Town Hall Discussion on the FLSA December 2, 2016 The Government - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

town hall discussion on the flsa
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Town Hall Discussion on the FLSA December 2, 2016 The Government - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Town Hall Discussion on the FLSA December 2, 2016 The Government Law Group Andy Phillips Chrissy Hamiel Milwaukee | Madison | Fox Valley - Green Bay | Waukesha County www.vonbriesen.com 2 The Change is NOT Here


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Milwaukee | Madison | Fox Valley - Green Bay | Waukesha County www.vonbriesen.com

Town Hall Discussion on the FLSA

December 2, 2016 The Government Law Group

Andy Phillips Chrissy Hamiel

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Change is NOT Here

  • On May 18, 2016, the U.S

. Department of Labor (“ DOL” ) announced the final rules revising the FLS A White Collar Exemption Regulations. – The revisions were to become effective December 1, 2016.

  • But then…

– On November 22, 2016 – j ust 10 days prior to the regulations going into effect – a federal j udge in Texas issued a preliminary inj unction effectively imposing a nationwide prohibition on the regulations taking effect. – Note that the lawsuit was brought by 21 states. Wisconsin is a party to the case.

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

What Did Judge Mazzant Do?

  • The Court held that Congress intended the executive, administrative, and

professional exemption to be based on the duties performed by the employee.

  • The new salary threshold effectively supplanted the duties test, thus

making salary the determinative factor for being able to claim the exemption.

  • Therefore, the Court said that the DOL had exceeded its authority in this

rulemaking. – “ If Congress intended the salary requirement to supplant the duties test, then Congress, not the Department, should make the change.”

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Now What?

  • The preliminary inj unction is only temporary.

– Further proceedings will occur to determine whether or not this should be permanent. – This matter will continue and, yes, it may change again.

  • It is intended to allow the Court time to render a decision on the merits.
  • The litigation and potential appeals could drag into the New Year, and

President-elect Trump could take action to rescind the overtime pay rule, or instruct DOL not to defend. – This rule is one of several that the incoming Trump administration has highlighted to roll back.

  • Note that Congress has also taken action to delay implementation of the
  • vertime pay rule.

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

An Additional Twist

  • Legislative Attempts to Delay Implementation

– On S eptember 28, 2016 the U.S . House of Representatives passed the Regulatory Relief for S mall Business, S chools and Nonprofits Act (H.R. 6094) by a vote of 246-177. – The bill would delay the start date of the overtime pay regulations for six months – to June 1, 2017. – The S enate has yet to schedule floor time for consideration of their companion bill, S . 3462.

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Action Items

  • The U. S

. District Court's preliminary inj unction does not affect or halt any actions employers may have taken in anticipation of the Final Rule going into effect on December 1.

  • Employers will need to decide how to appropriately deal with any changes

(reclassification of employees, salary increases, etc.) that were made to ensure compliance with the regulations. – Easier said, than done, right?

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Moving Forward

  • Employers for now will not be required to increase salary levels to the

$47,476 amount as of yet.

  • Many employers conducted a good, thorough review of the actual duties being

performed by those employees in exempt positions and corrected situations that may not have met the duties tests. – S alary aside, those corrections should remain in place. – Clerical staff is still clerical staff – t hey should not be paid on a salary basis. – There is nothing that limits DOL’ s (or private attorneys’ ) enforcement authority as it relates to existing regulations.

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Moving Forward

  • Most employers will most likely simply wait and take a “ wait and see”

approach. – What is best for you may not be best for all.

  • The Trump administration and the Republican Congress have signaled an
  • verturning of this regulation as well as other employment regulations.
  • The reality is that whether an employer decides to implement changes on

December 1 or take a “ wait and see” approach will really depend on what is best for each employer. – S

  • me employers have set plans in place that fit with their budget, culture

and possible promises made. – Others may definitely need the financial relief that the inj unction may provide.

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

What Do I Do While “ Waiting and S eeing” ?

  • Utilize the FLS

A Playbook – Download your copy at www.vonbriesen.com/ school – Note that the Playbook still references the prior salary level of $23,360

  • Considerations:

– Likely to be difficult to walk back salary increases without affecting morale.

  • Especially right before the holiday season.
  • Especially if that raise was substantial to move a truly exempt

employee above $47,476. – Reclassification of employees to non-exempt and imposing time tracking requirements have put employers in a flexible position to weather the possible changes.

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Milwaukee | Madison | Fox Valley - Green Bay | Waukesha County www.vonbriesen.com

Want more? Of course you do! Visit: www.vonbriesen.com and download your FREE copy of the FLS A Playbook