to Phase 3 SP Catchment June 2019 The SPFS Alternative Proposal is - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

to phase 3 sp catchment
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

to Phase 3 SP Catchment June 2019 The SPFS Alternative Proposal is - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Proposed Alternative to Phase 3 SP Catchment June 2019 The SPFS Alternative Proposal is District focused. It alleviates overcrowding to the same extent. District staff have indicated that they can redraw boundaries and address over capacity


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Proposed Alternative to Phase 3 SP Catchment

June 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The SPFS Alternative Proposal is District focused. It alleviates overcrowding to the same extent.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What’s the “domino effect”

District staff have indicated that they can redraw boundaries and address over capacity in schools and Maintain South Park Family School’s District-wide catchment

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Agenda

  • 1. Review of proposed boundaries
  • 2. Limitations of the proposed SP

catchment

  • 3. Addressing District concerns
  • 4. Benefits of the SPFS proposal
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Proposed Boundaries

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

James Bay

  • Increase in catchment

size is managed by transfers into SPFS

  • 40 students in. 40 out.
  • Prop

Proposed enr enrolment re remain ins = = 18 182 2 (of (of 19 196) 6)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Sir James Douglas

  • Has adequate space
  • Remains right sized by

shifting students to MJ/Willows

  • Alleviates GJ with SPFS

support

  • Proj

Project cted enr enrolment = = 426 426 (of (of 460 460)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Margaret Jenkins

  • Balances capacity more

equitably

  • Requires shifting of some

students into Willows

  • Vic High to Oak Bay High

Family

  • Proj

Project cted enr enrolment = = 448 448-462 462

slide-10
SLIDE 10

SPFS PAC Proposed Targeted Capacity at Neighbourhood Schools

slide-11
SLIDE 11

SD 61 Phase 3 Proposed Targeted Capacity

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Potential Adjustments to the North to Ensure a “Right Sized” SP Catchment

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Capacity at Neighbourhood Schools with “Right Sized” SP Catchment (North Boundary)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Potential Adjustments to the SP Eastern Boundary to Create a “Right Sized” SP Catchment

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Capacity at Neighbourhood Schools with “Right Sized” SP Catchment (East Boundary)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Why will it be hard to “right size” a SP catchment?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

City of Victoria Official Community Plan: CBD & Inner Harbour/Legislative

slide-18
SLIDE 18

City of Victoria Official Community Plan: Distribution of Residential and Urban in SP Catchment

slide-19
SLIDE 19

City of Victoria Official Community Plan: Lack of Residential Areas within a “Right Sized” SP Catchment

slide-20
SLIDE 20

City of Victoria Official Community Plan: Distribution of Core and Traditional Residential in SJD Catchment

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Capacity at Neighbourhood Schools with “Right Sized” SP Catchment (East Boundary)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Capacity at Neighbourhood Schools with “Right Sized” SP Catchment (North Boundary)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Capacity at Neighbourhood Schools with SPFS PAC Proposed Boundaries

slide-24
SLIDE 24

SPFS is a popular program with increasing demand for enrolment

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Addressing District Concerns

  • It created long walking distances
  • Limited capacity for increased

growth

  • Did not address capacity at GJ
  • Limited the ability for SJD to assume

Rockland area

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Option 2 Option 1

slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Walking Distances

  • Com

Comparable to to Di Distr strict and nd curr current ca catch tchment

  • Long

Longest fr from dow downtown core core

  • Bus

Bus rou

  • utes

s ava vail ilable

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Walking Distances

  • Imp

Improved for for ma many ny fam famil ilie ies s who ho now now go go to to SJD JD

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Addressing District Concerns

  • It created long walking distances
  • Limited capacity for increased

growth

  • Did not address capacity at GJ
  • Limited the ability for SJD to assume

Rockland area

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • Hard to “right size” SP

catchment

  • Ends SPFS parent participation

program

  • Does not shift students more

equitably into under enrolled schools

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Benefits of the SPFS Proposal

  • Balances enrolment
  • Shifts students equitably
  • 81-101 additional spaces
  • Educational aspirations of the

community maintained

slide-33
SLIDE 33

South Park Family School Can Maintain its District-Wide Access