UK Activities on (LAr) Photon Detection Andrzej Szelc (University - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

uk activities on lar photon detection
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

UK Activities on (LAr) Photon Detection Andrzej Szelc (University - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

UK Activities on (LAr) Photon Detection Andrzej Szelc (University of Manchester) Introduction Brief recap about scintillation light and how to detect it in liquid argon. Developing physics applications and methods of simulation for


slide-1
SLIDE 1

UK Activities on (LAr) Photon Detection

Andrzej Szelc

(University of Manchester)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

2

Introduction

  • Brief recap about scintillation light and how to

detect it in liquid argon.

  • Developing physics applications and methods of

simulation for scintillation light.

  • Hardware activities.
  • Opportunities for collaboration.
slide-3
SLIDE 3

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

3

Scintillation Light in Argon

Emission: Transport: Detection:

Ar Ar Ar Ar Excited dimer state g Photons are all ~128 nm – VUV Liquid argon is mostly transparent to its scintillation. At longer distances Rayleigh scattering ~55cm f(l) and absorption, e.g.

  • n nitrogen ~30 m

@2ppm N2 begins to play a role. Note high refractive index ~1.5 for VUV. Liquid argon is almost the

  • nly thing transparent to its

scintillation. Detection is challenging – most often need to use Wavelength shifting compounds, like TPB. Two-component light, 7ns + 1.3 us

  • E. Segreto
slide-4
SLIDE 4

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

4

How to collect LAr light

  • Proven detector

technology in liquid argon.

  • Small

channel/active area ratio.

  • Non-negligible size,

relatively high voltage.

PMTs

  • SiPMs: excellent

performance in liquid

  • argon. Small voltage

needed to operate.

  • Small active size –

need to be clever to avoid large channel number.

SiPMs SiPM+ Light Collector

  • WLS coated

bars coupled to SiPMs (current DUNE baseline design).

The ARAPUCA light trap

  • Use dichroic filters +

2 WLS to trap the light inside of the box

  • Detection with SiPMs
slide-5
SLIDE 5

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

5

Passive elements of light collection

  • Coating the detector walls with

a wavelength shifting compound allows the recovery of VUV light.

  • Adding highly reflective foils

underneath enhances light collection.

  • Used extensively in DM experiments,

not tried in neutrino experiments.

Applying TPB to the reflective foil used inside of the LArIAT TPC

WArP DM detector VETO (8 tons of LAr)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

6

Physics and Simulations SBND (and DUNE)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

7

Light Detection in SBND

  • UK focus on developing

the simulation framework for scintillation light This was useful in developing foils as a solution to enhance light collection.

  • SBND has a high LY

setup which leads to potential intereting physics applications.

  • Porting the experience

to DUNE simulations.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

8

Simulating light in argon (LArSoft)

  • Argon is a prolific

scintillator, so at beam neutrino energies simulating each optical photon is not feasible.

  • We use an optical lookup

library (developed by uBooNE) to mitigate this problem.

voxels

slide-9
SLIDE 9

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

9

Light Collection Effjciency in SBND

PMT s PMT s

cathode Field cage TPB-coated foils

“Cathode only confjguration”

Note: from now on, visible refers To light wavelength-shifted and reflected off of the foils, while VUV refers to light directly hitting the PMTs. VUV Visible Total No foils Cathode

  • nly
  • D. Garcia-Gamez, Manchester
slide-10
SLIDE 10

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

10

Direct light (VUV) timing parametrization:

A combination of Landau and exponential functions fits practically every distribution

  • f photon arrival times.

The fit parameters turn out to be monotonic functions of distance. (works for reflected light too) MC - Preliminary MC - Preliminary MC - Preliminary MC - Preliminary MC - Preliminary

  • D. Garcia-Gamez, Manchester
slide-11
SLIDE 11

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

11

Effects on timing constants

Fast component life time changes as a function of distance. MC - Preliminary Will affect triggers focusing on the fast component

  • D. Garcia-Gamez, Manchester
slide-12
SLIDE 12

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

12

  • D. Garcia-Gamez

MC - Preliminary

Y-Z Positional Resolution

slide-13
SLIDE 13

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

13

X-drift position resolution

  • If able to differentiate

VUV from Visible (re- emitted) possible to get position in x on the fly.

  • Additional information,

crucial for disentangling multiple events in the same frame.

  • Could decide to readout

just parts of detector.

New idea for LArTPCs!

With TPB coated foils MC - Preliminary MC - Preliminary

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

14

Simulations for DUNE

Hot off the press from Diego Garcia-Gamez (more in talk at DUNE CM)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

15

Long Term Goals

  • Use scintillation light to

enhance the physics of SBND and DUNE (and not

  • nly for triggering).
  • Calorimetry and timing are

clear potential improvements.

R Acciarri et al. 2012 JINST 7 P01016 59.5 keV 241Am peak LY @7phel/keV

  • P. Benetti et al. (WARP), NIM A 574 (2007) 83
slide-16
SLIDE 16

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

16

Hardware Activities (LArIAT/SBND and DUNE)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

17

LArIAT Mesh Cathode Runs

No problems in TPC

  • peration observed. Final

results in preparation. Important R&D for SBND

BEFORE AFTER Prototype of SBND mesh cathode manufactured in Manchester was installed in LArIAT beginning of March 2017. Ran with and without foils (change-over happened in early June).

Help from Liverpool grp.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

18

Foil Installation in SBND

  • The infrastructure needed

to manufacture the reflective foils for SBND is ready.

  • Installation in CPA and

tensioning procedure developed (help from Liverpool group).

  • Manchester has

infrastructure needed to manufacture large evaporated surfaces (up to 60x60 cm2).

slide-19
SLIDE 19

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

19

Evaporated Foil Plates

  • Preparations for

SBND installation going well.

  • Finalizing installation

procedure.

  • Evaporations will be

done in Manchester and UNICAMP over the summer.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

20

Towards DUNE

  • Foils on cathode are now considered as an

enhancement option by the PDS consortium (photon collection boosters).

  • UK groups involved: SP: Edinburgh,

Manchester, Sussex, Warwick.

  • DUNE cathode is resistive - need R&D to

develop mounting method, see next slide.

  • UCL performing SiPM test-stand for DUNE-DP.
slide-21
SLIDE 21

H V R & D

M a y 1 4 , 2 1 8 S u s s e x H V t e s t s 2 1

  • N

e e d t

  • a

v

  • i

d e x c e s s i v e c h a r g e b u i l d

  • u

p

  • n

f

  • i

l s u r f a c e l e a d i n g t

  • d

i s c h a r g e s

  • E

x a m p l e

  • p

t i

  • n

: 5 m m d i a m . h

  • l

e s

  • n

a 1 c m g r i d

  • a

l l

  • w

s d i r e c t p a t h f

  • r

i

  • n

s t

  • r

e s i s t i v e c a t h

  • d

e

  • C

a n t h e f

  • i

l s w i t h s t a n d 3 V w i t h

  • u

t b r e a k i n g d

  • w

n ?

  • V

i K u i t y f

  • i

l w i t h T P B c

  • a

t i n g s a n d w i c h e d b e t w e e n m e t a l e l e c t r

  • d

e s

  • y

e s : 1 8 k V a t r

  • m

t e m p . i n a i r , > 4 k V i n L N ✓

N e x t :

s m a l l T P C

  • l

i k e s e t u p w i t h D U N E

  • l

i k e c a t h

  • d

e w i t h T P B c

  • a

t e d p e r f

  • r

a t e d f

  • i

l a p p l i e d , a n d a n

  • d

e e l e c t r

  • d

e ( n

  • w

i r e g r i d ) , L A r l

  • k

f

  • r

s i g n s

  • f

d i s c h a r g e s b y m

  • n

i t

  • r

i n g c u r r e n t fm

  • w

t

  • c

a t h

  • d

e

FEM sim. from Bo Yu:

slide-22
SLIDE 22

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

22

Manchester SiPM Test-Stand

  • Funds secured to set up a Test-Stand to

characterize SiPMs.

  • Start with Dark-Box to test at visible light,
  • Chamber with cryo-cooler + gas argon to test in

cold and at VUV planned.

  • In talks with DUNE consortium leadership on
  • ptimizing components.
slide-23
SLIDE 23

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

23

Opportunities for Collaboration

  • A link is already established (SPRINT-FAPESP funds linking

Manchester and UNICAMP).

  • Brazilian groups getting involved in simulation for SBND and

DUNE (UFABC, UFSCAR, UNICAMP). More definitely welcome.

  • Hardware collaboration on foil production and development.
  • UK Manchester LArSoft workshop in the fall – gather all new

UK students/PDRAs to learn about LArSoft. Possibility to deepen the light simulation part this year and hopefully include LA participants.

  • Alternatively, UNICAMP organizing a school in December –

potential for workshop in light sim before or after.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

24

Summary

  • UK groups have built up the expertise in simulation of

scintillation light in LArSoft for SBND, and are beginning to port it to DUNE.

  • Lots of places to get involved - dedicated simulations (made

in Brazil) already being implemented.

  • We have developed the idea of WLS-covered foils as a

“photon-collection booster”. Will be installed in SBND, developing the idea for DUNE.

  • Developing hardware capabilities to test SiPMs.
  • We have a strong basis on which to build collaboration

between UK and Latin America.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

25

Thank You for your Attention

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • Quantity of scintillation light is

complementary to charge.

  • Registering both will improve energy

resolution.

  • Knowing position will maximise

precision.

  • Largest benefits at lower

energies, where TPC not as sensitive: Supernova neutrinos, nuclear effects, missing hadronic energy

Scintillation Light in LArTPCs:

energy resolution

R Acciarri et al. 2012 JINST 7 P01016 59.5 keV 241Am peak LY @7phel/keV

  • P. Benetti et al. (WARP), NIM A 574 (2007) 83
slide-27
SLIDE 27

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

27

39Ar – how big of a problem is it really?

  • 39Ar is a beta- emitter with

an end point at 565 keV. average energy of electron ~ 236 keV

  • Measured rate is 1Bq/kg.
  • Could it
  • verwhelm

the trigger?

arXiv:astro-ph/0603131v2

MC - Preliminary

  • C. Hill,

Manchester

slide-28
SLIDE 28

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

28

The ARAPUCA light trap

  • A way to enlarge the active

surface without increasing number of channels.

  • Use dichroic filters + 2 WLS
  • E. Segreto & A.

Bergamini-Machado Planned installation In SBND and protoDUNE

slide-29
SLIDE 29

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

29

  • LArIAT is an excellent

test-bed for new ideas, like WLS – covered foils.

LArTPC

LArIAT Light Readout

Applying TPB to the reflective foil that will line the inside of the LArIAT TPC Two cryogenic PMTS

  • one 3” high QE (30%)
  • one 2” standard QE

(20%)

+3 SiPMs Wavelength shifting reflector foil

Hamamatsu R11065

  • First test of TPB

coated reflector foils in a running TPC (at beam neutrino energies).

slide-30
SLIDE 30

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

30

  • I

n f a c t , t h e t

  • l

s w e r e d e v e l

  • p

e d f

  • r

L A r I A T fj r s t , a n d a d a p t e d f

  • r

S B N D .

  • Using the same simulation

tools as SBND

L A r I A T P h

  • t
  • n

M C L Y = 1 4 . 1 p e / M e V

T

  • p
  • d
  • w

n v i e w S i d e v i e w

L A r I A T P h

  • t
  • n

M C L Y = 6 . 2 p e / M e V

T

  • p
  • d
  • w

n v i e w S i d e v i e w

Beam Direction Beam Direction

Excellent uniformity in the detector. Three full runs completed (Not all PMTs were always

  • n).

Data analysis in progress.

  • W. Foreman
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Calorimetry with Scintillation Light

For protons interacting inelastically a large fraction

  • f the energy is lost to the

TPC. MC - Preliminary MC - Preliminary MC - Preliminary MC - Preliminary MC - Preliminary MC - Preliminary

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Timing

  • To see if ~ns resolutions can be

achieved need to account for second

  • rder effects, e.g. Rayleigh scattering.
  • impossible to do using a lookup library

(memory) -> parametrization of arrival times.

  • Assume we can model Argon

Scintillation timing (in principle

  • ptimistic).

[ n m ] λ

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

g r

  • u

p v e l

  • c

i t y [ c m / n s ]

5 1 1 5 2 2 5 E n t r i e s 3 7 4 5 4 6 M e a n 1 . 1 3 R M S 1 . 5 8

[ c m / n s ]

g r

  • u

p

v 5 1 1 5 2 2 5 2 4 6 8 1

3

1 ×

E n t r i e s 3 7 4 5 4 6 M e a n 1 . 1 3 R M S 1 . 5 8 E n t r i e s 6 6 3 7 1 M e a n 2 4 R M S . 8 2 9 3 E n t r i e s 6 6 3 7 1 M e a n 2 4 R M S . 8 2 9 3

Visible VUV VUV Visible

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Works for Visible Light too:

Cathode only configuration is much easier to model - Path of light easier to “predict”. MC - Preliminary MC - Preliminary MC - Preliminary MC - Preliminary MC - Preliminary MC - Preliminary

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Single PMT time resolution

Direct light Refmected light Note that flight time scales differently wrt distance for reflected/visible and VUVlight. MC - Preliminary

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Timing

MC – Preliminary No electronics effects High energy events Timing resolution depends on the quantity

  • f arriving light (smaller

chance of missing photons coming in) MC - Preliminary

slide-36
SLIDE 36

14/05/18

  • A. M. Szelc @ LA-UK meeting Fermilab

36

Validating the Simulation

  • Simplest topology

– easy to understand.

  • Great to test

predictions vs reality.

  • Data agrees with

MC predictions (in progress).

μ

+ /

  • L

A r I A T P r e l i m i n a r y T h r

  • u

g h

  • g
  • i

n g μ E T L ( 2 ” ) P M T

P . K r y c z y n s k i