740 Payroll Impact ($ million) $346 $284 $630

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Spending on Goods and Services

 $122.6 million purchased from Alaska vendors  2,000 businesses and organizations

Spending by Location, FY15

$36,000,000 $39,000,000 $34,000,000 $14,000,000

Anchorage Fairbanks Juneau Other

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The University as an Investment

State Appropriat ions, $375.2 [CATEGOR Y NAME], [VALUE] Federal Receipts, $122.8 UA Receipts, $59.2 Auxiliary Receipts, $43.5 Other, $55.4

Revenue ($ millions)

 Total Revenue = $789 million  General fund appropriations comprised 48% of revenue  Every $1 invested by the State generates $3 in economic activity

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Survey Methodology

Survey Sample and Margin of Error, by region

Region / Community Sample Size (n) +/- Maximum Margin of Error Southcentral 250 ±6.3% Anchorage 100 ±10.0 Interior/ Far North 253 ±6.3 Fairbanks (including North Pole) 101 ±10.0 Southeast 252 ±6.3 Juneau 100 ±10.0 Southwest 168 ±8.2 Total 923 ±3.3%

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Demographics of Sample

 50% male, 48% female  Average of 33 years in Alaska  42% have children or grandchildren in elementary, middle or high school  43% have received or have a family member who has received a UA degree, certificate or license  Average household income of $71,900

 13% earning less than $25,000

18-34 20% 35-54 33% 55-64 24% 65+ 23%

Age Distribution

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Importance to Alaska

20 40 60 80

Refused Don’t know Not at all important Not important Neutral Important Very important

In your opinion, how important is the University of Alaska to the State of Alaska?

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Impacts of the University of Alaska

 Alaskans report significant, positive impacts

 UA expenditures are important to local economies  Alaska businesses benefit from a UA-trained workforce  UA keeps Alaskans in-state and at work  UA Arctic research has real-world implications and will help Alaska and the world address climate change

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Shaping the Future

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total Southcentral Interior/Far North Southeast Southwest

Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Don’t know Refused

The University plays a vital role in shaping Alaska’s future.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Description of the University of Alaska

Total Southcentral Interior/ Far North Southeast Southwest Important Important Important Important Important Vital Vital Vital Accessible Vital Diverse Diverse Diverse Relevant Diverse Relevant Relevant Relevant Vital Relevant Accessible Accessible Welcoming Welcoming Welcoming Total Southcentral Interior/ Far North Southeast Southwest Bold Bold Courageous Bold Bold Courageous Courageous Bold Courageous Strategic Strategic Strategic Inspirational Strategic Courageous Distinctive Distinctive Loyal Progressive Inspirational Inspirational Inspirational Strategic Distinctive Excellent

Most Accurate Terms, by region Least Accurate Terms, by region

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Funding the University of Alaska

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

University of Alaska is a public institution and it is very important that the State invest in the University’s budget. State funding for University of Alaska has been cut for three straight years. These budget cuts will have a very negative impact on Alaska’s economy.

Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know Refused

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Executive Interview Methodology

 23 Alaska leaders

 Industry, trade organizations, ANCSA corporations  Many connections with University of Alaska  Conducted in April and May

 Themes

 University is integral to Alaska’s future

 Greater focus on Alaska’s needs and core strengths  University must be more visibly lean and coordinated

 Points of pride

 Forefront of petroleum engineering, aerospace program, geophysical institute, sports

 Workforce development and economic diversification are priorities  State financial support necessary

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Recommendations

 Narrow strategic scope  Integrate and coordinate campuses  Reduce and control expectations  Demonstrate efficiency with financial resources  Focus on applied research and service  Take cues from past successes  Increase awareness of current successes

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Questions?

 Full report includes much more!

 More questions  Subgroup analysis

 Southcentral, Interior/Far North, Southwest, and Southeast  Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Juneau  Demographics: gender, income, education  Alaska Native, rural, urban  Alumni, previous donors, and more