towards an evolved lower bound for the most circular
play

Towards an Evolved Lower Bound for the Most Circular Partition of a - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Towards an Evolved Lower Bound for the Most Circular Partition of a Square Claudia Obermaier Markus Wagner {obermaie,wagnermar}@uni-koblenz.de Circular Polygons Circular Polygons d scc Aspect ratio diameter(smallest circumscribing circle)


  1. Towards an Evolved Lower Bound for the Most Circular Partition of a Square Claudia Obermaier Markus Wagner {obermaie,wagnermar}@uni-koblenz.de

  2. Circular Polygons

  3. Circular Polygons d scc Aspect ratio γ diameter(smallest circumscribing circle) =

  4. Circular Polygons d lid Square: γ = 1.414 d scc Aspect ratio γ diameter(smallest circumscribing circle) = diameter(larges inscribed circle)

  5. Circular Polygons Square: γ = 1.414 Pentagon: γ = 1.236 Hexagon: γ = 1.155 Aspect ratio γ diameter(smallest circumscribing circle) = diameter(larges inscribed circle)

  6. Circular Polygons Square: γ = 1.414 Pentagon: γ = 1.236 Hexagon: γ = 1.155 Aspect ratio γ Near 1.0  circular

  7. Circular Partitions

  8. Circular Partitions P 2 P 1 P 4 P 3 Partition of a polygon P in P 1 , …, P n

  9. Circular Partitions Partition of a polygon P in P 1 , …, P n γ partition = max { γ(P 1 ), …, γ(P n ) }

  10. Circular Partition into Convex Polygons Best so far [DIO03] γ = 1.29950 [DIO03] Mirela Damian-Iordache and Joseph O’Rourke. Partitioning regular polygons into circular pieces I: Convex partitions. CoRR, cs.CG/0304023, 2003.

  11. Circular Partition into Convex Polygons Best so far [DIO03] γ = 1.29950 Lower bound γ = 1.28868 Our question: Is some improvement possible?

  12. Evolutionary Algorithm 1. Representation 2. Fitness Function 3. Selection Mechanism 4. Initial Population

  13. Operators • Push Operator mutates vertices • Tile Operator Tile Operator mutates non-circular polygons mutates non-circular polygons • Star Operator mutates concave polygons • Crossover Operator

  14. Tile Operator

  15. Tile Operator Tetragon! Square: γ = 1.414 Pentagon: γ = 1.236 Hexagon: γ = 1.155

  16. Tile Operator

  17. Tile Operator Tetragon gone!

  18. Short Run Results γ = 1.6699 γ = 1.3405 optimal: γ = 1.3396 Long way to γ = 1.2995

  19. Discussion Long run experiments: No improvement over [DIO03] (γ = 1.29950) γ = 1.28898 • Seeding crucial • Not trivial to leave local minima • Search space • High level of epistasis

  20. Thank you!

  21. Personal Note I’m looking for a PhD position  Thank you!

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend