Trichoderma - Azotobacter biofilm as a promising inoculant for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

trichoderma azotobacter biofilm as a promising inoculant
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Trichoderma - Azotobacter biofilm as a promising inoculant for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Trichoderma - Azotobacter biofilm as a promising inoculant for enhancing plant growth and soil nutrient dynamics in cotton Kulandaivelu Velmourougane 1,2 and Radha Prasanna 2 1 Division of Crop Production ICAR-CICR, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India 2


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Trichoderma-Azotobacter biofilm as a promising inoculant for enhancing plant growth and soil nutrient dynamics in cotton

Kulandaivelu Velmourougane1,2 and Radha Prasanna2

1Division of Crop Production

ICAR-CICR, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India

2Division of Microbiology,

ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, India

7th ACRDN Meeting, 15-17 Sept 2017, Nagpur

velicar@gmail.com

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Microbial inoculants are an important component of integrated soil

and crop management practices in agriculture

  • For

deriving maximum benefits from inoculation using microorganisms, effective colonisation of roots and rhizosphere is an essential step

  • As several biotic and abiotic factors reduce the survival and

proliferation of the applied bioinoculants in the rhizosphere

  • This necessitates alternative delivery method for bioinoculants
  • Biofilmed

biofertilizers are

  • ne
  • f

such recent innovation in agriculture

Bioinoculant technology

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Biofilms

  • A

biofilm is an assemblage

  • r

aggregation

  • f

microbial cells embedded in a self produced polymeric matrix

  • Biofilm formation offers a reproductive

fitness advantage in terms of slow growth and physiological heterogeneity, as compared to planktonic cells

  • Mechanism to remain in a conducive

place through effective colonization

  • Strategy to overcome stress
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Significance of biofilms in agriculture

  • Several

genera

  • f

agriculturally important (beneficial/pathogens) bacteria, fungi, cyanobacteria are reported to produce single or multispecies biofilms

  • Biofilm formation on the plant roots is an important

trait

  • f

rhizospheric microorganisms, which prevents them from being detached from the plant caused by various natural processes occurring in the soil

  • Biofilm matrix makes the microbial cells more

tolerant to stress conditions, thereby lengthens their survival rate in soils

  • EPS also found to play an essential role in

development of functional nodules in diazotrophs. Deletion of genes involved in biosynthesis of EPS resulted in formation of pseudonodules in several diazotrophs

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • To develop and evaluate the effect of fungus-

bacterial biofilm on root and rhizosphere colonisation

  • To understand the role of fungus-bacterial biofilm on

plant growth, soil nutrient availability, soil biology and plant defense enzymes in cotton

Objectives

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Azotobacter chroococcum

(MTCC 25045/NAIMCC-B-00061)

Trichoderma viride

(ITCC 2211)

Microbial partners used in the study

slide-7
SLIDE 7

4d 8d 12d 16d

J100 + Az P100 + Tv J75:P25 + Az J75:P25 + Tv J75:P25 + Az + Tv J50:P50 + Az J50:P50 + Tv J50:P50 + Az + Tv J25:P75 + Az J25:P75 + Tv J25:P75 + Az + Tv

Colony characteristics of A. chroococcum, T. viride and their biofilm in different growth media ratios (4-16 days)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Az Tv AZ + Tv Az-Tv

Tv-Az

4d 8d 12d 16d 20d

Biofilm development under individual, coculture and staggered inoculation

slide-9
SLIDE 9

J100 P100 J75:P25 J50:P50 J25:P75 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n

  • Quantification of biofilm formation in different growth media, using crystal violet assay

after 16 days of inoculation. a, J100 - A. chroococcum; b, P100 - A. chroococcum; c, J75:P25

  • A. chroococcum; d, J50:P50 - A. chroococcum; e, J25:P75 - A. chroococcum; f, J100 - T.

viride; g, P100 - T. viride; h, J75:P25 - T. viride; i, J50:P50 - T. viride; j, J25:P75 - T. viride; k, J100 - A. chroococcum- T. viride co-culture; l, P100 - A. chroococcum- T. viride co-culture; m, J75:P25 - A. chroococcum- T. viride co-culture; n, J50:P50 - A. chroococcum-T. viride coculture; o, J25:P75 - A. chroococcum- T. viride co-culture

slide-10
SLIDE 10

12d

P100 (Tv) J75:P25 (Tv) J75:P25 (Co-culture) J50:P50 (Tv) J50:P50 (Co-culture) J25:P75 (Tv) J25:P75 (Co-culture)

4d 8d 16d

Biofilm biomass in different growth media

slide-11
SLIDE 11

J50:P50 J25:P75

Phase contrast microphotographs of coaggregation between A. chroococcum-T. viride – 16 dpi

J75:P25

Tv hyphae Az cells Az cells Tv hyphae

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Az Tv EPS Tv Tv hyphae Az attachment to Tv

Scanning electron microphotograph of Tv-Az biofilm

EPS

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Root colonization study

National Phytotron Facility

  • To

understand the colonization behavior of developed biofilms in the rhizosphere/rhizoplane of cotton

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Cotton (Suraj)

Surface-sterilized in a 1% sodium hypochlorite solution for 5 min, washed five times with sterile water for 3 min each, and soaked in sterile water

  • vernight

Treatment details

T1: Recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) - no microbial inoculation 100 kg N (urea): 50 kg P2O5 (SSP): 50 kg K2O (MOP) ha-1 T2: 75% Nitrogen (N) + Full dose of Phosphorus (P) and Potassium (K) (75% N + FDPK) - no microbial inoculation T3: 75% N + FDPK + A. chroococcum (Az) T4: 75% N + FDPK + T. viride (Tv) T5: 75% N + FDPK + T. viride – A. chroococcum biofilm (Tv-Az) The cotton seeds were inoculated with 0.5 mL of Az (1010 cfu mL-1, 48h old culture), Tv (108 spores mL-1, 1 week old culture), and Tv-Az biofilm (Az:1010 cfu mL-1 and Tv :1010 spores mL-1, 6d old biofilm)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

RDF 75% N + FDPK Az alone Tv alone Tv – Az biofilm

20 days old cotton seedlings

RDF 75% N + FDPK Az alone Tv alone Tv – Az biofilm

Biofilm on growth characteristics of 20d old cotton seedlings

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Treatments Seedlings length (cm) * Seedlings fresh wt. (mg) * Seedlings dry wt. (mg) * Root: Shoot ratio* Protein (mg g-1 fresh wt.)** Shoot Root Shoot Root Shoot Root Leaves Roots RDF 14.0c 9.2a 1740b 0.260b 0.650b 0.210d 0.33b 6.2c 3.7c 75%N+FDPK 13.6c 7.9b 1170c 0.180c 0.570c 0.190e 0.33b 5.9d 3.5c 75%N+FDPK + Az 15.8b 9.9a 1860ab 0.280b 0.680b 0.250b 0.37a 7.4b 5.7b 75%N+FDPK + Tv 14.3c 9.6a 1770b 0.270b 0.650b 0.250c 0.37a 7.2b 5.9b 75%N+FDPK + Tv-Az 17.2a 10.1a 2120a 0.320a 0.750a 0.300a 0.39a 10.2a 7.0a cv 6.52 5.37 11.5 11.2 4.72 1.95 5.00 1.89 2.93 SEm ± 0.32 0.20 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.007 0.006 0.51 0.45 CD (p=0.05) 1.28 0.87 0.26 0.03 0.04 0.006 0.02 0.36 0.38

Evaluation of microbial inoculation on plant growth parameters (20 DAI)

* n=10; ** n=3

The Tv-Az biofilm inoculation showed an increase of 23% and 10% in terms of shoot and root length respectively, over the RDF

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Treatments OC (%) Available N (mg kg-1) Available P (mg kg-1) Available K (mg kg-1) Zinc (mg kg-1) Copper (mg kg-1) Manganese (mg kg-1) Iron (mg kg-1) RDF 0.52 ± 0.02bc 56 ± 0.68c 3.0 ± 0.52cd 83 ± 1.42bc 2.5 ± 0.56b 1.6 ± 0.10cd 1.1 ± 0.20c 1.5 ± 0.09c 75%N+FDPK 0.49 ± 0.01c 51 ± 0.84e 2.4 ± 0.52d 79 ± 0.89d 1.2 ± 0.16d 1.4 ± 0.05d 0.8 ± 0.10c 1.3 ± 0.04d 75%N+FDPK + Az 0.56 ± 0.03ab 60 ± 1.12b 3.9 ± 0.52bc 86 ± 2.34b 2.7 ± 0.20b 1.9 ± 0.26c 1.5 ± 0.04b 1.5 ± 0.05c 75%N+FDPK + Tv 0.53 ± 0.01bc 54 ± 1.57d 4.8 ± 0.52b 81 ± 0.34cd 1.9 ± 0.14c 2.3 ± 0.26b 1.7 ± 0.29b 1.7 ± 0.06b 75%N+FDPK + Tv-Az 0.60 ± 0.04a 63 ± 0.34a 6.0 ± 1.03a 90 ± 2.27a 3.5 ± 0.28a 2.7 ± 0.16a 2.2 ± 0.13a 1.9 ± 0.03a cv 4.71 1.76 16.3 1.96 12.9 9.44 12.0 3.58 SEm ± 0.01 1.13 0.36 1.11 0.22 0.13 0.13 0.05 CD (p=0.05) 0.04 1.82 1.18 2.99 0.55 0.34 0.32 0.10

Effects of microbial inoculation on macro- and micronutrient status of cotton grown soil (20 DAI)

  • 50% increase in SOC in Tv-Az biofilm treatment as compared to their initial values
  • 30% increase in soil available nitrogen, 3.6 fold increase in P and 18% increase in K in Tv-

Az biofilm treatment as compared to their initial values

  • Tv-Az treatment showed a fold increase of 3.2 (Zn), 1.9 (Cu), 3.5 (Mn) and 2.5 (Fe) over the

initial micronutrient status

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Time course changes in soil polysaccharides, proteins and dehydrogenase activity as influenced by microbial inoculation

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5d 10d 20d

Soil protein (mg g-1)

T = *** D = *** T x D = *** RDF 75% N+FDPK Az Tv Tv-Az

5 10 15 20 25 5d 10d 20d

DHA (µg TPF g-1 d-1)

T = *** D = *** T x D = *** RDF 75% N+FDPK Az Tv Tv-Az

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 5d 10d 20d

Soil polysaccharides (mg g-1)

T = *** D = *** T x D = *** RDF 75% N+FDPK Az Tv Tv-Az

  • 4.4 fold increase in soil polysaccharide content
  • 4.3 fold increase in soil protein content
  • Several fold increase in DHA

in Tv-Az treatment as compared to the initial soil values

slide-19
SLIDE 19

cd d b bc a d d b c a 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 RDF 75% N+FDPK Az Tv Tv-Az PPO (Units mg-1 protein min-1) (P>3.7E-05) (P<8.3E-06) Leaves Roots cd d b bc a c c b b a 5 10 15 20 25 RDF 75% N+FDPK Az Tv Tv-Az PO (Units mg-1 protein min-1) (P<0.005) (P<0.0002) Leaves Roots d e c b a c c b b a 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 RDF 75% N+FDPK Az Tv Tv-Az PEPcase (µmoles mg-1 protein min-1) (P<5E-06) (P<0.0001) Leaves Roots b b b b a c c b c a 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 RDF 75% N+FDPK Az Tv Tv-Az CAT (Units mg-1 protein min-1) Shoot (P<0.005) Root (P<0.001) Leaves Roots c d b b a c d b c a 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 RDF 75% N+FDPK Az Tv Tv-Az Total phenols (mg CAE g-1 fresh wt.) (P<6E-08) (P<3E-06) Leaves Root c c b b a c d b b a 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 RDF 75% N+FDPK Az Tv Tv-Az

PAL (moles t-cinnamic acid mg-1 protein h-1)

(P<0.0004) (P<0.0007) Leaves Root

Effect of microbial inoculation on plant antioxidant and defense enzymes activities in 20d old cotton seedlings

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Time course analyses of colonization behaviour of microbial inoculants in cotton rhizosphere and rhizoplane

9.5 10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 12.0 12.5 13.0 0d 5d 10d 15d 20d

Population (log10 cfu g-1)

T = *** D = *** T x D = ***

RS - Az RP - Az RS - Tv RP - Tv

9.5 10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 0d 5d 10d 15d 20d

Population (log10 cfu g-1)

T = *** D = *** T x D = ***

RS - Az (Tv-Az) RP - Az (Tv-Az) RS - Tv (Tv-Az) RP - Tv (Tv-Az)

  • Rhizosphere population found to be significantly (p<0.0001) higher as compared to the

rhizoplane population density

  • The population densities of Tv-Az biofilm in the rhizosphere and rhizosphere were

found to be significantly higher in the biofilm treatment

  • As compared to Az population (rhizosphere: 2% and rhizoplane: 1%) in Tv-Az biofilm,

the Tv treatment showed increased population densities in both rhizosphere (2.49%) and rhizoplane (1.79%), as compared to their single inoculation

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Scanning electron microphotographs depicting cotton root colonisation by Tv-Az biofilm

Cotton root Tv hyphae

Cotton root

Tv hyphae Az attached to Tv hyphae EPS Az embedded in the EPS Cotton root colonized by Tv and Az

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Cotton roots (5 DAI) Fluorescein (40× ) Cotton roots (20 DAI) Fluorescein (100× ) Cotton roots (20 DAI) Acridine orange (100× )

Confocal laser scanning microscopy depicting cotton root colonisation by Tv-Az biofilm

slide-23
SLIDE 23

d d b c a 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 RDF 75% N+FDPK Az Tv Tv-Az Biofilm (OD550) CD (0.01)= 0.325

Quantification of biofilm formation through crystal violet staining

RDF 75% N + FDPK Az alone Tv alone Tv – Az biofilm

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Transcriptome analysis

  • Transcriptome

analysis was undertaken to understand the transcriptional (downregulated and upregulated genes) responses in

  • A. chroococcum

cells and T. viride vs Tv-Az biofilm

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Azotobacter chroococcum (Az) Trichoderma viride (Tv) Tv-Az biofilm R1 R2 R1 R2 R1 R2

  • No. of reads

7,898,059 7,362,242 15,547,359 16,231,968 33,683,972 30,356,072

  • No. of bases

1,188,251,803 1,107,059,972 2,326,627,601 2,437,036,277 5,062,473,622 4,559,608,730 Total data (Gb) 1.18 1.10 2.32 2.43 5.06 4.55

RNASeq high quality data statistics of A. chroococcum, T. viride and Tv-Az biofilm

Azotobacter chroococcum Trichoderma viride R1 R2 R1 R2

  • No. of transcripts

6432 30419 983 43330 Total bases 1,712,320 19,236,033 345,094 29,407,013 Mean transcript length 266 632 351 678 N50 248 978 333 1237

  • Max. transcript length

3159 8631 3314 10057

  • Min. transcript length

201 201 201 201

Assembly statistics of A. chroococcum and T. viride Coding sequence (CDS) statistics of A. chroococcum and T. viride

Azotobacter chroococcum Trichoderma viride R1 R2 R1 R2

  • No. of CDS

538 322 13,314 16,606 Total bases 23,037 152,703 10,020,066 15,176,673 Mean CDS length 428 474 752 913

  • Max. CDS length

1,980 2,226 7,956 9,381

  • Min. CDS length

297 297 297 297

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Gene ontology (GO) distribution for CDS of A. chroococcum and T. viride

Sample Biological processes Molecular functions Cellular component

  • A. chroococcum -R1

244 247 186

  • A. chroococcum -R2

170 178 117

  • T. viride -R1

6519 7002 5205

  • T. viride -R2

7721 8390 6121

Statistics of differentially expressed CDS of A. chroococcum and T. viride

Sample Commonly expressed Up-regulated Down-regulated

  • A. chroococcum R1 Vs. Tv-Az biofilm R1

115 59 56

  • A. chroococcum R2 Vs. Tv-Az biofilm R2

153 76 77

  • T. viride R1 Vs. Tv-Az biofilm R1

8222 4114 4108

  • T. viride R2 Vs. Tv-Az biofilm R2

9166 4629 4537

slide-27
SLIDE 27

R1 R2 Heat map of differentially expressed genes in Azotobacter chroococcum (Az) vs. T. viride – A. chroococcum (Tv-Az) biofilm

slide-28
SLIDE 28

R1 R2 Heat map of differentially expressed genes in Trichoderma viride (Tv) vs. T. viride – A. chroococcum (Tv-Az) biofilm

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Gene expression analysis of biofilms a) Up-regulation of gene expression in CDS-366, CDS-12703, CDS-10036, CDS- 5300 and CDS-13443 over control; b) relative normalised expression of up-regulated genes (CDS-366, CDS-12703, CDS-10036, CDS-5300, CDS-13443) on 3rd, 6th and 9th day of biofilm formation

b a

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Gene expression analysis of biofilms a) Down-regulation of gene expression in CDS-89 as compared to control. Relative; b)normalised expression of down-regulated gene (CDS-89) on 3rd, 6th and 9th day of biofilm formation

Pink – 16s gene Blue – CDS-89

b a

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Conclusions and future prospects

+

  • The

dual species biofilm interacted synergistically in terms of its functionality, leading to enhanced growth and nutrient availability and uptake, indicative

  • f its better survival in the crop

rhizosphere

  • The

implications

  • f

these improvements

  • n

cotton productivity, quality and biocontrol potential against insects and fungal/bacterial pathogens needs to be investigated, for its potential use an environment-friendly input in cotton farming.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Acknowledgements

Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi ICAR-Central Institute for Cotton Research, Nagpur

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Thanks