transport coefficients from pl m
play

Transport Coefficients from PL M BLTP Seminar JINR-Dubna, January - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transport Coefficients from PL M BLTP Seminar JINR-Dubna, January 28, 2015, 16:00 Abdel Nasser Tawfik Egyptian Center for Theoretical Physics (ECTP), World Laboratory for Cosmology And Particle Physics (WLCAPP) Modern University for


  1. Transport Coefficients from PL  M BLTP Seminar JINR-Dubna, January 28, 2015, 16:00 Abdel Nasser Tawfik Egyptian Center for Theoretical Physics (ECTP), World Laboratory for Cosmology And Particle Physics (WLCAPP) Modern University for Technology and Information (MTI Univ.) http://atawfik.net/

  2. Outline • Sigma model and symmetries • SU(3) L  M with Polyakov-Loop Potential • Electrical and Heat Conductivity • Bulk and Shear Viscosity

  3. Sigma Models Sigma-Model is a Physical system with the Lagrangian The fields φ i represent map from a base manifold spacetime (worldsheet) to a target (Riemannian) manifold of the scalars linked together by internal symmetries. The scalars g ij determines linear and non-linear properties. It was introduced by Gell-Mann and Levy in 1960 . The name σ -model comes from a field corresponding to the spinless meson σ , scalar introduced earlier by Schwinger .

  4. Symmetries • L  M is an effective theory for QCD dof at low-energy and incorporates global SU(Nf) r × SU(Nf) ℓ × U(1) A symmetry (not local SU(3) c ) • For Nf=2 massless quarks, the phase transition can be of • 2 nd -order, if U(1) A symmetry is explicitly broken by instantons • 1 st -order (fluctuations), if U(1) A symmetry is restored at Tc • For Nf = 3 massless quarks, the transition is always of 1 st -order • In last case, the term which breaks U(1) A symmetry explicitly drives 1 st -order phase-transition • In absence of explicit U(1) A symmetry breaking, the transition is fluctuation-induced of 1 st -order Pisarski and Wilczek, PRD29, 338 (1984).

  5. Importance of L  M • L  M is one of lattice QCD alternatives • Various symmetry-breaking scenarios can be investigated in a more easy way • Various properties of strongly interacting matter can be studied • But, finite-T L  M requires many-body resummation schemes, because the IR divergences cause perturbation theory to break down

  6. LSM Symmetries • Again, for Nf massless quarks, QCD Lagrangian has SU(Nf) r × SU(Nf) ℓ × U(1) A symmetry • In vacuum, a non-vanishing expectation value of the quark- antiquark condensate, spontaneously breaks this symmetry to diagonal SU(Nf) V group of vector transformations, V = r + ℓ • For Nf=3, effective low-energy dof of QCD are scalar and pseudoscalar mesons. Since mesons are quark-antiquark states, they fall in singlet and octet representations of SU(3) V . • The SU(Nf) r × SU(Nf) ℓ × U(1) A symmetry of QCD Lagrangian is explicitly broken by nonvanishing quark masses • For M≤Nf degenerate quarks, SU(M) V symmetry is preserved • If M>Nf , mass eigenstates are mixtures of singlet and octet states Jonathan T. Lenaghan,, Dirk H. Rischke, Jurgen Schaffner-Bielich, Phys.Rev. D62 (2000) 085008

  7. Symmetry and Conservations Symmetries imply conservation laws: invariance of Lagrangian under translations in space and time  momentum and energy conservation QCD Lagrangian for massless quarks shows symmetry under vector and axial transformation. equally (vector) left- and right-handed parts treated differently (Axial) For example: symmetry of vector transformations leads to Isospin conservation

  8. Transformation Chiral symmetry of vector field under unitary transformation 𝜄 𝑏 corresponding the rotational angle, 𝑈 𝑗𝑘 𝑏 matrix generates the transformation and a index indicating several generators associated with the symmetry transformation. Vector transformation Λ 𝑊 Axil transformation Λ 𝐵 conjugate Fermions Dirac Lagrangian which describes free Fermion particle of mass m Under vector transformation Λ 𝑊 L D is invariant. BUT axial-voctor transformation Λ 𝐵 reads  are component fields such as  ’s

  9. Sigma fields Combination of quarks (q# of mesons), a meson-like state (pseudoscalar Meson) (scalar Meson) Pion like state 𝐾 𝑞 = 0 − Sigma like state 𝐾 𝑞 = 0 + Gell-Mann & Levy obtained an invariant form if squares of the two states are summed 𝜧 𝑾 : 𝝆 2 → 𝝆 2 𝜧 𝑩 : 𝝆 𝟑 → 𝝆 𝟑 + 𝟑𝝉𝜾𝝆 𝝉 𝟑 → 𝝉 𝟑 𝝉 2 → 𝝉 𝟑 − 𝟑𝝉𝜾𝝆 𝜧 𝑾 , 𝜧 𝐵 (𝝆 𝟑 + 𝝉 2 ) (𝝆 𝟑 + 𝝉 2 )

  10. Vector transformation Vector transformation Levi-Civita Symbols

  11. Axial-Vector transformation

  12. LSM Lagrangian K. E interaction term between nucleons K. E Pion nucleon Potential Of Mesons and the mesons Of nucleons Nucleon mass term The chiral part of L  M-Lagrangian has 𝑇𝑉 3 𝑆 × 𝑇𝑉 3 𝑀 symmetry where fermionic part and mesonic part • 𝒏 𝟑 is tree-level mass of the fields in the absence of symmetry breaking • 𝝁 𝟐 𝒃𝒐𝒆 𝝁 𝟑 are the two possible quartic coupling constants, • 𝒅 is the cubic coupling constant, • 𝒉 flavor-blind Yukawa coupling of quarks to mesons and of quarks to background gauge field 𝑩 𝝂 = 𝜺 𝝂𝟏 𝑩 𝟏 𝒅 = 𝟓. 𝟗𝟏; 𝒉 = 𝟕. 𝟔; 𝝁 𝟐 = 𝟔. 𝟘𝟏; 𝝁 𝟑 = 𝟓𝟕. 𝟓𝟗; 𝒏 𝟑 = (𝟏. 𝟓𝟘𝟔)^𝟑;

  13. SU(3) LSM 𝝔 is a complex 𝟒 × 𝟒 matrix and parameterizing scalar 𝝉 𝒃 and pseudoscalar 𝝆 𝒃 (nonets) mesons where  a are the scalar fields and  a are the pseudoscalar fields. The 3 × 3 matrix H breaks the symmetry explicitly and is chosen as where h a are nine external fields and T a = /2 are generators of U(3) with are Gell-Mann matrices

  14. SU(3) LSM Gell-Mann matrices with as required 𝜇 𝑏 span all traceless Hermitian matrices, then the generators follow1 where f are structure constant given by

  15. SU(3) LSM 2 ℎ0 + ℎ3 + ℎ8 3 ℎ1 − ⅈ ℎ2 ℎ4 − ⅈ ℎ5 3 2 ℎ0 − ℎ3 + ℎ8 𝐼 = ; ℎ1 + ⅈ ℎ2 3 ℎ6 − ⅈ ℎ7 3 2 ℎ0 − 2 ℎ8 ℎ4 + ⅈ ℎ5 ℎ6 + ⅈ ℎ7 3 3

  16. SU(3) LSM When shifting  field by vacuum expectation value, where the tree-level potential is is determined from

  17. SU(3) LSM where The masses are not diagonal, thus σ a and π a fields are not mass generators in standard basis of SU(3). As, the mass matrices are symmetric and real, diagonalization is achieved by an orthogonal transformation

  18. SU(3) LSM The expectation values where From PCAC relations

  19. LSM involving Polyakov-Loop Potential Why Polyakov loop? • the chiral model does NOT describe effects of QCD gluonic dof • absence of confinement results in a non-zero quark number density even in confined phase • The functional form of the potential is motivated by the QCD symmetries of in the pure gauge limit

  20. LSM involving Polyakov-Loop Potential The thermal expectation value of color traced Wilson loop in the temporal direction determines Polyakov-loop potential Polyakov-loop potential and its conjugate This can be represented by a matrix in the color space Temperature Polyakov gauge

  21. LSM involving Polyakov-Loop Potential The coupling between Polyakov loop and quarks is given by the covariant derivative in the chiral limit invariant under chiral flavor group (like QCD Lagrangian) is T-dependent Polyakov Potential In case of no quarks, then and the Polyakov loop is considered as an order parameter for the deconfinement phase-transition

  22. Partition Function In thermal equilibrium, the grand partition function can be defined by using a path integral over quark, antiquark and meson fields where and chemical potential Thermodynamic potential density

  23. LSM involving Polyakov-Loop Potential The quarks and antiquarks Potential contribution where N gives the number of quark flavors , Mesonic potential Vandermonde determinant is found negligibly small

  24. Thermodynamical Potential The thermodynamic potential has the parameters Condensates (chiral order parameters) (deconfinement order parameters can be fixed, experimentally minimizing the potential refined by lattice QCD,

  25. Transport Coefficients from PLSM Electrical and Heat Conductivity Number density Fine structure etc. Quark mass Quarks flavors Decay time Relative velocity Bulk and Shear Viscosity Specific heat Vacuum energy density Pressure, energy density, entropy, speed of sound

  26. Electrical Conductivity Based on parton-hadron-string dynamics transport approach an additional force causes the propagation of charge. The electrical current density z-momentum of j-th particle at time t Mass of j-th particle at time t In natural units, the ratio of current density and electric field strength  electric conductivity proportionality between e-current and e-field F. Reif, Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics, (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965). W. Cassing, O. Linnyk, T. Steinert, and V. Ozvenchuk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 182301 (2013).

  27. Electrical Conductivity for partonic degrees of freedom in relaxation time approximation,  is described in Gases, Liquids within the dynamical quasiparticle model (DQPM), the thermal and Solid State, dependence reads  q width of quasiparticle spectral function n density of nonlocalized charges  relaxation time of charge carriers M q pole mass=spectral dist. of quark-mass * effective masses m e flavor averaged fractional quark charge squared In PHSD: DQPM matches quasiparticles properties to lattice QCD results in equilibrium for EOS, electromagnetic correlator, among others.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend