Tourism, Joint UNCTAD - Commonwealth Secretariat - International - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

tourism joint unctad commonwealth secretariat
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Tourism, Joint UNCTAD - Commonwealth Secretariat - International - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Oceans Economy and Trade, Sustainable Fisheries, Transport and Tourism, Joint UNCTAD - Commonwealth Secretariat - International Ocean Institute Seminar, 10-12 May 2016 - Geneva, Switzerland This expert paper is reproduced by the UNCTAD


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Oceans Economy and Trade, Sustainable Fisheries, Transport and Tourism, Joint UNCTAD - Commonwealth Secretariat - International Ocean Institute Seminar, 10-12 May 2016 - Geneva, Switzerland

This expert paper is reproduced by the UNCTAD secretariat in the form and language in which it has been received. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the view of the United Nations.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The Blue Economy in Perspective

89.8 0.3 10.0

Volume of World Trade (%)

Seaborne Airborne Overland 72.7 13.0 14.3

Value of World Trade (%)

Seaborne Airborne Overland

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Blue Chain

  • 1. Building
  • 2. Ownership
  • 3. Registration 4. Operations
  • 5. Scrapping

Korea & China (72%) Greece, Japan & China (38%) Panama, Liberia & Marshall Islands (42%) Denmark & Switzerland (30%) India, Bangladesh, China & Pakistan (92%)

Financing and Insurance Seafarers Global Terminal Operators

UK & Scandinavia Philippines & Indonesia Hong Kong, Netherlands, Singapore & UAE (44%)

BLUE CHAIN SUPPORT

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Feeling the Blues…

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Seaborne Trade & Exports of Goods

International Seaborne Trade and Exports of Goods, 1955-2014

Seaborne Trade (billions of tons of goods loaded) - Left Axis Exports of Goods (trillions at current $US) - Left Axis Ratio Exports / Seaborne Trade - Right Axis

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Blue Highways: Maritime Shipping

5% 15% 30%

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The Blue Pinch: Terminal Surface Controlled by the Main Global Terminal Operators

17,242 hectares (172.4 km2)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The Big Blue: Evolution of Containerships

Early Containerships (1956-) Panamax (1980-) Post Panamax I (1988-) New-Panamax (2014-) Fully Cellular (1970-) Panamax Max (1985-) Post Panamax II (2000-) Post Panamax III (2006-) Triple E (2013-)

500 – 800 TEU 1,000 – 2,500 TEU 3,000 – 3,400 TEU 3,400 – 4,500 TEU 4,000 – 5,000 TEU 6,000 – 8,000 TEU 12,500 TEU 15,000 TEU 18,000 TEU 200x20x9 137x17x9 215x20x10 250x32x12.5 290x32x12.5 285x40x13 300x43x14.5 366x49x15.2 400x59x15.5 397x56x15.5 ; 22–10–8 (not shown)

(LOA – Beam – Draft)

10 8 23 20 10 6 6 9 17 5 9 15 6 8 13 5 6 13 10 4 5 8 4 6 4

6 containers across 4 containers high on deck 4 containers high below deck

A B C D E

meters

slide-8
SLIDE 8

World’s Major Container Ports, 2012

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Transshipment Volume and Incidence by Major Ports, 2007-12

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Emerging Structure of the Ocean Economy

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The Spatial Organization of the Ocean Economy: Maritime Clusters

Port Clusters Terminal Clusters Port / Logistics Clusters

Multiport Gateway Transshipment cluster

Terminal operator A (Container) Terminal operator B (Container) Terminal operator C (Bulk) Port authority

Port-Centric Logistics Zone Container Terminal

First Tier Logistics Second Tier Logistics Bulk

Port Port

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Container port / terminal Logistics zone / site Strongly developed corridor Poorly developed corridor Multi-port gateway region

Pacific-Asia (e.g. Pearl River Delta) North American West Coast (e.g. LA/Long Beach) North Europe (e.g. Rhine Scheldt Delta)

Landbridge

The Geographical Setting of Multi-port Gateways Regions

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The East Asian Container Port System and its Multi-port Gateway Regions

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The North-American Container Port System and its Multi-Port Gateway Regions

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The European Container Port System and its Multi-port Gateway Regions

slide-16
SLIDE 16

ZHUHAI

Inter-firm Relationships in the Main Container Ports of the Pearl River Delta, 2015

HONG KONG

Asia Container Terminals DP World Hong Kong Hong Kong International Terminals COSCO-HIT Terminal Modern Terminals Asia Port Services

SHENZHEN

Chiwan Container Terminal Shekou Container Terminals Da Chan Bay Terminal One Yantian International Container Terminals Zhuhai International Container Terminals

GUANGZHOU

Dongguan Container Terminal Guangzhou South China Oceangate Container Terminal Nansha Container Terminal Guangzhou Huangpu Xingang Terminal Guangzhou Huangpu Xinsha Terminal Nanhai International Container Terminals

HUTCHISON PORT HOLDINGS

PSA DP World

Cosco Pacific

APM Terminals (AP Moller Group)

20%

China Shipping Group

40% 50% 50% Modern Terminals China Merchants Holdings International 55% 25% 33% 67% 20% 50% 50%

Shipping Line Terminal Operator Terminal

PORT

Financial Holding Guangzhou Port Group Shenzhen Municipal Government Shenzhen Yantian Port Group 20% 8% 65% 41% 60% 50% 51% 49% 39% Cosco Pacific 15% 25% 35% 80%

China Merchant Mawan Port

84% 100% 40% 40%

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Inter-firm Relationships in the Three Main Container Ports of North America, 2015

LONG BEACH LOS ANGELES NEW YORK

APM Terminals Port Elizabeth Port Newark Container Terminal Maher Terminal Global Terminal and Container Services New York Container Terminal

APM Terminals (AP Moller Group) Maher Terminals Ports America 100% 50% Global Container Terminals 100%

Pacific Container Terminal Total Terminals International California United Terminals Pier G Berth Long Beach Container Terminal Terminal A Terminal C60 Global Gateway South APM Terminals Pier 400 Evergreen Terminal TraPac Los Angeles Berth136 Yusen Terminals West Basin Container Terminal

Stevedoring Services

  • f America

Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan 100% Cosco Pacific 51% 49% 100%

Hanjin

AIG Highstar Capital Deutsche Bank RREEF Macquarie Infrastructure 20% 65%

Hyundai

100% 100%

K-Lines

100%

OOIL

100%

MSC

50%

APL Evergreen

70% 30%

Yangming

100% 20%

Mitsui OSK

61%

NYK

100% 100%

Shipping Line Terminal Operator Terminal

PORT

Financial Holding 100%

China Shipping

40% 20%

Matson

35% 50%

MSC

34% 50%

MSC

46%

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Inter-firm Relationships in the Three Main Container Ports of the Rhine-Scheldt Delta, 2015

DP World

PSA

HUTCHISON PORT HOLDINGS APM Terminals

ANTWERP

Antwerp Gateway (3)

PSA HNN

MSC Home terminal OCHZ APM Terminal

ZEEBRUGGE ROTTERDAM

Rotterdam World Gateway (Maasvlakte II)

ECT

APM Terminal Rotterdam

CMA-CGM (2)

MSC NYK

APM Terminals Maasvlakte II Minority Shareholding (4) Waal- and Eemhaven Delta Terminal Euromax phase 1 Majority shareholding

ZIM Line (1)

DP World Delwaidedock North Sea Terminal Europe Terminal Deurganck Terminal

New World Alliance CYKH Alliance

Antwerp International Terminal (AIT)

Shipping Line (Global) Terminal Operator Terminal

Shanghai International Port Group (SIPG)

Zeebrugge International Port

Cosco Pacific 100% 20% 51% 93% 100% 50% 50% 50% 60% 30% 10% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 42.5% 20% 20% 10% 35% 100% 65% 75% 25%

PORT

Financial Holding

Delta MSC Terminal

50% 50%

slide-19
SLIDE 19

The Massification and Clustering of Transportation in Inland Systems

Port Port

IT IT IT IT Inland Port

Corridor

Port-Centric Direct truck End haul Rail / Barge IT Intermodal Industrial Park Inland Terminal

Port Inland Load Center Network Formation and Logistics

On-dock / near dock rail

slide-20
SLIDE 20

International Inventory of Inland Ports and Port Centric Logistics Zones