Toward production of clean energy commodities: commodities: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

toward production of clean energy commodities commodities
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Toward production of clean energy commodities: commodities: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Green Resources Company Toward production of clean energy commodities: commodities: uranium & battery metals www.u3o8corp.com 3 8 March, 2017 Power Storage Rare Earths Nuclear Energy Yttrium & Uranium Vanadium, Nickel TSX:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A Green Resources Company

Toward production of clean energy commodities:

3 8

commodities: uranium & battery metals

www.u3o8corp.com March, 2017

Nuclear Energy Power Storage Rare Earths

Uranium

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF Vanadium, Nickel & Phosphate

Yttrium & Neodymium

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Forward-Looking Statements & Disclaimer

A Green Resources Company

QP for Technical Disclosure – All scientific and technical disclosure contained herein has been prepared and approved by Dr. Richard Spencer, U3O8 Corp’s President and CEO and a “qualified person” within the meaning of NI 43-101.

Certain statements contained herein constitute forward-looking statements (“FLS”) that involve substantial known and unknown risks and uncertainties. These FLS bj t t i k d t i ti t i f hi h b d th t l f U3O8 C i l di b t t li it d t th i t f l i are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, certain of which are beyond the control of U3O8 Corp., including, but not limited to, the impact of general economic conditions, industry conditions, geopolitical risks, volatility of commodity prices, assumptions used in resource estimates, economic analysis and financial projections, risks associated with the uncertainty of exploration results and estimates and that the resource potential will be achieved on exploration projects, timing and outcome of the preliminary economic assessment (“PEA”) and that a mine will be achieved on the Laguna Salada Project or the Berlin Deposit, that a joint venture will be formed with the Chubut provincial resource company, that the frac sand property will be developed as anticipated and silica potential is realized, currency fluctuations, the uncertainty of obtaining additional financing and exploration risk, and dependence upon regulatory approvals. Readers are cautioned that the assumptions used in the preparation of such information, although considered reasonable at the time of preparation, may prove to be imprecise and, as such, nd e reliance sho ld not be placed on FLS These FLS are made as of the date hereof and U3O8 Corp ass mes no obligation to pdate or re ise them to reflect undue reliance should not be placed on FLS. These FLS are made as of the date hereof and U3O8 Corp. assumes no obligation to update or revise them to reflect new events or circumstances. Industry and peer information has been drawn from publicly available sources and have not been independently verified by U3O8

  • Corp. Comparisons of U3O8 Corp’s resource and exploration targets with other uranium deposits are conceptual in nature, and have not been independently

verified by U3O8 Corp. and information regarding these peer deposits are drawn from publicly available information. Kurupung Project, Guyana – resource of 8.4Mlb indicated at 0.09% U3O8 and 7.7Mlb inferred at 0.08% U3O8. See June 26, 2012 – “Technical Review and Mineral Resource Estimates of the Aricheng C and Aricheng West Structures, Kurupung Uranium Project, Mazaruni District, Guyana for U3O8 Corp.” and January 14, 2009 – “A Technical Review of the Aricheng North and Aricheng South Uranium Deposits in Western Guyana for U3O8 Corp. and Prometheus Resources (Guyana) Inc.” Scout drilling suggests that the Kurupung may contain an additional exploration target of 6-11Mt at a grade of 0.08% to 0.10% U3O8 (~14-19Mlb) – see press releases dated June 10, 2008, October 15, 2009, November 18, 2009, March 16, 2010, April 20, 2011 and June 8, 2011. Laguna Salada Project, Argentina – resources of 6.3Mlb indicated at 60ppm U3O8 and 3.8Mlb inferred at 85ppm U3O8; and 57Mlb indicated at 550ppm V2O5 and 27Mlb at 590ppm V2O5. See May 20, 2011 – “Laguna Salada Project, Chubut Province, Argentina, NI 43-101 Technical Report on Laguna Salada: Initial Resource Estimate”. Based on exploration results on other mineralized areas, there is an additional exploration target of 56-113Mt at a grade of 50ppm to 60ppm U3O8 (~10- 15Mlb) – see press releases dated December, 4, 2013 and November 12, 2013. For the Laguna Salada PEA, see the September 18, 2014 – “Preliminary Economic Assessment of Laguna Salada Uranium-Vanadium Deposit, Chubut Province, Argentina”. Berlin Project, Colombia – resources of 1.5Mlb indicated at 0.11% U3O8 and 19.9Mlb inferred at 0.11% U3O8 ; plus a phosphate inferred resource of 0.8Mt at 9.3% P2O5 and vanadium inferred resource of 97mlb at 0.50% V2O5 defined on only the southern 3km of the 10.5km mineralized trend at Berlin. See March 2, 2012 – “Berlin Project, Colombia – National Instrument NI 43-101 Report”. Based on exploration on other mineralized areas, there is an additional exploration target of 20- 27Mt at a grade of 0.09% to 0.11% U3O8 (~50-55Mlb) on the remaining 7.5km of the trend – see press release dated September 20, 2012. For the Berlin PEA see the January 31, 2013 – “Berlin Project, Colombia - Preliminary Economic Assessment, NI 43-101 Report”. PEAs are preliminary in nature as they include inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically for economic consideration that would bl th t b l ifi d i l Mi l t i l d h t d t t d i i bilit Th i t i t

2

enable them to be classified as mineral reserves. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and have not demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that the results of the PEAs will be realized. Potential quantity and grades are conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource on the above exploration targets, and it is uncertain if further exploration will increase the mineral resources on the company’s projects in Guyana, Argentina and Colombia. Information on U3O8 Corp., its projects and technical reports in compliance with NI 43-101 are available on the company’s web site at www.u3o8corp.com.

