Towards scientific validated digital biomarkers measured by patient's - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

towards scientific validated digital biomarkers measured
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Towards scientific validated digital biomarkers measured by patient's - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Towards scientific validated digital biomarkers measured by patient's own smart devices: cases studies from Parkinson's disease and Multiple Sclerosis Christian Gossens, PhD, MBA, Global Head Digital Biomarkers, Roche pRED ISCTM Autumn 2018


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Towards scientific validated digital biomarkers measured by patient's

  • wn smart devices:

cases studies from Parkinson's disease and Multiple Sclerosis

Christian Gossens, PhD, MBA, Global Head Digital Biomarkers, Roche pRED ISCTM Autumn 2018 Conference, Marina Del Rey, 15 October 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Digital Operational Efficiency

Why «Digital» in Clinical Development? Digital is new normal!

Digital Translational Science

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Continuous data from mobile sensors Collect, process, analyse and add to clinical knowledge

Accelerometer Gyroscope GPS Touch Magnetometer

H C 1 2 3 4

  • 1

1 2

* ***

Sound Light

Clinical knowledge Data processing & analysis

And more Connectivity

Sensors

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Two case studies

Parkinson’s Disease (PD) Remote Monitoring

Distributed February 2015

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Remote Monitoring

Distributed November 2016

slide-5
SLIDE 5

RG7935/PRX002 Ph1 Parkinson’s disease case study

44 subjects completed daily assessments for 6 months, starting Feb. 2015

Daily Active Tests

Tremor Brady- kinesia

Rigidity/Postural Instability Phonation Postural Rest Tapping Balance Walking

Active Tests Passive Monitoring

Motor behavior in everyday life Gait Mobility

Provided phone Secure storage and data processing

Transferred by WIFI

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Active Test Example 1: Gait How does the incoming data look like?

Active Tests

Voice Tremor Dexterity

Bradykinesia: Lower Body Phonation Rest Postural Tapping Balance Walking

Active Tests Passive Monitoring

Motor behavior in everyday life Gait Mobility

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Accelerometer and gyroscope data from Gait test Illustrative example

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Active Test Example 2: Balance How sensitive are sensors in a normal Smartphone?

Active Tests

Voice Tremor Dexterity

Bradykinesia: Lower Body Phonation Rest Postural Tapping Balance Walking

Active Tests Passive Monitoring

Motor behavior in everyday life Gait Mobility

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Balance: Visualizing sway Illustrative example

“Healthy” tester: not much sway

Acceleration left/right Acceleration forward/backwards

Patient: a lot of sway

Acceleration left/right Acceleration forward/backwards

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Sensor measures correlate with clinical gold standard (MDS-UPDRS) Example: Rest Tremor

Sensor data feature (mean over 2 weeks) Skewness of acceleration magnitudes

H C 1 2 3 4

  • 1

1 2

* ***

Physician rating for Rest Tremor (MDS-UPDRS)

3 2 1

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Frequent sampling enabled measurement

  • f symptoms before/after sporadic clinic visits

‘We only see a snapshot

  • f a patient’s clinical status

during the exam – there is so much more we would need to know.’ (Investigator)

H C 1 2 3 4

  • 1

1 2

* ***

3 2 1

Sensor data feature (mean over 2 weeks) Skewness of acceleration magnitudes Physician rating for Rest Tremor (MDS-UPDRS)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Sensors detect significant rest tremor in patients clinically scored as having no tremor (‘0’)

Heightened sensitivity to motor symptoms will help measure progression, especially in prodromal patients

H C 1 2 3 4

  • 1

1 2

* ***

3 2 1

Sensor data feature (mean over 2 weeks) Skewness of acceleration magnitudes Physician rating for Rest Tremor (MDS-UPDRS)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Parkinson’s disease case study Continuous measurement picks up treatment effect fast and accurately

Sensor feature: Time from tap to tap (s)

Test: Dexterity Gait Feature: Tapping Time Stride-Time p-value <0.001 <0.001

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Unlocking insights from passive monitoring data Routinely using machine learning and high-performance computing to extract unprecedented insights

?

Time Acceleration sensor

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Unlocking insights from passive monitoring data Routinely using machine learning and high-performance computing to extract unprecedented insights

Time Acceleration

Human Activity Recognition Model

Trained with 50 hours of activity data (categorized datasets) 90 mins to process 1’200 GB

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Measuring effects of disease on everyday motor behavior Activity in daily life outside the clinic: Parkinson’s patients differ from controls

C D 0 .5 1 .0 1 .5 2 .0

* * *

Sit-to-stand transitions STS transitions per hour Healthy control Parkinson’s disease

Augmentation

slide-17
SLIDE 17

RG7935/PRX002 Ph1 Digital Biomarker analysis

First research article published in Movement Disorders

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Acknowledgements

slide-19
SLIDE 19

The Roche PD Mobile Application V2 was just presented at MDS 2018 meeting (Hongkong, October 6)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Two case studies

Parkinson’s Disease (PD) Remote Monitoring

Distributed February 2015

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Remote Monitoring

Distributed November 2016

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Floodlight See beyond the surface

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Identifying sub-clinical disease & progressing MS 365 days/year with active tests and passive monitoring

Legend

Day in the life of a patient with chronic stable symptoms Day with a visit to the clinic/physician Day with worsening symptoms Patients’ recall period 365 days in the life of a patient with MS: in current clinical practice a patient may only see their physician twice for around 10 minutes.

Remote monitoring promises to change this. Disease activity can be measured throughout the year, enabling better-informed treatment decisions.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

FLOODLIGHT study design 60 patients with MS, 20 controls

Mulero et al. 2017 Annual Meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers, May 24-27, Poster QL19, New Orleans, Louisiana

Site visit

Week Day

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 4 6 11 14 15 16 19 20 21 24 7 9 3 5 8 10 12 13 17 18 22 23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

FLOODLIGHT study design

Mulero et al. 2017 Annual Meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers, May 24-27, Poster QL19, New Orleans, Louisiana

Oral Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) Various Clinical/PRO Rating Scales Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25-FW) Berg Balance Scale (BBS) Nine hole peg test (9HPT)

Week Day

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 4 6 11 14 15 16 19 20 21 24 7 9 3 5 8 10 12 13 17 18 22 23

Site visit Clinical/PRO rating scales

slide-25
SLIDE 25

FLOODLIGHT study design

Mulero et al. 2017 Annual Meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers, May 24-27, Poster QL19, New Orleans, Louisiana

Week Day

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 4 6 11 14 15 16 19 20 21 24 7 9 3 5 8 10 12 13 17 18 22 23

Site visit Clinical/PRO rating scales Active test

Daily Mood Question (DMQ) Symptom Tracker (ST) Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS)-29 Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) Pinching Test Draw a Shape Test Static Balance Test (SBT) Five U-Turn Test (5UTT) Two-Minute Walk Test (2MWT)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

FLOODLIGHT study design

Mulero et al. 2017 Annual Meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers, May 24-27, Poster QL19, New Orleans, Louisiana

Week Day

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 4 6 11 14 15 16 19 20 21 24 7 9 3 5 8 10 12 13 17 18 22 23

Site visit Clinical/PRO rating scales Active test

Daily Mood Question (DMQ) Symptom Tracker (ST) Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS)-29 Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) Pinching Test Draw a Shape Test Static Balance Test (SBT) Five U-Turn Test (5UTT) Two-Minute Walk Test (2MWT)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

FLOODLIGHT study design

Mulero et al. 2017 Annual Meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers, May 24-27, Poster QL19, New Orleans, Louisiana

Week Day

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 4 6 11 14 15 16 19 20 21 24 7 9 3 5 8 10 12 13 17 18 22 23

Site visit Clinical/PRO rating scales Active test Passive monitoring

Gait Behaviour Mobility Pattern

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Three pillars of our Digital Biomarker analysis

  • 1. Adherence

Patients collect data regularly

  • 2. Agreement

Sensor data correlates with clinical scales

  • 3. Augmentation

Sensor data provides novel insights beyond clinical scales

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Adherence to active tests and passive monitoring is good and stable over 24 weeks

Active tests

Average # of tests per week Study week

Active tests Active tests (excluding Two-Minute Walking Test) Two-Minute Walking Test

Passive monitoring

Average daily hours of passive monitoring (h) Study week

Smartphone Smartwatch Mulero et al. 2017 Annual Meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers, May 24-27, Poster QL19, New Orleans, Louisiana

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Smartphones allow for modernized and remote assessments Example 1: Pinching test “Squeeze a Shape”

Clinical anchor Smartphone-based task Test rationale:

  • To assess fine distal motor manipulation (gripping & grasping, muscle weakness),

motor control and impaired hand-eye coordination

Patients are asked to:

  • Pinch tomatoes as fast as possible for 30 seconds
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Pinching test discriminates healthy controls from MS patients with normal hand/arm function

Montalban et al. 2018 ECTRIMS Meeting, 10–12 October, Berlin, Germany

‡ p<0.001; * p<0.05

9HPT= 9-hole peg test; MS= multiple sclerosis

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Smartphones allow for modernized and remote assessments Example 2: Turning speed in “5 U-Turn Test” (5UTT)

Test rationale:

  • U-Turns can be used to assess certain features of gait and balance
  • Smartphone and smartwatch sensors can measure change step counts, speed and asymmetry during U-Turns

Patients are asked to:

  • Do at least 5 U-turns while walking between two points

Timed 25 Foot Walk Smartphone-based task Clinical anchor

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Turning speed in U-turns while walking correlates with Timed 25-Foot Walk Test at baseline

(and also with Expanded Disability Status Scale)

T25-FW: Timed 25 Foot Walk

Montalban et al. 2018 ECTRIMS Meeting, 10–12 October, Berlin, Germany

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Augmentation: An example journey of a patient with MS in the FLOODLIGHT trial

2 4 6 8 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30

FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL

Month Day in Month

10 12

Screening visit

(patient skipped active test) EDSS: 3.5; T25-FW: 4.9s

12 week follow up

EDSS: 3.5; T25-FW: 6.6s

A day in the study Site visit

Termination visit

EDSS: 3.5; T25-FW: 10.3s

Mulero et al. 2017 ECTRIMS-ACTRIMS Meeting, 25–28 October, Poster P1226, Paris, France

A day in the study Site visit Reported relapse onset

Smartphone reported relapse onset (PRO)

EDSS: Expanded Disability Status Scale T25-FW: Timed 25 Foot Walk

slide-35
SLIDE 35

2 4 6 8 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30

FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL

Month Day in Month

10 12

Screening visit

(patient skipped active test) EDSS: 3.5; T25-FW: 4.9s

Termination visit

EDSS: 3.5; T25-FW: 10.3s

* Performance based on patient’s 5 U-Turn Test (5UTT) U-Turn speed distribution 5UTT U-Turn speed Performance (°/second)*

Good (> 79.4) Average (67.3 < x ≤ 79.4) Poor (≤ 67.3) Test not performed

12 week follow up

EDSS: 3.5; T25-FW: 6.6s

Smartphone reported relapse onset (PRO)

Augmentation: An example journey of a patient with MS in the FLOODLIGHT trial

Mulero et al. 2017 ECTRIMS-ACTRIMS Meeting, 25–28 October, Poster P1226, Paris, France

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Acknowledgements

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Digital Biomarkers rapidly built into clinical research programs

2018+ Feb 2015 2016

Parkinson’s disease Phase 1 Multiple Sclerosis (Floodlight) Parkinson’s disease Phase 2 Spinal Muscular Atrophy Huntington’s disease

2017

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Working with the community to build sets of robust digital outcome measures

Parkinson’s disease Multiple Sclerosis

https://www.roche.com/sustainability/open-sourcing-health.htm https://floodlightopen.com https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-10-09/sneaking-into-patients-pockets-one-medical-app-at-a-time

slide-39
SLIDE 39

FDA launched Program to apply Digital Health to Drugs

  • “… We’re also working to …

develop digital biomarkers as drug development tools.”

  • “… to enable these opportunities, we

need clear policies for how the review and validation of digital health tools can be baked into drug development programs.”

https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Speeches/ucm605697.htm

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Doing now what patients need next

slide-41
SLIDE 41
slide-42
SLIDE 42

Doing now what patients need next