Tipping the Scales: Is ART adding pounds to our patients? Matthew - - PDF document

tipping the scales is art adding pounds to our patients
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Tipping the Scales: Is ART adding pounds to our patients? Matthew - - PDF document

12/13/19 Tipping the Scales: Is ART adding pounds to our patients? Matthew D. Hickey, MD 1 Conflict of Interest I have no disclosures 2 1 12/13/19 1. Recent trends in weight gain 2. Weight gain after ART start and ART switch 3. Two


slide-1
SLIDE 1

12/13/19 1

Tipping the Scales: Is ART adding pounds to

  • ur patients?

Matthew D. Hickey, MD 1

Conflict of Interest

  • I have no disclosures

2

slide-2
SLIDE 2

12/13/19 2

Roadmap

  • 1. Recent trends in weight gain
  • 2. Weight gain after ART start and

ART switch

  • 3. Two RCTs of DTG +/- TAF in Sub-

Saharan Africa

  • 4. RCT data on bictegravir,

dolutegravir, and TAF

  • 5. Health consequences of weight

gain and possible mechanisms

3

First, a case (Audience Response)

  • 37 year old man with a recent diagnosis of HIV (CD4 280, VL 20,000)

who is presenting to establish care.

  • He also has hypertension and takes hydrochlorothiazide “most of the

time”. HLA-B*5701 is negative.

  • Prior to seeing you, he read on the internet that HIV medications could

make him gain weight and tells you that he absolutely wants to avoid weight gain.

  • What do you start?
  • A. DTG + TAF/FTC
  • B. DTG + TDF/FTC
  • C. DTG/3TC/ABC
  • D. BIC/TAF/FTC
  • E. DRV/c/TAF/FTC

4

slide-3
SLIDE 3

12/13/19 3

Weight increasing at ART start

  • Over time, BMI at ART start has

increased at rate faster than general US population

  • Prevalence of obesity:
  • PLHIV: 9% (1998) -> 18% (2010)
  • US Pop: 22% (1998) -> 27% (2010)

Koethe et al. AIDS Res Human Retrov. 2016

5

  • Significant weight gain after starting ART
  • Especially seen in men and non-white

women

  • Some weight gain due to ‘return to health’
  • 18% treatment-emergent obesity
  • Key questions:
  • How much of this weight gain is ‘return to

health’?

  • Does ART cause weight gain beyond ‘return

to health’?

  • Do some ART drugs cause more weight gain

than others?

Koethe et al. AIDS Res Human Retrov. 2016

Weight gain after ART start

6

slide-4
SLIDE 4

12/13/19 4

Weight gain among tr trea eatmen tment t naïv aïve patients starting ART

7

Unexpected finding: Weight gain with RAL vs boosted-PI

  • Randomized trial to see if

raltegravir had improved metabolic profile compared to protease inhibitors

  • Surprisingly, weight gain worse

with RAL, even when excluding baseline underweight

  • More weight gain among:
  • Low CD4 – return to health?
  • Black people, high viral load

Risk for severe weight gain (>10% body weight)

Bhagwat et al. CROI 2017 Oral #695.

Slide credit: John R Koethe, CROI 2019

Factor Adjusted Odds Ratio 95% CI p-value ATV/r vs. RAL 0.72 (0.53 to 0.99) p=0.04 DRV/r vs. RAL 0.73 (0.53 to 0.99) p=0.04 Black (non-Hispanic) 1.55 (1.10 to 2.20) p=0.01 Baseline log10 HIV-RNA 2.52 (2.00 to 3.16) p<0.0001 Baseline CD4 count (100 cells/uL) 0.78 (1.18 to 1.39) p<0.0001

8

slide-5
SLIDE 5

12/13/19 5

Greater weight gain with INSTI start

Bourgi et al. CROI 2019 Poster #670.

21,866 ART-naïve patients starting ART in US/Canada from 2007-2016

9

Weight gain among treatment experience ced patients switching to an INSTI

10

slide-6
SLIDE 6

12/13/19 6

Slide credit: John R Koethe, CROI 2019

Greater weight gain with switch to INSTI

  • Norwood. JAIDS. 2017
  • Single center in southern US (n=495)
  • Patients virally suppressed on EFV/TDF/FTC prior to switch
  • Weight gain greatest after switch to DTG/ABC/3TC

Integrase inhibitor regimens versus EFV/TDF/FTC DTG/ABC/3TC versus EFV/TDF/FTC Weight Change (kg) Weight Change (kg) Time from Regimen Switch (months) Time from Regimen Switch (months) Integrase Inhibitor EFV/TDF/FTC DTG/ABC/3TC EFV/TDF/FTC

11

Weight gain after switch to DTG from boosted protease inhibitor (NICE-022)

Waters, HIV Drug Therapy 2018 #102

Randomized trial of patients with high cardiovascular risk on boosted PI (n=415) who were switched to:

  • DTG immediate started at week 0
  • DTG delayed started at week 48

0.5 1 1.5 2 48 96 Weight changes (kg) Weeks

Weight gain after switch from boosted-PI to dolutegravir

DTG delayed DTG immediate +0.82 kg + . 2 5 k g +0.03 kg +0.98 kg DTG Switch DTG Switch

12

slide-7
SLIDE 7

12/13/19 7

  • Lake. CROI 2019. Poster 669.
  • Among patients suppressed

at time of switch to INSTI, weight stable pre-switch and increased post-switch (n=691)

  • Weight gain greatest with

switch to dolutegravir

  • Greater weight gain among

women, black people, older people

Weight increases after switch to INSTI

13

  • Two randomized trials of

Dolutegravir vs standard

  • f care (EFV/TDF/FTC) in

treatment naïve patients

  • ADVANCE in South Africa
  • NAMSAL in Cameroon

Randomized Trials of DTG in Sub-Saharan Africa

  • Venter. NEJM. 2019. NAMSAL ANRS 12313 Study Group. NEJM. 2019.

14

slide-8
SLIDE 8

12/13/19 8

ADVANCE Study: DTG vs EFV in South Africa

  • Randomized trial in treatment

naïve patients (n=1,053) comparing:

  • EFV + TDF/FTC (n=351)
  • DTG + TDF/FTC (n=351)
  • DTG + TAF/FTC (n=351)
  • Over half of participants were

women

  • Overall, high rates of viral

suppression

TAF/FTC+DTG, 84% TDF/FTC+DTG, 85% TDF/FTC/EFV, 79% 4 12 24 36 48 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48

Participants (%) Week

  • 1. Hill. IAS 2019. Abstr MOAX0102LB. 2. Venter. NEJM. 2019.

15

Greater weight gain with DTG + TAF/FTC

  • 1. Hill. IAS 2019. Abstr MOAX0102LB. 2. Venter. NEJM. 2019.

TAF/FTC+DTG TDF/FTC+DTG TDF/FTC/EFV Mean change in weight (kg) Week 48 +6 kg +3 kg +1 kg Week 96 +8 kg +5 kg +2 kg Treatment-emergent overweight, n (%) Week 48 23% 14% 9% Week 96 25% 13% 11% Treatment-emergent obesity, n (%) Week 48 14% 7% 6% Week 96 19% 8% 4%

Highly significant differences in weight change between arms, p<0.001 Clinical obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). TAF/FTC+DTG higher than other 2 groups (p<0.01)

16

slide-9
SLIDE 9

12/13/19 9

TAF/FTC+DTG (n=351) TDF/FTC+DTG (n=351) TDF/FTC/EFV (n=351) Underweight, kg (% change) Week 48 +4.8 (9%) +2.6 (5%) +3.1 (6%) Week 96 +4.5 (8%) +4.0 (8%) +3.2 (6%) Normal, kg (% change) Week 48 +5.6 (9%) +3.0 (5%) +1.1 (2%) Week 96 +8.1 (13%) +3.9 (6%) +2.2 (4%) Overweight, kg (% change) Week 48 +7.0 (9%) +3.6 (5%) +1.0 (1%) Week 96 +9.0 (12%) +4.6 (6%) +1.0 (1%) Obese, kg (% change) Week 48 +4.4 (5%) +3.2 (4%) 0.9 (1%) Week 96 +4.6 (5%) +6.3 (7%) +2.6 (3%)

  • McCann. European AIDS Conference 2019. Abstr. PS3/3.

Not just ‘return to health’: weight gain differences greatest in baseline normal and overweight BMI

17

Women gained more weight than men

Men Women

  • 1. Hill. IAS 2019. Abstr MOAX0102LB. 2. Venter. NEJM. 2019.

Similar results when excluding those with GI adverse events

18

slide-10
SLIDE 10

12/13/19 10

Week 48 Week 96

TAF/FTC+DTG (n=158) TDF/FTC+DTG (n=156) TDF/FTC/EFV (n=137) TAF/FTC+DTG (n=60) TDF/FTC+DTG (n=53) TDF/FTC/EFV (n=48)

  • 1. Hill. IAS 2019. Abstr MOAX0102LB. 2. Venter. NEJM. 2019.

Generalized increase in body fat

Women

19

TAF/FTC+DTG (n=351) TDF/FTC+DTG (n=351) TDF/FTC/EFV (n=351) Baseline prevalence 16/350 (5%) 21/351 (6%) 14/351 (4%) Treatment-emergent metabolic syndrome Week 48 20/290 (7%) 16/297 (5%) 9/275 (3%) Week 96 17/189 (9%) 9/189 (5%) 6/180 (3%) Statistically significant differences between TAF/FTC+DTG and TDF/FTC/EVF at week 96, p=0.025 Metabolic syndrome defined as obesity AND any two of: elevated triglycerides, low HDL, hypertension, diabetes

  • 1. McCann. European AIDS Conference 2019. Abstr. PS3/3. 2. Venter. NEJM. 2019.

Increase in metabolic syndrome with DTG+TAF

20

slide-11
SLIDE 11

12/13/19 11

NAMSAL Study: DTG vs EFV in Cameroon

  • Randomized trial in treatment

naïve patients (n=613) comparing:

  • EFV + TDF/3TC (n=310)
  • DTG + TDF/3TC (n=303)
  • Nearly two thirds of

participants were women

  • Lower rates of viral

suppression, largely due to higher baseline viral loads

NAMSAL ANRS 12313 Study Group. NEJM. 2019.

DTG+ TDF/3TC 75% EFV+ TDF/3TC 69%

21

Greater weight gain seen with DTG, again

Week 48 TDF/3TC+DTG (n=293) TDF/3TC+EFV400 (n=278) p-value for difference Mean change from baseline: Weight (kg) +5 +3 <0.001 BMI (kg/m2) +1.7 +1.2 <0.001

  • 1. NAMSAL ANRS 12313 Study Group. NEJM. 2019. 2. Hill. IAS 2019. Abstr MOAX0102LB

22

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12/13/19 12

≥ 10% change from baseline weight (Week 48)

p<0.05 p<0.01 n.s.

Treatment emergent obesity (Week 48)

  • 1. NAMSAL ANRS 12313 Study Group. NEJM. 2019. 2. Hill. IAS 2019. Abstr MOAX0102LB

26% 19% 44% 34%

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

TDF/ 3TC+ DTG TDF/ 3TC/ EFV TDF/ 3TC+ DTG TDF/ 3TC/ EFV

Men Women % participants 14% 2% 12% 7%

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

TDF/3 TC+D TG TDF/3 TC/EF V TDF/3 TC+D TG TDF/3 TC/EF V

Men Women % participants

Substantial treatment-emergent obesity in men

n.s.

23

Summary from ADVANCE and NAMSAL

  • Dolutegravir is associated with increased weight gain and obesity in

both men and women

  • Weight gain is greater in women and when DTG is combined with

TAF/FTC

  • Is this due to weight loss associated with TDF? Or weight gain with TAF?
  • In women, weight gain does not plateau by 2 years of follow up,

unknown whether weight continues to rise

  • Modest increase in metabolic syndrome with DTG+TAF/FTC
  • One question: Is bictegravir associated with similar weight gain?

24

slide-13
SLIDE 13

12/13/19 13

Pooled analysis of 8 RCTs in ART naïve patients: INSTI associated with greater increases in weight

Sax et al Clin Inf Dis Oct 2019

25

Dolutegravir and Bictegravir associated with largest weight gain

Sax et al Clin Inf Dis Oct 2019

26

slide-14
SLIDE 14

12/13/19 14

TAF also associated with greater weight gain than TDF

Sax et al Clin Inf Dis Oct 2019

27

Sax et al Clin Inf Dis Oct 2019

Greater weight gain with INSTI+TAF

Direct study comparisons

  • Greater weight gain with

EVG/c/TAF/FTC than EVG/c/TDF/FTC

Mean weight change (kg) over 1 year

28

slide-15
SLIDE 15

12/13/19 15

Sax et al Clin Inf Dis Oct 2019

Greater weight gain with INSTI+TAF

Direct study comparisons

  • Greater weight gain with

EVG/c/TAF/FTC than EVG/c/TDF/FTC

  • Greater weight gain with

BIC/TAF/FTC than DTG/ABC/3TC

Mean weight change (kg) over 1 year

29

Sax et al Clin Inf Dis Oct 2019

Greater weight gain with INSTI+TAF

Direct study comparisons

  • Greater weight gain with

EVG/c/TAF/FTC than EVG/c/TDF/FTC

  • Greater weight gain with

BIC/TAF/FTC than DTG/ABC/3TC

  • Similar weight gain in DTG vs

BIC when combined with TAF/FTC

Mean weight change (kg) over 1 year

30

slide-16
SLIDE 16

12/13/19 16

Sax et al Clin Inf Dis Oct 2019

Greater weight gain with INSTI+TAF

Direct study comparisons

  • Greater weight gain with

EVG/c/TAF/FTC than EVG/c/TDF/FTC

  • Greater weight gain with

BIC/TAF/FTC than DTG/ABC/3TC

  • Similar weight gain in DTG vs

BIC when combined with TAF/FTC

Mean weight change (kg) over 1 year

~0.9kg weight gain/year among average adult aged 20-40

Hill 2003 Science

31

Patients gain weight with ART… so what?

  • ADVANCE showed small increased prevalence of metabolic syndrome

in DTG+TAF/FTC compared to DTG+TDF/FTC or EFV+TDF/FTC1

  • Pooled analysis of 8 RCTs showed no increase in diabetes or

hypertension; very small decreases in HDL cholesterol2

  • Several cohort studies with conflicting results regarding incident

dyslipidemia and diabetes with INSTI or TAF-associated weight gain3-5

  • Follow up time may not be sufficient in studies conducted to date to

fully appreciate metabolic consequences of ART-associated weight gain

  • 1. McCann. European AIDS Conference 2019. Abstract PS3/3. 2. Sax et al Clin Inf Dis Oct 2019.
  • 3. Rebeiro IDWeek 2019. Abstract LB9. 4. Zimmerman IDWeek 2019. Abstract 981. 5. Schafer IDWeek 2019 Abstract 979.

32

slide-17
SLIDE 17

12/13/19 17

What we know and what we don’t

  • What we know
  • Greater weight gain with INSTIs in randomized trials among ART-naïve patients
  • Greater weight gain when TAF combined with INSTI among ART-naïve patients
  • Likely weight gain from switch to INSTI or TAF, though lower quality evidence
  • Risk of weight gain higher in women, black people (in US-based studies), high

viral load

  • What we don’t know
  • Mechanism of action for INSTI and TAF associated weight gain
  • Possible measures to prevent weight gain
  • Reversibility of weight gain
  • Long-term clinical consequences of ART-associated weight gain

33

Hypothesized mechanisms: INSTI

  • Promotion of adipose tissue growth and insulin resistance?
  • DTG/RAL associated with increased adipocyte growth and insulin resistance1
  • Case reports of acute-onset diabetes with INSTI switch2,3
  • Better virus elimination and reduction of catabolism?
  • More rapid viral suppression with INSTI
  • Better penetration into adipocytes4
  • Lack of weight gain with cabotegravir for PrEP5
  • 1. Gorwood. Intl Co-morbidities & Adverse Drug Reactions Workshop 2019. 2. Fong, IJSA 2017. 3. Horikawa TJECM 2018.
  • 4. Couturier Antiviral Res 2018. 5. CROI 2019 Abstract #034.

34

slide-18
SLIDE 18

12/13/19 18

Decisions we’re facing now in clinic

  • How do we counsel patients on possibility of weight gain without

scaring them away from ART?

  • Should some patients be switched from TAF to TDF?
  • Should we consider DTG/ABC/3TC for some patients for whom we are

worried about renal/bone toxicity and weight gain?

  • Is there less weight gain with two-drug therapy and should we be

thinking about this for selected patients (e.g. DTG/3TC, DTG/RPV)?

35

Back to the case…

  • 37 year old man with a recent diagnosis of HIV (CD4 280, VL 20,000)

who is presenting to establish care. He has hypertension and takes hydrochlorothiazide “most of the time”. HLA-B*5701 is negative. He is worried about weight gain

  • Did your answer change?
  • A. DTG + TAF/FTC
  • B. DTG + TDF/FTC
  • C. DTG/3TC/ABC
  • D. BIC/TAF/FTC
  • E. DRV/c/TAF/FTC

36

slide-19
SLIDE 19

12/13/19 19

Answer: A-E are all reasonable options

We will be discussing further in the debate!

  • A. DTG + TAF/FTC
  • B. DTG + TDF/FTC
  • C. DTG/3TC/ABC
  • D. BIC/TAF/FTC
  • E. DRV/c/TAF/FTC

37

Thank you!

Many thanks to the conference organizers for the opportunity to speak and to everyone who helped me prepare this talk:

Matt.Hickey@ucsf.edu

Diane Havlir Annie Luetkemeyer Carina Marquez Vivek Jain Ayesha Appa Meg Newman Ashley McMullen

38