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

slide-3
SLIDE 3

U3O8 Corp: Commodities for clean energy

A Green Resources Company

Commodities for clean energy

Off-grid / Micro-grid Regional Electricity/Transmission G id

  • 2. Battery

Commodities

Grid

Cities Towns / Industrial Complexes

Commodities

  • 1. Uranium

Nickel, Vanadium, Phosphate

To fuel nuclear power plants

Small

3 R E th

3

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

Large Nuclear Reactors Small Modular Reactors

  • 3. Rare Earths

High-efficiency generators & motors

slide-4
SLIDE 4

U3O8 Corp. Core Components

A Green Resources Company

p p

& Estimate of % Revenue that would be derived from each

U3O8 Corp U3O8 Corp

Project Uranium Battery Commodities Rare Earth Elements Other Metals Total Laguna Salada Laguna Salada, Argentina 86% Vanadium 14% 100% Vanadium 9% Nickel 15% Berlin, Colombia 35% 7% 3% 100% Nickel 15% Phosphate 31% Sub-total 55%

Note - PEA estimates are preliminary in nature, as is the revenue projected to be derived from each commodity. The PEAs

U3O8 Corp has a 39% holding in South American Silica

4

include resources that are not reserves that do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty of the results

  • f the PEA being realized - see slide 2

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

slide-5
SLIDE 5

U3O8 Corp.

Uranium Resource: 48 million pounds

A Green Resources Company

Uranium Resource: 48 million pounds

Guyana

Estimated Cash Cost of Uranium Production Estimated Capital Cost Priority

y Colombia

BERLIN, Colombia

Resource Type Million pounds

Indicated 1.5 US$0/pound of uranium net of by- products US$441 million 2 Inferred 19.9 LAGUNA SALADA A ti

Argentina

LAGUNA SALADA, Argentina Indicated 6.3 US$22/pound of uranium, net of by- product vanadium US$136 million 1 Inferred 3.8

g

KURUPUNG, Guyana Indicated 8.3 Rough estimate: US$45/pound Not yet estimated 3 Inferred 7.9

5 TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF Note – Projected cash costs are based on PEAs that are preliminary in nature as they include resource estimates that are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability – see slide 2

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Nuclear in Argentina

Generates up to 8% of electricity

A Green Resources Company

Generates up to 8% of electricity

Reactor Atucha I Embalse Atucha II Atucha III “No 5”

Large Nuclear Power Plants: 3 operating reactors

eacto tuc a ba se tuc a tuc a

  • 5

Date of Commercial Operation 1974 1984 2015 Construction starts 2017 Construction starts 2019 Capacity (MWe net) 335 600635 692 800 1,150 Type Siemens Candu-6 Siemens Candu-6 Hualong One Life extensions 10-years to 2027 25-years to 2040 7% output increase p

Small Reactors:

5 Research reactors operating in Argentina 5 Research reactors operating in Argentina 5 Research reactors built by Argentine reactor construction company INVAP elsewhere in the world CAREM Small Modular Reactor:

6

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

CAREM Small Modular Reactor:

  • 25MW prototype under construction, 100MW & 200MW units designed
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Nuclear Energy in Argentina:

A Green Resources Company

14,000

Recorded & Forecast Electricity Generation from Nuclear in Argentina

10 000 12,000

GWh)

Refurbished Embalse reactor expected to come back on-line in mid-2018. Expected to contribute to full-year’s it t ti 2019 Refurbished Embalse reactor expected to come back on-line in mid-2018. Forecast to contribute to full-year’s it t ti 2019 6 000 8,000 10,000

Produced (G

capacity starting 2019. capacity starting 2019. 4,000 6,000

Electricity P

2,000 7

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

Source of data: CNEA, IAEA

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Nuclear in Argentina

– the opportunity

A Green Resources Company

the opportunity

Reactor Design Reactor Construction Enrichment & Fuel Rod Spent Fuel St Uranium Production Nuclear energy industry overseen by ARN (Nuclear Regulatory Authority) Construction Fuel-Rod Manufacture Storage

CNEA/INVAP INVAP

Production

DIOXITEC & CONUAR NA-SA1 CNEA2

Australia’s only nuclear

Laguna Salada Deposit –

CNEA2

Nuclear fuel rod cluster Australia s only nuclear reactor – the OPAL research facility

Deposit U3O8 Corp. Cerro Solo Deposit – State through CNEA

INVAP to build medical isotope facility in

Spent fuel in dry storage in concrete casks - CNEA

8

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

p y USA for Coqui Pharma

1 Short-term storage at nuclear power plants operated by NA-SA; 2 Long-term storage in dry casks by CNEA.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Laguna Salada

Simple mining - real-time environmental restoration

A Green Resources Company

p g

Migrating Trench Advances

Mined area restored to

  • riginal landscape

Removing the Gravel Cover

Gravel that’s been mined, washed & replaced Gravel – averages 8m thick

Gravel – averages 8m thick Impermeable shale

Excavation up to 3m/10’ deep

Mining Uranium-Vanadium – bearing gravel

9 TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Laguna Salada

Operational Simplicity

A Green Resources Company

15cm 6 inches

Simple, continuous Gravel is sieved No blasting, no crushing p , Semi-desert Washed Gravel is replaced, recontoured & replanted with indigenous shrubs

Mining Benefic nment

g, g Washed removed prior to mining

ciation Extraction Environ

Transplantation trials 9% of the gravel is fine silt that is processed.  Metallurgical test Residual silt U i & Washing soda, baking soda

10

work aiming to concentrate the uranium in a smaller %

  • f fine material

Uranium & Vanadium

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Laguna Salada Project:

Resource growth potential

A Green Resources Company

g p

U3O8’s Concession Block Outlined in Green

Location of exploration results reported i J 2017

20-25Mlb >25Mlb

potential in gravel plain in Jan, 2017 potential in La Susana, La Rosada(1) discoveries & (grey area) discoveries & anomalous radon area

10Mlb

Current NI 43 101

  • 10Mlb NI 43-101 Uranium

Resource 43-101 uranium resource

  • 20-25Mlb potential in in La

Susana, La Rosada discoveries

  • >25Mlb - potential in rest of

p land package

> 55Mlb potential

20km

11

Concessions under JV option agreement are outlined in black

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Laguna Salada Project:

Higher Grades lead tolower Production Cost Estimates

A Green Resources Company

Laguna Salada Deposit: Estimated Cash Cost of Production with Grade of Fine Component of Gravel

$35 $40 $45

Cash cost Year 10

$25 $30 $35

  • f productio

(US$ per po

Average life of mine cash cost of production US$21.62/lb of U3O8

$10 $15 $20

  • n of Uraniu
  • und)

Year 1 Objective of current exploration to find higher-grade uranium-vanadium

$0 $5 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000

um

Uranium Grade (ppm U O ) Uranium Grade (ppm U3O8)

12

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Uranium Spot Market

A Green Resources Company

  • Spot price risen >40% off

Spot & Long-term Uranium Price (US$/lb) 11-year low;

  • Can control estimated

production cost through:

  • Finding higher grade

3O8 (US$/lb)

Fukushima

  • Finding higher-grade

resources;

  • Lowering opex;
  • Lowering capex.

ium Price U3

g p

Urani

Laguna Salada 10-year

Source: of data Ux Consulting Company LLC, Cantor Fitzgerald

Laguna Salada 10 year average cash cost of production US$22/lb  Aim is to reduce estimated cash cost

13 13

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

estimated cash cost

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Uranium Market Summary

A Green Resources Company

Global Uranium Demand Scenarios vs. Global Total Supply

Demand starts to outstrip supply in 2020/2021

Projected Demand Scenarios O8 Projected Demand Scenarios

Proposed Laguna Salada production

bs/year U3O Secondary Primary Supply Ml Secondary Supply

14

Source: Dundee Securities

14

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Uranium Spot Market

A Green Resources Company

Uranium Requirements of Nuclear Utilities as of Q3, 2016

  • Covered demand is

uranium bought by utilities under contract

um U3O8 Fukushima

under contract.

  • The rising “Uncovered

Demand” is the amount of uranium that is either going

  • unds Uraniu

to have to be bought in the

  • pen market or purchased

under new contracts.

Million po

Source: of graphic: Ux Consulting Company LLC, Cantor Fitzgerald

15 15

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Laguna Salada Deposit

Timeline & budget to mine decision

A Green Resources Company

Timeline & budget to mine decision

Next Steps: 1. Trial mining & pilot plant test work to produce yellowcake as proof of concept;

BUDGET TOWARDS POTENTIAL PRODUCTION

(US$)

Resource expansion &

2. Resource growth since economics are strongly geared to deposit size.

  • Projected 2 years to construction decision
  • Projected 1 year for construction

p upgrade to Measured & Indicated $3.0M Metallurgy & pilot plant $1.5M Social, environmental & $1 0M Conceptual Timeline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Resource expansion & upgrade Environmental (EIA) Metallurgy & pilot plant permitting $1.0M Feasibility study (FS) $1.5M Budget to Construction Decision $7.0M Metallurgy & pilot plant Mining & Environ. permit Permit to produce yellowcake Feasibility study (FS) CAPEX (in 2014 US$) CAPEX after forex adjustment (in 2015 US$) $136M / $117M

Recommended work program, timing & budget based on PEA that is preliminary in nature. Includes resources that are not reserves & do not have demonstrated economic viability. No certainty of the PEA being realized – see slide 2

Construction

16

y g

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Battery Commodities

A Green Resources Company

BERLIN, Colombia NI 43-101 Vanadium Nickel Phosphate

Colombia

NI 43-101 Resource category Vanadium Nickel Phosphate Million pounds Million pounds Million Tonnes Indicated 6 3.1 0.05 Inferred 91 42.1 0.8 LAGUNA SALADA, Argentina NI 43-101 Resource Vanadium (Mlb) Indicated 57

Argentina

Indicated 57 Inferred 27

181 million pounds Vanadium (V2O5) 45 illi d Ni k l g 45 million pounds Nickel 850,000 tonnes Phosphate (P2O5)

17 TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF WARNING – Projected cash costs are based on PEAs that are preliminary in nature as they include resource estimates that are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability – see slide 2

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Lithium Ion Battery Commodities

A Green Resources Company

y

apacity

5.00 6.00

Metal content per kWh in various Lithium-Ion batteries (kg/kWh)

storage ca

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

LFP LMO LVP LCO

  • f energy s

0.00 Manganese Lithium

Li-ion Battery Type Chemistry Abrev. Lithium Iron LiF PO LFP

Cobalt Lithium

l per kWh o

3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00

NCA

Phosphate LiFePO4 LFP Lithium Vanadium Phosphate Li3V2(PO4)3 LVP Lithium Manganese Oxide LiMn2O4 LMO

NMC

Kg of metal

0.00 1.00 2.00

Lithium Cobalt Oxide LiCoO2 LCO Lithium Nickel Cobalt Aluminium Oxide LiNiCoAlO2 NCA 18

K

Source of data: batteryuniversity.com

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

Lithium Nickel Managanese Cobalt Oxide LiNiMnCoO2 NMC

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Lithium Ion Battery Commodities

A Green Resources Company

600

y

Comparison of Specific Energy or Capacity of Battery Types

500

kg)

Lithium-Ion Batteries

Subaru G4e, BYD

300 400

nergy (Wh/k

Nissan Leaf, GM, Tesla, Panasonic

200

Specific En

Chevy Volt, BMW i3 BYD e- buses

100

Lead Acid NiCad Nickel Metal Lithium Lithium Iron Lithium NMC Lithium NCA Lithium

Car battery

Lead Acid NiCad Nickel Metal Hydride Lithium Titanite Lithium Iron Phosphate Lithium Manganese Oxide NMC Lithium Cobalt Oxide NCA Lithium Vanadium Phosphate

19

Source of data: batteryuniversity.com

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Lithium Ion Battery Commodities

A Green Resources Company

150

y

Demand Estimate vs Supply Ramp-up from Megafactories

125

h)

Boston Power

75 100

Hours (GWh

Tesla-Panasonic

50

Gigawatt H

LG Chem Foxcom BYD

25

G

Current Supply 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

20

From Dundee Capital Markets (June 13, 2016) from data from Benchmark Mineral Intelligence & Avicienne, Albrecht, 2016

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Battery Commodities

Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries (“VRB”)

A Green Resources Company

Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries ( VRB ) Vanadium Redox Batteries

– long duration lower power output

Energy-Centric Power-Centric V5+ V3+

Flow Batteries

V4+ V2+ V V

250

NCA Lithium Ion battery has 5X energy storage capacity of a VRB VRBs can withstand 20X the charge/discharge cycles as the best Lithium Ion battery

4+ 3+ 2+

Vanadium

  • ccurs

naturally in 4 different

200,000 10,000

47

21

5+ 2+

different charge states TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

10,000

VRB Lithium Iron Phosphate VRB NCA

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Battery Commodities

Vanadium Redox Batteries Industrial e Storage

A Green Resources Company

Vanadium Redox Batteries – Industrial e-Storage

UniEnergy System Features:

  • Industrial capacity – off-grid, microgrid- or grid-

stabilization (can’t be miniturized); stabilization (can t be miniturized);

  • Can be charged & discharged indefinately – tested to

200,000 cycles (max for Lithium Ion batteries is 7,000 cycles); E cellent safet (non flamable)

600kW & 2.2MWh DC  AC

  • Excellent safety (non-flamable);
  • Operates over a wide temperature range (-40° to +50°C);
  • Plug & play containerized systems;
  • 20-year design life on most systems;

Cost Guidance

  • US$500/kWh (UniEnergy Technologies)

= US$0.10/kWh over 15,000 cycles; y g y ;

  • 100% recyclable at very little cost – the electrolyte

maintains its intrinsic value;

  • VRBs expected to account for ~30% of battery storage

capacity – other battery types likely to constitute 70%;

  • US$300/kWh with recycled Vanadium

(Imery) = US$0.07/kWh over 15,000 cycles

  • Footprint: 20MW/acre or 50MW/hectare

capacity

  • ther battery types likely to constitute 70%;
  • Vanadium = ~42% of cost
  • Largest installed VRB in USA is 2MW/8MWh:
  • Could power 1,000 homes for 8 hours;

22

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF p

  • UET system cost estimate: US$0.05c/kWh
  • Largest battery in world is a VRB being installed in

China: 200MW/800MWh

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Battery Commodities

Vanadium Market

A Green Resources Company

Vanadium Market Vanadium market slipping into deficit

140,000

es)

100 000 120,000 Vanadium required for

Vanadium demand for batteries

um (tonne

80,000 100,000 Li-Ion Batteries Vanadium required for Redox Flow Batteries Steel Chemicals

Vanadiu

40,000 60,000 Steel, Chemicals Supply

Source of data: Camelot Ferroalloys Inc, Vanitec

20,000

23

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Battery Commodities

Vanadium Market

A Green Resources Company

Vanadium Market Vanadium Pentoxide (V2O5) Price

$6 00 $7.00 $8.00

US$/lb)

U 100%

$4 00 $5.00 $6.00

Price (U

Up 100%

$2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $0.00 $1.00 $

AssetMacro

24

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

Source of data: www.assetmacro.com 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Strategically Located in Uruguay, Brazil, Argentina Strategically Located in Uruguay, Brazil, Argentina

Brazil Properties

Nascent Need for Local Frac Sand Supply

Oil & gas production from the Vaca

Uruguay Properties

Vaca Muerta

  • Oil & gas production from the Vaca

Muerta is just starting

  • Foreign oil majors investing >$9B so far

to develop the giant Vaca Muerta shale in Argentina

Rio Rio Grande Grande Port Port

in Argentina

  • Frac sand / proppant market expected to

be 800,000 tonnes per year in 2016/2017. Current local production only 6,000t per ear

Favoured route to the

Argentine Properties San Antonio San Antonio Port Port

In Shale

year

  • Almost all of Argentina’s frac sand

imported from Brazil, China & USA Our properties near key shale basins

route to the Vaca Muerta Rail

Comodoro Comodoro Port Port

San Jorge Shale

Shale

p p y & infrastructure (road, rail & ports)

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Corporate Valuation

After-tax net present value of projects

A Green Resources Company

$350 Berlin Deposit, Colombia

p p j

After-tax Net Present Value of U3O8 Corp.’s projects (NPV at 7.5% Discount Rate (US$ Million) )

% $200 $250 $300 p Laguna Salada Project, Argentina alue at 7.5% S$M)

$142 $198 $255

$100 $150 $200 C t M k t Present Va unt rate (US

  • $40
  • $25

$3 $31 $59 $56 $85 $142

$50 $0 $50 Current Market capitalization of U3O8 Corp. er-Tax Net discou Combined NPV of

  • $100
  • $50

$35 $40 $50 $60 $70

=$229M =$314M =$145M =$60M Afte Projects (7.5% discount rate)

Uranium Price (US$/lb)

26

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

NPVs based on PEAs – see cautionary statements on slide 2

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Corporate Valuation

After-tax net present value of projects

A Green Resources Company

$250

p p j

After-tax Net Present Value of U3O8 Corp.’s projects (NPV at 10% Discount Rate (US$ Million) )

% $150 $200 Berlin Deposit, Colombia Laguna Salada Project, Argentina Value at 10% S$M)

$112 $159

$50 $100 $ Current Market Present V unt rate (US

  • $42
  • $29
  • $4

$22 $47

  • $4

$19 $66

  • $50

$0 $50 =$134M =$206M =$62M capitalization of U3O8 Corp. er-Tax Net discou Combined NPV of Projects (10%

  • $100
  • $50

$35 $40 $50 $60 $70 Aft j ( discount rate)

Uranium Price (US$/lb)

27

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

NPVs based on PEAs – see cautionary statements on slide 2

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Corporate Valuation

Comparison with peers

A Green Resources Company

$2.50

Enterprise Value per Pound of Uranium Resources

250

NI 43-101 Compliant Resources

p p

$1.50 $2.00 $

b

150 200

rce (Mlbs)

$0.50 $1.00 $

US$/l

50 100

nium Resour

$0.00 $0.50 Denison Fission Energy Energy Mega NexGen Berkeley Azarga um Res. UEX Kivalliq Western aramide O8 Corp Pele Mtn nerman Plateau Goviex Forsys Goviex nerman NexGen Plateau Forsys Denison aramide Fission Western Berkeley UEX Energy Pele Mtn O8 Corp um Res. Kivalliq EnCore Azarga Mega

Uran

D Toro Vimy N B Uraniu W La U3O P Bann Bann N D La W B Vimy P U3O Uraniu

  • U3O8 Corp. is undervalued relative to peers – has low enterprise value
  • U3O8 Corp. value per pound of resources is low relative to its peers – still trading as if

28

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

political risk has not improved dramatically in Argentina

Source Data: Dundee Corp. & Cantor Fitzgerald

slide-29
SLIDE 29

U3O8 Corp. Board

A Green Resources Company

Director Experience & Key Areas of Expertise Role on the Board

  • Dr. Keith

B

  • Founded Aurelian Resources & discovered the 13 million ounce (“Moz”) Fruta del Norte

(FDN) gold deposit in Ecuador. FDN was sold to Kinross Gold for $1.3B R i i t f PDAC’ Th Li d l I t ti l Di A d 2008

  • Founder of U3O8 Corp.
  • Minefinder

E Barron

  • Recipient of PDAC’s Thayer Lindsley International Discovery Award – 2008
  • Northern Miner’s Mining Man of the Year – 2008
  • Entrepenuer
  • Major shareholder
  • Mr. David

C t bl

  • Was VP- Investor Relations (IR) with Australia’s Normandy Mining until it was acquired

by Newmont;

  • VP-IR at FNX during the discovery in Sudbury that took the company from junior

l t d ith lti billi d ll k t

  • Chairman

C t Constable

explorer to a producer with a multi-billion dollar market cap;

  • Served on the board of Aquiline Resources until it was sold to Pan American Silver;
  • Holds a ICD.D designation from Institute of Canadian Directors
  • Corporate governance
  • Mr. David

Franklin

  • Co-founder & MD of WoodsWater Capital LP, a resource-focused private equity firm
  • Formerly CEO of Sprott Private Wealth;
  • Was market strategist at Sprott where he co-wrote the widely-followed monthly note
  • Investment banking
  • Corporate strategy

Franklin

Was market strategist at Sprott where he co wrote the widely followed monthly note “Markets at a Glace” with Eric Sprott;

  • Corporate strategy
  • Mr. Pablo

Marcet

  • Member of Board of Directors of Barrick Gold;
  • Participated in start-up of the giant Escondida copper mine in Chile;
  • As president of Northern Orion, oversaw project development of the Agua Rica gold-

copper deposit & its subsequent sale to Yamana Gold for $1.6B;

  • Entrepeneur
  • Mine developer
  • LatAm perspective – has

fi t h d k l d li

pp p q

  • Was president of Waymar Resources, which merged with Orosur Mining that operates a

gold mine in Uraguay

first-hand knowledge - lives in Argentina

  • Mr. Darin

Milmeister

  • Founder & Managing Partner of Extract Capital, a resource-focused fund;
  • Formerly Principal of Delware Street Capital, a long/short fund focused on commodities;
  • Resource fund

perspective

  • Corporate strategy

p gy

  • Dr. Richard

Spencer

See “Management” slide

  • Minefinder
  • Deep LatAm experience

29

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

slide-30
SLIDE 30

U3O8 Corp. Management

A Green Resources Company

Name Experience & Key Areas of Expertise Management Role

Led the exploration teams that:

  • Dr. Richard

Spencer

p

  • Discovered the 3.3 million ounce Quimsacocha / Loma Larga gold deposit in Ecuador (+23Moz silver);
  • Increased gold reserves at Las Cristinas in Venezuela by 65% from 10Moz to 17Moz;
  • Grass roots discoveries of copper porphyries in Ecuador – resources are:

23 billion pounds of copper + 4 Moz gold in Mirador, Panantza & San Carlos porphyries

President & CEO

  • Mr. John

Ross

  • As CFO of IAMGOLD Corp., was the first to introduce the gold “money policy” – converted the

company’s cash to gold at an average price of US$287/oz as an ultracontrarian when the majors were still hedged and when the Bank of England was selling the country’s gold

CFO Executive VP

  • Dr. Hugo

Bastias

  • Instrumental in the discovery of the 7.5Moz Veladero gold deposit – now a Barrick mine in Argentina;
  • Instrumental in U3O8 Corp.’s uranium discoveries in Colombia & Argentina.

Executive VP – based in Argentina Mr Elpidio

  • M.Sc in Mineral Exploration from Queens University, Ontario & an MBA
  • Business Development Director of Rio Tinto – Brazil (1988-2001);

Chief Operating Officer

  • Mr. Elpidio

Reis

p ( )

  • Was General Manager of Braziron Ltd;
  • Instrumental in the development of the 10Moz Morro do Ouro mine – developing processing

techniques for very low grade ore.

Officer – based in Brazil

  • Mr. Gabriel
  • Completed MSc in Mineral Exploration at Queens University, Ontario

VP Exploration based in Bastias

  • Led the team that discovered U3O8 Corp.’s Laguna Salada uranium-vanadium project in Argentina.

– based in Argentina

30

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

slide-31
SLIDE 31

U3O8 Corp. Capital Structure

A Green Resources Company

p p

Share Capital U3O8 Corp. Shareholder Base

Market cap

(at $0.035)

$11.4M 52wk range: $0.02 - $0.05 Average daily volume (3-mth): 1.90 million I tit ti l Basic shares o/s 329M Options o/s 20M Warrants o/s 118M

8%

Insiders Institutional 24% Insiders 65% Other Sh h ld Warrants o/s 118M Fully diluted 467M Insiders 11% Shareholders

Top Shareholders:

Dr Keith Barron – founder & director; Dr Keith Barron founder & director; Delaware Street Capital JMM Partners; Alpha North Asset Management.

31

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Corporate Strategy:

Sequential Project Development

A Green Resources Company

Laguna Salada, Argentina

~3 years to potential production

Berlin Project, Colombia

~4 to 5 years to potential production y p p y p p Immediate goal – double uranium resource to 20Mlb & upgrade to Measured & Indicated $3.0M Metallurgy & pilot plant $1 5M Met tests & refine flowsheet $1.0M Double resource to 50Mlb target & show 70-75Mlb potential $23M Metallurgy & pilot plant $1.5M Social, environmental & permitting $1.0M Feasibility study $1.5M TOTAL to reach mine decision in 2 yrs $7 0M Resource upgrade, environmental, permitting, feasibility study $20M TOTAL to reach mine decision $44M Capex $441M TOTAL to reach mine decision in 2 yrs $7.0M Capex Capex (forex-adjusted) $136M $117M

Development strategy: Project is Development strategies:

  • JV with producer & keep minority stake
  • Streaming agreements or royalties on by-

Capex $441M

Development strategy: Project is

sufficiently simple for U3O8 Corp. to put into production or JV with producer & keep minority stake to receive cash flow Streaming agreements or royalties on by products (phosphate, vanadium, nickel, rare earths)

Recommended work & budgets based on PEAs that are preliminary in nature. Resources are not reserves & do not have demonstrated economic viability. No

32

g p y y certainty of the PEAs being realized . Conceptual cumulative targets based on mineral resources & exploration results: Colombia – potential 32-34Mt at 0.09% to 0.11% U3O8 (~70-75Mlb) & Argentina – potential150-225Mt at 50ppm to 60ppm U3O8 (~20-25Mlb). Potential quantity & grades are conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration to define mineral resources on the targets. It is uncertain if further exploration will increase the mineral resources on the company’s projects.– see slide 2.

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

slide-33
SLIDE 33

A Green Resources Company

Richard Spencer, President & CEO richard@u3o8corp.com (416) 868-1491 www.u3o8corp.com

APPENDIX FOLLOWS

33

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Uranium Market Drivers

Unprecedented Nuclear Reactor Build

A Green Resources Company

Unprecedented Nuclear Reactor Build

Operable Under construction On Order Total

Life extension

  • f existing

reactors Closures planned in the short- reactors term

Pre-Fukushima 443 62 156 661 Feb 2017 449 59 166 674 159 23

Projected Supply

Feb 2017 449 59 166 674 159 23

449 518

China 43%

449 518

Reactors by 2024 Operable Reactors today, up from 439

34

Reactors by 2024 at Dec 2015

Source: Word Nuclear Association, World Nuclear News, Dundee Securities, Timeless Uranium

34

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Uranium Market Drivers

Chinese & Indian Nuclear – long-term growth

A Green Resources Company

160

Chinese actual & planned nuclear energy output (GW)

300

Indian actual & planned nuclear energy output (GW)

100 120 140 Output (GW)

Chi ’ l

USA’s nuclear output: ~100GW

200 250

pacity (GW)

India’s nuclear energy plan shows that India’s build is also exponential, comparable with China’s

40 60 80 ar Energy O

China’s nuclear build is exponential

100 150

r Energy Cap

comparable with China s

20

1969 1981 1986 1992 1994 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032

Nuclea

50

1969 1984 1992 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031 2034 2037 2040 2043 2046 2049

Nuclear

  • China- world’s 2nd largest economy;
  • Air polution  non-carbon power sources;
  • Water polution  symbiosis between nuclear

& f /

  • India - world’s 7th largest economy;
  • 7% average GDP growth rate in last 20 years;
  • 1/3 of popluation doesn’t have electricity;

35

& water purification / desalination.

  • 2/3 electricity provided by coal;
  • Per capita electricity use to double by 2020.

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Laguna Salada Project, Argentina:

Project status & pathway to production

A Green Resources Company

Discovery Initial (10Mlb) NI43-101 uranium resource Landmark agreement with Provincial govt Initial (10Mlb) NI43 101 uranium resource PEA focus on projected cash cost $22/lb Increase resource to 20-25Mlbs Trial Mining Pilot processing plant PEA – focus on projected cash cost

Next Steps

Low cash cost

  • f production

Trial Mining Pilot processing plant Feasibility Study Construction decision

p

Construction decision

36

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Laguna Salada Deposit

Overview

A Green Resources Company

Overview

Argentina’s only NI 43-101 uranium resource on which a PEA has been l d 10Mlb uranium resource, Vanadium by-product, completed Simple Geology 10 year mine life Flat-lying in soft gravel E l ti h d fi d t i Simple Mining Clear resource-growth potential Exploration has defined extensions to the deposit Free-digging “migrating trench” Simple Processing Screening to remove pebbles & concentrate uranium – followed by standard alkaline leach In-country uranium-enrichment Continuous real-time environmental restoration Shrubs moved from leading edge of the trench replanted on trailing edge Pilcaniyeu located ~450km from

37

In-country uranium-enrichment facility Pilcaniyeu located 450km from Laguna Salada

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Laguna Salada Project PEA Highlights

A Green Resources Company

PEA shows potential for low-cost, near-term production

PEA Highlights

PEA Highlights (base case, in US$ at US$60/lb U3O8)

U i V di Annual production Uranium Vanadium 0.6Mlb 0.96Mlb Revenue $223M $53M P i i l Fi i l M t i P T Aft T Principal Financial Metrics Pre-Tax After-Tax NPV discount rate 7.5% 10% 7.5% 10% NPV (incl royalties due to State) $55M $43M $31M $22M IRR 24% 18% Cash cost of production, capex, mine life & payback period Mine life 10 years Life of Mine average uranium cash cost of production1 $21 62/lb IRR 24% 18%

Increasing resource size & production rate has been modelled and shows a very significant improvement to

Life of Mine average uranium cash cost of production1 $21.62/lb Average uranium cash cost of production over 2½ year payback1 $16.14/lb Total capital (incl. sustaining & 20% contingency) $136M

38

the project’s economics. (This analysis was done internally by U3O8 Corp. and can’t be shown because it has not been verified by an external NI43-101 - compliant study.)

1 Projected uranium cash cost, net of vanadium credit & incl. 3% NSR to the Provincial

Government.. Laguna Salada PEA – see cautionary statements on slide 2

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Laguna Salada Deposit

PEA Summary

A Green Resources Company

PEA Summary

  • 1st independent PEA completed on a uranium deposit in Argentina;
  • Study completed by Tenova (Bateman) >100 years of experience;
  • Resource:
  • Resource:
  • 10Mlbs uranium (6.4Mlbs recoverable);
  • 84Mlbs vanadium (10Mlbs recoverable);
  • Projected average annual production 0 6Mlb uranium over 10 year mine life:
  • Projected average annual production 0.6Mlb uranium over 10 year mine life:

Argentina requires 0.4Mlbs per year to operate its three reactors – currently imports 100% of its fuel requirement  potential for off-take agreement;

  • 1Mlb/annum vanadium production;
  • Focus of the PEA was cash-cost of production:
  • US$21.62/lb average over the life of the mine;
  • US$16.14/lb during the 2½ year payback period;
  • Demonstrates potential for production cost that is competitive with in situ

leach and Athabasca Basin deposits.

  • Capex: $136M incl 20% contingency. US$ strength against currencies in which

plant equipment was quoted could reduce Capex by ~15%. plant equipment was quoted could reduce Capex by 15%.

39

1 Projected uranium cash cost, net of vanadium credit & includes a 3% NSR to the Provincial Government. The PEA is preliminary in nature.

Includes resources that are not reserves & do not have demonstrated economic viability. No certainty of the PEA being realized. – see slide 2

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

39

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Berlin Project, Colombia:

Project status & pathway to production

A Green Resources Company

j p y p Highest-value project in U3O8 Corp’s portfolio with one of the lowest projected uranium extraction costs in the industry p j y Built on discovery by Cogema (Areva) Initial (21Mlb) NI43-101 uranium resource Initial (21Mlb) NI43 101 uranium resource Having confirmed low potential production cost in PEA PEA – focus on projected cash cost Pilot processing plant

Next Next Step Step

Test alternative extraction techniques Increase resource to 50Mlb threshold Feasibility Study

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF 40

Construction decision

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Berlin:

Introduction

A Green Resources Company

Introduction

Berlin:

  • A uranium-bearing phosphate layer in

sedimentary rocks - contains a rare mix of nickel, vanadium, rare earths and other metals;

  • The current 21 million pound uranium

resource is from 3km of a 10.5km uranium- phosphate – bearing trend  there is room for resource growth to 70-75 million pounds of resource growth to 70-75 million pounds of uranium;

  • Extensive metallurgical test work has shown

that this mix of commodities can be cost- effectively extracted from the rock;

  • G

d i f t t

  • Good infrastructure:
  • located 12km from a hydroelectric plant;
  • 60km from the Magdalena river that is

navigable by barge to the Caribbean Sea;

  • 60km from principal paved highway and a

COLOMBIA

p p p g y railway that it being refurbished;

  • Local community is supportive of the project;
  • Mining would be by underground methods and

the uranium-phosphate rock would be processed

  • n site to remove the contained metals

41

  • n site to remove the contained metals.

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Berlin Deposit

Cross Section

A Green Resources Company

Cross Section

  • Mi

li ti i 3 thi k

West East

Mineralized layer

  • Mineralization in 3m thick

layer;

  • Remarkable continuity;
  • Underground mining

Sandstone Shale

  • peration;
  • Minimal mine

footprint;

  • Waste would be

replaced in backfill of underground excavations;

  • Cut and fill mining in

the steep areas combined with room and pillar in the flat areas.

42

42

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Berlin Project, Colombia

Multi-commodity Resource

A Green Resources Company

Current resources defined in compliance with NI 43-101 (0.04% U3O8 cut-off grade)

  • n southern 3km of a 10 5km mineralized trend

Tren Tren

  • n southern 3km of a 10.5km mineralized trend

Tonnes (million) Uranium Phosphate Vanadium Yttrium Grade (Mlb) Grade (Mt) Grade (Mlb) Grade (t) 0.6 0.11% 1.5 8.4% 0.05 0.4% 6.0 461ppm 294

4km

ched Are ched Are

10.5k

8.1 0.11% 19.9 9.4% 0.8 0.5% 91.0 500ppm 4,066 Tonnes (million) Neodymium Nickel Molybdenum Rhenium Grade (t) Grade (Mlb) Grade (Mlb) Grade (t)

Drill Drill

3

ea ea

km Mineral

0.6 110ppm 70 0.2% 3.1 570ppm 0.8 6ppm 4 8.1 100ppm 813 0.2% 42.1 620ppm 11.0 7ppm 55 Tonnes ( illi ) Zinc Silver

led Area led Area

.5km

lized Tren

(million) Grade (Mlbs) Grade (Moz) 0.6 0.30% 4.4 2.8ppm 0.1 8.1 0.30% 45 3.4ppm% 0.9

Current resource in southern 3km of 10.5km trend

3km

d

43

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

10.5km trend

m

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Berlin Project

PEA: commodities produced,

A Green Resources Company

% of revenue generated by each commodity

Main uses of commodities:

Neodymium 1% Moly, Zinc 3%

Uranium: Nuclear energy Phosphate: Fertilizer, batteries Nickel: Stainless steel, batteries, fertilizer

Yttrium 6% 1% 3%

Revenue: US$2.8B

Vanadium: Steel alloys, batteries Yttrium: Lazers, electronics, monitors Neodymium: Magnets high-efficiency motors

Uranium 35% Nickel Vanadium 9%

Neodymium: Magnets, high efficiency motors Base metals: Steel alloys, fertilizer, Zn-Ce flow batteries, galvanizing, alloys

15% Phosphate 31%

Metals & Phosphate extracted in a single metallurgical process – iron sulphate leach – was the principal process used at Elliot Lake

44

1 PEA estimates are preliminary in nature. Includes resources that are not reserves & do not have demonstrated economic

  • viability. No certainty of the PEA being realized. INTERNAL DISCUSSION PURPOSES – see slide 2

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

p p p p

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Berlin Project’s Other Commodities:

“Clean Energy & Agriculture Commodities”

A Green Resources Company

Clean Energy & Agriculture Commodities

Battery Commodities: Nickel Battery Commodities: Nickel, Vanadium, Phosphate Ph h t f f tili Phosphate for fertilizer

Berlin contains 3 micronutrients used in

Ni Mo

speciality fertilizers

Zn

Rare Earth Elements: Rare Earth Elements:

  • Neodymium for

supermagnets in motors & generators;

  • Yttrium for red phosphors

45

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

in screens an lazer technology

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Berlin Deposit:

PEA Highlights

A Green Resources Company

Potential to be a large, very low-cost uranium producer

Projected Base Case – PEA Highlights (US$60/lb U3O8), reported in US$

Annual uranium production 1 2Mlb

PEA Highlights

Annual uranium production 1.2Mlb Mine life 15 years Cumulative free cash flow $982M Pay-back period 4.6 years y y Initial capex $360M Sustaining capital $40M Contingency $41M Total capex (incl. 10% contingency) $441M

Principal Financial Metrics Pre-Tax After-Tax NPV discount rate 7.5% 10% 7.5% 10% NPV (incl royalties due to State) $338M $223M $198M $112M IRR 19% 15%

$1.8Billion of by-product revenues would cover the $1.6Billion

46

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

  • 1. Projections based on Berlin PEA – see cautionary statements on slide 2
  • perating cost (cost of mining & extraction)1
slide-47
SLIDE 47

Berlin Project

Drilling has shown Resource Growth Potential

A Green Resources Company

N

>25Mlb

potential

  • 21Mlb NI 43-101

Uranium Resource

4km potential identified by trenching

U a u esou ce

  • 25-30Mlb potential

exploration-drilled area

  • >25Mlb – northern area –

potential indicated by

10.5km

25-30Mlb

resource potential

trenching

potential indicated by trenching

> 70-75Mlb potential

Mineraliz

3.5km

Green unit contains uranium &

  • ther minerals

potential already identified by drilling zed Trend

3km

1Target based on mineral resources & exploration

results for potential 32-34Mt at 0.09% to 0.11% U3O8 (~70-75Mlb) Potential quantity & grades are conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource on these

21Mlb

Current NI 43-101

47 exploration to define a mineral resource on these targets & it is uncertain if further exploration will increase the current deposit – see slide 2.

NI 43 101 uranium resource

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Berlin Deposit

Potential to Improve Project’s Economics

A Green Resources Company

Potential to Improve Project s Economics

  • Potential to reduce operating (Opex) and capital costs (Capex):
  • Test work on the effectiveness of alternative techniques for the
  • Test work on the effectiveness of alternative techniques for the

extraction of metals and phosphate (eg. Use of membrane systems to separate the metals);

  • Potential to increase revenue:
  • Removal of carbonate to reduce reagent consumption (lower
  • perating costs);
  • Current PEA only considers revenue stream from two Rare Earth

Elements (Neodymium & Yttrium) Include other REEs such as Elements (Neodymium & Yttrium). Include other REEs such as Dysprosium & Europium in revenue stream;

  • Reduce electricity cost by capturing excess heat generated by the

processing plant.

  • Increase the uranium resource – the target is 70-75Mlbs1. Economics of

the deposit are strongly geared to deposit size.

1Target based on mineral resources & exploration results for potential 32-34Mt at 0.09% to 0.11% U3O8 (~70-75Mlb)

Potential quantity & grades are conceptual in nature There has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral 48

48

Potential quantity & grades are conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource on these targets & it is uncertain if further exploration will increase the current deposit – see slide 2.

TSX: UWE | OTCQB: UWEFF