tolerance volume
play

Tolerance Volume Manish Mandad David Cohen-Steiner Pierre Alliez - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Isotopic Approximation within a Tolerance Volume Manish Mandad David Cohen-Steiner Pierre Alliez Inria Sophia Antipolis - 1 Goals and Motivation - 2 Goals and Motivation Input: Tolerance volume of a surface geometry - 3 Goals and


  1. Isotopic Approximation within a Tolerance Volume Manish Mandad David Cohen-Steiner Pierre Alliez Inria Sophia Antipolis - 1

  2. Goals and Motivation - 2

  3. Goals and Motivation • Input: • Tolerance volume of a surface geometry - 3

  4. Goals and Motivation • Input: • Tolerance volume of a surface geometry • Output: • Surface triangle mesh • Properties:  Within tolerance volume Motivation: control global approximation error - 4

  5. Goals and Motivation • Input: • Tolerance volume of a surface geometry • Output: • Surface triangle mesh • Properties:  Within tolerance volume  Intersection free Motivation: simulation, machining, printing etc. - 5

  6. Goals and Motivation • Input: • Tolerance volume of a surface geometry • Output: • Surface triangle mesh • Properties:  Within tolerance volume  Intersection free  Low vertex count Motivation: get an approximated mesh, low polygon count - 6

  7. Goals and Motivation A Condition for Isotopic Approximation [Chazal, Cohen-Steiner 04] Constructive algorithm for this theoretical result - 7

  8. Goals and Motivation A Condition for Isotopic Approximation [Chazal, Cohen-Steiner 04] ∂Ω 1 Ω : Topological thickening of S Ω ∂Ω 2 - 8

  9. Goals and Motivation A Condition for Isotopic Approximation [Chazal, Cohen-Steiner 04] Ω : Topological thickening of S Ω If • S’ is included and separates sides of Ω , S’ • S’ is connected and • Genus of S’ does not exceed genus of S Then, S’ and S are isotopic. - 9

  10. Related Work - 10

  11. Related Work Simplification Envelopes Cohen et al. 1996 Multiresolution decimation based on global error Ciampalini et al. 1997 Adaptively Sampled Distance Fields Frisken et al. 2000 Zelinka – Garland Permission Grids: Practical, Error-Bounded 2002 Simplification Intersection Free Simplification Gumhold et al. 2003 GPU-based Tolerance Volumes for Mesh Botsch et al. 2004 Processing Borouchaki – Frey Simplification of surface mesh using Hausdorff 2005 envelope - 11

  12. Related Work Simplification Envelopes [Cohen et al. 96] - 12

  13. Related Work Simplification Envelopes [Cohen et al. 96] ― Very good for simple geometry ― Input dependent ― Tolerance hinders simplification - 13

  14. Overview Sampling Refinement Tolerance Volume Ω Simplification Output - 14

  15. Algorithm - 15

  16. Algorithm (Initialization) • S: Point sample of ∂Ω with labels f = -1 f = +1 σ radii balls at S cover ∂Ω Initialization - 16

  17. Algorithm (Initialization) • S: Point sample of ∂Ω with labels • Delaunay Triangulation T of loose bounding-box +1 +1 f = -1 f = +1 f = +1 +1 +1 Initialization - 17

  18. Algorithm (Initialization) • S: Point sample of ∂Ω with labels • Delaunay Triangulation T of loose bounding-box +1 +1 f = -1 f T f = +1 f = +1 +1 +1 Initialization - 18

  19. Algorithm (Initialization) • S: Point sample of ∂Ω with labels • Delaunay Triangulation T of loose bounding-box +1 +1 f = -1 Error Error s µ(s)=|f(s) µ(s)=|f s) – f T (s (s)| )| f T f = +1 f = +1 +1 +1 Initialization - 19

  20. Algorithm (coarse-to-fine) • S: Point sample of ∂Ω with labels • Delaunay Triangulation T of loose bounding-box • While (S not classified) • Insert Steiner point to T Sample point (s ∈ S) with maximum error Refinement - 20

  21. Algorithm (coarse-to-fine) • S: Point sample of ∂Ω with labels • Delaunay Triangulation T of loose bounding-box • While (S not classified) • Insert Steiner point to T f = -1 f T = 0 Zero-set f = +1 f = +1 Refinement - 21

  22. Algorithm (coarse-to-fine) • S: Point sample of ∂Ω with labels • Delaunay Triangulation T of loose bounding-box • While (S not classified) • Insert Steiner point to T Refinement - 22

  23. Algorithm (coarse-to-fine) • S: Point sample of ∂Ω with labels • Delaunay Triangulation T of loose bounding-box • While (S not classified) • Insert Steiner point to T Refinement - 23

  24. Algorithm (coarse-to-fine) • S: Point sample of ∂Ω with labels • Delaunay Triangulation T of loose bounding-box • While (S not classified) • Insert Steiner point to T Refinement - 24

  25. Algorithm (coarse-to-fine) • S: Point sample of ∂Ω with labels • Delaunay Triangulation T of loose bounding-box • While (S not classified) • Insert Steiner point to T Boundary of simplicial tolerance (∂ Ɣ ) Refinement - 25

  26. Algorithm (coarse-to-fine) • S: Point sample of ∂Ω with labels • Delaunay Triangulation T of loose bounding-box • While (S not classified) • Insert Steiner point to T Extension to 3D? Guarantees? Refinement - 26

  27. Refinement (conditions) Zero set may cross ∂Ω due to flat tetrahedra - 27

  28. Refinement (conditions) Zero set may cross ∂Ω due to flat tetrahedra Ensure interpolated function is Lipschitz - 28

  29. Refinement (conditions) Zero set may cross ∂Ω due to flat tetrahedra Ensure interpolated function is Lipschitz • μ(s) < 1 – α, given some α ∈ [0, 1] μ(s) < 1 Classify samples with a margin - 28

  30. Refinement (conditions) Zero set may cross ∂Ω due to flat tetrahedra Ensure interpolated function is Lipschitz • μ(s) < 1 – α, given some α ∈ [0, 1] • h > 2σ/α - 29

  31. Refinement (conditions) What else do we need to fix ? - 30

  32. Refinement (conditions) • Misoriented elements - 31

  33. Refinement (conditions) • Misoriented elements • Interpolated function should classify well local geometry f T defined on Δ ABC should classify well samples of S nearest (orange) to a shrunk triangle (green) - 32

  34. Refinement (conditions) S not classified : μ( s)>1 { • μ (s) ) ≥ 1 – α me α ∈ [0;1 given ven some [0;1] • h h ≤ 2 σ / α • f does f does not cla ot classifies ifies local ge cal geometry etry } - 33

  35. Algorithm (fine-to-coarse) • S: Point sample of ∂Ω with labels • Delaunay Triangulation T of loose bounding-box • While (S not classified) • Insert Steiner point to T • Collapse edges of ∂ Ɣ Simplification - 34

  36. Simplification (conditions) - 36

  37. Simplification (conditions) • Validity of Triangulation Link condition • Combinatorial Topology [Dey et al . 98] • Valid embedding – Visibility kernel of 1-ring [Lee-Preparata 79] Edge PQ to be Valid embedding collapsed kernel - 37

  38. Simplification (conditions) • Validity of Triangulation • Combinatorial Topology [Dey et al . 98] • Valid embedding – Visibility kernel of 1-ring [Lee-Preparata 79] Edge PQ to be Valid embedding collapsed kernel - 38

  39. Simplification (conditions) • Validity of Triangulation • Combinatorial Topology [Dey et al. 98] • Valid embedding – Visibility kernel of 1-ring [Lee-Preparata 79] • Preserve classification of S – Non convex problem Edge PQ to be Valid embedding Region that preserve collapsed kernel classification of S - 39

  40. Simplification (conditions) • Validity of Triangulation • Combinatorial Topology [Dey et al. 98] • Valid embedding – Visibility kernel of 1-ring [Lee-Preparata 79] • Preserve classification of S – Non convex problem • Optimal location : Minimizes sum of squared distances between target vertex and 2-ring planes - 40

  41. Simplification (conditions) • Validity of Triangulation • Combinatorial Topology [Dey et al. 98] • Valid embedding – Visibility kernel of 1-ring [Lee-Preparata 79] • Preserve classification of S – Non convex problem • Optimal location : Minimizes sum of squared distances between target vertex and 2-ring planes • Faithful normals (same as in refinement) - 42

  42. Algorithm (fine-to-coarse) • S: Point sample of ∂Ω with labels • Delaunay Triangulation T of loose bounding-box • While (S not classified) • Insert Steiner point to T • Collapse edges of ∂ Ɣ Simplification - 40

  43. Algorithm (fine-to-coarse) • S: Point sample of ∂Ω with labels • Delaunay Triangulation T of loose bounding-box • While (S not classified) • Insert Steiner point to T • Collapse edges of ∂ Ɣ Simplification - 41

  44. Algorithm (fine-to-coarse) • S: Point sample of ∂Ω with labels • Delaunay Triangulation T of loose bounding-box • While (S not classified) • Insert Steiner point to T • Collapse edges of ∂ Ɣ Simplification - 42

  45. Algorithm (fine-to-coarse) • S: Point sample of ∂Ω with labels • Delaunay Triangulation T of loose bounding-box • While (S not classified) • Insert Steiner point to T • Collapse edges of ∂ Ɣ • Insert Z in T Simplification - 43

  46. Algorithm (fine-to-coarse) • S: Point sample of ∂Ω with labels • Delaunay Triangulation T of loose bounding-box • While (S not classified) • Insert Steiner point to T • Collapse edges of ∂ Ɣ • Insert Z in T • Collapse edges of Z Simplification - 44

  47. Algorithm (fine-to-coarse) • S: Point sample of ∂Ω with labels • Delaunay Triangulation T of loose bounding-box • While (S not classified) • Insert Steiner point to T • Collapse edges of ∂ Ɣ • Insert Z in T • Collapse edges of Z Simplification - 45

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend