top antitop production at hadron colliders
play

Top-Antitop Production at Hadron Colliders Roberto BONCIANI - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Top-Antitop Production at Hadron Colliders Roberto BONCIANI Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie, Universit e Joseph Fourier/CNRS-IN2P3/INPG, F-38026 Grenoble, France HP2.3rd GGI-Florence, September 15, 2010 p.1/25 Plan


  1. Top-Antitop Production at Hadron Colliders Roberto BONCIANI Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie, Universit´ e Joseph Fourier/CNRS-IN2P3/INPG, F-38026 Grenoble, France HP2.3rd GGI-Florence, September 15, 2010 – p.1/25

  2. Plan of the Talk General Introduction Top Quark at the Tevatron LHC Perspectives Status of the Theoretical calculations The General Framework Total Cross Section at NLO Analytic Two-Loop QCD Corrections Conclusions HP2.3rd GGI-Florence, September 15, 2010 – p.2/25

  3. Top Quark HP2.3rd GGI-Florence, September 15, 2010 – p.3/25

  4. Top Quark With a mass of m t = 173 . 1 ± 1 . 3 GeV, the TOP quark (the up-type quark of the third generation) is the heaviest elementary particle produced so far at colliders. Because of its mass, top quark is going to play a unique role in understanding the EW symmetry breaking ⇒ Heavy-Quark physics crucial at the LHC. Pair Two production mechanisms Production q t g t p ) → t ¯ pp (¯ t · · · · · · Single Top q ¯ ¯ g ¯ t t q g t t t b W + p ) → t ¯ b, tq ′ (¯ q ′ ) , tW − pp (¯ W + · · · · · · q ′ ¯ ¯ g W − b q ′ (¯ q ′ ) q ′ (¯ q ′ ) Top quark does not hadronize, since it decays in about 5 · 10 − 25 s (one order of magnitude smaller than the hadronization time) = ⇒ opportunity to study the quark as single particle Spin properties Interaction vertices W + Top quark mass V tb t Decay products: almost exclusively t → W + b ( | V tb | ≫ | V td | , | V ts | ) b HP2.3rd GGI-Florence, September 15, 2010 – p.3/25

  5. Top Quark With a mass of m t = 173 . 1 ± 1 . 3 GeV, the TOP quark (the up-type quark of the third generation) is the heaviest elementary particle produced so far at colliders. Because of its mass, top quark is going to play a unique role in understanding the EW symmetry breaking ⇒ Heavy-Quark physics crucial at the LHC. Pair Two production mechanisms Production q t g t p ) → t ¯ pp (¯ t · · · · · · Single Top q ¯ ¯ g ¯ t t q g t t t b W + p ) → t ¯ b, tq ′ (¯ q ′ ) , tW − pp (¯ W + · · · · · · q ′ ¯ ¯ g W − b q ′ (¯ q ′ ) q ′ (¯ q ′ ) Top quark does not hadronize, since it decays in about 5 · 10 − 25 s (one order of magnitude smaller than the hadronization time) = ⇒ opportunity to study the quark as single particle Spin properties Interaction vertices W + Top quark mass V tb t Decay products: almost exclusively t → W + b ( | V tb | ≫ | V td | , | V ts | ) b HP2.3rd GGI-Florence, September 15, 2010 – p.3/25

  6. Top Quark With a mass of m t = 173 . 1 ± 1 . 3 GeV, the TOP quark (the up-type quark of the third generation) is the heaviest elementary particle produced so far at colliders. Because of its mass, top quark is going to play a unique role in understanding the EW symmetry breaking ⇒ Heavy-Quark physics crucial at the LHC. Pair Two production mechanisms Production q t g t p ) → t ¯ pp (¯ t · · · · · · Single Top q ¯ ¯ g ¯ t t q g t t t b W + p ) → t ¯ b, tq ′ (¯ q ′ ) , tW − pp (¯ W + · · · · · · q ′ ¯ ¯ g W − b q ′ (¯ q ′ ) q ′ (¯ q ′ ) Top quark does not hadronize, since it decays in about 5 · 10 − 25 s (one order of magnitude smaller than the hadronization time) = ⇒ opportunity to study the quark as single particle Spin properties Interaction vertices W + Top quark mass V tb t Decay products: almost exclusively t → W + b ( | V tb | ≫ | V td | , | V ts | ) b HP2.3rd GGI-Florence, September 15, 2010 – p.3/25

  7. Top Quark Tevatron LHC To date the Top quark could be Running since end 2009 produced and studied only at the pp collisions at √ s = 7 (14) TeV Tevatron (discovery 1995) p collisions at √ s = 1 . 96 TeV LHC will be a factory for heavy quarks p ¯ ( L ∼ 10 33 − 10 34 cm − 2 s − 1 , t ¯ t at ∼ 1Hz!) L ∼ 6 . 5 fb − 1 reached in 2009 Even in the first low-luminosity phase (2 O (10 3 ) t ¯ t pairs produced so far years ∼ 1 fb − 1 @ 7 TeV) ∼ O (10 4 ) reg- istered t ¯ t pairs Only recently confirmation of single-t HP2.3rd GGI-Florence, September 15, 2010 – p.3/25

  8. Top Quark @ Tevatron HP2.3rd GGI-Florence, September 15, 2010 – p.4/25

  9. Top Quark @ Tevatron Events measured at Tevatron t ∼ 7 pb [ t → W + bW − ¯ b → lνlνb ¯ p → t ¯ p ¯ b Dilepton ∼ 10 % t → W + bW − ¯ q ′ b ¯ p → t ¯ σ t ¯ p ¯ b → lνq ¯ b Lep+jets ∼ 44 % t → W + bW − ¯ q ′ b ¯ p → t ¯ q ′ q ¯ p ¯ b → q ¯ b All jets ∼ 46 % HP2.3rd GGI-Florence, September 15, 2010 – p.4/25

  10. Top Quark @ Tevatron Events measured at Tevatron t ∼ 7 pb [ t → W + bW − ¯ b → lνlνb ¯ p → t ¯ p ¯ b Dilepton ∼ 10 % t → W + bW − ¯ q ′ b ¯ p → t ¯ σ t ¯ p ¯ b → lνq ¯ b Lep+jets ∼ 44 % t → W + bW − ¯ q ′ b ¯ p → t ¯ q ′ q ¯ p ¯ b → q ¯ b All jets ∼ 46 % 2 high- p T lept, ≥ 2 jets and ME HP2.3rd GGI-Florence, September 15, 2010 – p.4/25

  11. Top Quark @ Tevatron Events measured at Tevatron t ∼ 7 pb [ t → W + bW − ¯ b → lνlνb ¯ p → t ¯ p ¯ b Dilepton ∼ 10 % t → W + bW − ¯ q ′ b ¯ p → t ¯ σ t ¯ p ¯ b → lνq ¯ b Lep+jets ∼ 44 % t → W + bW − ¯ q ′ b ¯ p → t ¯ q ′ q ¯ p ¯ b → q ¯ b All jets ∼ 46 % 2 high- p T lept, ≥ 2 jets and ME 1 isol high- p T lept, ≥ 4 jets and ME HP2.3rd GGI-Florence, September 15, 2010 – p.4/25

  12. Top Quark @ Tevatron Events measured at Tevatron t ∼ 7 pb [ t → W + bW − ¯ b → lνlνb ¯ p → t ¯ p ¯ b Dilepton ∼ 10 % t → W + bW − ¯ q ′ b ¯ p → t ¯ σ t ¯ p ¯ b → lνq ¯ b Lep+jets ∼ 44 % t → W + bW − ¯ q ′ b ¯ p → t ¯ q ′ q ¯ p ¯ b → q ¯ b All jets ∼ 46 % 2 high- p T lept, ≥ 2 jets and ME NO lept, ≥ 6 jets and low ME 1 isol high- p T lept, ≥ 4 jets and ME HP2.3rd GGI-Florence, September 15, 2010 – p.4/25

  13. Top Quark @ Tevatron Events measured at Tevatron t ∼ 7 pb [ t → W + bW − ¯ b → lνlνb ¯ p → t ¯ p ¯ b Dilepton ∼ 10 % t → W + bW − ¯ q ′ b ¯ p → t ¯ σ t ¯ p ¯ b → lνq ¯ b Lep+jets ∼ 44 % t → W + bW − ¯ q ′ b ¯ p → t ¯ q ′ q ¯ p ¯ b → q ¯ b All jets ∼ 46 % 2 high- p T lept, ≥ 2 jets and ME NO lept, ≥ 6 jets and low ME 1 isol high- p T lept, ≥ 4 jets and ME Background Processes q ′ q, l − W + g g q q g q g g g Z, γ q, l + W + q g q ¯ q ¯ ¯ q ¯ W − W+jets QCD Drell-Yan Di-boson HP2.3rd GGI-Florence, September 15, 2010 – p.4/25

  14. Top Quark @ Tevatron Events measured at Tevatron t ∼ 7 pb [ t → W + bW − ¯ b → lνlνb ¯ p → t ¯ p ¯ b Dilepton ∼ 10 % t → W + bW − ¯ q ′ b ¯ p → t ¯ σ t ¯ p ¯ b → lνq ¯ b Lep+jets ∼ 44 % t → W + bW − ¯ q ′ b ¯ p → t ¯ q ′ q ¯ p ¯ b → q ¯ b All jets ∼ 46 % 2 high- p T lept, ≥ 2 jets and ME NO lept, ≥ 6 jets and low ME 1 isol high- p T lept, ≥ 4 jets and ME Background Processes q ′ q, l − W + g g q q g q Reduction of the background: b-tagging crucial g g g Z, γ q, l + W + q g q ¯ q ¯ ¯ q ¯ W − W+jets QCD Drell-Yan Di-boson HP2.3rd GGI-Florence, September 15, 2010 – p.4/25

  15. Top Quark @ Tevatron t = N data − N bkgr Total Cross Section σ t ¯ ǫ L Combination CDF-D0 ( m t = 175 GeV) σ t ¯ t = 7 . 0 ± 0 . 6 pb (∆ σ t ¯ t /σ t ¯ t ∼ 9%) Top-quark Mass 14 Mass of the Top Quark (*Preliminary) CDF-I di-l ± ± 167.4 10.3 4.9 Fundamental parameter of the SM. A precise D0-I di-l ± ± 168.4 12.3 3.6 measurement useful to constraint Higgs mass from * CDF-II di-l ± ± 171.2 2.7 2.9 * D0-II di-l ± ± radiative corrections ( ∆ r ) 174.7 2.9 2.4 CDF-I l+j ± ± 176.1 5.1 5.3 D0-I l+j ± ± 180.1 3.9 3.6 A possible extraction: σ t ¯ t = ⇒ need of precise theoretical * CDF-II l+j ± ± 172.1 0.9 1.3 * determination D0-II l+j ± ± 173.7 0.8 1.6 CDF-I all-j ± ± 186.0 10.0 5.7 ∆ m t ∼ 1 ∆ σ t ¯ t * CDF-II all-j ± ± 174.8 1.7 1.9 m t 5 σ t ¯ * CDF-II trk ± ± 175.3 6.2 3.0 t * Tevatron March’09 ± ± 173.1 0.6 1.1 hep-ex/0903.2503 (stat.) (syst.) ± Combination CDF-D0 χ CDF March’07 2 ± ± /dof = 6.3/10.0 (79%) 12.4 1.5 2.2 0 150 160 170 180 190 200 2 m t = 173 . 1 ± 1 . 3 GeV (0 . 75%) m (GeV/c ) top HP2.3rd GGI-Florence, September 15, 2010 – p.5/25

  16. Top Quark @ Tevatron W helicity fractions F i = B ( t → bW + ( λ W = i )) ( i = − 1 , 0 , 1 ) measured fitting the distribution in θ ∗ (the angle between l + in the W + rest frame and W + direction in the t rest frame) 1 d cos θ ∗ = 3 d Γ 4 F 0 sin 2 θ ∗ + 3 8 F − (1 − cos θ ∗ ) 2 + 3 8 F + (1 + cos θ ∗ ) 2 Γ F 0 + F + + F − = 1 F 0 = 0 . 66 ± 0 . 16 ± 0 . 05 F + = − 0 . 03 ± 0 . 06 ± 0 . 03 Spin correlations measured fitting the double distribution ( θ 1 ( θ 2 ) is the angle between the dir of flight of l 1 ( l 2 ) in the t (¯ t ) rest frame and the t (¯ t ) direction in the t ¯ t rest frame) d 2 N 1 = 1 4 (1 + κ cos θ 1 cos θ 2 ) N d cos θ 1 d cos θ 2 − 0 . 455 < κ < 0 . 865 (68% CL ) A F B = N ( y t > 0) − N ( y t < 0) Forward-Backward Asymmetry N ( y t > 0) + N ( y t < 0) A F B = (19 . 3 ± 6 . 5( sta ) ± 2 . 4( sys ))% HP2.3rd GGI-Florence, September 15, 2010 – p.6/25

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend