Uncertainty in Acoustic Mine Uncertainty in Acoustic Mine Detection - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

uncertainty in acoustic mine uncertainty in acoustic mine
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Uncertainty in Acoustic Mine Uncertainty in Acoustic Mine Detection - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Uncertainty in Acoustic Mine Uncertainty in Acoustic Mine Detection due to Environmental Detection due to Environmental Variability Variability Peter C. Chu and LCDR Nick A. Vares Vares Peter C. Chu and LCDR Nick A. Naval Postgraduate


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Uncertainty in Acoustic Mine Uncertainty in Acoustic Mine Detection due to Environmental Detection due to Environmental Variability Variability

Peter C. Chu and LCDR Nick A. Peter C. Chu and LCDR Nick A. Vares Vares Naval Postgraduate School Naval Postgraduate School Ruth E. Keenan Ruth E. Keenan Scientific Application International Scientific Application International Corporation Corporation Email: Email: pcchu@nps.edu pcchu@nps.edu http:// http:// www.oc.nps.navy.mil/~ chu www.oc.nps.navy.mil/~ chu

Sponsored by the Naval Oceanographic Office Sponsored by the Naval Oceanographic Office

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Purpose Purpose

  • Determine the impact of bottom type

Determine the impact of bottom type and wind variations on bottom moored and wind variations on bottom moored mine detection mine detection

  • Determine the significance of

Determine the significance of transducer depth on bottom moored transducer depth on bottom moored mine detection mine detection

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Navy Relevance Navy Relevance

  • Littoral engagement

Littoral engagement

  • Mine warfare

Mine warfare

  • Diesel submarines

Diesel submarines

  • Unmanned Undersea Vehicles (UUVs)

Unmanned Undersea Vehicles (UUVs)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

CASS/GRAB CASS/GRAB

  • Comprehensive Acoustic Simulation

Comprehensive Acoustic Simulation System (CASS) System (CASS)

  • Gaussian Ray Bundle (GRAB) Eigenray

Gaussian Ray Bundle (GRAB) Eigenray model model

  • Navy standard model for active and

Navy standard model for active and passive range dependent acoustic passive range dependent acoustic propagation, reverberation and signal propagation, reverberation and signal excess excess

  • Frequency range 600Hz to 100 kHz

Frequency range 600Hz to 100 kHz

slide-5
SLIDE 5

CASS/GRAB Model Description CASS/GRAB Model Description

  • The CASS model is the range

The CASS model is the range dependent improvement of the dependent improvement of the Generic Sonar Model (GSM). Generic Sonar Model (GSM). CASS performs signal excess CASS performs signal excess calculations. calculations.

  • The GRAB model is a subset of

The GRAB model is a subset of the CASS model and its main the CASS model and its main function is to compute function is to compute eigenrays and propagation loss eigenrays and propagation loss as inputs in the CASS signal as inputs in the CASS signal excess calculations. excess calculations.

CASS Comprehensive Acoustic System Simulation

Propagation Model 1: FAME Propagation Model 3: COLOSSUS Propagation Model 4: AMOS equations Backscatter Models Reverberation Noise Models Signal to Noise Signal Excess Graphic Displays System Parameters (Beamforming)

Propagation Model 2: GRAB Gaussian Ray Bundle OAML GRAB v1.0 Environmental Interpolations

Environmental Model Interpolations Surface and Bottom Forward Loss Volume Attenuation Sound Speed Algorithms Call GRAB

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Comprehensive Acoustic Comprehensive Acoustic Simulation System/Guassian Simulation System/Guassian Ray Bundle (CASS/GRAB) Ray Bundle (CASS/GRAB)

  • In the GRAB model, the travel time, source angle, target

In the GRAB model, the travel time, source angle, target angle, and phase of the ray bundles are equal to those angle, and phase of the ray bundles are equal to those values for the classic ray path. values for the classic ray path.

  • The main difference between the GRAB model and a classic

The main difference between the GRAB model and a classic ray path is that the amplitude of the Gaussian ray bundles ray path is that the amplitude of the Gaussian ray bundles is global, affecting all depths to some degree whereas is global, affecting all depths to some degree whereas classic ray path amplitudes are local. GRAB calculates classic ray path amplitudes are local. GRAB calculates amplitude globally by distributing the amplitudes according amplitude globally by distributing the amplitudes according to the Gaussian equation to the Gaussian equation

[ ]

{ }

Ψ Γ

ν ν ν ν ν ν ν

β π σ σ = − −

, ,

exp . ( ) /

2 2

2 05 p r z z

r

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Mine Hunting Sonar Mine Hunting Sonar

  • Generic VHF forward looking

Generic VHF forward looking

  • CASS/GRAB input file for MIW with

CASS/GRAB input file for MIW with signal excess output signal excess output

  • Generic bottom moored mine

Generic bottom moored mine

slide-8
SLIDE 8

AN/SQQ AN/SQQ-

  • 32 Mine Hunting

32 Mine Hunting Sonar System Sonar System

  • The CASS/GRAB

The CASS/GRAB Acoustic model input Acoustic model input file used in this study file used in this study simulates a VHF simulates a VHF forward looking sonar, forward looking sonar, similar to the Acoustic similar to the Acoustic Performance of the Performance of the AN/SQQ AN/SQQ-

  • 32.

32.

  • The AN/SQQ

The AN/SQQ-

  • 32 is the

32 is the key mine hunting key mine hunting component of the U.S. component of the U.S. Navy Navy’ ’s Mine Hunting s Mine Hunting and Countermeasure and Countermeasure ships. ships.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Detection Sonar and Detection Sonar and Classification Sonar Assembly Classification Sonar Assembly

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Input Parameters Input Parameters

  • Bottom depth

Bottom depth

  • Target depth

Target depth

  • Transducer depth

Transducer depth

  • Wind speed

Wind speed

  • Bottom type grain size

Bottom type grain size index index

  • Frequency min/max

Frequency min/max

  • Self noise

Self noise

  • Source level

Source level

  • Pulse length

Pulse length

  • Target strength/depth

Target strength/depth

  • Transmitter tilt angle

Transmitter tilt angle

  • Surface scattering

Surface scattering /reflection model /reflection model

  • Bottom scattering

Bottom scattering /reflection model /reflection model

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Bottom Type Bottom Type Geoacoustic Geoacoustic Properties Properties

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Yellow Sea Yellow Sea Bottom Sediment Bottom Sediment Chart Chart

  • Bottom Sediment

Bottom Sediment types can vary types can vary greatly over a small greatly over a small area area

1. 1.

Mud Mud

2. 2.

Sand Sand

3. 3.

Gravel Gravel

4. 4.

Rock Rock

slide-13
SLIDE 13

AN/SQQ AN/SQQ-

  • 32 Employment

32 Employment

  • Variable depth

Variable depth high frequency high frequency sonar system sonar system

  • Sonar can be place

Sonar can be place at various at various positions in the positions in the water column to water column to

  • ptimize the
  • ptimize the

detection of either detection of either moored or bottom moored or bottom mines. mines.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Two Depths of Transducer Two Depths of Transducer

  • Shallow Transducer: 17 ft (5.18 m)

Shallow Transducer: 17 ft (5.18 m)

  • Deep Transducer (25 m)

Deep Transducer (25 m)

  • Water depth: 30 m

Water depth: 30 m

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Uncertainty Uncertainty

  • Tilt angles + 4

Tilt angles + 40

0 to

to – – 12 120

  • Wind 5

Wind 5 – – 25 knots 25 knots

  • Coarse sand to silt bottoms

Coarse sand to silt bottoms

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Shallow Transducer

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Deep Transducer

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Acoustic Uncertainty Due to Wind and Bottom Type Uncertainty for Shallow Transducer (Range = 300 m)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Acoustic Uncertainty Due to Wind and Bottom Type Uncertainty for Deep Transducer (Range = 300 m)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Difference Between Deep and Shallow Transducers (Range = 300 m)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Acoustic Uncertainty Due to Wind and Bottom Uncertainty for Shallow Transducer (Range = 600 m)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Acoustic Uncertainty Due to Wind and Bottom Uncertaint for Deep Transducer (Range = 600 m)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Difference Between Deep and Shallow Transducers (Range = 600 m)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Acoustic Uncertainty Due to Wind and Bottom Uncertainty for Shallow Transducer (Range = 900 m)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Acoustic Uncertainty Due to Wind and Bottom Uncertainty for Shallow Transducer (Range = 900 m)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Difference Between Deep and Shallow Transducers (Range = 900 m)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Acoustic Uncertainty Due to Wind and Bottom Uncertainty for Shallow Transducer (Range = 1200 m)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Acoustic Uncertainty Due to Wind and Bottom Uncertainty for Deep Transducer (Range = 1200 m)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Difference Between Deep and Shallow Transducers (Range = 1200 m)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Conclusions Conclusions

  • Bottom type and wind variability are

Bottom type and wind variability are important for sandy silt detections important for sandy silt detections

  • Acoustic uncertainty due to bottom type and

Acoustic uncertainty due to bottom type and wind data variability is on the order of a few wind data variability is on the order of a few decibels decibels

  • Deep transducers provide higher signal

Deep transducers provide higher signal excess for most detectable cases excess for most detectable cases

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Recommendations Recommendations

  • Sensor improvements of a few decibels

Sensor improvements of a few decibels are significant for detection are significant for detection

  • Employment of sensors deeper aids

Employment of sensors deeper aids bottom moored mine detection bottom moored mine detection