united utilities rspb penny anderson penny anderson
play

United Utilities/RSPB Penny Anderson Penny Anderson Associates Ltd - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Sustainable Catchment Management Programme (SCaMP) 2005-2010 (-2020) United Utilities/RSPB Penny Anderson Penny Anderson Associates Ltd Background Innovative, large scale project Aim to improve: biodiversity condition raw


  1. The Sustainable Catchment Management Programme (SCaMP) 2005-2010 (-2020) United Utilities/RSPB Penny Anderson Penny Anderson Associates Ltd

  2. Background • Innovative, large scale project • Aim to improve: – biodiversity condition – raw drinking water quality  Reduce runoff rates, sediment load and downstream flooding  Reduce erosion and loss of carbon  Increase carbon sequestration • Provide a sustainable future for tenants • Support regional BAP habitats and species

  3. Where? 21 farms, 45 land holdings c.20,000ha

  4. Innovative • United Utilities owns c. 57,000 ha in NW Region • 17,500ha designated as SSSI • Own land to protect raw water quality for 6.7million people • First project where regulators permitted catchment management as part of AMP process • As a regulated Utility Undertaker, UU has obligations to take biodiversity and habitat into account, although not funded to do so

  5. Landscape Scale Approach – multiple benefits  Sustainable catchment management plans  Work closely with tenant farmers, keepers etc  Implement works in a partnership approach  RSPB - agri-environment support  UU invested in infrastructure and other capital works. Budget £12.5million 2005-2010 • £10.5million on restoration works • £2million on capital investments

  6. Measures  grip blocking 85.23km in the Goyt and Bowland  re-vegetation of eroding bare peat 470ha, plus some gully blocking  restoring dwarf shrub heath

  7. Restoration of bare peat % Grass Kg weig Other additions species ha -1 ht Highland Bent Wavy hair-grass (Agrostis 6 2.43 (Deschampsia castellana) flexuosa) added where seed available Sheep’s Lime @ 1 t ha -1 fescue 15 6.09 NPK 10:30:15 (Festuca fertiliser @ 250 kg ha - ovina) 1 Red fescue (Festuca rubra 19 7.91 rubra) Blue fescue (Festuca 15 6.09 longifolia) Perennial ryegrass (Lolium 24 9.74 perenne Romark) Perennial ryegrass 21 8.52 (Lolium perenne Rio) Totals 100 40.78

  8. Measures cont.  woodland enhancement -111ha  planting new upland oak and wet woodland - 516ha  hay meadow improvements-109ha  250ha rush pastures -100 scrapes + rush cutting  new bridges, water troughs, stream fencing - reduces pathogens in water  9 new stock buildings - indoor wintering and lambing  new waste management facilities - reduce run-off to water courses

  9. Monitoring 2005-2015 (and beyond) • Hydrological and vegetation effects of grip blocking - Whitendale and Brennand + Goyt Estate • Bare peat re-vegetation treatments on Ashway Gap, Quiet Shepherd & Arnfield Estates - vegetation and hydrology • Vegetation response to changes in sheep stocking levels - 2 Estates, Bowland • Vegetation response to restoration of acid grassland to dwarf shrub-rich vegetation - 4 sites

  10. Monitoring methods • Monitored: – Water colour and turbidity at sub catchment scale - daily • Stage in river – 15mins • Dip wells across grips – 15mins • Vegetation biennially

  11. Type 1 Colour Pattern (catchment response) Colour in water Type 1 Goyt and Whitendale steams, Hazen<500, grip blocking Goyt Raw Water Colour (2006-2014) Whitendale Intake Raw Water Colour (2006-2014) Type 2 Colour Pattern (catchment response) Type 2 Higher colour, >500, more peat in catchment, Brennand, grip blocking 2008-2009 Brennand Brown Syke Stream Raw Water Colour (2007-2014) Brennand Bield Field Stream Raw Water Colour (2007-2014) Type 3 Colour Pattern (catchment response) Type 3 Ashway Gap – very high colour levels, degraded, gullied catchment, re-vegetated, gully blocking 2007 Ashway Gap Chew Clough Raw Water Colour (2006-2014) Ashway Gap Small Clough Raw Water Colour (2006-2014) Legend Green dots: True colour (Hazen) measured daily Dashed grey lines: Series mean and median values Orange line: Locally weighted average (LOWESS) of series

  12. Effects of grip blocking on colour Goyt 700 700 RAW WATER COLOUR Monthly mean 600 600 500 500 COLOUR (HAZEN) 400 400 300 300 200 200 100 100 0 0 06/06/2006 14/09/2006 23/12/2006 02/04/2007 11/07/2007 19/10/2007 27/01/2008 06/05/2008 14/08/2008 22/11/2008 02/03/2009 10/06/2009 18/09/2009 27/12/2009 06/04/2010 15/07/2010 23/10/2010 31/01/2011 11/05/2011 19/08/2011 27/11/2011 06/03/2012 14/06/2012 22/09/2012 01/01/2013 11/04/2013 20/07/2013 28/10/2013 DATE All sites - small, but statistically significant decline in raw water colour after 2 years in Brennand and Goyt, after 5 years in Whitendale

  13. WATER TABLE DEPTH BELOW SURFACE (cm) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 26/03/2007 Lower perturbations water table in Goyt Statistically higher 26/05/2007 26/07/2007 26/09/2007 26/11/2007 26/01/2008 26/03/2008 26/05/2008 26/07/2008 Effects on water table 26/09/2008 26/11/2008 26/01/2009 26/03/2009 26/05/2009 26/07/2009 26/09/2009 26/11/2009 26/01/2010 26/03/2010 26/05/2010 DATE 26/07/2010 26/09/2010 26/11/2010 26/01/2011 26/03/2011 26/05/2011 26/07/2011 26/09/2011 26/11/2011 26/01/2012 26/03/2012 26/05/2012 Mean annual WTL (cm) Water Table Level (below surface, cm) 26/07/2012 26/09/2012 26/11/2012 26/01/2013 26/03/2013 26/05/2013 26/07/2013 26/09/2013 26/11/2013

  14. Grip blocking on Brennand, Bowland Oct 2012 Feb 2009 May 2007 June 2014 June 2013

  15. Carbon savings Goyt Total DOC DOC Loss Mean DOC Median DOC Loss kg/Year/ Loss Per Loss Per Per Year Hectare Day Day September 2006 - September 67,355kg 89kg 206kg 72kg 2007 September 2007 - September 48,121kg 64kg 145kg 53kg 2008 September 2008 - September 38147kg 51kg 115kg 41kg 2009 September 2009 - September 37,090kg 49kg 102kg 31kg 2010

  16. Other effects • Flooding – No effects found

  17. Sphagnum Cover Brennand before (2007) and after (2009 – 2012) Restoration Measures ( Mean and Standard Deviation) BB1 – reference site, BB2 and BB3 - grips blocked eroded catchment, BB4 and BB5 - grips blocked uneroded catchment Blanket bog species showing trends for increases – cranberry, bog asphodel, bog rosemary, cross-leaved heath, crowberry 100 * 80 * Sphagnum cover (%) * * * 2007 60 2008 2009 40 2010 * 2012 * * 20 * * 0 Mostly Sphagnum fallax BB1 BB2 BB3 BB4 BB5 Site Code

  18. Sphagnum Goyt Goyt - Sphagnum cover after grip blocking, stock reduction and stopping of burning BB1 and BB2 - peat-blocked grips BB3 - reference site grips, unblocked BB5 - plastic-blocked grips 100 2006 2008 80 Sphagnum cover (%) 2010 2012 60 * 40 * 20 * * 0 BB1 BB2 BB3 BB5 Site Code

  19. 100 Other species * 80 Dwarf shrub cover (%) * * * * * * 60 2007 * * * * 2008 BRENNAND * * * * 40 2009 * * * Cottongrasses – no consistent trend 2010 * * 2012 20 Wavy hair-grass – increase then decline 0 Heather – increase then decline BB1 BB2 BB3 BB4 BB5 Site Code Bilberry – decline on some sites not on Dwarf shrubs Brennand others 100 Other mosses – increases after grazing * Purple moorgrass cover (%) reduced, not with grip blocking 80 * Most differences reflect reduced 2006 60 2008 grazing 2010 40 2012 GOYT 20 Reduction in Molinia 1 plot 0 BB1 BB2 BB3 BB5 Site Code Molinia Goyt

  20. 2011 Longdendale Vegetation Results Lime, nurse seed & fertiliser Plot 2007 prior to treatment (left) & 2012 (right), Geojute No geojute Lime, nurse seed, fertiliser, brash + Geojute 2007 (left) 2012 (right)

  21. Longdendale Results – Grass Nurse crop Cover before (2007) and after restoration BB1 and BB5, gently sloping, treated with lime, fertiliser and grass seed BB6a and BB6b on steeper slopes treated with lime, fertiliser, grass seed and heather brash BB6b with geojute as well BB7 reference site untreated 100 * 80 Nurse Crop Cover (%) * 2007 60 * 2008 2009 2010 40 2012 * * 20 * * * * * * * 0 BB1 BB6a BB6b BB7 Site Code

  22. Longdendale – dwarf shrub cover before (2007) and after restoration BB1 gently sloping, treated with lime, fertiliser and grass seed BB6a and BB6b on steeper slopes treated with lime, fertiliser, grass seed and heather brash BB6b with geojute as well BB7 reference site untreated Mostly heather 100 Dwarf Shrub Cover (%) 80 2007 60 2008 2009 * * 2010 40 2012 * 20 * * * 0 BB1 BB6a BB6b BB7 Site Code

  23. Longdendale – Moss cover Before (2007) and after Restoration BB1 gently sloping, treated with lime, fertiliser and grass seed BB6a and BB6b on steeper slopes treated with lime, fertiliser grass seed and heather brash BB6b with geojute as well BB7 reference site untreated 100 80 Bryophyte Cover (%) * * * 2007 60 2008 2010 2010 40 2012 20 * Spp- Campylopus & * * * * 0 Hypnum BB1 BB6a BB6b BB7 Site Code

  24. Longdendale - other species Cottongrasses 100 80 Cottongrass Cover (%) 2007 60 2008 2009 2010 40 * 2012 * * * 20 * * * * * * 0 BB1 BB6a BB6b BB7 Site Code No Sphagnum Few other species

  25. Coir rolls in peat pans 2007 Coir rolls 2011 2010 45 40 Total Vegetation Cover Baseline Vegetation Cover (%) 35 Year (2007) and following 30 2007 Restoration Measures 25 2008 (2007onwards) 2009 20 2010 Plot BB2a no coir 15 Plot BB2b coir rolls Installed 10 5 0 BB2a BB2b Site Code

  26. Heather bales Wider works Stone dams Cottongrass fruiting – stock removal Liming and fertilising Heather/coir dams Coir rolls Stone dams in gullies

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend