Transition from direct to sequential 2p-decay in theory and in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

transition from direct to sequential
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Transition from direct to sequential 2p-decay in theory and in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Leonid Grigorenko Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions, JINR, Dubna, Russia Transition from direct to sequential 2p-decay in theory and in experiment. NUSTAR meeting, March 2-4, 2016 Limits of nuclear structure existence Dripline is


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Leonid Grigorenko

Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions, JINR, Dubna, Russia

Transition from direct to sequential 2p-decay in theory and in experiment.

NUSTAR meeting, March 2-4, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Limits of nuclear structure existence

Dripline is studied for light nuclei Dripline is achieved for Z<32 and N<22 Limits of the nuclear structure are not solidly established even for the lightest isotopes.

7H, 12He, 13Li, 5Be - ???

Limits of nuclear structure Continuum dynamics

Continuous spectrum Discrete spectrum

ET

Stationary states Quasistationary states

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Few-body dynamics

More than 2 First of all three-body Less than 6-7

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Few-body dynamics at the driplines

Exotic phenomena in vicinity of driplines: Haloes (green) True 2p/2n decays (red) 4p/4n emitters (blue) NOT INVESTIGATED (gray) Modern RIB research: move towards and beyond the driplines Few-body dynamics at the driplines as consequence of (i) clusterization and (ii) paring NOT SO EXOTIC: More or less every second isotope in vicinity of the driplines has features connected to few-body dynamics

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Qualitative view of two-proton radioactivity

Bound orbital Unbound orbital No bound orbitals ! Classical case:

  • ne particle emission is always possible

Quantum mechanical case: it could be that both particles should be emitted simultaneously

  • No deeper bound orbitals.
  • The common orbital for two protons exists only when both are “inside”.
  • When one of them goes out, their common orbital do not exist any

more and the second HAS to go out instantaneously Exclusive Quantum- Mechanical phenomenon

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Three-body correlations.

  • 2-dimensional “internal three-body correlations”
  • r “energy-angular correlations”

e = Ex / ET cos(q k) = (kx,ky)/kxky

  • “T” and “Y” Jacobi systems reveal different

dynamical aspects

  • Three-body variables in coordinate and in

momentum space.

qr qk

  

 ky

ky kx

 kx

qk

    

"Y" system "T" system Y

X

qr

p p core

Y

X

core p p

 ky

 

kx

 kx

ky

1 2 3 1 2 3

2-body decay: state is defined by 2 parameters - energy and width 3-body decays: 2-dimensional “internal” 3-body correlations

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Three-body decay – a lot more information than for two-body decay encrypted in the correlations Which kind of new knowledge we can decrypt from that?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

45Fe: the first found and the best studied

Pfützner et al., EPJA 14 (2002) 279 Giovinazzo et al., 89 (2002) 102501 Dossat et al., PRC 72 (2005) 054315 Q2p = 1.154 MeV Miernik et al., PRL 99 (2007) 192501

  • Special design Optical TPC → nuclear

physics “life video”

  • Improved lifetime:
  • Complete momentum correlations provided

L.Grigorenko et al., PLB 677 (2009) 30 L.Grigorenko et al., PRC 82 (2010) 014615

0.22 19 2 0.16 1/2

1.3 10 MeV (2 ) 3.5(5) ms

p

T p

  

   

diproton Brown, 1991

Brown 1991: energy – yes, lifetime – no Grigorenko 2001: energy – no, lifetime – yes

  • A. Brown, PRC 41 (1991) R1513.
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Common properties of correlations

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0

core - p

6Be 12O 16Ne 19Mg 45Fe 62Se

d j / d (Ex /ET )

Ex / ET

  • Energy correlation in the core-p channel well

corresponds to original prediction of Goldansky: energies of the emitted protons tend to be equal.

  • Energy correlation in the p-p channel in the

s-d shell nuclei quantitatively depend on the structure

  • Energy correlation in the p-p channel in the

p-f shell nuclei qualitatively depend on the structure

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0

12O W(s2) 67% 16Ne W(s2) 54% 19Mg W(s2) 60% 19Mg W(s2) 10%

p - p

d j / d (Ex /ET )

Ex / ET

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0

p - p

W(p2) 98% W(p2) 43% W(p2) 24% W(p2) 2%

d j / d (Ex /ET ) Ex / ET

How can we use the correlation information?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

0.00.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 2 4 6 8 10

  • 1.0
  • 0.5

0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 2 4 6 8 10

  • 1.0
  • 0.5

0.0 0.5 1.0

45 26Fe 3/2

"T" "Y"

dj /de d(cosqk)

cos (qk)

e

c

  • s

(q

k

)

e

1.0 0.5 0.0

  • 0.5
  • 1.0

0.00.20.40.60.81.0 2 4 6 8

  • Exp. data

counts

cos(qk)

e

1.0 0.5 0.0

  • 0.5
  • 1.0

0.00.20.40.60.81.0 2 4 6 8 10

cos(q

k

)

e

45Fe: internal correlations

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 10 20 30

counts

45Fe "T" system

e

W(p2) = 43% W(p2) = 24% W(p2) = 10%

Miernik et al., PRL 99 (2007) 192501

  • Complete kinematics reconstructed
  • Both lifetime and correlations provide W(p2) ~ 30%

45Fe

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Growing sophistication of the theoretical methods

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Monte-Carlo codes

  • For studies of correlations full quantum-mechanical

Monte Carlo simulations are required

  • Decompose experimental particle correlation data
  • ver hyperspherical amplitudes in the momentum
  • space. HH amplitudes automatically take into account

PP, angular momenta in the subsystems and spin. Calculated or parameterized.

  • Density matrix formalism:
  • Density matrix has especially simple form in the system
  • f transferred momentum for direct reactions
  • Three-body decay -> eightfold differential cross section
  • People involved: Yu. Parfenova, T. Golubkova, P. Sharov

Observables in reactions: Nuclear structure + Reaction mechanism + Final state interaction Experimental bias: Acceptance + Resolution + Physical backgrounds

M.S.Golovkov et al., PRL 93 (2004) 262501. M.S.Golovkov et al., PRC 72 (2005) 064612. L.V. Grigorenko et al., PRC 82 (2010) 014615. A.S.Fomichev et al., PLB 708 (2012) 6. I.A. Egorova et al., PRL 109 (2012) 202502.

  • I. Mukha et al., PRL 115 (2015) 202501.
slide-13
SLIDE 13

6Be at MSU: correlations

  • n resonance
  • High statistics (~106 events/state)
  • High resolution
  • Nice agreement with the previous (Texas A&M,

Dubna) experimental data

Experiment:

  • R. Charity and coworkers, MSU 7Be(9Be,X)6Be
  • I. Egorova et al., PRL 109 (2012) 202502.
slide-14
SLIDE 14

6Be at MSU: energy evolution of correlations

Note: the higher decay energy – the more developed is low-energy p-p correlation (“diproton”) Note: above 2+ the e distribution is practically insensitive to decay energy Note: when two-body states enters the decay window the intensity at expected peak position is suppressed Note: sequential decay patterns appears only for ET > 2Er+ 

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Long-range character of three-body Coulomb by example of 45Fe

  • Start point for extrapolation: typical range of

1000 fm in r value

  • End point for extrapolation: typical range of

100000 fm in r value

  • Complicated treatment of experimental

effects

45Fe, ET = 1.154 MeV

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 5000 10000 15000

  • 1.0
  • 0.5

0.0 0.5 1.0

Probability

c

  • s

(

qk

)

e = Ex / ET rmax = 1000 fm

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 5000 10000 15000

  • 1.0
  • 0.5

0.0 0.5 1.0

rext = 100000 fm Probability

cos(qk)

e = Ex / ET

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 10 20 30 40

Events "Y" system

45Fe

e

No exp. res: fin. With exp. res: init. fin.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Long-range character of three-body Coulomb by example of 16Ne

  • New level of experimental precision. MSU 2013:

16Ne populated in n knockout from 17Ne

  • The energy distribution in “Y” Jacobi system only

reproduced for extreme range of calculation

16Ne g.s., ET = 1.466 MeV

  • K. Brown et al., PRL 113 (2014) 232501
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Two-proton decay of

30Ar

slide-18
SLIDE 18

S388 experiment at GSI

“Search for 2p radioactivity in 30Ar”

  • 2012
  • Primary 36Ar beam 885 AMeV
  • 8 g/cm2 primary Be target
  • Second. 31Ar beam 620 AMeV
  • 50 ions s−1
  • 4.8 g/cm2 secondary Be target

“Beta-delayed p decays of 31Ar”

  • I. Mukha et al., PRL 115 (2015) 202501.
  • A. Lis et al., PRC 91 (2014) 064309.
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Identification of heavy fragment excitations by target area g array

GADAST mSi tracking

detector system for light charged particles

NeuRad

High-angular resolution neutron detector

FRS, SuperFRS

  • ne of the

middle focal planes

VERY THICK

secondary target for one-

  • r two-nucleon

knockout

Warsaw OTPC

Radioactive particle emission for stopped reaction and decay products Last achromatic stage of fragment separator is Hi-res spectrometer for heavy decay fragment

Hi-res angular measurements

both for proton and neutron dripline nuclei populated on secondary target

Degrade the heavy fragment energy

MC simulation framework

to interpret the correlation data with incomplete kinematics

AZ

A-1Z

A-1(Z-2)

A(Z-1)

p n

A-2(Z-1)

Particle unstable systems beyond proton or neutron driplines

Beam

Radiation-

  • hard

SSDs

for beam diagnostics

1 4 2 3 5 6

EXPERT: EXotic Particle Emission and Radioactivity by Tracking

GSI, FLNR JINR, Warsaw Uni., PTI St.-Petersburg

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Basic idea

Not an invariant mass measurement: only transverse momentum distributions Better than invariant mass method! IF you understand what is happening

~ (qmax  q )



qmax

dq dq dW/dq

q q

Two-body decay Radioactivity studies

tracking Two-proton events:

Coordinate along trajectory

(2) exponential "tail" due to decay in the flight (1) Fragmentation in the target

A ZX A+1 Z X

decay point

p p

A-2 Z-2X core

  • Prof. I. Mukha:
  • pportunity to

investigate particle radioactivity in fs-ns lifetime range

  • HOWEVER. Found to be well suited for

spectroscopy

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Basic idea

Better than invariant mass method IF you understand what is happening

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0

core - p

6Be 12O 16Ne 19Mg 45Fe 62Se

d j / d (Ex /ET )

Ex / ET θp1 -

14 O (mrad)

θ p2 -

14 O (mrad)

16Ne True three-body decay Energies of protons tend to be almost equal

19Mg

  • I. Mukha et al., PRL 99 (2007) 182501.
  • I. Mukha et al., PRC 77 (2008) 061303.
  • I. Mukha et al., PRC 79 (2009) 061301.
slide-22
SLIDE 22

30Ar and 29Cl spectra and decay schemes

Statistics is limited Special bonus: evidence for “transition” dynamics of 30Ar g.s. decay, never seen before Complex and rich decay picture. A lot of information!

  • I. Mukha et al., PRL 115 (2015) 202501.
slide-23
SLIDE 23

“Transition” decay dynamics

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Mechanisms of 2p decay

Three principal parameters:

ET Er r

Three major decay mechanisms: True 2p, Democratic 2p Sequential 2p There SHOULD EXIST transition region between them

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Energy core-p correlations for for fifferent mechanisms

Democratic 2p <-> Sequential 2p True 2p <-> Sequential 2p

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Transition decay mechanism beyond the dripline

Upper and lower s-d shell Systematics of proton and two- proton separation energies All three mechanisms of 2p emission as well as transition situation change each other on the move away from the dripline

slide-27
SLIDE 27

General view of transition dynamics

Energy correlations between core and one proton

“30Ar”

True 2p Sequential 2p Transition

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Phase transition like behaviour -> Strong sensitivity to parameters -> Opportunity to define them precisely

slide-29
SLIDE 29

30Ar: ground 2.25 MeV state decay

Seen for the first time for the ground state decays Strong sensitivity to parameters -> sensitive “tool” for fixing parameters ET from 2.0 to 2.5 MeV

slide-30
SLIDE 30

29Cl ground state width

Strong dependence of the signal

  • n the g.s. properties of core+p

subsystem – 29Cl Energy is “easy” to measure, width could be very complicated. From T1/2~1 ps to ~100-200 keV there is a “blind spot” Prospects to establish this kind

  • f measurements for width

determination Theory – simplified semianalytical model of 2p decay

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Systematic studies by variation of all decay parameters

Kolmogorov test: probability to match the experimental pattern Three principal parameters:

ET Er r

  • I. Mukha, X. Xu: confinement

in parameter space.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Possibility to study transition dynamics in

15Ne

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Nearest transition candidates in s-d shell: 15Ne, 26S, 34Ca

Energy correlations between core and one proton

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Prospects to observe transition dynamics in 15Ne

  • F. Wamers et al., PRL 112 (2014) 132502
  • V. Goldberg et al., PLB 692 (2010) 307

Proposal: to study energy evolution of correlations across broad g.s. of 15Ne to extract 14F width

16Ne, 16Ne, GSI 14F, TEXAS A&M

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Prospects to observe transition dynamics in 15Ne

  • K. Brown et al., PRL 113 (2014) 232501

Evolution of energy distributions with total decay energy ET really exists

  • I. Egorova et al., PRL 109 (2012) 202502.

6Be, MSU 16Ne, MSU

Fine differences in energy distributions are extractable from data

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Conclusions

  • Few-body dynamics is widespread beyond the
  • driplines. ~ 1/2 of the proton-rich nuclei located by 1-2

atomic numbers beyond the proton dripline decay by 2p emission.

  • Three major mechanisms of 2p emission: true 2p,

democratic 2p, sequential. Major dependence on just three parameters: ET Er r

  • Crossing of Sp and S2p curves beyond the dripline –

high probability of transition dynamics.

  • In the transition region sensitivity to parameters

become very high. Pragmatically most interesting is extraction of r – the width of the g.s. in core-p subsystem.

  • Feasibility of such studies is demonstrated by example
  • f 30Ar and 15Ne decays

30Ar 15Ne