transport for the north smart ticketing 2
play

Transport for the North Smart Ticketing 2 Prepared for: Transport - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transport for the North Smart Ticketing 2 Prepared for: Transport Focus 13 th April 2016 Our reference: 36020 PREPARED BY ILLUMINAS a global team based in London, New York and Austin Prepared in compliance with the International quality


  1. Transport for the North Smart Ticketing 2 Prepared for: Transport Focus 13 th April 2016 Our reference: 36020 PREPARED BY ILLUMINAS a global team based in London, New York and Austin Prepared in compliance with the International quality standard covering market research, ISO 20252 (2012), The MRS Code of Conduct, and the Data Protection Act 1998 by Illuminas, 183-203 Eversholt Street, London NW1 1BU, UK T +44 (0)20 7909 0929 F +44 (0)20 7909 0921 E info@illuminas-global.com www.illuminas-global.com INTERNAL

  2. Background & Objectives 2 INTERNAL

  3. Background Research conducted by Illuminas in December 2015 provided • Transport Focus with a baseline understanding of perceptions of travel within the North, as well as insight into the needs and wants from a smart ticketing system The research showed that there were high levels of conceptual buy- • in to the smart ticketing concept. The study also highlighted areas where further insight was needed A further study was commissioned by Transport Focus primarily to conduct a more robust, larger scale quantitative study to cover the North in its entirety, as opposed to being clustered around major cities (as was the case with first phase of the research). Additionally, there was a requirement to add further qualitative understanding with regard to smart ticketing. The main purpose was to provide more detail on various of the operational options of the smart ticketing scheme. The operational aspects were: Registration • Account-based ticketing • Payment media options: smartphone, smartcard and contactless payment card • Payment structure and fare types • Identity and branding • 3 INTERNAL

  4. Method: qualitative and quantitative research QUALITATIVE RESEARCH QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH 16 depth interviews with respondents The quantitative research consisted of: • whom had previously participated in the December 2015 focus groups : 2000 x 20 minute interviews 1720 online interviews 5 depths in Liverpool • 280 face to face interviews (with those 5 depths in Leeds • without internet access at home) 3 depths in Sheffield • 3 depths in Hull • Interviews were carried out both online and face to face to ensure the full Northern Respondents included a mix of leisure • population, including offliners, were users, business users and commuters included 4 INTERNAL

  5. Sample profile 5 INTERNAL

  6. Sample composition Quotas were set to ensure all respondents used public transport at least once every three months • Of those contacted, 33% screened out due to not using public transport frequently enough • Geographical coverage of those that screened out: 20% North East, 43% North West, 33% Yorkshire & The • Humber PUBLIC TRANSPORT USAGE QS5. How many days a week do you typically use public transport? (%) Daily Five days a week Four days a week 16 15 6 10 12 14 9 9 3 5 Three days a week Two days a week Once a week Twice a month Once a month 63% use public transport on a weekly basis (31% Once every two months use it five or more days a week) Once every three months Base: all respondents (n=2000) INTERNAL

  7. Sample profile : overview Good regional spread across the North: North West 41%, North East 28% and Yorkshire and the • Humber 30% Good spread in terms of gender, age, social grade, marital status and household composition • (NB no quotas set here) Over half the sample work either full or part time. For the majority (78%) working hours are • regular hours and week day daytime (90%) Currently, single mode ticketing (61%) via paper format (72%) is the norm. Only a third use • multi-modal tickets. There are significant differences by urban and rural respondents in terms of ticket types Urban residents significantly more likely to be using multi-modal tickets (52% versus 26% rural) and • use smart ticketing (16% versus 8% rural) Rural residents significantly more likely to be using single mode (74% versus 48% urban) and more • likely using paper tickets (76% versus 69% urban) User frequencies for analysis purposes are defined as Rural / urban definition for analysis: Very frequent (weekly, five days a week, four days a week) Urban = lives within 10 miles of the nearest City • • Fairly frequent (three days a week, two days a week, once a week) Rural = lives greater than 10 miles of the nearest City • • Less frequent (twice a month, once a month, once every two months, once every three months) (Hull, Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester, Newcastle, Sheffield) • 8 INTERNAL

  8. Respondent background REGION QS1. Which of the following areas do you live in? (%) NORTH EAST 28% County Durham 11% Northumberland 5% Tees Valley 3% Tyne & Wear 9% NORTH WEST 41% Cheshire 6% YORKSHIRE & Cumbria 5% THE HUMBER 30% Greater Manchester 13% Humberside 4% Lancashire 10% North Yorkshire 5% Merseyside 7% South Yorkshire 8% West Yorkshire 13% GREATER MANCHESTER Base: all respondents (n=2000) INTERNAL

  9. Respondent profile TOTAL n = 2000 QS2. Gender (%) QS3. Age range (%) QP2. Social grade (%) Under 20 A 9 5 20-29 14 17 B 24 43 30-39 25 5 27 40-49 C 37 50-59 D 24 60-69 4 E 70+ 45% 55% QP4. Household (%) QP4. Marital status (%) QP5. Number of children living at home under the 43 With a partner/spouse 3 age of 18 (Average) Single 8 I live on my own 25 1.8 Married 29 With your own children under 12 16 the age of 18 Living with 7 With a parent partner Divorced or 49 With your own children aged 5 separated 18 or over Widowed With friends, colleagues or 2 Base: n=316 students With other relatives 1 10 10 INTERNAL

  10. Respondent working profile TOTAL n = 2000 QS4a. Working status (%) QS4c. Working hours (%) Work full time Work part time 6 Week day daytime 90 Full time student (between 8am-6pm) 42 27 Part time student Unemployed 14 6 6 Retired Week day other times 24 Homemaker 1 (evenings/nights) QS4b. Working hours (%) Weekend daytime 20 Regular hours (e.g. (between 8am-6pm) the same days and 22 hours each week) Irregular hours (e.g. Weekend other times 78 12 different hours or (evening nights) days each week) Base: n=1100 Base: n=1100 11 11 INTERNAL

  11. Multi mode ticketing is significantly higher amongst those in urban locations Multi or single modal tickets Current ticket format % Q13. Which of the following applies to the tickets you use when Q22. Thinking about the different types of tickets that you said you using public transport? normally use when travelling on public transport, which format do these tickets take? % My ticket enables 36% 61% me to travel on Paper ticket 72 different types of public transport 76% Rural 14 Mobile phone ticket My ticket is for use 69% Urban on just one type of Smartcard 12 public transport 16% Urban only 74% Rural 52% Urban Printed barcode 6 8% Rural 48% Urban 26% Rural Other 12 Monthly spend Q14b. How much do you typically spend on public transport per month? VERY FAIRLY LESS Column % FREQUENTLY FREQUENTLY FREQUENTLY Less than £10 25% 42% 52% % £10-£25 13% 26% 16% £26-£50 22% 16% 7% £51-£75 19% 9% 2% £76-£100 11% 3% 2% 38 £101-£150 5% 1% 1% £151 + 4% 1% 0% 19 16 I use public transport 11 6 2 2 6 less frequently than once a month 1% 2% 19% Less than £10 £10-25 £26-50 £51-75 £76-£100 £101-£150 £151+ I use public transport less frequently than once No differences by urban/rural split for monthly spend a month Base: all respondents (n = 2000) 12 INTERNAL

  12. Commuters: overview Most journeys are relatively short: • 67% under 30 minutes • 48% under 5 miles • For ticketing there is an even split of those purchasing season tickets and purchasing • on the day Of season tickets purchased, monthlys are most common, followed closely by weekly • seasons Of the on the day purchasers, 45% purchase en-route. Train and tram tickets show • greatest variability in terms of where the tickets are purchased from, fairly evenly distributed across en-route, from a ticket machine, from a ticket office and online Key information sources are boards at stops/stations, the internet and staff at • stops/stations 13 INTERNAL

  13. The shorter the commute, the nearer the place of work Journey distance Journey length Q6. Approximately how far do you travel on a typical journey to and Q5. How long, door to door, does a typical journey take when from your usual place of work/college/university? travelling to your usual place of work/college/university? 10% 28% 32 30 21 29% 16 30 mins - 24% Less than 2 2-5 miles 5-10 miles More than 1 hour miles 10 miles 8% > 1 hour Total % < 10 10-20 21-30 > 31 minutes minutes minutes minutes 7% 6% 3% 1% < 2 miles 3% 14% 10% 6% 2-5 miles 1% 7% 12% 11% 5-10 miles 0% 1% 5% 15% >10 miles Base: All who commute for work/study (1041) 14 INTERNAL

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend