two dimensional screening a useful optimality condition
play

Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition A. Araujo 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition A. Araujo 1 , 2 S. Vieira 3 1 IMPA 2 FGV-RJ 3 IBMEC-RJ Jun 2012 Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 1 Outline We study a monopolistic screening problem


  1. Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition A. Araujo 1 , 2 S. Vieira 3 1 IMPA 2 FGV-RJ 3 IBMEC-RJ Jun 2012 Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 1

  2. Outline • We study a monopolistic screening problem where the firm produces a single product and faces heterogeneous customers. Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 2

  3. Outline • We study a monopolistic screening problem where the firm produces a single product and faces heterogeneous customers. • The customers’ preferences exhibit two dimensions of uncertainty, which are their private information. Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 2

  4. Outline • We study a monopolistic screening problem where the firm produces a single product and faces heterogeneous customers. • The customers’ preferences exhibit two dimensions of uncertainty, which are their private information. • We will derive the necessary optimality conditions characterizing the level curves for the optimal quantity assignment function. Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 2

  5. Model • The customer has a quasi-linear preference v ( q, a, b ) − t, where ( a, b ) ∈ Θ = [0 , 1] × [0 , 1] is the customer’s type, q ∈ R + is the good consumed, and t is the monetary payment. Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 3

  6. Model • The customer has a quasi-linear preference v ( q, a, b ) − t, where ( a, b ) ∈ Θ = [0 , 1] × [0 , 1] is the customer’s type, q ∈ R + is the good consumed, and t is the monetary payment. • The firm is a profit maximizing monopolist which produces a single product q ∈ R + . Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 3

  7. Model • The customer has a quasi-linear preference v ( q, a, b ) − t, where ( a, b ) ∈ Θ = [0 , 1] × [0 , 1] is the customer’s type, q ∈ R + is the good consumed, and t is the monetary payment. • The firm is a profit maximizing monopolist which produces a single product q ∈ R + . • The firm does not observe ( a, b ) and has a prior distribution over Θ according to the differentiable density function f ( a, b ) > 0 . Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 3

  8. Model • The customer has a quasi-linear preference v ( q, a, b ) − t, where ( a, b ) ∈ Θ = [0 , 1] × [0 , 1] is the customer’s type, q ∈ R + is the good consumed, and t is the monetary payment. • The firm is a profit maximizing monopolist which produces a single product q ∈ R + . • The firm does not observe ( a, b ) and has a prior distribution over Θ according to the differentiable density function f ( a, b ) > 0 . • The monopolist’s preference is given by Π( q, t ) = t − C ( q ) , where C ( q ) is a the cost function. Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 3

  9. Monopolist’s Problem Formally, the monopolist’s problem consists in choosing the contract ( q, t ) : Θ → R + × R that solves � 1 � 1 max Π( q ( a, b ) , t ( a, b )) f ( a, b ) dadb, ( Π ) q ( · ) ,t ( · ) 0 0 Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 4

  10. Monopolist’s Problem Formally, the monopolist’s problem consists in choosing the contract ( q, t ) : Θ → R + × R that solves � 1 � 1 max Π( q ( a, b ) , t ( a, b )) f ( a, b ) dadb, ( Π ) q ( · ) ,t ( · ) 0 0 subject to the individual-rationality constraints: v ( q ( a, b ) , a, b ) − t ( a, b ) ≥ 0 ∀ ( a, b ) ∈ Θ , (IR) Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 4

  11. Monopolist’s Problem Formally, the monopolist’s problem consists in choosing the contract ( q, t ) : Θ → R + × R that solves � 1 � 1 max Π( q ( a, b ) , t ( a, b )) f ( a, b ) dadb, ( Π ) q ( · ) ,t ( · ) 0 0 subject to the individual-rationality constraints: v ( q ( a, b ) , a, b ) − t ( a, b ) ≥ 0 ∀ ( a, b ) ∈ Θ , (IR) and the incentive compatibility constraints: ( a ′ ,b ′ ) ∈ Θ { v ( q ( a ′ , b ′ ) , a, b ) − t ( a ′ , b ′ ) } , ( a, b ) ∈ arg max ∀ ( a, b ) ∈ Θ . (IC) Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 4

  12. Basic Ideas 1. From the incentive compatibility constraints, we derive a quasi-linear partial differential equation (PDE) for q ( a, b ) . Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 5

  13. Basic Ideas 1. From the incentive compatibility constraints, we derive a quasi-linear partial differential equation (PDE) for q ( a, b ) . 2. Using the method of characteristic curves, we get a new and convenient parametrization of the type space. Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 5

  14. Basic Ideas 1. From the incentive compatibility constraints, we derive a quasi-linear partial differential equation (PDE) for q ( a, b ) . 2. Using the method of characteristic curves, we get a new and convenient parametrization of the type space. 3. In these new variables, we derive the optimality condition for the monopolist’s problem along the characteristic curve. Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 5

  15. Local Incentive Conditions • For an incentive compatible contract ( q, t ) , the customer’s maximization problem is: Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 6

  16. Local Incentive Conditions • For an incentive compatible contract ( q, t ) , the customer’s maximization problem is: ( a ′ ,b ′ ) ∈ Θ { v ( q ( a ′ , b ′ ) , a, b ) − t ( a ′ , b ′ ) } . max (1) Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 6

  17. Local Incentive Conditions • For an incentive compatible contract ( q, t ) , the customer’s maximization problem is: ( a ′ ,b ′ ) ∈ Θ { v ( q ( a ′ , b ′ ) , a, b ) − t ( a ′ , b ′ ) } . max (1) • The first-order necessary optimality conditions for problem (1) are Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 6

  18. Local Incentive Conditions • For an incentive compatible contract ( q, t ) , the customer’s maximization problem is: ( a ′ ,b ′ ) ∈ Θ { v ( q ( a ′ , b ′ ) , a, b ) − t ( a ′ , b ′ ) } . max (1) • The first-order necessary optimality conditions for problem (1) are v q q a = t a , and v q q b = t b . (2) Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 6

  19. Local Incentive Conditions • For an incentive compatible contract ( q, t ) , the customer’s maximization problem is: ( a ′ ,b ′ ) ∈ Θ { v ( q ( a ′ , b ′ ) , a, b ) − t ( a ′ , b ′ ) } . max (1) • The first-order necessary optimality conditions for problem (1) are v q q a = t a , and v q q b = t b . (2) • Finally, using the Schwarz’s integrability condition Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 6

  20. Local Incentive Conditions • For an incentive compatible contract ( q, t ) , the customer’s maximization problem is: ( a ′ ,b ′ ) ∈ Θ { v ( q ( a ′ , b ′ ) , a, b ) − t ( a ′ , b ′ ) } . max (1) • The first-order necessary optimality conditions for problem (1) are v q q a = t a , and v q q b = t b . (2) • Finally, using the Schwarz’s integrability condition t ab = t ba , Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 6

  21. Local Incentive Conditions • For an incentive compatible contract ( q, t ) , the customer’s maximization problem is: ( a ′ ,b ′ ) ∈ Θ { v ( q ( a ′ , b ′ ) , a, b ) − t ( a ′ , b ′ ) } . max (1) • The first-order necessary optimality conditions for problem (1) are v q q a = t a , and v q q b = t b . (2) • Finally, using the Schwarz’s integrability condition t ab = t ba , we get the following partial differential equation (PDE): − v qb q a + q b = 0 . (3) v qa Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 6

  22. Cauchy Initial Value Problem − v qb  q a + q b = 0 ,  v qa   (CP)   q | Γ = φ ( r ) .  • The idea is to prescribe the value of q ( · ) on Γ and then use the characteristic curves to propagate this information to the participation region. • In this sense, because Γ is a one-dimensional curve, we are reducing problem from two-dimensions to one. Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 7

  23. Cauchy Initial Value Problem − v qb  q a + q b = 0 ,  v qa   (CP)   q | Γ = φ ( r ) .  • The idea is to prescribe the value of q ( · ) on Γ and then use the characteristic curves to propagate this information to the participation region. • In this sense, because Γ is a one-dimensional curve, we are reducing problem from two-dimensions to one. Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 7

  24. Cauchy Initial Value Problem − v qb  q a + q b = 0 , Γ = { ( α 0 ( r ) , β 0 ( r )) }  v qa   (CP)   q | Γ = φ ( r ) .  • The idea is to prescribe the value of q ( · ) on Γ and then use the characteristic curves to propagate this information to the participation region. • In this sense, because Γ is a one-dimensional curve, we are reducing problem from two-dimensions to one. Two-dimensional screening: a useful optimality condition, Jun 2012 7

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend