TSUNAMI HAZARD ASSESSMENT FOR DIBBA OMAN AND DIBBA UNITED ARAB - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
tsunami hazard assessment for dibba oman and dibba united
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

TSUNAMI HAZARD ASSESSMENT FOR DIBBA OMAN AND DIBBA UNITED ARAB - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Feb 05, 2024 476 likes •727 views

TSUNAMI HAZARD ASSESSMENT FOR DIBBA OMAN AND DIBBA UNITED ARAB EMIRATES El-Hussain I, Al-Habsi Z, Omira R, Al-Bulushi K, Deif A, Al-Rawas G, Mohammad AME, Baptista MA OUTLINE 1. INTORDUCTION 2. PERPARATION OF TSUNAMI MODEL 2.1 Building the

slide-1
SLIDE 1

TSUNAMI HAZARD ASSESSMENT

FOR DIBBA OMAN AND DIBBA UNITED ARAB EMIRATES

El-Hussain I, Al-Habsi Z, Omira R, Al-Bulushi K, Deif A, Al-Rawas G, Mohammad AME, Baptista MA

slide-2
SLIDE 2

OUTLINE

  • 1. INTORDUCTION
  • 2. PERPARATION OF TSUNAMI MODEL

2.1 Building the DEM 2.2 Nested grids

  • 3. METHODOLOGY

3.1 Deterministic Tsunami Hazard Assessment

Initial condition Numerical simulation (NSWING) 3.2 Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Assessment

  • 4. RESULTS

4.1 Deterministic Tsunami Hazard Assessment

4.2 Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Assessment

  • 5. CONCLUSIONS
slide-3
SLIDE 3

1.INTORDUCTION

  • Tsunami hazard assessment in spot light
  • Collaboration research study between SQU and UAEU
  • The ultimate goal
  • This study we used state-of-the-art techniques to model tsunami generation,

propagation and impact based on near field earthquake sources both far field and non-seismic sources are not subjected in this study

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • 2. PERPARATION OF TSUNAMI MODEL

2.1 Building the DEM

The DEM was generated from different Data sets:

  • GEPCO (30 seconds arc resolution)
  • Aster (30 meter resolution)
  • Nautical maps
  • Topography grid (5 meter resolution)
  • Bathymetry grid (5 meter resolution)
slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • 2. PERPARATION OF TSUNAMI MODEL

2.1 Building the DEM

A 3D view of DEM 10m Resolution for DIBBA The resultant DEM is a 10 m resolution grid which combine both bathymetry and topography data

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • 2. PERPARATION OF TSUNAMI MODEL

2.2 Nested grids

  • Smooth propagation
  • Numerical stability
  • Refinement factor of 5
  • Four resolution grid layers:

layer 1: 1250 m layer 2: 250 m layer 3: 50 m layer 4: 10 m

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Initial Condition

  • 3. METHODOLOGY

3.1 DETERMINISTIC TSUNAMI HAZARD ASSESSMENT (DTHA)

Scenario MSZ Length (km) Width (km) Slip(m) Dip(0) Strike(0) Rake(0) Mw 1 Eastern 461 110 11.1 7 263 90 8.8 2 Western 30 20 1.8 7 281 90 6.9 Historical MSZ Tsunami Length (km) Width (km) Slip(m) Dip(0) Strike(0) Rake(0) Mw 27 Nov. 1945 150 70 6.6 7 246 90 8.1

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Initial Sea Level Deformation for Eastern Makran Subduction Zone Mw8.8 Scenario Generation of initial sea level deformation grid . A profile graph AB plot perpendicular to the fault showing a maximum initial wave height of 4.2m

DIBBA

A B

DIBBA

A B

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Numerical Simulation

In this study, a Numerical code called NSWING (Non-linear Shallow water model with nested grids) is used to compute tsunami wave forms that includes the discretization and explicit leap-frog finite difference scheme to solve the shallow water equations in spherical coordinates

Regional Tsunami animation of EMSZ Mw8.8 Scenario

3.1 DETERMINISTIC TSUNAMI HAZARD ASSESSMENT (DTHA)

The tsunami impact descried in term of maximum wave height, flow depth ,run- up, drawback and inundation distance.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

3.2 PROBABILISTIC TSUNAMI HAZARD ASSESSMENT (PTHA)

Probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment approach consists in considering the recurrence rate of earthquake scenarios with different magnitudes. The result is a probability of exceeding a certain wave height/flow depth in a given periods.

Num Grid name Mw Scenario Number Fault location length width slip Dip Duration hours 1 mw7.9sc01 7.9 sc1 East 100 70 5 7 6 2 mw7.9sc02 7.9 sc2 East 100 70 5 7 6 3 mw7.9sc03 7.9 sc3 East 100 70 5 7 6 4 mw7.9sc04 7.9 sc4 East 100 70 5 7 6 5 mw7.9sc05 7.9 sc5 East 100 70 5 7 6 6 mw7.9sc06 7.9 sc6 East 100 70 5 7 6 7 mw7.9sc07 7.9 sc7 East 100 70 5 7 6 8 mw7.9sc08 7.9 sc8 East 100 70 5 7 6 9 mw7.9sc09 7.9 sc9 West 100 70 5 7 4 10 mw7.9sc10 7.9 sc10 West 100 70 5 7 4 11 mw7.9sc11 7.9 sc11 West 100 70 5 7 4 12 mw7.9sc12 7.9 sc12 West 100 70 5 7 4 13 mw7.9sc13 7.9 sc13 West 100 70 5 7 4 14 mw7.9sc14 7.9 sc14 West 100 70 5 7 4 15 mw8.1sc01 8.1 sc1 East 150 70 6 7 6 16 mw8.1sc02 8.1 sc2 East 150 70 6 7 6 17 mw8.1sc03 8.1 sc3 East 150 70 6 7 6 18 mw8.1sc04 8.1 sc4 East 150 70 6 7 6 19 mw8.1sc05 8.1 sc5 East 150 70 6 7 6 20 mw8.1sc06 8.1 sc6 Entire 150 70 6 7 6 21 mw8.1sc07 8.1 sc7 West 150 70 6 7 4 22 mw8.1sc08 8.1 sc8 West 150 70 6 7 4 23 mw8.1sc09 8.1 sc9 West 150 70 6 7 4 24 mw8.3sc01 8.3 sc1 East 300 110 4 7 6 25 mw8.3sc02 8.3 sc2 East 300 110 4 7 6 26 mw8.3sc03 8.3 sc3 Entire 300 110 4 7 6 27 mw8.3sc04 8.3 sc4 West 300 110 4 7 4 28 mw8.5sc01 8.5 sc1 East 350 110 6.5 7 6 29 mw8.5sc02 8.5 sc2 Entire 350 110 6.5 7 6 30 mw8.5sc03 8.5 sc3 West 350 110 6.5 7 4 31 mw8.7sc01 8.7 sc1 East 400 110 10 7 6 32 mw8.7sc02 8.7 sc2 Entire 400 110 10 7 6 33 mw8.7sc03 8.7 sc3 West 350 110 11 7 4 34 mw8.9sc01 8.9 sc1 Entire 808 110 10 7 6 35 mw9.1sc01 9.1 sc2 West 808 215 10 7 4

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • 4. RESULTS

4.1 Deterministic tsunami hazard assessment

  • Regional MWH and TTT for EMSZ Mw8.8 Scenario

Regional Tsunami animation of EMSZ Mw8.8 Scenario

MWH 6 m TTT 1 hr. 24 min

Length (km) Width (km) Slip(m) Dip(0) Strike(0) Rake(0) Mw 461 110 11.1 7 263 90 8.8

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • 4. RESULTS

4.1 Deterministic tsunami hazard assessment

  • Regional MWH and TTT for WMSZ Mw6.9 Scenario

Regional Tsunami animation of WMSZ Mw6.9 Scenario

MWH 0.6 m TTT 48 min

Length (km) Width (km) Slip(m) Dip(0) Strike(0) Rake(0) Mw 30 20 1.8 7 281 90 6.9

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • 4. RESULTS

4.1 Deterministic tsunami hazard assessment

  • Regional MWH and TTT for Historical MSZ 1945 Mw 8.1

Regional Tsunami animation of HMSZ 1945 Mw8.1

MWH 4.3 m TTT 1 hr. 42 min

Length (km) Width (km) Slip(m) Dip(0) Strike(0) Rake(0) Mw 150 70 6.6 7 246 90 8.1

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • 4. RESULTS

4.1 Deterministic tsunami hazard assessment

  • DIBBA Maximum Wave height and Flow depth for EMSZ Mw8.8 Scenario
slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • 4. RESULTS

4.1 Deterministic tsunami hazard assessment

  • DIBBA Maximum Wave height and Flow depth for WMSZ Mw6.9 Scenario
slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • 4. RESULTS

4.1 Deterministic tsunami hazard assessment

  • DIBBA Maximum wave Height and Flow depth for Historical MSZ 1945 Mw8.1
slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • 4. RESULTS

4.2 Probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment

  • DIBBA 100-years Probability that MWH/Flow depth exceeds 0.5m , 1.0m and 2.0m
slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • 4. RESULTS

4.2 Probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment

  • DIBBA 250-years Probability that MWH/Flow depth exceeds 0.5m , 1.0m and 2.0m
slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • 4. RESULTS

4.2 Probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment

  • DIBBA 500-years Probability that MWH/Flow depth exceeds 0.5m , 1.0m and 2.0m
slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • 4. RESULTS

4.2 Probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment

  • DIBBA 1000-years Probability that MWH/Flow depth exceeds 0.5m , 1.0m and 2.0m
slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • 5. CONCLUSIONS

5.1 DTHA Summary

EMSZ Mw8.8 WMSZ Mw6.9 1945MSZ Mw8.1 Maximum Inundation (m) 456 310 152 Area Flooded (x103 m²) 371 217 70 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2

EMSZ Mw8.8 WMSZ Mw6.9 1945MSZ Mw8.1

1.2 0.9 0.5 1.1 0.9 0.5

Runup (m) Flow Depth (m)

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • 5. CONCLUSIONS

5.2 PTHA Summary

Exposure period Tsunami Probability that a maximum wave height

  • ffshore exceed the given value

0.5 m 1.0 m 2.0 m 100 years

90% 75% 25%

250 years

100% 90% 35%

500 years

100% 100% 50%

1000 years

100% 100% 60%

slide-23
SLIDE 23

THANK YOU اركش