towards a single market for occupational pensions without
play

Towards a Single Market for Occupational Pensions Without Tax - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Towards a Single Market for Occupational Pensions Without Tax Obstacles May 25| 9:00 AM 9:45 AM Peter Schonewille, European Commission, DG TAXUD/E/3 Competence Centre for Pension Research, University of Tilburg Email:


  1. “Towards a Single Market for Occupational Pensions Without Tax Obstacles” May 25| 9:00 AM – 9:45 AM Peter Schonewille, European Commission, DG TAXUD/E/3 Competence Centre for Pension Research, University of Tilburg Email: peter.schonewille@ec.europa.eu, Phone: + 32 2 29 55 919

  2. AGENDA • EU�tax�developments�since�San�Diego�2003: – Cross�border�contributions – Cross�border�transfer�of�capital – Pan�European�pension�funds – Discriminatory�taxation�of�investment�results�(dividends,� interest,�real�estate) – Asset�pooling

  3. FOR NON-EU LAWYERS • Harmonisation�of�pension�taxation�rules�very�unlikely • Tax�Directive�would�require�unanimous�support�of�27� Member�States • Creation�of�level�playing�field�in�EU�will�come�via�anti� discrimination�provisions�of�EC�Treaty • If�necessary,�via�European�Court�of�Justice

  4. EET, TEE, ETT, TTE • Dominant�system�in�EU�is�EET:�contributions�Exempt,� results�of�fund�Exempt,�benefits�Taxed • TEE:�Luxembourg,�Germany�(is�moving�to�EET),�Poland,� Hungary • ETT:�Sweden,�Denmark,�Italy,�Cyprus • TTE:�normal�savings,�without�tax�subsidy

  5. CROSS-BORDER DEDUCTIONS • Problem�was�that�many�EET�or�ETT�states�did�not�give� tax�relief�for�pension�contributions�paid�to�pension�funds� established�in�other�Member�States� • Commission�started�infringement�cases�against�nine�(of� the�old�15)�EET/ETT�Member�States�for�not�allowing� cross�border�deduction

  6. COURT RULINGS • ������������� ������� ,�Case�C�150/04�of�30�January� 2007�and� ������������� ������� ,�Case�C�522/04�of�5� July�2007: Tax�relief�for�contributions�paid�on�pension�contracts�with� domestic�providers�and�no�such�relief�for�contributions� paid�to�institutions�in�other�Member�States�is�against�the� EC�Treaty

  7. DISCRIMINATION ELIMINATED • Pension�funds�can�now�receive�contributions�from�all� Member�States�without�tax�discrimination,�only�situation� in�Bulgaria�(€ 360�per�annum)�remains�unclear • Conclusion:�Main�tax�barrier�for�cross�border�labour� mobility�and�pan�European�pension�funds�has�been� eliminated

  8. PENSION CAPITAL TRANSFER • Mobile�workers�may�wish�to�transfer�their�pension�capital� to�fund�of�new�employer • Multinationals�with�pan�European�fund�may�want�to� centralise�pension�capital�in�pan�European�fund • Otherwise�they�need�to�continue�to�operate�their�old� funds�+�new�pan�European�fund

  9. OUTBOUND RESTRICTIONS • European�Court�of�Justice�in�the�same ������������� ��������� C�522/04:�If�domestic�transfers�are�tax�free� taxation�of�outbound�transfers�is�forbidden • This�case�should�help�to�convince�other�Member�States� to�change�their�law�where�necessary

  10. LIMITED INFORMATION • In�this�stage�only�Belgium,�Greece,�Lithuania,� Luxembourg�and�the�Netherlands�appear�to�allow� outbound�transfers�and�have�no�tax�discriminations • Infringement�cases�will�come • Please�send�email�to�Commission�if�you�encounter�tax� discrimination

  11. PAN-EUROPEAN PENSION FUNDS

  12. PENSION FUND DIRECTIVE Officially:�“Directive�2003/41/EC�of�the�European� Parliament�and�of�the�Council�of�3�June�2003�on�the� activities�and�supervision�of�institutions�for�occupational� retirement�provision�(IORPs)”

  13. PURPOSES DIRECTIVE • Help�to�create�a�Single�Market�for�occupational�pensions • Set�minimum�standards�for�prudential�supervision • Provide�a�single�passport�for�cross�border�pension� provision • Guarantee�a�high�degree�of�security�for�workers�and� companies�

  14. REVISION DIRECTIVE • Commission�is�examining�whether�solvency�rules�should� be�changed • Commission�organises�Wednesday�27�May�2009� conference�in�Brussels • Will�be�for�new�Commissioner�for�the�Internal�Market�to� decide�on�way�forward�

  15. THE MARKET

  16. SEVEN TRILLION • Large�potential�pan�European�pension�market • € 7.000.000.000.000�capital�with�pension�funds�at�stake • Not�all�Member�States�appear�interested • Only�Ireland,�Luxembourg,�Belgium�and�the�Netherlands

  17. NUMBER OF IORPS • 11�November�2008:�CEIOPS�reports�70�IORPS�with� cross�border�activity�in�EU,�31�new�ones�since�entry�into� force�of�Directive.�22�new�IORPS�since�January�2007 • Directive�also�applicable�in�Norway,�Iceland�and� Liechtenstein,�members�of�European�Economic�Area� (EEA)�Agreement

  18. WORLD PERSPECTIVE • Clients�for�pan�European�solutions�are�by�definition� multinationals • Many�multinationals�have�subsidiaries�outside�the� EU/EEA • Pan�European�solutions�will�be�unique�in�the�world

  19. LIABILITY POOLING • If�and�when�the�EU�generates�pension�providers�that� can�deal�with�the�social,�labour�and�tax�law�of�up�to�thirty� different�jurisdictions�these�same�providers�may�be�able� to�deal�with�the�off�shore�arrangements�for�expats�from� non�EEA�States

  20. INTEL EXAMPLE • IORP�in�Ireland • Sections�for�Ireland,�UK,�Poland�and�Hungary�are� operational • Sections�for�Russia,�Egypt�and�Turkey�are�being� developed

  21. THIRD STATES • Under�some�bilateral�tax�treaties,�for�instance,�Belgium� US,�US�will�grant�tax�relief�for�pension�contributions�paid� to�pan�European�pension�fund�for�mobile�worker�who� was�sent�from�Belgium�to�US • Conclusion:�Pan�European�pension�funds�may�also� provide�tax�efficient�solutions�for�expats�working�outside� EU

  22. OBSERVATION • Companies�starting�with�liability�pooling�will�follow�step� by�step�approach�(see�Intel) • Start�where�the�need�is�greatest:�expats/mobile�workers • Start�with�one�other�Member�State,�and�gradually�extend� number�of�Member�States�from�which�contributions�are� paid�into�pan�European�fund

  23. DISCRIMINATORY TAXATION OF INVESTMENT RESULTS OF FOREIGN PENSION FUNDS

  24. INTEREST & DIVIDENDS • In�EET/TEE�States�domestic�pension�funds�exempt�from� tax�on�investment�results • Often�exemption�at�source�of�withholding�taxes�on� dividend�and�interest�payments,�if�there�is�no�exemption� at�source�refund�procedure�for�withholding�taxes • However,�no�exemption�at�source�or�relief�procedure�for� foreign�pension�funds

  25. RESTRICTION • Result:�source�State�levies�higher�tax�on�outbound� dividend�and�interest�paid�to�pension�funds�then�on� domestic�dividends�and�interest • Clear�restriction�of�free�movement�of�capital�of�Article�56� EC�(and�possibly�Article�43�EC�on�freedom�of� establishment) • No�justification�in�sight

  26. DISRIMINATORY TAXATION OF INVESTMENT RESULTS • The�Commission�has�already�opened�infringement� procedures�against�the�Czech�Republic,�Denmark,� Spain,�Lithuania,�the�Netherlands,�Poland,�Portugal,� Slovenia�and�Sweden,�Italy,�Germany,�Estonia,�Austria,� Spain�and�Portugal�for�taxing�the�investment�results�of� foreign�pension�funds,�whereas�domestic�funds�are� exempt

  27. ONGOING PROCESS (1) • 27�November�2008:�Commission�refers�Spain�and� Portugal�to�European�Court�of�Justice�for�levying� withholding�tax�of�18�%�(Spain)�or�25%�(Portugal)�on� dividends�paid�to�foreign�pension�funds�while�exempting� domestic�pension�funds�from�corporation�tax

  28. ONGOING PROCESS (2) • 14�May�2009:�Commission�sends�reasoned�opinion�to� Poland�for�exempting�Polish�pension�funds�from� corporation�tax�while�levying�withholding�tax�of�19�%�on� dividends�and�20%�on�interest�paid�to�foreign�pension� funds

  29. FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES • Apparently�tens�of�billions�Euro�at�stake • Many�funds�in�Europe�are�filing�claims�with�the�source� States,�as�far�back�as�they�can • They�have�to�safeguard�their�rights�themselves • Commission�works�only�for�the�future

  30. THIRD COUNTRIES

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend