Transcription: Pausing and Backtracking: Error Correction Mamata - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcription: Pausing and Backtracking: Error Correction Mamata - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcription: Pausing and Backtracking: Error Correction Mamata Sahoo and Stefan Klumpp Theory and Bio-systems group, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam, Germany Transcription Transcription is the efficient regulatory
Transcription
◮ Transcription is the efficient regulatory process in
cells,organisms and tissues →Control the complex form of gene expression.
◮ what happens?
◮ The genetic information → stored in DNA → RNA
transcript.
◮ How?
◮ Transcription → RNA polymerase moves along the length
- f a DNA template by a single base pair per stochastic
nucleotide addition → creating a complementary RNA.
Transcriptional pausing
◮ 1Heterogeneity in transcription rate → Transcription is not
continuous ⇒ interrupted by pausing events.
◮ Pauses:RNAP gets halt for times→ forms inactive
configuration.
◮ 2Two general classes of Pauses→ most frequent.
- 1K. Adelman et al., PNAS 99, 13538(2002)
2I.Artsimovitch et al., PNAS 97, 7090(2000)
Backtracking during transcription: Backtracking pauses
◮ 3 Backtracking occurs in three phases.
◮ Phase 1: Backtracking ◮ Phase 2: Sliding→ diffusional in nature. ◮ Phase 3: Recovery of transcription 3J.W. Shaevitz, et al., Nature 426, 684(2003)
Questions Addressed?
◮ What happens to the transcription → pause and
backtracking ?
◮ Pauses have negative effect on transcription ⇒ High
transcription rate requires the pausing events to be suppressed.
◮ Backtracking pauses→automatically suppressed by the
trailing RNAP from behind. However, backtracking is required for the error correction and further recovery of transcription.
◮ Making a pause→ creating an error, Cleaving the transcript
→ Correcting the error.
◮ Questions??
◮ What fraction of errors are corrected?? ◮ How the efficiency of error correction limited controlled?? ◮ How the accuracy can be improved??
Model studied for transcription
p kc D D D ǫ ǫ ǫ
′
α D1 kc kc D ǫ
Transcription with pausing and backtracking
0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
α
0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012
J
P=0.0 P=0.00007 P=0.0007 P=0.007 D1=0.28, D=0.07 without Pausing with pause+backtracking Kc=0.07
◮ Both initiation and elongation limited. ◮ 4Low density and maximal current phase. ◮ At high transcription intiation rate → transcription starts
limiting by elongation.
◮ Strongly affected by pausing events → elongation limited
regime.
◮ Suppresses⇒ with pausing and backtracking.
4L.B. Shaw, et al., Phys.Rev.E 68, 021910(2003)
Single RNAP transcription: Efficiency of error correction (fec)
p kc kc
D1 D D D
ǫ ǫ ǫ ǫ
′
◮ Efficiency of error correction,fec = P∞
m=1 KcPm
P∞
m=1 KcPm+ǫ1Pm−1
◮ For single RNAP transcription,fec = 1 1+
ǫ1 P∞ m=1 Kc Pm
◮ Following the relation, fec = Kca Kca+ǫ1(1−a);
a = (1 + Kc
2D ) − 1 2D
- (4D2 + K 2
c + 4KcD − 4DD1).
= (1 + Kc
2D ) − Kc 2D
- (1 + 4D
Kc ) (for D = D1).
Fec with diffusive rate (D)
0.025 0.05 0.075 0.1 0.125 0.15 0.175 0.2
α
0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
fec
D1=0.28, D=0.007 D1=0.28, D=0.07 D1=0.28, D=0.2 D1=0.28, D=0.4
Kc=0.07
◮ Fec is also both initiation and elongation limited. ◮ Increase of D affect strongly in the elongation limited
regime.
◮ Strong diffusivity suppresses the error correction ⇒ RNAP
spends much time in diffusive manner in any of the backtracked sites.
Fec with backward stepping rate(D1): Single RNAP and Multi-RNAP transcription
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
D1
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
fec
α=0.0 α=1.0 Kc=D/10=0.007
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65
D1
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
fec
α=0.0 α=1.0 Kc=D=0.07
◮ Fec in multi-RNAP transcription is always reduced
comparatively with single-RNAP transcription⇒ Lack of free spaces that restricts diffusion of backtracked RNAP.
◮ The difference is strongly affected for higher D1 regime. ◮ Further increase of Kc reduces the difference between both
cases ⇒ Push back effect of the trailing RNAP from behind in the multi-RNAP transcription.
Fec with the cleavage rate(Kc):Single-RNAP and Multi-RNAP transcription
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Kc
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
fec
α=0.0 α=1.0 D=D1=0.07
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Kc
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
fec
α=0.0 α=1.0 D1=0.28, D=0.07
◮ Fec for single-RNAP transcription is always above the fec
for multi-RNAP transcription ⇒ Available free spaces for error correction.
◮ Fec for multi-RNAP transcription is always reduced ⇒
Dense traffic effect.
◮ Error correction in multi-RNAP case is improved for higher
- Kc. Further improvement is achieved with increase in D1.
Fec with both cleavage rate(Kc) and backward stepping rate(D1)
0.01 0.1
Kc
0.01 0.1
D1
0.01 0.1 0.01 0.1
α=0.0 α=1.0 ◮ Fec is strongly controlled both by D1 and Kc. ◮ Error correction→ Strongly improved increasing both by
backward stepping rate,D1 and cleavage rate,Kc.
Fec with distance(L) between an active RNAP and a paused RNAP
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
L
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
fec
Simulation Analytical
D1=D=Kc=0.07
◮ fec(L) = fecsingle max {1 − exp(−(L/L0))} ◮ Approximation: L0 = ǫ Kc . ◮ Gap distribution, P(L) = (α ǫ )(ǫ−α ǫ )L. ◮ fec increases with the distance: More free space available
for error correction.
◮ Larger gap size ⇒Better error correction.
Efficiency of error correction:Multi-RNAP transcription
0.025 0.05 0.075 0.1 0.125 0.15 0.175 0.2 0.225 0.25 0.275
α
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
fec
Simulation Analytical
αc=0.08 αc=0.04 D=D1=Kc=0.07