to renovate and preserve or replace the real dilemma 21
play

To Renovate and Preserve or Replace The Real Dilemma... 21 st - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

UNC Greensboro Quad Housing 21 st Century Housing To Renovate and Preserve or Replace The Real Dilemma... 21 st Century Housing To Renovate and Preserve or Replace The Real Dilemma... UNC Greensboro Quad Housing Presented By Fred A.


  1. UNC Greensboro Quad Housing 21 st Century Housing To Renovate and Preserve or Replace The Real Dilemma...

  2. 21 st Century Housing To Renovate and Preserve or Replace The Real Dilemma...

  3. UNC Greensboro Quad Housing Presented By  Fred A. Patrick, AIA, PE, LEED AP – UNC Greensboro – Director of Facilities Design and Construction  Johnny Rankin, LEED AP BD+C – Balfour Beatty Construction – Executive Vice President Raleigh Operations  Kenn Bullock, RLA, ASLA – Woolpert Design – Vice President and National Practice Leader Higher Education UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  4. Important Project Facts CHANGE 1 CONTRACT Seven Building 239,257/SF Renovation CONTRACTS ORDERS / SUBTOTAL FEE AMENDMENTS Single Prime 2 $3,367,796 $45,571,059 $48,938,855 Design Period 8 Months Contract 14 Actual Change 4.5% $2,194,571 $0 Orders 3 Construction Period 14 Months Plumbing $0 $0 $0 Contract HVAC Contract $0 $0 $0 4 603 Total Beds Included In Renovation Electrical $0 $0 $0 Contract Elevator Contract $0 $0 $0 5 $205/SF Renovation Cost Other Contract(s) $0 $0 $0 Design Contract $4,205,215 $50,702 $4,255,917 Owner Costs N/A N/A $1,343,923 6 $81,159 Per Bed Cost Total Contract $7,573,011 $45,621,761 $54,538,695 UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  5. Design Team  Team was a cross functional team of design and engineering firms. 1. UNC Greensboro Facilities & Housing 2. Balfour Beatty Construction 3. Woolpert Design 4. SKA Consulting Engineers, Inc. 5. Stanford White 6. Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + Company  The Design Team’s renovation effort was a focused, comprehensive process to preserve the integrity of the quad while providing “state -of-the- art” living/learning experiences. UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  6. University Driven Directives  The initial directive for the renovation of the Quad Housing came from the 2007 Campus Master Plan…  The public debate over renovation verses new construction…  Preserve existing architectural  The dormitories at the Quad have details & design elements. space-shaping significance which creates a sense of place and  Preserve Alumni Heritage of the enhances the character of the Quad Housing Project for future campus. donations.  Strive to preserve important  Students expectations demand 21 st buildings, campus wide. Century facilities.  Plan for phasing of all improvement  Obtain Administration & Chancellor projects. buy-in for the renovation process. UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  7. What The Conditions Were Like Dated and Tired Residential Housing and Spaces UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  8. What The Conditions Were Like 1968 UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  9. What The Conditions Were Like 2012 UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  10. As-Built Information and Laser Scanning  Utilized laser scanning for determining existing conditions… 1. Obtains fast, accurate results of as-built information. 2. Provides complete measurement data of Scanning To Model Coordination the entire surface of the interior and exterior spaces and surfaces. 3. Incorporates the information into CAD and BIM models where no model exists. 4. Develops data of the whole so assemblies can be digitally put together in BIM, revealing inaccuracies and interferences. UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  11. As-Built Laser Scanning and BIM As-Built Laser Scan Model and BIM Information Generation UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  12. Project Goals  Key project goals included: 1. Project to be delivered on time and within budget. 2. Design of the project was to be a collaboration between the design team, the UNCG Facilities team and the user. 3. Re-program the space to obtain the maximum number of beds possible. 4. Design for systems and technology to meet the 21 st Century student needs. 5. Work toward the highest LEED accreditation standard. UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  13. Overall Design Philosophy  The Design Team’s key directive was to exceed UNCG’s expectations: 1. Improve the aesthetic and functional qualities of the quad housing area. 2. Achieve LEED Gold. 3. Improve the environmental performance of the spaces. 4. Preserve the historic landscape. 5. Preserve the historical image of the quad area buildings. 6. Provide phasing where necessary. 7. Support the 2007 Master Plan directives. UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  14. Detailed Design Philosophy  Preservation of the historical character while upgrading the facilities.  Preservation of the historic tree scape of the historical quad.  Policy adherence of “re - use vs. replacement” .  Adaptive re-use of the access to the central quadrangle.  Connectivity of the quad housing to the entire campus. UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  15. Design Challenges  Lower floor heights to work with.  Limited space for new HVAC systems.  The existence of hazardous materials within the buildings.  The challenge of the existing solid masonry wall construction of the buildings.  Accessibility into and out of the existing structures.  The presence of a lot of unknown conditions that affected both cost and schedule.  The schedule for placing “heads upon beds” within a tight time frame. UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  16. Design Decisions  Replacement of the existing building parapets.  Raising of the height of the parlors.  Opening up of the portal through Shaw Hall.  Total project roof replacements with TPO roof membranes and aluminum coping.  Total project HVAC replacements.  Updating the Chiller piping system while the quad core was already torn up during construction.  Upgrade the stormwater performance of the entire project UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  17. Sustainable Design Philosophy  Approach included the utilization of the 3- P’s of sustainability for the design. – People/Planet/Profit  Key points include: 1. Improvement of the quality of student life. 2. Include instructional facilities in the living environment. 3. Reuse the existing buildings to improve environmental performance and pollution reduction. 4. Provide infrastructure improvements to reduced operating costs (actual 42% water and 28% energy savings). UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  18. Detailed Site Design Concept Quad Site Redesign Concept Ideas UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  19. Six-Pack Floor Plans Proposed Six Pack Dormitory Room Arrangement Existing Six Pack Dormitory Room Arrangement UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  20. Six-Pack Design Concept Typical Six Pack Internal Quad Elevation With Parlors UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  21. Six-Pack Parlor Concepts Parlor Plaza Conceptual Studies UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  22. Six-Pack Design Concepts Parlor Conceptual Development Options UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  23. Shaw Hall Floor Plans Existing Shaw Hall Proposed Shaw Hall UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  24. Shaw Hall Design Concepts Shaw Hall Living/Learning Component UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  25. Sustainability Approach Key Aspects Achieved 22 of 26 points for a sustainable site development. 1 2 36% of building materials came from 500 mile radius. 100 % of multi-occupant spaces were designed with own 3 thermal control. 4 Exceeded CO2 ranges as defined by ASHRAE 55-2004. Project pioneered multi-building GBCI certifications 5 UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  26. Building Envelope Renovation Preserve the character of the historical façade in design. 1 Remove existing cornice and replace with GRFC cornice 2 applications. Remove punched windows and replace with aluminum, 3 single hung with low-e insulated glass and screens. Install new steel head flashing at each building opening and 4 install new jamb and sill membrane flashing and stainless steel sill pans and stile aluminum doors. UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  27. Building Envelope Renovation Lightweight concrete roof insulation with fleeceback TPO 5 roof membrane replacement and aluminum coping. Opening of the portal through Shaw Hall increasing 6 pedestrian & air circulation in core. Inclusion of continuous band of storefront windows in 7 parlors that are the same as the individual rooms. Connectivity of new additions at Shaw via “hyphens” and 8 clad with a stone buffer to the existing building. UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

  28. Building Envelope Renovation UNC Greensboro Quad Housing | Preservation/Renovation vs. Replacement

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend