top 3 s demo
play

TOP 3 S Demo NCDOT Division of Planning and Programming October 6, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TOP 3 S Demo NCDOT Division of Planning and Programming October 6, 2016 Todays Roadmap 1. Background and Planning Framework 2. Strategic Prioritization Process 3. Programming the STIP 4. TOP 3 S 5. Demos of Existing Products &


  1. TOP 3 S Demo NCDOT Division of Planning and Programming October 6, 2016

  2. Today’s Roadmap 1. Background and Planning Framework 2. Strategic Prioritization Process 3. Programming the STIP 4. TOP 3 S 5. Demos of Existing Products & Applications Transportation

  3. Background and Planning Framework Transportation 3

  4. Background NCDOT funds six modes of transportation Annual Budget of approx. $4.4B* ($1.8B for STI) Key Partners Transportation 4

  5. Transportation Program Life Cycle Long-Range Planning Determine Needs Planning & Prioritization Programming Functions Program Development Fund Projects Project Planning Minimize Impacts Project Design Design and Acquire ROW Construction Build Facility Maintenance & Operations Maintain Facility 5 Transportation

  6. Planning, Prioritization, Programming Framework Long-Range Planning ArcGIS Desktop MS Word • CTPs (30 yr) • CTPs – NCDOT • MTPs (20 yr) • MTPs – MPOs SPOT On!ine Prioritization MS Excel • Scores ArcGIS Online STIP MS Access ArcGIS Desktop ArcGIS Online Transportation 6

  7. Strategic Prioritization Process Transportation 7

  8. Strategic Transportation Investments (STI) Law Prioritizes Capital Expenditures across all modes (Mobility/Expansion + Modernization) Needs-based Directly ties funding to Prioritization Results Workgroup Transportation 8

  9. How STI Works 40% of Funds 30% of Funds 30% of Funds Estimated $18B in Funds for SFY 2018-2027 Statewide Mobility Focus  Address Regional Impact Significant Congestion and Bottlenecks Focus  Improve Division Needs • Selection based on Connectivity within 100% Data Regions Focus  Address Local • Projects Programmed • Selection based on prior to Local Input Needs 70% Data & 30% Local Ranking • Selection based on 50% Input Data & 50% Local Input • Funding based on • Funding based on equal population within share for each Division (14) Region (7) = ~$39M / yr Transportation 9

  10. Transportation regions & divisions 10

  11. Eligibility Definitions Mode Statewide Mobility Regional Impact Division Needs • Interstates (existing & future) • NHS routes (July 1, 2012) • STRAHNET Highway • ADHS Routes Other US and NC Routes All County (SR) Routes • Uncompleted Intrastate projects • Designated Toll Facilities Large Commercial Service Other Commercial Service All Airports without Aviation Airports ($500K cap) Airports not in Statewide Commercial Service ($18.5M ($300K cap) cap) Bicycle- N/A N/A All projects ($0 state funds) Pedestrian Public Service spanning two or more All other service, including N/A Transportation counties (10% cap) terminals and stations Ferry N/A Ferry expansion Replacement vessels Freight Capacity Service on Rail service spanning two or Rail service not included on Rail Class I Railroad Corridors more counties not Statewide Statewide or Regional Transportation 11

  12. 3-Year Prioritization & STIP Cycle 2017 2016 Fall Winter Spring Summer P4.0 Division Needs End P4.0 Draft 2018 ‐ P4.0 Final 2018 ‐ Local Input Point P4.0 2027 STIP Released 2027 STIP Released Assignment BOT Approves Project Start P5.0 Workgroup P5.0 Workgroup P5.0 Submittal Criteria/Weights 2017 2018 Fall Winter Spring Summer Release Quant. Regional Impact Release Regional Scores & Project Data Review and Scoring Local Input Point Total Scores & Statewide Assignment Funded Projects Funded Projects Local Input Methodologies Submitted and Approved 2018 2019 Fall Winter Spring Summer Division Needs Local End P5.0 Draft 2020 ‐ P5.0 Final 2020 ‐ 2029 Input Point P5.0 2029 STIP Released STIP Approved Assignment

  13. Workgroup Purpose GS 136-189.11 (h): the Department shall endeavor to continually improve the methodology and criteria used to score highway and non-highway projects pursuant to this Article, including the use of normalization techniques, and methods to strengthen the data collection process. The Department is directed to continue the use of a Workgroup process to develop improvements to the prioritization process. Purpose: Provide recommendations to NCDOT on prioritization criteria, weights, and scoring process for all modes Transportation 13

  14. Highway Scoring – Quantitative Criteria Criteria Existing Project Benefits Conditions (Future Conditions) - Congestion (Volume/Capacity + Volume) - Benefit/Cost (Travel Time Savings + Safety Benefits / Cost to NCDOT) - Safety Score (Critical Crash Rates, Density, Severity) - Economic Competitiveness (Jobs, Change in County Economy) - Accessibility / Connectivity (County Economic Indicator, Improve Mobility) - Freight (Truck Volumes, STRAHNet/Future Interstate, Freight Terminals) - Multimodal (Passenger Terminals) - Lane Width (Existing Width vs. Standard Width) - Shoulder Width (Existing Width vs. Standard Width) - Pavement Score (Pavement Condition Rating) Transportation

  15. P4.0 Highway Scoring Criteria & Weights QUANTITATIVE LOCAL INPUT Funding Category Data Division MPO/RPO Congestion = 30% Benefit-Cost = 25% Statewide Safety = 15% 100% -- -- Mobility Economic Comp. = 10% Freight = 15% Multimodal = 5% Congestion = 20% Benefit-Cost = 20% Regional 70% 15% 15% Safety = 10% Impact Accessibility/Connectivity = 10% Freight = 10% Congestion = 15% Benefit-Cost = 15% Division 50% 25% 25% Safety = 10% Needs Accessibility/Connectivity = 5% Freight = 5% Transportation 15

  16. P4.0 Scoring Process - Highways Travel Time Savings - Corridor Statewide Mobility Projects (TPB / PB) TREDIS (ERD- Group) Travel Time Design Concepts - Savings - Intersection, Intersection, Interchange, Interchange, Superstreet, Superstreet, Operational Operational Projects (CMT) Projects (CMT) Review of Mapping, Costs (TIP Unit, Review of Projects from Project Description, Feasibility Studies, MPO, RPO, and SPOT Updates Data as NEPA Perspective / Cross-Section, and Score Projects NCTA, ITS & Division Data Review Needed Logical Termini (PDEA) Attributes (SPOT, GIS Signals Unit) Unit) Safety Scores and Crash Data - Intersection, Interchange, Projects (Traffic Safety Unit) All Other Data (SPOT, GIS Unit, SPOT On!ine) Orange – NCDOT project review Green – Acquire scoring inputs/data Yellow – MPO, RPO, & Division data review Blue – Score projects Transportation

  17. Scoring Process • Data reviewed Projects Submitted • Quantitative scores calculated Statewide Mobility • Projects programmed Regional Impact based on quant. score • Local input points Division Needs assigned • Total scores calculated • Local input points • Projects programmed assigned • Total scores calculated • Projects programmed Transportation 17

  18. Transportation Programming the STIP

  19. State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) STIP identifies funding and scheduling of projects in NCDOT’s capital program 10 Year Program (currently 2016-2025) • 1st Five Years is “Delivery STIP” – committed projects from prioritization perspective • 2nd Five Years is “Developmental STIP” – projects in early scoping and environmental development stage Updated every 2 years Current STIP contains over $20 Billion of projects • Highway, non-highway, bridges, safety, Interstate Maintenance, CMAQ Transportation 19

  20. STIP Development Priority Ranking & Normalization Funding Category Committed Allocations Projects STIP Project STI Law Development Provisions Time Transportation 20

  21. Scheduling Impacts to Programming • Regardless of priority, projects cannot be programmed for Right of Way (ROW) or Construction prior to completion of planning/environmental (NEPA) and design work • A lower scoring project that can be delivered soon may get scheduled prior to a higher ranking project that still needs extensive work Transportation 21

  22. STI Legislation Funding Caps and Restrictions Caps which Impact Programming: • Statewide Mobility corridor cap • Funding limits on airport projects in all categories • Funding limits on Regional Impact transit projects • Funding limit on light rail and commuter rail projects • Prohibition on using state funds to match federal-aid for independent bicycle and pedestrian projects Transportation 22

  23. Types of Projects in the STIP Statewide Statewide Mobility Mobility Projects Projects Exempt Exempt programs programs Regional Regional and and Impact Impact transition transition Projects Projects projects projects STIP STIP Alternate Alternate Division Division Criteria Criteria Needs Needs Projects Projects Projects Projects Transportation 23

  24. TOP 3 S Transportation 24

  25. Transportation On!ine Planning, Prioritization & Programming System Project Data Repository (Spatial and Tabular) Ultimately includes all projects Initial focus on projects from Long-range Plans, evaluated through Prioritization Process, and Programmed in STIP Different Modules with varying functionality (based on use) Connects to multiple data sources & applications Transportation 25

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend